Workflow Progress Screenshots
Meng ToCommunityCreated by Meng To
- Skill
- Guidelines
- Automation and integrations
- MIT
- Low risk
- Has scripts
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured workflow for capturing and delivering screenshots to users during visual development tasks. It emphasizes proactive communication by providing visual evidence of progress, fixes, and results without waiting for explicit requests. The workflow covers the entire capture lifecycle, from setting up the environment and ensuring consistent framing to verifying image quality and providing clear, descriptive captions for every visual update.
What it does
- Captures visual states including start, key moments, and final results.
- Provides guidelines for consistent framing and side-by-side comparisons.
- Ensures images are verified for quality and accuracy before delivery.
- Standardizes the use of captions to explain what each image proves.
- Defines methods for headless browser capture and motion representation.
- Integrates visual evidence directly into project reports.
When to use it
- When working on UI, web pages, games, 3D scenes, or data visualizations.
- When a user requests visual confirmation of progress or specific changes.
- Before submitting reports that claim a visual change has been successfully implemented.
- During iterative development passes to allow for early user redirection.
Advantages
- Reduces ambiguity by replacing descriptive text with direct visual evidence.
- Facilitates faster feedback loops by sharing progress as it happens.
- Ensures visual consistency across different stages of a task.
- Improves transparency by documenting the state before and after changes.
Usage examples
- “I am working on the login page UI. Please provide screenshots of the progress.”
- The agent will capture the initial state, the interaction during input, and the final result, sending them as files with descriptive captions.
- “Can you show me the fix for the broken navigation menu?”
- The agent will provide a side-by-side comparison showing the bug and the corrected state using consistent framing.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/mengto/workflow-progress-screenshots/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip workflow-progress-screenshots.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Meng To
Workflow: progress screenshots
The user judges visual work by looking at it, and asks for screenshots in almost every thread:
"keep giving me screenshots"
"send screenshots every pass"
"can you give me screenshots of those?"
"I still don't see the screenshots. Where are they?"
Describing a change is not showing it. A screenshot mentioned but not sent doesn't count.
Rules
Send, don't describe. Use the host's file-sending tool (
SendUserFile, or an inline image in the report) so the picture is in front of the user. A path in a sentence is not enough.Unasked, and as you go. Send a picture after each meaningful pass, so the user can redirect early:
the first working version;
each big fix;
each round of a scoring loop.
Don't hold them all for the final report. Don't flood them either: one small batch per pass, not every save.
Start, key moment, result. For any change with a before and after, capture all three with the same framing: the state before, the interaction (hovering, aiming, mid-animation, the panel opening), and the outcome. For fixes, show the bug, then the fix.
Real renders only. Capture the actual page, game or app, not a mockup or an idea of it. Set up the state with a review fixture, a URL flag or a debug hook, rather than describing it.
Look at every image before sending. Things that mean recapture:
stray toasts or hover pins;
half-loaded art or missing fonts;
the wrong scene, or stale numbers.
If the picture doesn't show what the caption claims, it isn't evidence.
Caption what it proves. One line per picture: what changed and what it verifies. For example, "Before: the hint reads 'out of range'. After: '90% hit · 5 damage'."
Label honestly. Say "headless browser capture" or "browser viewport". A 390×844 viewport is a phone-sized browser check, not a device test. Scripted or staged moments are named as staged.
Same framing for comparisons. Use the same viewport, camera and state for before and after. Put them side by side with
compare.py.
How to capture
The in-app browser pane is fine while it's visible. A hidden pane stalls
requestAnimationFrameand returns stale or black frames, so use headless capture then.Headless:
scripts/capture.mjs <url> <out.png>, withWIDTH/HEIGHT,MOBILE=1,WAIT_FOR="<ready expression>",SETTLE=<ms>, and JS steps to click, open or scroll. It prints page errors, so a broken page gets caught instead of photographed.1600×900 for desktop,
MOBILE=1for a 390×844 phone viewport.SETTLE=3000–5000for WebGL or 3D scenes; they render slowly headless, and an early shot misses models, fonts and icons.Run captures one at a time. Parallel headless Chrome on a busy machine gives protocol errors and missed frames.
Side by side:
scripts/compare.py out.jpg before.png "Before" after.png "After", or three panels for start, key moment and result.Motion: a still misses what moves. Take a short burst of frames through the effect, and slow the page clock if the app exposes one. Or send a strip of frames.
If the project names a specific capture tool (for example "use the Codex browser"), use it.
Keep capture scripts and output in a gitignored folder inside the project (such as
qa/captures/), not a scratchpad the app wipes on restart.
In the final report
The screenshots go inline, each with its caption, after the summary of what changed.
Say which were headless captures, and which viewport a phone check used.
If something couldn't be captured, say so and why. Don't substitute a description.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer878 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md4.1 KiB
- scripts/capture.mjsScript6.2 KiB
- scripts/compare.pyScript1.9 KiB
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs Python, Needs Node.js
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Scripts that your agent may run
This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Meng To
- Publisher
- Meng To (Community)
- Source
- MengTo/Skills · agent-skills/workflow/workflow-progress-screenshots · commit 5ea1661
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Meng To.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download workflow-progress-screenshots.zip