Generated banner for Web Quality Audit
Generated logo for Web Quality Audit

Web Quality Audit

Addy OsmaniCommunityCreated by web-quality-skillsDistributed by Addy Osmani

  • Skill
  • Review and audit
  • Software development
  • MIT
  • Low risk
  • Has scripts

From the author

Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
— the description by web-quality-skills

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

The web-quality-audit skill provides a structured methodology for evaluating website health. It emphasizes collecting live browser evidence and performing source inspection rather than relying solely on aggregate scores. The audit process covers Core Web Vitals, accessibility standards, SEO crawlability, security best practices, and agentic browsing compatibility. It includes specific guidance on tool routing, severity prioritization, and reporting formats to ensure findings are actionable and verifiable.

What it does

  • Provides a systematic workflow for auditing web performance, accessibility, SEO, and security.
  • Integrates live browser performance traces and Lighthouse audits for evidence-based reporting.
  • Categorizes findings by severity levels from critical to low to guide remediation efforts.
  • Defines a standardized output format for audit results, including evidence, impact, and fix recommendations.
  • Offers checklists for pre-deployment, weekly, and monthly maintenance routines.
  • Evaluates agentic browsing readiness by checking semantic HTML and accessibility tree structures.

When to use it

  • When you need to perform a comprehensive quality review of a website.
  • When investigating performance bottlenecks or accessibility barriers.
  • Before major deployments to verify site health and best practice adherence.
  • When assessing how well AI agents and search tools can interact with your rendered content.

Advantages

  • Reduces reliance on noisy or inactionable automated scores.
  • Promotes a balanced approach combining automated testing with manual inspection.
  • Provides clear, actionable severity levels to prioritize development work.
  • Standardizes the reporting process for consistent team communication.

Usage examples

“Run a web quality audit on my homepage.”
The agent will initiate a performance trace, run a Lighthouse audit, and generate a structured report detailing performance, accessibility, SEO, and security findings.
“Check my site for accessibility and SEO issues.”
The agent will evaluate the site against WCAG criteria and SEO best practices, providing a list of identified issues categorized by priority.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/addyosmani/web-quality-audit/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip web-quality-audit.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by web-quality-skills

Web quality audit

Comprehensive quality review that combines live browser evidence with source inspection. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, and Agentic Browsing without treating an aggregate score as proof of quality.

Lighthouse 13+. The Performance category now uses shared Performance Insights across Lighthouse and the DevTools Performance panel (announcement). Follow current insight names and evidence. Do not require removed audit IDs or automatically recreate their recommendations; some were retired because they were noisy, inactionable, or easy to over-recommend.

How it works

  1. Establish the audit target: representative URLs, important states and journeys, public versus authenticated access, and mobile/desktop scope.

  2. If a page can run, read the measurement workflow and collect a minimal live baseline before searching the codebase broadly.

  3. Use runtime failures to localize source inspection. Keep measured findings separate from hypotheses found only in code.

  4. Categorize by user impact and confidence, then make or recommend specific fixes.

  5. Re-run equivalent automated checks and the affected manual flows. Report what is verified and what still needs field or human validation.

Tool routing

Use the best capability already available; do not block the audit on optional setup.

NeedPreferred routeFallback
Performance and Core Web VitalsRecord a browser performance trace and analyze focused insights; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use performance_start_trace then performance_analyze_insightLighthouse CLI or PageSpeed Insights lab data
Real-user performanceCrUX values included in current DevTools trace summariesPageSpeed Insights/CrUX Vis; direct CrUX API only when a key is already available or automation is requested
Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, Agentic BrowsingRun a live Lighthouse audit; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use lighthouse_auditCategory-specific Lighthouse CLI audits plus manual checks
Rendered semantics and interactionInspect the accessibility tree and exercise the UI; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use take_snapshot and focused evaluate_scriptBrowser/manual testing
Source smoke testscripts/analyze.sh <path>Direct source inspection

Chrome DevTools MCP's lighthouse_audit intentionally excludes performance. Its navigation mode reloads the page; use snapshot mode when preserving the current authenticated or user-created state matters. The static analyzer is a fast smoke test, not a substitute for a rendered-page audit.

Audit categories

Performance

Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s. The largest visible element must render quickly. Optimize images, fonts, and server response time.

  • INP (Interaction to Next Paint) < 200ms. User interactions must feel instant. Reduce JavaScript execution time and break up long tasks.

  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1. Content must not jump around. Set explicit dimensions on images, embeds, and ads.

Resource Optimization:

  • Compress images. Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks. Serve correctly sized images via srcset.

  • Minimize JavaScript. Remove unused code. Use code splitting. Defer non-critical scripts.

  • Optimize CSS. Extract critical CSS. Remove unused styles. Avoid @import.

  • Efficient fonts. Use font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.

Loading Strategy:

  • Preconnect to origins. Add <link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.

  • Preload critical assets. LCP images, fonts, and above-fold CSS.

  • Lazy load below-fold content. Images, iframes, and heavy components.

  • Cache effectively. Long cache TTLs for static assets. Immutable caching for hashed files.

Accessibility

Perceivable:

  • Text alternatives. Every <img> has meaningful alt text. Decorative images use alt="".

