Generated banner for Engrava
Generated logo for Engrava

Engrava

Memory frameworkOfficial Sovantica project

Created by Sovantica

Published in sovantica/engrava. Publisher page

12 GitHub stars

What it is

The memory database for AI agents - graph memory, hybrid search, tamper-evident thought/edge journal.
— the description by Sovantica

AutoGineer overview, from the brain’s own files

Engrava is an in-process memory database designed for AI agents, built on SQLite. It provides a structured way to store and retrieve agent thoughts using a graph-based model, where thoughts are linked by typed edges. The system supports hybrid search, combining vector similarity, full-text search (FTS5), recency, and priority. It includes built-in mechanisms for memory consolidation (dreaming), memory hygiene (archiving and garbage collection), and a tamper-evident journal for tracking mutations. Engrava operates as a library with no external service dependencies in its core path, allowing agents to maintain persistent, queryable state locally.

How it works

Memory model: Hybrid

AutoGineer overview, from the brain’s own files

Engrava uses a SQLite database to store thoughts and their relationships. It organizes data into thoughts and typed edges, which can be queried using the MindQL language. The system supports hybrid search by combining vector embeddings, keyword search, and metadata signals. It manages memory through a lifecycle that includes archiving and garbage collection, and it can consolidate memories into reflections. The system is extensible via hooks and provides an MCP server for integration with various AI agent frameworks.

Folders
FolderRoleFiles
.githubagent-config16
docsdocs37
examplesexamples13
scriptsscripts24
srcsource-code89
teststests201
.githooksfolder1

The agent reads

Requirements

Runtimes: Python >=3.11

Databases: SQLite

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Google Antigravity, Kiro, OpenCode, Amp, Roo Code, Cline, JetBrains Junie, Devin (ex-Windsurf)

Set it up

  1. This brain runs code automatically: 2 scripts. Review .githooks/commit-msg, Makefile before opening the folder in Claude Code. No step below turns a hook on for you.

    • .githooks/commit-msg: runs on git commit-msg
    • Makefile: echo "$(BLUE)>> Installing engrava + dev dependencies$(RESET)"; $(PIP) install --upgrade pip setuptools wheel; $(PIP) install -e ".[dev]"; bash scripts/install_hooks.sh; echo "$(GREEN)>> Done. Run 'make check' to verify quality gate.$(RESET)"
  2. Not scanned by AutoGineerIts dependencies are installed by pip or uv when you run it and were not scanned by AutoGineer (5 declared). https://pypi.org/project/engrava/
  3. Created by Sovantica. Published in sovantica/engrava. Licence: MIT License.

Usage

AutoGineer overview, from the brain’s own files

  • Persistent memory for autonomous AI agents
  • Personal knowledge base management
  • Conversation storage with semantic retrieval
  • Research notes with associative linking
  • Memory-backed agent development
  • Audit-trailed thought and edge tracking
“Store a new observation about a project requirement.”
The agent uses the remember() method to persist the thought, which is then indexed for future hybrid search and graph traversal.
“Retrieve relevant context for a coding task.”
The agent uses the recall() method, which performs a hybrid search across FTS5, vector, and graph signals to return ranked, contextually relevant thoughts.
“Query the memory graph for all observations with high priority.”
The agent executes a MindQL query: FIND thoughts WHERE thought_type = 'OBSERVATION' AND priority = 'P1'.
“Consolidate old memories to free up space.”
The agent triggers the DreamingExtension to cluster related thoughts and compute reflections, or uses the memory hygiene loop to archive low-signal thoughts.

Documentation by Sovantica

Engrava

The memory database for AI agents.

A queryable memory graph with bi-temporal valid-time predicates — in an in-process Python library over one SQLite file, with no generative-model call in the core write path.

Image: CI Image: PyPI Image: Python Image: License: MIT

Engrava is a standalone, in-process database for AI agent memory. Built on SQLite, it provides thought CRUD, edge-based knowledge graphs, embedding-based similarity search, full-text search (FTS5/BM25), and a declarative extension system — all in a single package with zero external service dependencies.

Benchmark results are published, and the runs are reproducible from a separate repository. Every published run is Group A — memory_pipeline_llms: [], no language model anywhere in the memory layer's built-in path. That is a property of the architecture's default signals and hooks rather than a measurement, unless a custom Dreaming signal or Memory Hygiene hook is configured to call one.

