Code Review
AnthropicOfficialPublished by Anthropic
- Skill
- Review and audit
- Software development
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
From the skill’s files
Taken from the skill’s own files (its description, section headings and stated usage). Not an AutoGineer summary, and not written by the author as one.
Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps. Review code changes with a structured lens on security, performance, correctness, and maintainability.
What it does
- Usage
- How It Works
- Review Dimensions
- Output
- If Connectors Available
- Tips
When to use it
- Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.
Advantages
The skill’s files do not state this.
Usage examples
The skill’s files do not state this.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/anthropics/code-review/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip code-review.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Anthropic
/code-review
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Review code changes with a structured lens on security, performance, correctness, and maintainability.
Usage
/code-review <PR URL or file path>Review the provided code changes: @$1
If no specific file or URL is provided, ask what to review.
How It Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CODE REVIEW │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ STANDALONE (always works) │
│ ✓ Paste a diff, PR URL, or point to files │
│ ✓ Security audit (OWASP top 10, injection, auth) │
│ ✓ Performance review (N+1, memory leaks, complexity) │
│ ✓ Correctness (edge cases, error handling, race conditions) │
│ ✓ Style (naming, structure, readability) │
│ ✓ Actionable suggestions with code examples │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools) │
│ + Source control: Pull PR diff automatically │
│ + Project tracker: Link findings to tickets │
│ + Knowledge base: Check against team coding standards │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Review Dimensions
Security
SQL injection, XSS, CSRF
Authentication and authorization flaws
Secrets or credentials in code
Insecure deserialization
Path traversal
SSRF
Performance
N+1 queries
Unnecessary memory allocations
Algorithmic complexity (O(n²) in hot paths)
Missing database indexes
Unbounded queries or loops
Resource leaks
Correctness
Edge cases (empty input, null, overflow)
Race conditions and concurrency issues
Error handling and propagation
Off-by-one errors
Type safety
Maintainability
Naming clarity
Single responsibility
Duplication
Test coverage
Documentation for non-obvious logic
Output
## Code Review: [PR title or file]
### Summary
[1-2 sentence overview of the changes and overall quality]
### Critical Issues
| # | File | Line | Issue | Severity |
|---|------|------|-------|----------|
| 1 | [file] | [line] | [description] | 🔴 Critical |
### Suggestions
| # | File | Line | Suggestion | Category |
|---|------|------|------------|----------|
| 1 | [file] | [line] | [description] | Performance |
### What Looks Good
- [Positive observations]
### Verdict
[Approve / Request Changes / Needs Discussion]If Connectors Available
If ~~source control is connected:
Pull the PR diff automatically from the URL
Check CI status and test results
If ~~project tracker is connected:
Link findings to related tickets
Verify the PR addresses the stated requirements
If ~~knowledge base is connected:
Check changes against team coding standards and style guides
Tips
Provide context — "This is a hot path" or "This handles PII" helps me focus.
Specify concerns — "Focus on security" narrows the review.
Include tests — I'll check test coverage and quality too.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer900 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.3 KiB
- SKILL.md4.2 KiB
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: Claude Code, Claude apps
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Claude Code frontmatter
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Anthropic
- Publisher
- Anthropic (Official)
- Source
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · engineering/skills/code-review · commit e050c2e
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download code-review.zip