  • Color contrast. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA).

  • Don't rely on color alone. Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.

  • Captions and transcripts. Video has captions. Audio has transcripts.

Operable:

  • Keyboard accessible. All functionality available via keyboard. No keyboard traps.

  • Focus visible. Clear focus indicators on all interactive elements.

  • Skip links. Provide "Skip to main content" for keyboard users.

  • Sufficient time. Users can extend time limits. No auto-advancing content without controls.

Understandable:

  • Page language. Set lang attribute on <html>.

  • Consistent navigation. Same navigation structure across pages.

  • Error identification. Form errors clearly described and associated with fields.

  • Labels and instructions. All form inputs have associated labels.

Robust:

  • Valid HTML. No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.

  • ARIA used correctly. Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.

  • Name, role, value. Interactive elements have accessible names and correct roles.

SEO

Crawlability:

  • Valid robots.txt. Doesn't block important resources.

  • XML sitemap. Lists all important pages. Submitted to Search Console.

  • Canonical URLs. Prevent duplicate content issues.

  • No noindex on important pages. Check meta robots and headers.

On-Page SEO:

  • Unique title tags. Make each title descriptive and concise; display truncation varies by device and result type.

  • Meta descriptions. Write useful, page-specific summaries; search engines may choose a different snippet.

  • Heading hierarchy. The primary heading is descriptive and the structure is logical; do not fail valid HTML solely for using more than one <h1>.

  • Descriptive link text. Not "click here" or "read more".

Technical SEO:

  • Mobile-friendly. Responsive design. Tap targets ≥ 48px.

  • HTTPS. Secure connection required.

  • Page experience signals. Use field Core Web Vitals as evidence, without promising a ranking change.

  • Structured data. JSON-LD for rich snippets (Article, Product, FAQ, etc.).

Best practices

Security:

  • HTTPS everywhere. No mixed content. HSTS enabled.

  • No vulnerable libraries. Keep dependencies updated.

  • CSP headers. Content Security Policy to prevent XSS.

  • No exposed source maps. In production builds.

Modern Standards:

  • No deprecated APIs. Replace document.write, synchronous XHR, etc.

  • Valid doctype. Use <!DOCTYPE html>.

  • Charset declared. <meta charset="UTF-8"> as first element in <head>.

  • No browser errors. Clean console. No CORS issues.

UX Patterns:

  • No intrusive interstitials. Especially on mobile.

  • Clear permission requests. Only ask when needed, with context.

  • No misleading buttons. Buttons do what they say.

Agentic browsing

Use the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing results as technical signals for how well assistants can understand and interact with the rendered page.

  • Accessible interaction surface. Semantic HTML, labels, names, roles, and states must expose meaningful controls in the accessibility tree.

  • WebMCP integrations are valid when present. Review registered tools, schemas, and form coverage; do not add WebMCP solely to raise an audit score.

  • llms.txt is optional. A valid file may help compatible tools discover curated content, but a Lighthouse pass does not prove that search or AI products will ingest, rank, or cite it.

  • Keep this category separate from SEO claims. Agentic browsability is not evidence of search ranking or AI visibility.

Severity levels

LevelDescriptionAction
CriticalSecurity vulnerabilities, complete failuresFix immediately
HighCore Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriersFix before launch
MediumPerformance opportunities, SEO improvementsFix within sprint
LowMinor optimizations, code qualityFix when convenient

Audit output format

When performing an audit, structure findings as:

## Audit results

### Evidence
| Signal | Scope/conditions | Result | Source |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|
| LCP | URL, phone, p75/28 days | 3.1s (needs improvement) | CrUX |
| Accessibility | URL, mobile navigation | 92 | Lighthouse |

### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
  - **Impact:** Why this matters
  - **Evidence:** Measured failure, runtime observation, or source hypothesis
  - **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation

### High priority (X found)
...

### Summary
- Performance: measured status and X findings
- Accessibility: automated status, X findings, manual checks pending/passed
- SEO: X findings
- Best Practices: X findings
- Agentic Browsing: X findings or not available

### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...

### Verification
- Re-run results under the same conditions
- Manual checks completed
- Field validation still pending

Quick checklist

Before every deploy
  • [ ] Core Web Vitals passing

  • [ ] No accessibility errors (axe/Lighthouse)

  • [ ] No console errors

  • [ ] HTTPS working

  • [ ] Meta tags present

Weekly review
  • [ ] Check Search Console for issues

  • [ ] Review Core Web Vitals trends

  • [ ] Update dependencies

  • [ ] Test with screen reader

Monthly deep dive
  • [ ] Full Lighthouse audit

  • [ ] Performance profiling

  • [ ] Accessibility audit with real users

  • [ ] SEO keyword review

References

For detailed guidelines on specific areas:

  • Performance Optimization

  • Core Web Vitals

  • Accessibility

  • SEO

  • Best Practices

Files

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Security

What our scanner noticed· Low risk

  • Scripts that your agent may run

This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Created by
web-quality-skills
Publisher
Addy Osmani (Community)
Distributed by
Addy Osmani
Source
addyosmani/web-quality-skills · skills/web-quality-audit · commit afa8da9
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by web-quality-skills or Addy Osmani.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download web-quality-audit.zip