  • Benchmark results — the live table: every published row with the comparability segment it belongs to.

  • engrava-benchmark — the runner. Clone it and reproduce a result against the package from PyPI. MIT.

  • Discussions — questions; reproduction questions belong in the Q&A category.

Use Cases

  • AI agent persistent memory

  • Personal knowledge base

  • Conversation storage with semantic search

  • Research notes with associative linking

  • Any application that needs a thought-graph with embeddings

Quick Start

Installation
pip install engrava

Optional extras:

pip install 'engrava[vec]'                # sqlite-vec vector search backend
pip install 'engrava[embeddings-local]'   # sentence-transformers embeddings (local model)
pip install 'engrava[embeddings-openai]'  # OpenAI-compatible embeddings API
pip install 'engrava[embeddings-ollama]'  # Ollama local embeddings server
pip install 'engrava[embeddings-hf]'      # HuggingFace Inference API embeddings

Dreaming/consolidation and the knowledge graph need no extra — they are part of the base install.

embeddings-local carries a large first-run download. It pulls sentence-transformers and torch, plus a further, separate model download (~88 MB for all-MiniLM-L6-v2, cached under ~/.cache/huggingface/hub) on first use. On Linux, the PyPI build of torch also pulls the NVIDIA CUDA libraries as dependencies: several gigabytes, most of it usable only with an NVIDIA GPU. Without one, install the CPU-only build first (see Configuration: No NVIDIA GPU for the exact command and numbers). engrava-mcp[local] is the exact same download, reached through the server package instead of this one. If you do not need semantic search in-process, pip install engrava alone (no extra, no download, no model) already gives you keyword search, the graph, and MindQL — see Configuration → Quick-start profiles for that and the Ollama-backed alternative that keeps the model out of this process entirely.

Basic Usage

Store a memory and search for it in two calls — no IDs to generate, no record to assemble:

import asyncio

import aiosqlite

from engrava import SqliteEngravaCore


async def main() -> None:
    # SqliteEngravaCore wraps an open aiosqlite connection.
    async with aiosqlite.connect(":memory:") as conn:
        conn.row_factory = aiosqlite.Row
        store = SqliteEngravaCore(conn)
        await store.ensure_schema()

        await store.remember("Python is great for AI agents")
        await store.remember("SQLite needs no server")

        result = await store.recall("what language is good for agents?")
        for thought_id, score in result.results:
            thought = await store.get_thought(thought_id)
            if thought is not None:
                print(f"{thought.essence}  (score: {score:.3f})")


asyncio.run(main())

remember() stores the text as a thought (generating its ID for you) and returns the stored ThoughtRecord; recall() runs the same hybrid search as search_hybrid() and returns the ranked results. This store has no SearchConfig of its own, and it still ranks with the same default weights — FTS 0.30, vector 0.55, recency 0.10, priority 0.05, graph 0.00 (opt-in) — as a store built with one; see Hybrid Search. For full control — setting priority, thought type, metadata, or the cognitive cycle on a write — build a ThoughtRecord yourself and call create_thought().

From here, link thoughts with typed edges, query them with MindQL, or run the full ingest → dream → search tour in the Quick Start guide.

Configuration-Driven Setup
from engrava import SqliteEngravaCore

# from_config opens and OWNS the connection — use it as an async context manager.
async with await SqliteEngravaCore.from_config("engrava.yaml") as store:
    # The schema is already applied by from_config.
    thought = await store.get_thought("some-id")

See docs/configuration.md for the full YAML schema.

Upgrading

Automatic schema migration runs on first connection. See the upgrade guide for compatibility notes, backup guidance, and troubleshooting steps.

Features

Thought CRUD

Create, read, update, and archive thoughts with full lifecycle management. All models are frozen Pydantic objects — mutations happen via evolve().

Edge-Based Knowledge Graph

Link thoughts with typed, weighted edges. Edge types include ASSOCIATED, DEPENDS_ON, DERIVED_FROM, CONSOLIDATED_FROM (created by dreaming), and CONTESTED_BY.

