Generated banner for Agent Development
Generated logo for Agent Development

Agent Development

AnthropicOfficialPublished by Anthropic

  • Skill
  • Guidelines
  • Agent tooling
  • Apache-2.0
  • Low risk
  • Has scripts

From the author

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.
— the description by Anthropic

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides the framework and best practices for developing autonomous agents within Claude Code. It covers the complete agent lifecycle, including file structure, YAML frontmatter configuration, system prompt design, and testing procedures. It emphasizes creating agents that are modular, well-defined, and capable of handling multi-step tasks independently through clear triggering conditions and robust behavioral instructions.

What it does

  • Defines the required markdown and YAML frontmatter structure for agent files.
  • Provides patterns for writing effective system prompts in the second person.
  • Outlines best practices for defining triggering conditions and scenarios.
  • Offers guidance on model selection, color-coding for UI, and tool access control.
  • Includes templates and prompts for AI-assisted agent generation.
  • Provides validation and testing workflows to ensure agent reliability.

When to use it

  • When you need to create a new autonomous agent for a Claude Code plugin.
  • When you are refining an existing agent's system prompt or triggering logic.
  • When you need to ensure your agent configuration follows established structural standards.
  • When you are troubleshooting why an agent is not triggering as expected.

Advantages

  • Standardizes agent development across different plugins.
  • Improves agent reliability through clear triggering scenarios.
  • Promotes the principle of least privilege via tool restriction.
  • Facilitates consistent behavior through structured system prompt templates.

Usage examples

“Create an agent configuration for a security-analyzer that checks code for vulnerabilities.”
The agent will generate a JSON object with a unique identifier, a description with prose triggers, and a system prompt structured with responsibilities, analysis processes, and quality standards.
“How should I structure the system prompt for a new documentation-writer agent?”
The agent will provide a template including core responsibilities, a generation process, quality standards, output format, and edge case handling.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/anthropics/agent-development/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip agent-development.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Anthropic

Agent Development for Claude Code Plugins

Overview

Agents are autonomous subprocesses that handle complex, multi-step tasks independently. Understanding agent structure, triggering conditions, and system prompt design enables creating powerful autonomous capabilities.

Key concepts:

  • Agents are FOR autonomous work, commands are FOR user-initiated actions

  • Markdown file format with YAML frontmatter

  • Triggering via description field with examples

  • System prompt defines agent behavior

  • Model and color customization

Agent File Structure

Complete Format
---
name: agent-identifier
description: Use this agent when [triggering conditions]. Typical triggers include [scenario 1 in prose], [scenario 2 in prose], and [scenario 3 in prose]. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.
model: inherit
color: blue
tools: ["Read", "Write", "Grep"]
---

You are [agent role description]...

## When to invoke

[Two to four representative scenarios written as prose, e.g.:]
- **[Scenario name].** [What the situation looks like and what the agent should do.]
- **[Scenario name].** [Same.]

**Your Core Responsibilities:**
1. [Responsibility 1]
2. [Responsibility 2]

**Analysis Process:**
[Step-by-step workflow]

**Output Format:**
[What to return]

Frontmatter Fields

name (required)

Agent identifier used for namespacing and invocation.

Format: lowercase, numbers, hyphens only Length: 3-50 characters Pattern: Must start and end with alphanumeric

Good examples:

  • code-reviewer

  • test-generator

  • api-docs-writer

  • security-analyzer

Bad examples:

  • helper (too generic)

  • -agent- (starts/ends with hyphen)

  • my_agent (underscores not allowed)

  • ag (too short, < 3 chars)

description (required)

Defines when Claude should trigger this agent. This is the most critical field — it is loaded into context whenever the agent is registered, so the harness can decide when to dispatch.

Must include:

  1. Triggering conditions ("Use this agent when...")

  2. A short prose summary of the typical trigger scenarios

  3. A pointer to a "When to invoke" section in the agent body for the detailed worked scenarios

Format:

Use this agent when [conditions]. Typical triggers include [scenario 1 in prose], [scenario 2 in prose], and [scenario 3 in prose]. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.

Best practices:

  • Name 2-4 trigger scenarios in the prose summary

  • Cover both proactive (assistant invokes itself) and reactive (user requests) triggering

  • Cover different phrasings of the same intent

  • Be specific about when NOT to use the agent

  • Put detailed scenarios in the body under "When to invoke" as a bullet list of prose descriptions

model (required)

Which model the agent should use.

Options:

  • inherit - Use same model as parent (recommended)

  • sonnet - Claude Sonnet (balanced)

  • opus - Claude Opus (most capable, expensive)

  • haiku - Claude Haiku (fast, cheap)

Recommendation: Use inherit unless agent needs specific model capabilities.

color (required)

Visual identifier for agent in UI.

