Pulumi Upgrade Provider
PulumiOfficialPublished by Pulumi
- Skill
- Workflow
- Cloud and DevOps
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured workflow for upgrading Pulumi provider repositories to new upstream versions. It guides the user through running the upgrade-provider tool in a non-submitting mode, managing the repository state, resolving common errors such as patch conflicts or module mapping issues, and performing a final review before submission. The process ensures that generated code and documentation are correctly updated while maintaining the integrity of the provider's history and configuration.
What it does
- Executes the upgrade-provider tool to automate repository updates.
- Provides a systematic loop for identifying and fixing upgrade failures.
- Offers guidance on resolving patch conflicts and upstream dependency issues.
- Includes steps for auditing generated documentation for placeholders.
- Defines a review process for verifying changes before final submission.
- Outlines the procedure for submitting the upgrade via pull requests.
When to use it
- When a Pulumi provider needs to be upgraded to a new upstream version.
- When the upgrade-provider tool encounters errors during the automated process.
- When manual intervention is required to resolve patch conflicts or module mapping issues.
- When verifying the generated output of an upgrade before pushing changes.
Advantages
- Standardizes the upgrade process across different provider repositories.
- Provides clear error resolution paths for common upgrade blockers.
- Ensures that generated commits and documentation are reviewed for accuracy.
- Maintains a clean and reproducible workflow for provider maintenance.
Usage examples
- “Upgrade the current provider repository to the latest upstream version.”
- The agent initiates the upgrade-provider tool with the --no-submit flag, monitors the logs for errors, and provides a report on the local completion status.
- “I encountered a patch conflict while running the provider upgrade. How do I fix it?”
- The agent directs you to resolve the conflict within the upstream submodule, verify the patch intent, and use the check_in script before rerunning the upgrade.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/pulumi/pulumi-upgrade-provider/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip pulumi-upgrade-provider.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Pulumi
Pulumi Upgrade Provider
Overview
Run upgrade-provider --no-submit, fix known failures, and rerun until success. During the run loop, the tool owns branch and generated-commit state but does not push or mutate GitHub. After success, review and correct the local result before submitting it using the plan printed by the tool.
Preflight
Record existing changes as the pre-upgrade baseline:
baseline_file="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/upgrade-provider-$(basename "$PWD")-baseline.txt"
git status --short --untracked-files=all | tee "$baseline_file"Existing changes do not block the upgrade, but the tool stages broadly and may include them in generated commits. If practical, isolate clearly unrelated work in another branch or worktree, move local-only files, or add untracked local artifacts to .git/info/exclude. Otherwise proceed and carry this baseline into the final review. Do not add a repository .gitignore rule unless the path should be ignored for all contributors.
Keep the run log outside the repository so the tool cannot stage it.
Run Loop
Run from repo root:
log_file="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/upgrade-provider-$(basename "$PWD").log"
upgrade-provider $ORG/$REPO --repo-path . --no-submit > "$log_file" 2> /dev/nullPreserve --no-submit on every retry.
Wait for completion (can take up to 10 minutes).
Check for errors by scanning the log for lines starting with
error::
if command -v rg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
rg -n '^error: ' "$log_file" || true
else
grep -n '^error: ' "$log_file" || true
fiOn a successful exit, first check whether the tool found that no upgrade was required:
if grep -Fq 'No actions needed' "$log_file"; then
echo 'No actions needed'
fiIf present, report that the provider is already current or the requested target is not an upgrade, then stop successfully. There is no local upgrade to review or submit.
Otherwise, extract and read the complete local-completion report from the captured stdout:
awk '/^Upgrade completed locally;/{found=1} found' "$log_file"This includes the proposed PR body and metadata, review commands, and every skipped submission action.
If failed, fix using this skill's
references/upgrade-provider-errors.md(from the skill folder, not the repo), then rerun with--no-submit. If upstream migrated from Terraform Plugin SDKv2 to Plugin Framework, use the migration-guide routing in that reference instead of treating the framework change alone as an architectural blocker. For upstreamgo getfailures involving ignoredreplacedirectives orunknown revision v0.0.0, rerun with--target-versionafter applying the documentedprovider/go.modreplacements; preserve the original major/non-major intent and add--majoronly for actual major version upgrades.If a fix requires creating/amending/removing/rebasing patches, use the
upstream-patchesskill for the patch workflow. Interrupted patch workflows must be checked in before rerunning.If you fixed a conflict, report exact edits (file paths + concrete changes or preserved intent).
Repeat until the tool prints
No actions neededor the local-completion report and proposed PR plan. This run must not push or mutate GitHub; a branch or PR from an earlier run may already exist.
When to Stop and Report Failure
Stop iterating and report failure if any of these conditions are met:
Command not found (exit code 127): The
upgrade-providertool is not in PATH.Same error 3 times: You've attempted to fix the same error 3 times without success.
Unknown error pattern: The error is not covered in
references/upgrade-provider-errors.mdand you cannot determine a safe fix.Ambiguous patch state: You cannot prove that every patch was applied and the target rebase completed.
Requires human judgment: The fix needs user input, such as choosing between multiple valid implementation approaches or making an architectural decision about module organization. Upstream breaking changes, deprecations, or framework migrations do not by themselves require stopping; stop only when implementing the upgrade presents an unresolved choice.
When stopping, report:
The error(s) encountered.
What fixes were attempted (with file paths and changes).
Why human intervention is needed.
Any partial progress.
Review the Local Upgrade
Use the tool's final report as the source of truth for the base branch, working branch, proposed PR title/body/metadata, and skipped submission actions.
