Ad Campaign Analyzer
GitHubOfficialCreated by GooseWorksDistributed by GitHub
- Skill
- Research and analysis
- Business and productivity
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
Ad Campaign Analyzer is a diagnostic tool that processes raw performance data from platforms like Google, Meta, and LinkedIn to provide actionable insights. It moves beyond basic metrics by performing statistical significance checks, identifying budget waste, and calculating funnel-adjusted customer acquisition costs. The skill produces a structured report that includes a specific budget reallocation plan, helping users decide exactly where to cut, scale, or test to improve their return on ad spend.
What it does
- Normalizes performance data from multiple advertising platforms into a unified format.
- Identifies wasted ad spend by flagging zero-conversion items and high-CPA outliers.
- Calculates funnel-adjusted CAC to reveal which channels drive actual business results.
- Performs statistical significance checks on A/B test variants.
- Generates a concrete budget reallocation plan based on efficiency indices and marginal returns.
- Provides a structured, ready-to-use markdown report for campaign optimization.
When to use it
- When you have raw performance data and need to decide which campaigns to pause or scale.
- When you want to understand if your current ad budget is distributed efficiently across channels.
- When you need to identify specific keywords, ads, or audiences that are wasting your budget.
- When you are planning to reallocate your monthly ad spend to improve overall ROAS.
- When you need a data-backed recommendation for testing new advertising channels.
Advantages
- Provides objective, data-driven decisions rather than relying on dashboard surface metrics.
- Enables cross-channel budget optimization by normalizing disparate platform data.
- Helps prevent common mistakes like spreading budget too thin or over-investing in saturated channels.
- Includes clear, actionable steps for immediate, short-term, and long-term campaign improvements.
- Requires no external API integrations, ensuring privacy and ease of use.
Usage examples
- “Analyze my Google Ads performance and tell me where I am wasting money.”
- The agent will request your campaign data, analyze your keywords and ad groups for zero-conversion spend, and provide a list of specific items to pause or add as negatives.
- “I have $5,000 a month for ads across Google and Meta. How should I distribute it?”
- The agent will ingest your current performance data, calculate the efficiency index for each channel, and provide a recommended budget split to maximize your conversion volume.
- “Which of my Meta ads are actually working?”
- The agent will identify your top-performing ads based on CTR and conversion rate, and recommend scaling those specific assets while suggesting what to test next.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/github/ad-campaign-analyzer/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip ad-campaign-analyzer.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by GooseWorks
Ad Campaign Analyzer
Take raw campaign performance data and turn it into clear decisions. This skill doesn't just summarize metrics — it diagnoses problems, identifies winners, checks statistical significance, and tells you exactly what to cut, scale, and test next. Then it goes further: it compares channels on equal terms, finds where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan.
Core principle: Most startup founders check their ad dashboard, see a ROAS number, and either panic or celebrate. This skill gives you the nuanced analysis a paid media specialist would: what's actually significant, what's noise, and where your next dollar should go. It also solves the allocation problem — most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere).
When to Use
"Analyze my Google Ads performance"
"Which ads should I kill?"
"Is this campaign working?"
"Where am I wasting ad spend?"
"Optimize my Meta Ads"
"How should I split my ad budget?"
"Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
"Reallocate my ad spend across channels"
"Where am I getting the best return?"
"I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?"
Phase 0: Intake
Campaign data — One of:
CSV export from Google Ads / Meta Ads Manager / LinkedIn Campaign Manager
Pasted performance table
Screenshots of dashboard (we'll extract the data)
Platform(s) — Google / Meta / LinkedIn / All
Time period — What date range does this cover?
Monthly budget — Total ad spend in this period
Primary goal — What conversion are you optimizing for? (Demos / Trials / Purchases / Leads)
Target metrics — Do you have target CPA or ROAS? (If not, we'll benchmark)
Any known changes? — Did you change creative, budget, or targeting during this period?
Channels currently running — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other
Funnel data (if available):
Lead → MQL rate
MQL → SQL rate
SQL → Close rate
Average deal size
Channels you're considering but haven't tried — Want to test new channels?
Constraints — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on?
Phase 1: Data Ingestion & Normalization
Accepted Data Formats
| Source | Key Columns Expected |
|---|---|
| Google Ads | Campaign, Ad Group, Keyword, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Conv Rate, Cost, Conv Value |
| Meta Ads | Campaign, Ad Set, Ad, Impressions, Reach, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost Per Result, Amount Spent, ROAS |
| LinkedIn Ads | Campaign, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost, Leads |
Normalize all data into a standard analysis format:
| Dimension | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | Spend | Revenue/Value |
|---|
Multi-Channel Normalization
When data spans multiple channels, also produce a channel-level rollup:
| Channel | Monthly Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | ROAS | CAC* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Search | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [X] | $[X] |
| Google Display | ... | |||||||||
| Meta (FB/IG) | ... | |||||||||
| ... | ||||||||||
| [Other] | ... | |||||||||
| Total | $[X] | [N] | $[X] avg | [X] avg | $[X] avg |
*CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment)
Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available)
Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert.
