Analyzing Funnel Correlation
PostHogOfficialPublished by PostHog
- Skill
- Research and analysis
- Data and AI
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a methodology for performing correlation analysis on funnel data within PostHog. By comparing the behavior of users who complete a funnel against those who drop off, it calculates odds ratios to identify which events or properties are statistically associated with success or failure. The approach uses HogQL to build contingency tables, allowing users to uncover patterns in user behavior that might explain conversion trends.
What it does
- Calculates odds ratios to measure the strength of correlation between specific events and funnel outcomes.
- Compares user property values between converters and non-converters.
- Filters out low-significance signals to ensure statistical relevance.
- Provides SQL templates for both event-based and property-based correlation analysis.
- Includes guidance on interpreting odds ratios and identifying potential noise in the data.
When to use it
- When you need to understand why users are dropping off at specific stages of a funnel.
- When you want to identify which actions or user attributes predict successful conversion.
- When you need to compare the behavior of converters versus non-converters.
- When you are performing exploratory data analysis to generate hypotheses for future experiments.
Advantages
- Enables deeper insights into funnel performance beyond standard conversion rates.
- Uses a robust statistical approach (odds ratios) to quantify signal strength.
- Provides a structured workflow for data extraction and analysis.
- Helps prioritize product improvements by highlighting high-impact behavioral signals.
Usage examples
- “Why are users dropping off between the signup and checkout steps in my funnel?”
- The agent will define the funnel steps, execute the event correlation query, and report which events are most strongly associated with the drop-off group.
- “What do users who convert do differently than those who don't?”
- The agent will run a correlation analysis to identify specific events or user properties that appear significantly more often in the converter group.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/posthog/analyzing-funnel-correlation/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip analyzing-funnel-correlation.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by PostHog
Analyzing funnel correlation
Correlation compares two groups of people who entered a funnel: people who completed the last step (success) and people who did not (failure). For each candidate event or property value, build a contingency table and compute the odds ratio. An odds ratio above 1 means the signal goes with conversion. Below 1 means it goes with drop-off. The further the ratio is from 1, the stronger the correlation.
Correlation is not causation. Tell the user that, and suggest an experiment to test a strong signal.
Workflow
Get the funnel definition: the step events, the date range, and the conversion window. If the user names a saved insight, read it with
insight-get. Confirm the step events withread-data-schema.Run the funnel with
query-funneland note the total entrants and converters. The SQL below must give totals in the same range. If not, fix the step filters first.Run the event correlation query below with
execute-sql.If the user asks about person attributes, run the property variant.
Report the top success signals and the top failure signals with their counts. To show who is behind a signal, use
query-funnel-actorsor filter the funnel by that event or property.
Event correlation
Replace the step events, the date range, the conversion window (seconds in windowFunnel, days in the INTERVAL), and the step count.
Add more event = '...' conditions to windowFunnel for more steps, and set steps = N to the last step.
