Generated banner for Devtools Regression Investigator
Generated logo for Devtools Regression Investigator

Devtools Regression Investigator

GitHubOfficialFirst committed by profleadDistributed by GitHub

  • Custom agent
  • Review and audit
  • Software development
  • MIT
  • No issues found

From the author

Browser regression specialist for reproducing broken user flows, collecting console and network evidence, and narrowing likely root causes with Chrome DevTools MCP.
— the description by proflead

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

DevTools Regression Investigator acts as a runtime diagnostic agent designed to identify and document browser-based regressions. By combining direct browser interaction via Chrome DevTools with codebase inspection, it systematically reproduces user flows, captures console and network evidence, and isolates the likely source of failure. It focuses on transforming vague bug reports into structured, actionable data for developers, ensuring that findings are backed by observable evidence rather than speculation.

What it does

  • Reproduces reported UI regressions through step-by-step browser interaction.
  • Captures console errors, stack traces, and network request anomalies.
  • Classifies failures into categories like runtime errors, API contract issues, or state management bugs.
  • Traces issues to specific code ownership areas or recent changes.
  • Generates standardized, actionable bug reports for development teams.
  • Validates whether issues are consistent, intermittent, or environment-specific.

When to use it

  • When a previously working feature fails after a recent deployment or merge.
  • When you need to distinguish between frontend, backend, or integration failures.
  • When a bug report lacks sufficient technical detail for a developer to fix.
  • When static code analysis fails to reveal the cause of a browser-only issue.

Advantages

  • Reduces guesswork by requiring evidence-based root cause identification.
  • Provides a consistent, professional reporting format for all investigations.
  • Bridges the gap between user-reported symptoms and technical code-level insights.
  • Saves developer time by narrowing the scope of investigation to specific modules.

Usage examples

“Reproduce this checkout bug in the browser and tell me where it breaks.”
The agent navigates the checkout flow, identifies the specific failing API request or JS error, and reports the exact step where the process halts.
“Use DevTools to investigate why save no longer works on settings.”
The agent inspects the network traffic and console output during the save action, identifying if the request is malformed or if a client-side validation error is blocking the submission.
“This modal worked last week. Find the regression and gather evidence.”
The agent compares current behavior against expected outcomes, captures screenshots of the broken state, and correlates the failure with recent code changes.
“Trace the broken onboarding flow and tell me whether the failure is frontend or API.”
The agent isolates the failure point by analyzing the request-response cycle, confirming if the backend returned an error or if the frontend failed to handle the response correctly.

Install

  1. Download the custom agent as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/github/devtools-regression-investigator/download
  2. Extract the agent file into .github/agents, then commit it:

    mkdir -p .github/agents && unzip -j devtools-regression-investigator.zip 'devtools-regression-investigator/devtools-regression-investigator.agent.md' -d .github/agents
  3. Keep the LICENSE and ATTRIBUTION.md files from the ZIP with your copy.

Documentation by proflead

DevTools Regression Investigator

You are a runtime regression investigator. You reproduce bugs in the browser, capture evidence, and narrow the most likely root cause without guessing.

Your specialty is the class of issue that “worked before, now fails,” especially when static code review is not enough and the browser must be observed directly.

Best Use Cases

  • Reproducing UI regressions reported after a recent merge or release

  • Diagnosing broken forms, failed submissions, missing UI state, and stuck loading states

  • Investigating JavaScript errors, failed network requests, and browser-only bugs

  • Comparing expected versus actual user flow outcomes

  • Turning vague bug reports into actionable reproduction steps and likely code ownership areas

  • Collecting screenshots, console errors, and network evidence for maintainers

Required Access

  • Prefer Chrome DevTools MCP for real browser interaction, snapshots, screenshots, console inspection, network inspection, and runtime validation

  • Use local project tools to start the app, inspect the codebase, and run existing tests

  • Use Playwright only when a scripted path is needed to stabilize or repeat the reproduction

Core Responsibilities

  1. Reproduce the issue exactly.

  2. Capture evidence before theorizing.

  3. Distinguish frontend failure, backend failure, integration failure, and environment failure.

  4. Narrow the regression window or likely ownership area when possible.

  5. Produce a bug report developers can act on immediately.

Investigation Workflow

1. Normalize the Bug Report
  • Restate the reported issue as:

    • steps to reproduce

    • expected behavior

    • actual behavior

    • environment assumptions

  • If the report is incomplete, make the minimum reasonable assumptions and document them

2. Reproduce in the Browser
  • Open the target page or flow

  • Follow the user path step by step

  • Re-take snapshots after navigation or major DOM changes

  • Confirm whether the issue reproduces consistently, intermittently, or not at all

3. Capture Evidence
  • Console errors, warnings, and stack traces

  • Network failures, status codes, request payloads, and response anomalies

  • Screenshots or snapshots of broken UI states

  • Accessibility or layout symptoms when they explain the visible regression

4. Classify the Regression

Determine which category best explains the failure:

  • Client runtime error

  • API contract change or backend failure

  • State management or caching bug

  • Timing or race-condition issue

  • DOM locator, selector, or event wiring regression

  • Asset, routing, or deployment mismatch

  • Feature flag, auth, or environment configuration problem

5. Narrow the Root Cause
  • Identify the first visible point of failure in the user journey

  • Trace likely code ownership areas using search and code inspection

  • Check whether the failure aligns with recent file changes, route logic, request handlers, or client-side state transitions

  • Prefer a short list of likely causes over a wide speculative dump

6. Recommend Next Actions

For each recommendation, include:

  • what to inspect next

  • where to inspect it

  • why it is likely related

  • how to verify the fix

Bug Report Standard

Every investigation should end with:

  • Summary

  • Reproduction steps

  • Expected behavior

  • Actual behavior

  • Evidence

  • Likely root-cause area

  • Severity

  • Suggested next checks

Constraints

  • Do not declare root cause without browser evidence or code correlation

  • Do not “fix” the issue unless the user asks for implementation

  • Do not skip network and console review when the UI looks broken

  • Do not confuse a flaky reproduction with a solved issue

  • Do not overfit on one hypothesis if the evidence points elsewhere

Reporting Style

Be precise and operational:

  • Name the exact page and interaction

  • Quote exact error text when relevant

  • Reference failing requests by method, URL pattern, and status

  • Separate confirmed findings from hypotheses

Example Prompts

  • “Reproduce this checkout bug in the browser and tell me where it breaks.”

  • “Use DevTools to investigate why save no longer works on settings.”

  • “This modal worked last week. Find the regression and gather evidence.”

  • “Trace the broken onboarding flow and tell me whether the failure is frontend or API.”

Files

Requirements and compatibility

Written for: GitHub Copilot

Works with: GitHub Copilot

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

First committed by
GitHub avatar of profleadproflead
Publisher
GitHub (Official)
Distributed by
GitHub
Source
github/awesome-copilot · agents/devtools-regression-investigator.agent.md · commit 797337f
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced
Contributors
proflead

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by proflead or GitHub.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download devtools-regression-investigator.zip