Store embeddings alongside thoughts and search them with the built-in NumPy cosine backend or the optional sqlite-vec backend (pip install 'engrava[vec]'). Pluggable embedding providers:

ProviderExtraBackend
SentenceTransformerProviderembeddings-localLocal model via sentence-transformers
OpenAICompatibleProviderembeddings-openaiAny OpenAI-compatible API
OllamaProviderembeddings-ollamaLocal Ollama server
HuggingFaceProviderembeddings-hfHuggingFace Inference API
CallbackProvider(built-in)Custom callable
Full-Text Search (FTS5)

SQLite FTS5 virtual table with BM25 ranking. Hybrid search combines vector similarity, text relevance, recency, priority, and graph connectivity. Signals that cannot run for a query are skipped and the remaining weights are redistributed.

MindQL Query Language

Declarative query language for the thought-graph:

FIND thoughts WHERE thought_type = 'OBSERVATION' AND priority = 'P1' LIMIT 10
COUNT thoughts WHERE lifecycle_status = 'ACTIVE'
SELECT thought_id, essence FROM thought WHERE thought_type = 'BELIEF'

Extensible with custom commands through MindQLExecutor or an ExtensionManifest; the lifecycle hook registry is reserved and is not consulted by the core executor.

Extension System

Plug into the thought lifecycle via EngravaHooksProtocol. Subclass DefaultEngravaHooks when you only need selected active methods:

from engrava import DefaultEngravaHooks, ThoughtRecord

class MyHooks(DefaultEngravaHooks):
    async def on_store(self, thought: ThoughtRecord) -> ThoughtRecord:
        # Observe or enrich the object returned after persistence.
        return thought

    async def decay_function(
        self, thought: ThoughtRecord, elapsed_cycles: int
    ) -> float:
        # Supply a decay multiplier to an enabled Memory Hygiene pass.
        return 1.0

Core currently invokes on_store, on_retrieve, and decay_function. on_store runs after the source thought's row is inserted; changing its return value does not rewrite the persisted row. score_function and mindql_extension_registry() remain reserved protocol methods and are not called by core.

Dreaming / Memory Consolidation

Built-in DreamingExtension for periodic memory consolidation — scores thoughts via its default signals (no LLM calls), promotes high-value entries, and creates REFLECTION thoughts by clustering semantically related thoughts and computing centroid embeddings through a deterministic structural function, not an LLM. A custom signal you register with DreamingExtension runs whatever code it contains. Available since 0.3.0.

→ See docs/benchmarks.md for reproducible evidence (synthetic benchmark suite runnable in ~5 minutes).

Forgetting / Memory Hygiene

The subtractive half of memory maintenance, paired with Dreaming: an opt-in loop whose built-in scoring makes no LLM calls, that archives cold, low-signal thoughts — the default action, reversible via restore_thought — and, as a separately opted-in step, garbage-collects them (not reversible) once both restore windows have elapsed under their non-zero defaults — a cycle count and a wall-clock duration, either of which can be configured to 0 to disable that window. OFF by default; once enabled, archived thoughts drop out of default retrieval and can be restored (restore_thought / include_archived).

→ See docs/memory-hygiene.md for the loop, protection, restore windows, and the honest deletion posture.

Tamper-Evident Thought/Edge Journal

Opt-in hash-chain journal that records thought and edge mutations (plus action status/verification_status transitions) as SHA-256-linked, before/after entries — a tamper-evident thought/edge journal, not a whole-database audit (embeddings and action creation are not covered). Off by default, one config flag to enable. Query history with store.journal.get_entries(...) and validate the chain with store.verify_journal(), which audits whatever chain is on disk independent of the current journal.enabled state — the store.journal writer handle does not exist while journaling is off, but the chain earlier sessions wrote is still in journal_entry and still needs verifying.

→ See docs/audit-trail.md for enabling, querying, verification, and the security model (what "tamper-evident" does and does not guarantee).