WITH
funnel_actors AS (
SELECT
person_id AS actor_id,
windowFunnel(1209600)(toDateTime(timestamp), event = 'step one', event = 'step two') AS steps,
arraySort(groupArrayIf((toUnixTimestamp(timestamp), event = 'step two'), event IN ('step one', 'step two'))) AS step_events,
arrayReverseFill(t -> t > 0, arrayMap(x -> if(x.2, x.1, 0), step_events)) AS next_final,
arrayFirstIndex((x, t) -> NOT x.2 AND t > 0 AND t <= x.1 + 1209600, step_events, next_final) AS attempt,
toDateTime(if(attempt > 0, step_events[attempt].1, arrayFirst(x -> NOT x.2, step_events).1)) AS first_timestamp,
toDateTime(next_final[greatest(attempt, 1)]) AS final_timestamp
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('step one', 'step two')
AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY actor_id
HAVING steps >= 1
),
totals AS (
SELECT countIf(steps = 2) AS success_total, countIf(steps < 2) AS failure_total
FROM funnel_actors
),
per_event AS (
SELECT
e.event AS name,
countDistinctIf(a.actor_id, a.steps = 2) AS success_count,
countDistinctIf(a.actor_id, a.steps < 2) AS failure_count
FROM events AS e
JOIN funnel_actors AS a ON e.person_id = a.actor_id
WHERE e.timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
AND e.timestamp > a.first_timestamp
AND e.timestamp < if(a.steps = 2, a.final_timestamp, a.first_timestamp + INTERVAL 14 DAY)
AND e.event NOT IN ('step one', 'step two')
GROUP BY name
)
SELECT
name,
success_count,
failure_count,
success_total,
failure_total,
((success_count + 1) * (failure_total - failure_count + 1))
/ ((success_total - success_count + 1) * (failure_count + 1)) AS odds_ratio
FROM per_event
CROSS JOIN totals
WHERE success_count + failure_count >= least(25, 0.02 * (success_total + failure_total))
ORDER BY abs(log(odds_ratio)) DESC
LIMIT 20The query only counts events between funnel entry and conversion.
step_events holds the first-step and last-step events in time order. next_final gives the next last-step time for each of them in one pass.
For people who converted, attempt picks the first entry that has a last step inside the window, so both timestamps come from the same attempt.
For more steps, keep only the first and last step events in groupArrayIf. The attempt then ignores the middle steps, so the interval can start at an earlier entry than the one that converted.
For people who did not convert, it counts events from their first entry until the conversion window closes.
The timestamps use whole seconds because windowFunnel compares whole seconds. Keep them the same, or some converters get no matched attempt.
It excludes the funnel step events, because they correlate with conversion by definition.
Property correlation
To compare person property values, group the actors by the property and skip the events join.
WITH
funnel_actors AS (
SELECT
person_id AS actor_id,
windowFunnel(1209600)(toDateTime(timestamp), event = 'step one', event = 'step two') AS steps,
any(person.properties.$browser) AS value
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('step one', 'step two')
AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY actor_id
HAVING steps >= 1
),
totals AS (
SELECT countIf(steps = 2) AS success_total, countIf(steps < 2) AS failure_total
FROM funnel_actors
),
per_value AS (
SELECT
toString(value) AS name,
countIf(steps = 2) AS success_count,
countIf(steps < 2) AS failure_count
FROM funnel_actors
GROUP BY name
)
SELECT
name,
success_count,
failure_count,
((success_count + 1) * (failure_total - failure_count + 1))
/ ((success_total - success_count + 1) * (failure_count + 1)) AS odds_ratio
FROM per_value
CROSS JOIN totals
WHERE success_count + failure_count >= least(25, 0.02 * (success_total + failure_total))
ORDER BY abs(log(odds_ratio)) DESC
LIMIT 20To look at the properties of one event instead, filter per_event to that event and group by e.properties.<name>.
Read the results with care
The
+ 1in each cell is a prior. It prevents division by zero and damps signals from small counts.The
WHEREfilter drops signals seen by fewer than 25 people or 2% of entrants. Small groups give unstable ratios.If one group is more than 10 times bigger than the other, the ratios are less reliable. Tell the user.
If
success_totalorfailure_totalis 0, there is nothing to compare.Noise events that everybody sends, such as
$pageview,$pageleave, or$feature_flag_called, can fill the list. Exclude them when they hide the useful signals.For group-based funnels, replace
person_idwith$group_Nand the person properties with group properties. Also addAND $group_N != ''to the funnel stepWHEREclause. Events without that group have an empty key, and without the filter they become one fake actor that can convert.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer875 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md7.0 KiB
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- PostHog
- Publisher
- PostHog (Official)
- Source
- PostHog/skills · skills/omnibus/analyzing-funnel-correlation · commit a5d30e7
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by PostHog.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download analyzing-funnel-correlation.zip