Porters Five Forces
Pawel HurynCommunityCreated by Pawel Huryn
- Skill
- Research and analysis
- Business and productivity
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill enables an agent to act as a competitive strategist, performing a structured Porter's Five Forces analysis. It evaluates the structural attractiveness of an industry by examining competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, the threat of substitutes, and the threat of new entrants. The analysis helps identify key competitive dynamics, assess profitability potential, and develop strategic initiatives to defend against threats or leverage market advantages.
What it does
- Evaluates competitive rivalry intensity within a specific market.
- Assesses the bargaining power of suppliers and buyers.
- Analyzes the risk posed by potential substitutes and new market entrants.
- Rates overall industry attractiveness based on the five forces.
- Provides strategic implications and recommendations for competitive positioning.
- Prioritizes critical forces to guide strategic decision-making.
When to use it
- When assessing the overall attractiveness of a new or existing market.
- During strategic planning to identify competitive threats.
- When evaluating the impact of potential new entrants or disruptive technologies.
- To inform product positioning and differentiation strategies.
- When analyzing industry profitability drivers.
Advantages
- Provides a standardized, rigorous framework for industry analysis.
- Helps identify specific levers to improve competitive positioning.
- Clarifies the impact of external market forces on business profitability.
- Supports data-driven strategic planning and risk assessment.
Usage examples
- “Perform a Porter's Five Forces analysis for the electric vehicle charging station industry.”
- The agent will provide a detailed breakdown of rivalry, supplier/buyer power, and threats, concluding with an assessment of the industry's structural attractiveness and strategic recommendations.
- “Analyze the competitive dynamics of the SaaS project management software market using Porter's Five Forces.”
- The agent will identify the specific forces impacting the SaaS market, such as low switching costs for buyers and high threat of new entrants, and suggest strategies for maintaining market share.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/phuryn/porters-five-forces/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip porters-five-forces.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Pawel Huryn
Porter's Five Forces
Metadata
Name: porters-five-forces
Description: Perform a Porter's Five Forces analysis evaluating competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants.
Triggers: Porter's five forces, competitive forces, industry analysis, market forces, competitive dynamics
Instructions
You are a competitive strategist conducting a Porter's Five Forces analysis for $ARGUMENTS.
Your task is to evaluate the structural attractiveness of an industry and identify the competitive dynamics that will determine profitability.
Input Requirements
Industry or market definition
Current competitors and competitive positioning
Supplier and customer landscape
Potential substitutes and new entrants
Product or service specifics
Porter's Five Forces Framework
1. Competitive Rivalry (How intense is competition?)
The degree to which companies compete directly for market share and customers.
High Rivalry When:
Many competitors of similar size and strength
Slow industry growth (zero-sum competition)
Low product differentiation (commoditized)
High fixed costs (pressure to maintain volume)
Exit barriers are high (expensive to leave)
Price competition is intense
Rivals have diverse strategies and goals
Emotional or strategic commitments keep rivals fighting
Low Rivalry When:
Few competitors
High growth market
High differentiation (less price-sensitive)
Low fixed costs
Low switching costs for competitors
Industry leader has clear dominance
Rivals are cooperative or have compatible goals
Strategic Implications:
Assess competitive positioning and differentiation
Define defensible competitive advantages
Monitor competitor moves and market consolidation
Invest in differentiation or cost leadership
2. Supplier Power (How much power do suppliers have?)
The ability of suppliers to increase prices or reduce quality, affecting your profitability.
High Supplier Power When:
Few suppliers or concentrated supplier base
Switching costs are high (changing suppliers is expensive)
Backward integration threat (suppliers become competitors)
Suppliers' product is critical or unique
Suppliers have strong bargaining position
No substitutes for supplier offerings
Suppliers sell to many industries (less dependent on you)
Low Supplier Power When:
Many suppliers available
Low switching costs
Suppliers depend on your business
Commodity products (interchangeable suppliers)
Threat of forward integration (you become your own supplier)
Available substitutes for supplier offerings
You have significant bargaining leverage
Strategic Implications:
Diversify supplier base to reduce dependency
Build strong supplier relationships
Consider vertical integration or alternatives
Negotiate long-term contracts with favorable terms
Invest in suppliers' success (partnerships)
3. Buyer Power (How much power do customers have?)
The ability of customers to negotiate lower prices or demand higher quality, affecting your margin.