Phase 2: Performance Diagnostics
2A: Campaign-Level Health Check
For each campaign:
| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTR | [X%] | [Industry avg] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| CPC | $[X] | [Category avg] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| Conv Rate | [X%] | [Benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| CPA | $[X] | [Target or benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| ROAS | [X] | [Target or benchmark] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
| Impression Share | [X%] | [>60% ideal] | [Good/Okay/Poor] |
2B: Budget Waste Detection
Identify spend that produced no or negative return:
| Waste Type | Signal | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Zero-conversion keywords/ads | Spend > $[X] with 0 conversions | Pause or add negatives |
| High CPA outliers | CPA > 3x target | Pause or restructure |
| Low CTR ads | CTR < 50% of campaign average | Replace creative |
| Broad match bleed | Search terms report showing irrelevant clicks | Add negative keywords |
| Audience overlap | Same users hit by multiple campaigns | Exclude audiences |
| Dayparting waste | Conversions cluster at certain hours; spend is 24/7 | Set ad schedule |
2C: Winner Identification
Find what's actually working:
| Winner Type | Signal | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Top-performing keywords | Lowest CPA, highest conv rate | Increase bid, add variants |
| Winning ads | Highest CTR + conv rate combo | Scale spend, clone for other groups |
| Best audiences | Lowest CPA segment | Increase budget allocation |
| Best times | Peak conversion hours/days | Concentrate budget |
2D: Statistical Significance Check
For any A/B test (ad variants, audiences, landing pages):
Test: [Variant A] vs [Variant B]
Metric: [Conv Rate / CTR / CPA]
Variant A: [X%] (n=[sample_size])
Variant B: [Y%] (n=[sample_size])
Confidence level: [X%]
Verdict: [Statistically significant / Not enough data / Too close to call]
Recommended action: [Pick winner / Continue test / Increase budget to reach significance]Minimum sample: 100 clicks per variant for CTR tests, 30 conversions per variant for CPA tests.
Phase 3: Funnel Analysis
Click → Conversion Path
Impressions: [N] (100%)
↓ CTR: [X%]
Clicks: [N] ([X%] of impressions)
↓ Landing page → Conversion: [X%]
Conversions: [N] ([X%] of clicks)
↓ Conversion → Revenue: $[X] avg
Revenue: $[N]Funnel Drop-Off Diagnosis
| Drop-Off Point | Rate | Benchmark | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impression → Click | [CTR%] | [Benchmark] | [Ad relevance / targeting] | [Copy/targeting change] |
| Click → Conversion | [Conv%] | [Benchmark] | [Landing page / offer / audience mismatch] | [LP optimization] |
| Conversion → Revenue | [Close%] | [Benchmark] | [Lead quality / sales process] | [Qualification criteria] |
Phase 4: Budget Reallocation
When data spans multiple channels, perform cross-channel budget optimization.
4A: Channel Efficiency Ranking
| Rank | Channel | CPA | Funnel-Adj CAC | Share of Spend | Share of Conversions | Efficiency Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Channel] | $[X] | $[X] | [X%] | [X%] | [Conv share ÷ Spend share] |
Efficiency Index:
> 1.0 = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions)
= 1.0 = Proportional (fair share)
< 1.0 = Over-invested (getting less than its share)
4B: Marginal Return Analysis
For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns:
| Channel | Current CPA | Impression Share / Saturation Signal | Marginal Return Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Search | $[X] | [X%] impression share — room to grow | Likely positive |
| Meta | $[X] | Frequency [X] — audience may be saturated | Diminishing |
| $[X] | Low volume — limited targeting pool | Ceiling soon |
4C: Funnel Stage Coverage
| Funnel Stage | Channels Covering It | Current Spend | Gap? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness (top) | [Meta Display, YouTube] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| Consideration (mid) | [Google Search, Meta retargeting] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| Decision (bottom) | [Google Brand, Google Search] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| Retargeting | [Meta, Google Display] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
4D: Budget Shift Recommendations
| Channel | Current Spend | Recommended Spend | Change | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Search | $[X] | $[Y] | +$[Z] | [Lowest CPA, room to scale] |
| Meta | $[X] | $[Y] | -$[Z] | [Audience saturation, frequency too high] |
| $[X] | $[Y] | $0 | [Maintain — niche but valuable] | |
| [New channel] | $0 | $[Y] | +$[Y] | [Test budget — competitors succeeding here] |
| Total | $[X] | $[X] | $0 | Budget-neutral reallocation |