Multi-Service Isolation

Run multiple independent databases under one EngravaManager:

from pathlib import Path

from engrava import EngravaManager

async with EngravaManager(data_dir=Path("./data")) as mgr:
    agent_a = await mgr.get_store("agent-a")
    agent_b = await mgr.get_store("agent-b")
    # Completely isolated databases
MCP Server

Want Engrava as a memory server for your agent? The MCP server ships as its own package, engrava-mcp — a native stdio server (no HTTP shim) with read tools, optional write tools, attachable engrava:// resources, and guided prompts, for any MCP client (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code):

uvx engrava-mcp        # or: pip install engrava-mcp

engrava-mcp pulls engrava in transitively, so installing it also gives you the import engrava library. See the engrava-mcp package for install, client configuration, the full tool/resource/prompt reference, and read-only mode.

uvx vs. a persistent install. uvx engrava-mcp (equivalently uv tool run engrava-mcp) installs into "an ephemeral virtual environment in the uv cache directory" per uv's own --help text — fine for the lexical/network profiles above, which add nothing heavier than httpx. Once you are on the local profile (engrava-mcp[local], the same sentence-transformers + torch download as engrava[embeddings-local]), uv tool install 'engrava-mcp[local]' is the better fit: it installs once into a persistent environment — the same uvx engrava-mcp invocation then reuses that installed environment instead of resolving a fresh ephemeral one — and a later uv tool upgrade engrava-mcp re-pays only the changed packages, not the whole dependency tree.

CLI

engrava --db mydata.db info          # Database stats
engrava --db mydata.db query "FIND thoughts WHERE thought_type = 'OBSERVATION' LIMIT 5"
engrava --db mydata.db snapshot -o backup.jsonl
engrava --db mydata.db restore -i backup.jsonl
engrava --db mydata.db gc            # Collect ARCHIVED thoughts + their edges/embeddings/actions
engrava --db mydata.db migrate       # Ensure schema is up-to-date
engrava --db mydata.db export -o portable.json

gc physically deletes ARCHIVED thoughts together with every edge touching one on either end — including edges whose other end is still live — their embeddings and the actions sourced from them, then reconciles the vector index by removing every vec0 row no embedding row owns; on a vec0-indexed store where sqlite-vec cannot be loaded — most commonly because engrava[vec] is not installed — a pass that is about to delete stops before deleting anything and exits 1 rather than stranding those vectors in an index nothing can then reach them through.

engrava info's --format json output carries every field of the metrics snapshot exposed by await store.metrics(), with the snapshot's own schema version renamed metrics_schema_version, plus two fields the snapshot itself does not carry, db_path and database_schema_version — see Upgrade Guide. The default text output is a shorter summary of that same data, not the full snapshot.

See the CLI reference for every command and option.

Architecture

  • SQLite with WAL mode for concurrent reads

  • Frozen Pydantic models — immutable domain objects

  • Async-first — all I/O via aiosqlite

  • Hook-based extension — zero monkey-patching

  • Template method pattern — subclass SqliteEngravaCore for extended schemas

  • Zero external services — everything runs locally in-process

Documentation

  • Documentation Index — choose a path by task: learn, build, operate, extend, or migrate

  • Core Concepts — the mental model (thought, edge, reflection, cycle, …) — start here

  • The Bi-temporal Model — the optional valid-time axis: query a fact as of any instant, invalidate without deleting

  • Positioning — when Engrava is (and isn't) the right tool, and how it compares

  • Quick Start — 5-minute setup guide

  • Tutorial — build a small notes memory end to end

  • Recipes — copy-paste snippets for common tasks (store a turn, retrieve context, TTL, dedup, …)

  • Building a memory-backed agent — the end-to-end agent turn loop (ingest → retrieve → generate → consolidate)

  • Migrating from another memory system — concept mapping, porting calls, bulk import, and scoping/multi-tenancy

  • Embeddings — wiring a real embedding provider (local / OpenAI / Ollama / HuggingFace / custom)

  • MCP server (engrava-mcp) — expose a store to MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code) via the standalone server package: install, run, client config, tools/resources/prompts

  • Configuration — YAML config format and options

  • Upgrade Guide — compatibility matrix, backups, and troubleshooting

  • Extensions — Writing custom extensions and hooks

  • Observability — Metrics snapshot API

  • Audit Trail — Tamper-evident hash-chain journal (enabling, querying, verifying, security model)

  • Evidence and Conflicts — model claims, provenance, contested facts, and caller-owned clarification

  • Security — trust boundaries, data egress, tenant isolation, encryption posture, and journal limits

  • Error Handling and Recovery — decide when to retry, repair input, or replace a store