Options: blue, cyan, green, yellow, magenta, red

Guidelines:

  • Choose distinct colors for different agents in same plugin

  • Use consistent colors for similar agent types

  • Blue/cyan: Analysis, review

  • Green: Success-oriented tasks

  • Yellow: Caution, validation

  • Red: Critical, security

  • Magenta: Creative, generation

tools (optional)

Restrict agent to specific tools.

Format: Array of tool names

tools: ["Read", "Write", "Grep", "Bash"]

Default: If omitted, agent has access to all tools

Best practice: Limit tools to minimum needed (principle of least privilege)

Common tool sets:

  • Read-only analysis: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob"]

  • Code generation: ["Read", "Write", "Grep"]

  • Testing: ["Read", "Bash", "Grep"]

  • Full access: Omit field or use ["*"]

System Prompt Design

The markdown body becomes the agent's system prompt. Write in second person, addressing the agent directly.

Structure

Standard template:

You are [role] specializing in [domain].

**Your Core Responsibilities:**
1. [Primary responsibility]
2. [Secondary responsibility]
3. [Additional responsibilities...]

**Analysis Process:**
1. [Step one]
2. [Step two]
3. [Step three]
[...]

**Quality Standards:**
- [Standard 1]
- [Standard 2]

**Output Format:**
Provide results in this format:
- [What to include]
- [How to structure]

**Edge Cases:**
Handle these situations:
- [Edge case 1]: [How to handle]
- [Edge case 2]: [How to handle]
Best Practices

✅ DO:

  • Write in second person ("You are...", "You will...")

  • Be specific about responsibilities

  • Provide step-by-step process

  • Define output format

  • Include quality standards

  • Address edge cases

  • Keep under 10,000 characters

❌ DON'T:

  • Write in first person ("I am...", "I will...")

  • Be vague or generic

  • Omit process steps

  • Leave output format undefined

  • Skip quality guidance

  • Ignore error cases

Creating Agents

Method 1: AI-Assisted Generation

Use this prompt pattern (extracted from Claude Code):

Create an agent configuration based on this request: "[YOUR DESCRIPTION]"

Requirements:
1. Extract core intent and responsibilities
2. Design expert persona for the domain
3. Create comprehensive system prompt with:
   - Clear behavioral boundaries
   - Specific methodologies
   - Edge case handling
   - Output format
   - A "When to invoke" section listing 2-4 trigger scenarios as prose bullets
4. Create identifier (lowercase, hyphens, 3-50 chars)
5. Write description with triggering conditions and a short prose summary of trigger scenarios

Return JSON with:
{
  "identifier": "agent-name",
  "whenToUse": "Use this agent when... Typical triggers include [...]. See \"When to invoke\" in the agent body.",
  "systemPrompt": "You are..."
}

Then convert to agent file format with frontmatter.

See examples/agent-creation-prompt.md for complete template.

Method 2: Manual Creation
  1. Choose agent identifier (3-50 chars, lowercase, hyphens)

  2. Write description with examples

  3. Select model (usually inherit)

  4. Choose color for visual identification

  5. Define tools (if restricting access)

  6. Write system prompt with structure above

  7. Save as agents/agent-name.md

Validation Rules

Identifier Validation
✅ Valid: code-reviewer, test-gen, api-analyzer-v2
❌ Invalid: ag (too short), -start (starts with hyphen), my_agent (underscore)

Rules:

  • 3-50 characters

  • Lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens only

  • Must start and end with alphanumeric

  • No underscores, spaces, or special characters

Description Validation

Length: 10-5,000 characters Must include: Triggering conditions and examples Best: 200-1,000 characters with 2-4 examples

System Prompt Validation

Length: 20-10,000 characters Best: 500-3,000 characters Structure: Clear responsibilities, process, output format

Agent Organization

Plugin Agents Directory
plugin-name/
└── agents/
    ├── analyzer.md
    ├── reviewer.md
    └── generator.md

All .md files in agents/ are auto-discovered.

Namespacing

Agents are namespaced automatically:

  • Single plugin: agent-name

  • With subdirectories: plugin:subdir:agent-name

Testing Agents

Test Triggering

Create test scenarios to verify agent triggers correctly:

  1. Write agent with specific triggering examples

  2. Use similar phrasing to examples in test

  3. Check Claude loads the agent

  4. Verify agent provides expected functionality

Test System Prompt

Ensure system prompt is complete:

  1. Give agent typical task

  2. Check it follows process steps

  3. Verify output format is correct

  4. Test edge cases mentioned in prompt

  5. Confirm quality standards are met

Quick Reference

Minimal Agent
---
name: simple-agent
description: Use this agent when [condition]. Typical triggers include [trigger 1] and [trigger 2]. See "When to invoke" in the agent body.
model: inherit
color: blue
---

You are an agent that [does X].