4E: Scenario Modeling
Scenario 1: Conservative shift (+/- 20%)
Expected conversions: [N] (currently [N]) = [X%] improvement
Expected blended CPA: $[X] (currently $[X])
Risk: Low
Scenario 2: Aggressive shift (+/- 40%)
Expected conversions: [N] = [X%] improvement
Expected blended CPA: $[X]
Risk: Medium — less data on scaled channels
Scenario 3: Budget increase to $[Y]/mo
Recommended allocation: [table]
Expected conversions: [N]
New channels to test: [list]
Phase 5: Output Format
# Ad Campaign Analysis — [Product/Client] — [DATE]
Period: [Date range]
Total spend: $[X]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Primary goal: [Conversions / Revenue / Leads]
---
## Executive Summary
[3-5 sentences: Overall performance verdict, biggest win, biggest problem, top recommendation including any reallocation moves]
---
## Performance Dashboard
| Campaign | Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | CPA | ROAS | Verdict |
|----------|-------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|-----|------|---------|
| [Name] | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | $[X] | [X] | [Scale/Optimize/Pause] |
---
## Budget Waste Report
**Total estimated waste: $[X] ([X%] of total spend)**
### Wasted on zero-conversion items: $[X]
[List of keywords/ads/audiences with spend but no conversions]
### Wasted on high-CPA items: $[X]
[List of items with CPA > 3x target]
### Recommended saves: $[X]/month
[Specific items to pause]
---
## Winners to Scale
### Top Keywords/Audiences
| Item | CPA | Conv Rate | Current Spend | Recommended Spend |
|------|-----|----------|--------------|-------------------|
### Top Ads
| Ad | CTR | Conv Rate | Why It Works |
|----|-----|----------|-------------|
---
## A/B Test Results
### [Test Name]
- Variant A: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Variant B: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Confidence: [X%]
- **Verdict:** [Winner / Continue / Inconclusive]
---
## Budget Reallocation
### Current vs Recommended Allocation
| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change | Why |
|---------|---------|------------|--------|-----|
| [Channel] | $[X] | $[Y] | [+/-$Z] | [1-line reason] |
**Projected impact:**
- Conversions: [N] → [N] (+[X%])
- Blended CPA: $[X] → $[Y] (-[X%])
### Funnel Stage Coverage
[Coverage map with gaps identified]
### New Channel Recommendations
#### [Channel Name]
- **Why test:** [Reasoning]
- **Recommended test budget:** $[X]/mo for [X weeks]
- **Success criteria:** CPA < $[X]
- **Competitors using it:** [Yes/No — who]
---
## Action Plan
### Immediate (This Week)
- [ ] **Pause:** [Specific items — keywords, ads, audiences]
- [ ] **Scale:** [Specific items — increase budget/bids]
- [ ] **Add negatives:** [Specific keywords from search terms]
- [ ] **Reallocate:** [Specific dollar shifts between channels]
### This Month
- [ ] **Test:** [New ad angles / audiences / landing pages]
- [ ] **Restructure:** [Ad groups that need splitting or merging]
- [ ] **Optimize:** [Bid strategy changes]
- [ ] **Monitor reallocation:** Track CPA shifts on scaled channels, watch for diminishing returns
### Next Month
- [ ] **Expand:** [New campaigns / channels to test]
- [ ] **Re-evaluate:** [Run this analysis again with new data, adjust allocations based on actual results]Save to campaign-analysis-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).
Cost
| Component | Cost |
|---|---|
| Data analysis | Free (LLM reasoning) |
| Statistical calculations | Free |
| Total | Free |
Tools Required
No external tools needed — pure reasoning skill
User provides campaign data as CSV, paste, or screenshot
Trigger Phrases
"Analyze my ad campaign performance"
"Which ads should I pause?"
"Where am I wasting ad budget?"
"Is my Google Ads campaign working?"
"Optimize my Meta Ads spend"
"How should I allocate my ad budget?"
"Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
"Reallocate my ad spend"
"Where am I getting the best ROAS?"
"Optimize my multi-channel ad budget"
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer912 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md13.6 KiB
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: GitHub Copilot
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
The author says: Cross-platform. Pure reasoning skill over user-provided campaign exports (CSV, paste, or screenshot from Google, Meta, or LinkedIn) — no external tools, network calls, or API keys.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- GooseWorks
- Publisher
- GitHub (Official)
- Distributed by
- GitHub
- Source
- github/awesome-copilot · skills/ad-campaign-analyzer · commit 797337f
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by GooseWorks or GitHub.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download ad-campaign-analyzer.zip