  • Benchmarks — release gates, versioned observed values, and LongMemEval

  • API Reference — Full protocol and class reference

  • CLI Reference — every engrava command and option

  • Glossary — quick definitions of every Engrava term

  • MindQL — Query language syntax and examples

  • Troubleshooting — symptom → cause → fix for common errors

  • FAQ — quick answers (LLM/keys, embeddings-optional, scale, concurrency, backups, …)

  • Performance & Scaling — the vector-backend switch, bulk-ingest, and dreaming cost at scale

  • Data Lifecycle & Retention — lifecycle states, TTL, archive-vs-delete, GDPR erasure, disk reclamation

  • Deployment — process model, database files on disk, containers, graceful shutdown

  • Concurrency — the WAL single-writer model, busy timeout, and per-service isolation

  • Backup & Recovery — WAL-safe backups, snapshot vs file copy, restore verification

  • Known Limitations — Platform notes and constraints

Development

make install   # deps + dev extras + local git hooks -- from the primary checkout
make gate      # fast: hooks-active + lint + format check + type check + goldens drift, ~70s
make check     # lint + format check + type check + the full test suite with coverage (unchanged; no hooks-active, no goldens drift)

make install also wires a commit-msg hook that lints the message of the commit a squash merge creates — including on a local branch that never opens a pull request, where nothing else does. It refuses to install from a linked worktree (core.hooksPath is shared across all of them). See CONTRIBUTING.md for what it covers and what it does not.

License

MIT — see LICENSE for details.

docs/benchmarks.md

Benchmarks

Engrava ships two reproducible benchmark harnesses:

  • a small synthetic Dreaming benchmark used by the release smoke gate; and

  • a LongMemEval runner for broader long-term-memory retrieval evaluation.

These are the two harnesses distributed inside the engrava Python package. They are separate from the standalone engrava-benchmark repository, which provides its own cross-system reproduction workflow and published result artifacts. Installing Engrava does not install or run that repository, and the in-package commands below do not read its configurations or results.

This page separates three things that are easy to conflate: the benchmark methodology, the release thresholds, and the observed values for one specific Engrava and dependency version. Passing the release thresholds does not mean that Dreaming improves aggregate retrieval accuracy.

Synthetic Dreaming benchmark

Install the local embedding extra and run the binding release measurements:

pip install 'engrava[embeddings-local]'
python -m engrava.benchmarks.synthetic

Add the frozen 50-question OFF/ON snapshot:

python -m engrava.benchmarks.synthetic --with-reproducibility
Synthetic CLI options
OptionDefaultScope
--with-reproducibilityoffAlso evaluate and print the bundled synthetic-v1.json OFF/ON per-scenario snapshot. The snapshot remains informational.
--regenerateoffGenerate a snapshot dataset instead of loading the bundled file. Implies --with-reproducibility; binding subsets are still fixed.
--seed20260508Generator seed used only with --regenerate.
--n-conversations50Generated conversation count; used only with --regenerate.
--avg-turns70Target turns per generated conversation; used only with --regenerate.
--density0.4Generated distraction density; used only with --regenerate.
--scenariosallComma-separated known scenario names included in the reproducibility snapshot. Does not alter binding measurements.
--top-k5Retrieval K used by recall@K in the reproducibility snapshot and binding measurements that consume it.
--output-formattexttext or structured json.
--output-pathstdoutUsed only with --output-format json; text output still goes to stdout.

Exit code 0 means every binding measurement passed, 1 means at least one failed, and 2 is the clean missing-embeddings-extras exit. Snapshot metrics do not affect the exit code.

The harness uses sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2, a fixed generator seed (20260508), deterministic scoring, and no LLM judge.

Two measurement surfaces

The command deliberately reports two different surfaces.

Binding release measurements use separately generated, curated scenario subsets. They gate the process exit code:

MeasurementContractWhat it checks
Synthesis coverage>= 0.80Dreaming creates REFLECTIONs whose membership intersects the expected synthesis facts. This is a data-layer mechanism check, not retrieval accuracy.
Direct neutrality<= 0.05 absolute ON/OFF deltaDreaming does not materially move recall on the curated direct-answer subset.
Sanity tolerance<= 0.05 absolute ON/OFF deltaDreaming does not materially move recall on the curated sanity subset.
Sanity, explicit boost 1.0<= 0.05 absolute ON/OFF deltaThe same sanity check with the reflection boost pinned explicitly.