Review a bounded summary first:
default_branch=$(gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq .defaultBranchRef.name)
base_ref="origin/$default_branch"
git status --short --untracked-files=all
git log --oneline "$base_ref"..HEAD
git diff --shortstat "$base_ref"...HEAD
git diff --name-only "$base_ref"...HEAD | awk -F/ '{print $1}' | sort | uniq -cProvider upgrades can change thousands of generated SDK files. Do not print the full branch diff by default. Use path-limited git diff "$base_ref"...HEAD -- <paths> commands to inspect source, configuration, patch, schema, and unexpected directories. For generated SDKs, inspect summaries or targeted files unless a full diff is necessary.
Cross-check the final branch against the pre-upgrade baseline:
baseline_file="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/upgrade-provider-$(basename "$PWD")-baseline.txt"
[ ! -f "$baseline_file" ] || cat "$baseline_file"For every pre-existing path included in the branch, decide whether it belongs in the upgrade PR. Keep intentional paths; move unrelated work to another branch/worktree or remove it from the unpublished upgrade history before pushing. A separate commit on the same branch isolates history but does not remove the path from the PR, and unstaging alone is insufficient after the tool has committed it. Revoke any exposed credential even if the history is rewritten.
MUST audit generated doc replacements for unresolved placeholders before publication:
if [ -f provider/replacements.json ]; then
if command -v rg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
rg -n '"new":.*TODO|TODO' provider/replacements.json || true
else
grep -En '"new":.*TODO|TODO' provider/replacements.json || true
fi
fiIf any TODO is found in provider/replacements.json:
Treat it as a pre-submission blocker; replacement values render into generated docs.
Inspect each
old/newpair and replaceTODOwith concrete Pulumi-facing wording, usuallyPulumi,this provider, orthe provider.Run focused validation if the repo has the test:
cd provider && go test -v -run TestReplacementDoesNotIncludeTodos .If the upgrade changed patches, review the applied commits and then exit checkout mode:
./scripts/upstream.sh checkout
git -C upstream log --oneline pulumi/checkout-base..pulumi/patch-checkout
# Inspect relevant commits with git -C upstream show <sha>.
./scripts/upstream.sh check_inList commit SHAs/titles, summarize each intent, and call out behavioral changes or risks. check_in is mandatory after review; leaving upstream on pulumi/patch-checkout blocks the next safe tool run.
Run focused validation for every manual fix and add focused follow-up commits.
Require a clean working tree before submission.
Submit the Reviewed Upgrade
The local-completion report lists the proposed PR metadata and every skipped action. MUST reproduce all applicable actions, not only PR creation:
Preserve the proposed title, body, release label, reviewers, and assignee. Never decide, infer, or change the release label: provider upgrades follow the upstream version transition, so the label represents that version delta rather than the agent's assessment of whether individual changes are breaking. For example, upstream
v0.9.0tov0.10.0remains a minor upgrade even when it contains breaking behavioral changes. Use exactly the label emitted byupgrade-provider, report any concern to reviewers without changing the metadata, and never add--majorunless the upstream target crosses the current upstream major version.If fixes unblocked the upgrade, append this section to the proposed body before submission when practical:
---
### Fixes applied to unblock upgrade
- <list concrete unblocker edits here, with file paths and intent>Push only after review. The tool reports an unconditional force-push; manual submission intentionally uses the safer lease-protected equivalent unless the user explicitly approves overwriting newer remote work:
branch=$(git branch --show-current)
git push --set-upstream origin "$branch" --force-with-leaseUse
ghto create or update the PR as described by the report.Assign listed upgrade issues to the PR assignee when requested.
For bridge upgrades, close listed superseded bridge PRs and comment with the replacement PR URL.
Fetch and report the final PR URL:
gh pr view --json url --jq .url || gh pr list --head "$(git branch --show-current)" --json url --jq '.[0].url'If the fixes section was not included before submission, append it without replacing the existing body:
repo=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq .nameWithOwner)
pr_number=$(gh pr view --json number --jq .number)
gh pr view --json body --jq .body > /tmp/pr_body.txt
cat <<'EOF' >> /tmp/pr_body.txt
---
### Fixes applied to unblock upgrade
- <list concrete unblocker edits here, with file paths and intent>
EOF
gh api -X PATCH "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr_number" --raw-field body="$(cat /tmp/pr_body.txt)"Use REST (gh api) instead of gh pr edit to avoid GraphQL project-card errors. Keep existing body content; only append.
Notes
git rebase --continue --no-editis not supported in older git versions. Usegit rebase --continueand accept the existing commit message.To avoid the editor prompt during
git rebase --continue, run it withGIT_EDITOR=true(orGIT_EDITOR=:).
Guardrails
Never commit, push, or create branches manually during the upgrade-provider run loop.
After
--no-submitsucceeds, focused correction commits and manual submission are permitted.Never use
./scripts/upstream.sh init -funless intentionally discarding interrupted patch work; it is destructive.Do not leave
upstreamin checkout or an active Git operation before submission.Do not stash changes; use a clean worktree or remove unrelated artifacts instead.
References
Use this skill's
references/upgrade-provider-errors.md(from the skill folder, not the repo) for interrupted patch state, patch conflict, SDKv2-to-Plugin-Framework migration, ignored upstream replacement, vendored upstream dependency, .NET duplicate file, and new module mapping fixes.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer890 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md10.9 KiB
- agents/openai.yaml287 B
- references/upgrade-provider-errors.md19.6 KiB
- use_cases.yaml1.7 KiB
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs a command-line tool
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Pulumi
- Publisher
- Pulumi (Official)
- Source
- pulumi/agent-skills · package-maintenance/skills/pulumi-upgrade-provider · commit 82f222a
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Pulumi.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download pulumi-upgrade-provider.zip