High Buyer Power When:
Few large customers (concentrated demand)
Buyers switch easily and often (low switching costs)
Backwards integration threat (customers become competitors)
Product is undifferentiated (commoditized)
Buyers have price sensitivity or tight budgets
Buyers have full information about alternatives
Customers can bypass you entirely
Low Buyer Power When:
Many fragmented customers
High switching costs (lock-in, integration, training)
High product differentiation (fewer alternatives)
Customers depend on your product
You have strong brand or reputation
Switching to alternatives involves risk
Customers lack information about alternatives
Strategic Implications:
Build strong customer relationships and loyalty
Create switching costs through integration
Invest in brand and differentiation
Develop customer success programs
Create network effects or communities
Segment customers by willingness to pay
4. Threat of Substitutes (Are there alternative solutions?)
The risk that customers will switch to alternative products that solve the same problem.
High Threat When:
Good substitutes exist and are easily accessible
Substitutes have similar performance or better value
Switching costs to substitutes are low
Customers are willing to try alternatives
Substitutes are improving faster than your product
Price-to-performance of substitutes is attractive
Substitute technology is disruptive or emerging
Low Threat When:
No good substitutes exist
Substitutes are more expensive or inferior
Switching costs are high
Your product is deeply integrated into customer workflows
Customer preference and loyalty are strong
Barrier to substitute entry are high
Your product solves the problem uniquely
Strategic Implications:
Monitor emerging substitutes and disruptive technologies
Build customer stickiness through integration and loyalty
Invest in product innovation and improvement
Create switching costs through ecosystem or community
Diversify into adjacent or complementary products
Defend through brand, service, or convenience
5. Threat of New Entrants (Can new competitors easily enter?)
The risk that new competitors will enter the market and capture share.
High Threat When:
Low barriers to entry (capital, expertise, licensing)
Attractive industry margins and growth
Incumbents are vulnerable or complacent
Distribution or channel access is available
Economies of scale are limited
Network effects are weak or absent
Regulation is permissive
New technologies enable disruption
Low Threat When:
High barriers to entry (capital, IP, expertise, relationships)
Entrenched incumbents with scale advantages
Strong network effects or switching costs
Brand loyalty is high
Regulatory or licensing barriers exist
Economies of scale create cost advantage
Control of critical resources or distribution
Retaliation by incumbents is credible
Strategic Implications:
Build defensible barriers (IP, brand, network effects)
Establish cost leadership and scale advantages
Create switching costs and customer lock-in
Invest in brand and customer relationships
Monitor startups and disruptors in your space
Build alliances and control key resources
Output Process
Assess each of the five forces (High, Medium, Low)
Rate industry attractiveness (High rivalry + strong forces = less attractive)
For each force, identify:
Current state and trend (getting stronger/weaker)
Key players or dynamics
Implications for profitability
Prioritize the 2-3 forces most critical to your strategy
Develop strategic responses:
How can we reduce threat of high-power forces?
How can we leverage weak forces for advantage?
Identify competitive positioning opportunities
Create strategic initiatives aligned with force analysis
Industry Attractiveness
Attractive: Low rivalry, weak supplier/buyer power, few substitutes, high entry barriers
Unattractive: High rivalry, strong supplier/buyer power, many substitutes, low entry barriers
Moderate: Mixed dynamics requiring strategic differentiation
Notes
No industry is universally attractive or unattractive; position matters
Same industry can be attractive for some companies, unattractive for others
Forces change over time; re-assess as market evolves
Use Porter's Five Forces with SWOT and PESTLE for comprehensive analysis
Strategy should directly address the highest-force threats
Further Reading
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer877 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md8.0 KiB
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Pawel Huryn
- Publisher
- Pawel Huryn (Community)
- Source
- phuryn/pm-skills · pm-product-strategy/skills/porters-five-forces · commit 2a12295
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Pawel Huryn.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download porters-five-forces.zip