The reproducibility snapshot uses the bundled, frozen synthetic-v1.json: 50 questions across nine naturally distributed scenarios. It is informational and does not affect the exit code. This broader distribution can expose regressions that the curated binding subsets do not.

Observed v0.5/v0.6-candidate baseline

The v0.5.0 and v0.3.0 columns were measured on 2026-07-23; the v0.6.0 column was re-measured on 2026-07-30 against the release candidate itself, because this page's own reproduction rule forbids carrying a prior revision's numbers under a release heading. Both measurements used:

  • Python 3.12.13;

  • sentence-transformers 5.6.0; and

  • sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (the harness default).

The Engrava revision differs by column: the v0.5.0 column used v0.5.0 revision 88b535b, and the v0.6.0 column now reports the candidate at 2918e38. The 2026-07-23 run had measured a provisional candidate at 1033a2e, twenty src/ commits earlier — including two in the dreaming path the binding measurements exercise — so those numbers were superseded before the tag rather than wrong when taken.

All four binding values are unchanged between the two candidate revisions. That is the substantive result of the re-measurement: those twenty commits moved none of them. It is not a performance comparison — wall times across separate runs are not comparable — and the byte-identity claim recorded for the earlier pair is not restated here, because the reports were not compared byte for byte this time.

Binding results
Measurementv0.3.0 historicalv0.5.0v0.6.0 candidateContract
Synthesis coverage0.8000.8000.800>= 0.80
Direct neutrality0.0330.0000.000<= 0.05
Sanity tolerance0.0420.0000.000<= 0.05
Sanity, boost 1.00.0420.0000.000<= 0.05

All binding measurements pass. These values come from the curated subsets, not from the frozen 50-question distribution below.

Frozen snapshot results
ScenarioOFF recall@5ON recall@5DeltaOFF substringON substring
Overall (50 questions)0.8000.700-10.0 pp0.6600.600
abstract_theme_recall0.0000.0000.0 pp0.0000.000
contradiction_resolution0.6000.6000.0 pp0.2000.200
distraction_heavy1.0001.0000.0 pp1.0001.000
long_recall_simple1.0001.0000.0 pp1.0001.000
multi_fact_recall0.6000.200-40.0 pp0.6000.200
recent_fact_recall0.9000.9000.0 pp1.0001.000
repeated_paraphrase_compression1.0001.0000.0 pp0.4290.429
single_unique_fact1.0001.0000.0 pp1.0001.000
thematic_cluster0.8330.333-50.0 pp0.8330.667

The older v0.3.0 capture reported aggregate recall@5 0.820 OFF and 0.780 ON (-4.0 pp). Those numbers remain historical evidence for v0.3.0; they are not a valid baseline for v0.5.0 or v0.6.0.

Interpretation
  • No v0.5-to-v0.6 regression was observed. Every recorded metric is identical between the two measured revisions.

  • Dreaming is not an accuracy-lift claim. On the current frozen distribution, enabling it reduces aggregate recall@5 by 10 percentage points and substring match by 6 points. The largest recall movements are in multi_fact_recall and thematic_cluster.

  • A green binding gate and a weaker broad snapshot can coexist. The binding measurements use different curated datasets and test bounded release contracts. They do not assert that the full frozen distribution improves.

  • Treat the snapshot as diagnostic. It shows where Dreaming changes top-K outcomes; inspect result composition to determine whether REFLECTION participation caused a movement. Tune reflection participation for your corpus and measure your own workload.

What contradiction_resolution does not prove

Despite its name, this scenario is a retrieval fixture, not a semantic conflict engine. It stores an initial statement followed by a correction and asks for the current state. Its recall metric accepts retrieval of either associated fact ID; the separate substring metric checks whether the corrected value appears.

The v0.5/v0.6-candidate result is 0.600 recall and 0.200 corrected-value substring match in both OFF and ON arms. It does not test entity resolution, CONTESTED_BY edge creation, evidence promotion, truth selection, or clarification-task generation. See Evidence and conflicts for Engrava's actual boundary.