## When to invoke

- **[Scenario A].** [Description.]
- **[Scenario B].** [Description.]

Process:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]

Output: [What to provide]
Frontmatter Fields Summary
FieldRequiredFormatExample
nameYeslowercase-hyphenscode-reviewer
descriptionYesProse triggersUse when... Typical triggers include...
modelYesinherit/sonnet/opus/haikuinherit
colorYesColor nameblue
toolsNoArray of tool names["Read", "Grep"]
Best Practices

DO:

  • ✅ Name 2-4 trigger scenarios in the description (as prose)

  • ✅ Put detailed worked scenarios in a "When to invoke" body section, as prose bullets

  • ✅ Write specific triggering conditions

  • ✅ Use inherit for model unless specific need

  • ✅ Choose appropriate tools (least privilege)

  • ✅ Write clear, structured system prompts

  • ✅ Test agent triggering thoroughly

DON'T:

  • ❌ Use generic descriptions without trigger scenarios

  • ❌ Omit triggering conditions

  • ❌ Give all agents same color

  • ❌ Grant unnecessary tool access

  • ❌ Write vague system prompts

  • ❌ Skip testing

Additional Resources

Reference Files

For detailed guidance, consult:

  • references/system-prompt-design.md - Complete system prompt patterns

  • references/triggering-examples.md - Example formats and best practices

  • references/agent-creation-system-prompt.md - The exact prompt from Claude Code

Example Files

Working examples in examples/:

  • agent-creation-prompt.md - AI-assisted agent generation template

  • complete-agent-examples.md - Full agent examples for different use cases

Utility Scripts

Development tools in scripts/:

  • validate-agent.sh - Validate agent file structure

  • test-agent-trigger.sh - Test if agent triggers correctly

Implementation Workflow

To create an agent for a plugin:

  1. Define agent purpose and triggering conditions

  2. Choose creation method (AI-assisted or manual)

  3. Create agents/agent-name.md file

  4. Write frontmatter with all required fields

  5. Write system prompt following best practices

  6. Name 2-4 trigger scenarios in description (prose) and detail them in a "When to invoke" body section

  7. Validate with scripts/validate-agent.sh

  8. Test triggering with real scenarios

  9. Document agent in plugin README

Focus on clear triggering conditions and comprehensive system prompts for autonomous operation.

Files

references/triggering-examples.md

Agent Triggering: Best Practices

Complete guide to writing trigger descriptions that cause an agent to be dispatched reliably.

Where trigger descriptions live

An agent file has two places that talk about triggering:

  1. description: field in YAML frontmatter. Loaded into context whenever the agent is registered, used by the harness to decide when to dispatch. Keep it flat prose.

  2. A "When to invoke" section in the agent body. Loaded only when the agent is actually invoked. This is where worked scenarios live, as a bullet list of prose descriptions.

Format

description: field
description: Use this agent when [conditions]. Typical triggers include [scenario 1 phrased as a prose noun phrase], [scenario 2], and [scenario 3]. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.

Rules:

  • Single line of flat prose within the YAML scalar.

  • Name 2-4 trigger scenarios as noun phrases.

  • End with the pointer to the body's "When to invoke" section.

"When to invoke" body section
## When to invoke

[Two to four representative scenarios as prose bullets. Each describes the situation
in third person and what the agent should do.]

- **[Short scenario name].** [What the situation looks like — what just happened or what
  the user is asking for — and what the agent should do in response.]
- **[Short scenario name].** [Same.]

Anatomy of a good scenario

Scenario name (the bold lead)

Purpose: A short noun phrase identifying the situation type.

Good names:

  • User-requested review after a feature lands.

  • Proactive review of newly-written code.

  • Pre-PR sanity check.

  • PR updated with new logic.

Bad names:

  • Normal usage. (not specific)

  • User needs help. (vague)

Scenario body (after the lead)

Purpose: Describe what happens and what the agent should do — in prose, third person, no quoted utterances.

Good:

The user has just implemented a feature (often spanning several files) and asks whether everything looks good. Run a review of the recent diff and report findings.

Bad (transcript shape — do not use):

user: "Can you check if everything looks good?"
assistant: "I'll use the reviewer agent..."

The bad version mixes a turn-marker shape into the agent file. Keep scenarios as situation descriptions in prose.

Trigger types to cover

Aim for 2-4 scenarios that span these axes:

Explicit request

The user directly asks for what the agent does.

  • User-requested security check. The user explicitly asks for a security review of recent code.

Proactive triggering

The assistant invokes the agent without an explicit ask, after relevant work.

  • Proactive review after writing database code. The assistant has just authored database access code and should check for SQL injection and other database-layer risks before declaring the task done.

Implicit request

The user implies need without naming the agent.

  • Code-clarity complaint. The user describes existing code as confusing or hard to follow. Treat as a request to refactor for readability.