LongMemEval harness

Engrava also ships a runner for the public LongMemEval benchmark. The upstream dataset is downloaded on first use and cached outside the package:

python -m engrava.benchmarks.longmemeval
python -m engrava.benchmarks.longmemeval --eval-mode=cosine --dreaming
LongMemEval CLI options
OptionDefaultScope
--variantoracleUpstream dataset variant: oracle, s, or m.
--eval-modesubstringCLI evaluator: substring or cosine. llm is Python-only.
--subsetall typesExact question_type filter, for example single-session-recall.
--limitno capEvaluate only the first N questions after the subset filter.
--top-k5Retrieval K passed to search_hybrid().
--dreaming / --no-dreamingoffRun, or explicitly suppress, one consolidation cycle per question.
--hygiene / --no-hygieneoffRun, or suppress, one conservative archive-only Memory Hygiene pass per question after ingest/Dreaming.
--hygiene-eviction-threshold0.20Hygiene eviction-score cutoff; consulted only with --hygiene. Lower values forget less.

The CLI prints a text summary and does not expose an output-file option. It returns 0 after evaluating at least one question, 1 for download/runtime or empty-filter failures, and 2 when the local embeddings extra is unavailable. Each question uses a fresh in-memory database.

ModeLLM requiredRole
substringNoDeterministic Free-side reference mode.
cosineNoEmbedding-based match for paraphrased answers.
llmYes, caller-supplied judgeOptional programmatic evaluator; not exposed by the CLI.

The default release smoke gate runs the synthetic binding measurements. LongMemEval is an optional, longer manual probe because it downloads an external dataset. Its harness, attribution, cache behavior, evaluation modes, and Python API are documented in src/engrava/benchmarks/longmemeval/README.md. The Python API additionally exposes db_path for isolated per-question files and llm_judge for caller-supplied LLM evaluation; neither is a CLI option.

What these benchmarks do not establish

They do not prove:

  • automatic contradiction detection or resolution;

  • entity extraction, canonicalization, or truth arbitration;

  • LLM answer quality (unless a caller explicitly supplies the LongMemEval LLM judge);

  • production latency, throughput, or a corpus-size ceiling;

  • tenant isolation, security, or audit-journal integrity; or

  • that the synthetic scenario distribution matches your application.

Use the Performance guide for workload measurement and the Security model for trust boundaries.

Reproducing and recording a release baseline

For a comparable rerun, hold all of these fixed:

  • Engrava revision;

  • benchmark dataset and generator seed;

  • Python and numeric dependency versions;

  • embedding model and provider version;

  • search/Dreaming configuration; and

  • top_k.

Record both the binding values and the full OFF/ON snapshot. A release may keep the same thresholds while its observed values move; documentation must never silently reuse a prior version's observed numbers.

402 files · 357 not served here

Advantages

Limitations

Security

Risk level: Low risk

This brain runs

Git hooks (1)

  • .githooks/commit-msg (commit-msg): runs on git commit-msg

Agent instructions that run or fetch something (4)

  • AGENTS.md: Run `git commit` and it fires on the patterns it checks for.
  • CLAUDE.md: pip install -e ".[dev]"
  • CLAUDE.md: Run a clean test suite locally before pushing;
  • CLAUDE.md: Branch from `dev`, follow Conventional Commits, run the local quality gate before pushing.

Install scripts (1)

  • Makefile (make install): echo "$(BLUE)>> Installing engrava + dev dependencies$(RESET)"; $(PIP) install --upgrade pip setuptools wheel; $(PIP) install -e ".[dev]"; bash scripts/install_hooks.sh; echo "$(GREEN)>> Done. Run 'make check' to verify quality gate.$(RESET)"
  • Low risk: scripts-present (.githooks/commit-msg)
  • Low risk: network-instructions (CLAUDE.md:40)
  • Low risk: network-instructions (pyproject.toml:98)
  • Low risk: scripts-present (scripts/install_hooks.sh)

Attribution and licence

Created by
Sovantica
Declared authors
  • Sovantica (declared in pyproject.toml)
Publisher
Sovantica (Official Sovantica project)
Source
sovantica/engrava · commit f6a8b73
Licence
MIT License (files served here)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Sovantica.

Install from source

357 of its files are not served here, so there is no ZIP. sovantica/engrava at f6a8b73