Tool-usage pattern

The agent should follow a particular tool-use pattern.

  • Post-test-edit verification. The assistant has just made multiple edits to test files. Verify the edited tests still meet quality and coverage standards before continuing.

Phrasing variation

If the same intent is commonly phrased multiple ways, mention that in prose:

Pre-PR sanity check. The user signals (in any phrasing — "ready to open a PR", "I think we're done here", "let's ship this") that they're about to open a pull request.

Don't write three near-duplicate scenarios that differ only in the literal phrase — collapse them into one prose scenario that names the variation.

How many scenarios?

  • Minimum: 2. Usually one explicit + one proactive.

  • Recommended: 3-4. Explicit, proactive, and one implicit or edge case.

  • Maximum: 5. More than that bloats the body without adding routing signal.

Worked example

Prose triggers in description:
description: Use this agent when you need to review code. Typical triggers include user-requested review after a feature lands, proactive review of freshly-written code, and a pre-PR sanity check. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.
Scenarios as situation descriptions in the body
## When to invoke

- **User-requested review.** The user asks for a review of recent changes (any phrasing). Run a review of the unstaged diff.
Trigger condition only — output format goes elsewhere
- **Review.** The user asks for a review. Run the review and report findings as specified in the Output Format section.

Template library

Code review agent
description: Use this agent when you need to review code for adherence to project guidelines and best practices. Typical triggers include the user asking for a review of a feature they just implemented, proactive review of newly-written code before declaring a task done, and a pre-PR sanity check. See "When to invoke" in the agent body.
## When to invoke

- **User-requested review after a feature lands.** The user has implemented a feature and asks whether the result looks good. Review the recent diff and report findings.
- **Proactive review of newly-written code.** The assistant has just authored new code in response to a user request. Run a self-review before declaring the task done.
- **Pre-PR sanity check.** The user signals readiness to open a pull request. Review the full diff first.
Test generation agent
description: Use this agent when you need to generate tests for code that lacks them. Typical triggers include the user explicitly asking for tests for a function or module, and the assistant proactively generating tests after writing new code that has no test coverage. See "When to invoke" in the agent body.
## When to invoke

- **Explicit test request.** The user asks for tests covering a specific function, module, or feature. Generate a comprehensive test suite.
- **Proactive coverage after new code.** The assistant has just written new code with no accompanying tests. Generate tests before declaring the task done.
Documentation agent
description: Use this agent when you need to write or improve documentation for code, especially APIs. Typical triggers include the user asking for docs on a specific function or endpoint, and proactive documentation generation after the assistant adds new API surface. See "When to invoke" in the agent body.
## When to invoke

- **Explicit doc request.** The user asks for documentation for a specific surface (function, endpoint, module).
- **Proactive docs for new API surface.** The assistant has just added new API endpoints or public functions without docstrings.
Validation agent
description: Use this agent when you need to validate code before commit or merge. Typical triggers include the user signaling readiness to commit, and an explicit validation request. See "When to invoke" in the agent body.
## When to invoke

- **Pre-commit validation.** The user signals readiness to commit. Run validation first and surface any issues.
- **Explicit validation request.** The user asks for the code to be validated.

Debugging triggering issues

Agent not triggering

Check:

  1. The description: prose names the right trigger scenarios.

  2. The scenarios in the body cover the actual phrasings the user uses.

  3. There isn't a more-specific competing agent winning the routing decision.

Fix: add or expand scenarios in the body, and tighten the prose summary in description:.

Agent triggers too often

Check:

  1. The trigger scenarios are too generic or overlap with other agents.

  2. The description: doesn't say when NOT to use the agent.

Fix: narrow the scenarios; add a "Do not invoke when..." line to description: if needed.

Agent triggers in the wrong scenarios

Check:

  1. Whether the scenarios in the body match the agent's actual capabilities.

Fix: rewrite scenarios to match what the agent actually does.

Best practices summary

  • Keep description: as flat prose with a short summary of trigger scenarios

  • Put detailed scenarios in a "When to invoke" body section, as prose bullets

  • Cover both explicit and proactive triggering

  • Describe situations the agent should respond to

  • Mention phrasing variation in prose ("any phrasing — 'ready to ship', 'looks done'") rather than via multiple near-duplicate scenarios

  • Keep trigger scenarios separate from output format

Conclusion

Reliable triggering comes from prose descriptions of the situations an agent should respond to.

Requirements and compatibility

Written for: Claude Code, Claude apps

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Security

What our scanner noticed· Low risk

  • Scripts that your agent may run

This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
Anthropic
Publisher
Anthropic (Official)
Source
anthropics/claude-plugins-official · plugins/plugin-dev/skills/agent-development · commit 0412be7
Licence
Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from plugins/plugin-dev/LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download agent-development.zip