Growth Pulse
AnthropicOfficialPublished by Anthropic
- Skill
- Content generator
- Business and productivity
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
Growth Pulse acts as a strategic diagnostic engine for small and medium-sized business owners. Instead of forcing owners to manually aggregate data from disparate dashboards, this skill pulls information from connected CRM, e-commerce, payment, and marketing platforms to identify the 'story' behind the numbers. It evaluates performance across five key dimensions—channel trends, funnel conversion, campaign returns, product performance, and customer sentiment—to provide a clear, evidence-based assessment of whether the business's growth engine is functioning effectively. The output concludes with three prioritized, high-impact actions for the week, ensuring the owner focuses on what truly moves the needle.
What it does
- Aggregates data from CRM, payment processors, e-commerce platforms, and marketing tools.
- Computes five core growth views: channel trends, funnel health, campaign ROI, product performance, and customer sentiment.
- Synthesizes raw data into a cohesive narrative to explain current business performance.
- Generates exactly three prioritized, data-backed growth actions for the upcoming week.
- Delivers insights via a structured visual artifact, document, or integrated platform page.
- Offers optional follow-up actions like content strategy or pipeline expansion based on findings.
When to use it
- When an owner asks for a general 'growth check' or wants to know if their marketing is working.
- When investigating why a sales pipeline is stalling or why a specific campaign is underperforming.
- When deciding where to allocate marketing or sales budget for the upcoming month.
- When evaluating which products are driving revenue versus those that are stagnating.
- When needing to understand the relationship between customer sentiment and revenue trends.
Advantages
- Eliminates the need for manual data aggregation across multiple business tools.
- Provides a unified, objective view of growth rather than fragmented dashboard metrics.
- Forces prioritization by limiting output to only three high-impact actions.
- Ensures insights are always contextualized with comparisons to previous periods.
- Supports flexible scoping, allowing owners to query specific areas like pipeline or product performance.
Usage examples
- “Is my marketing working?”
- The agent pulls data from connected ad platforms and CRM, analyzes campaign ROI and lead quality, and provides a summary of whether current spend is driving profitable growth.
- “Where should I put my money next month?”
- The agent evaluates channel trends and campaign returns to identify the most effective acquisition sources and recommends three specific budget allocation actions.
- “How is the funnel looking?”
- The agent analyzes lead-to-win conversion rates and identifies specific stages where drop-offs are occurring, providing actionable steps to improve conversion.
- “What's selling?”
- The agent isolates product performance data to report on top and bottom performers by revenue and growth rate, offering insights into inventory or promotion strategy.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/anthropics/growth-pulse/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip growth-pulse.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Anthropic
Growth Pulse
One page that answers whether the growth engine is working, and what to do about it this week.
Owners describe pulling numbers from three dashboards and trying to find the story themselves. The story is the deliverable here — not the dashboards.
Step 1 — Pull everything in parallel
Dispatch all connector calls in a single batch. See reference/data_sources.md for the metric-to-tool mapping. Serial pulls turn this into a wait nobody sits through twice.
HubSpot — deals by stage, new contacts, lead source, win rate, cycle time, stalled deals
PayPal, Stripe, Square — revenue trend, transaction counts, refunds
Shopify — orders, SKU-level revenue, repeat purchase rate
QuickBooks — realized revenue, the number the books agree with
TikTok Ads — last week's spend, impressions, clicks, results, and cost per result per campaign, from the native connector (
report_integrated_get, last 7 days against the prior 7), so paid spend sits beside the sales it claims to driveMailchimp — campaign, e-commerce, and audience-growth analytics, with revenue attribution on campaigns
Gmail or Microsoft 365 — inbound inquiry volume and response times
Public reviews — recent ratings and review text, via web research
If a source errors or is missing, record it and move on. This skill is designed to say something useful on one connector and something excellent on six.
Zero connectors is a supported path. Ask for exports — a CRM deal export, a sales report, an ads performance CSV — and build the same pulse from files. Say it plainly rather than stalling.
Step 2 — Compute the five views
Read reference/thresholds.md for the cutoffs. Compute each view and assign it a status.
Channel trend — revenue by channel this period versus last, and versus the same period last year where available
Funnel conversion — leads in, qualified, opportunities, won; the conversion rate between each step and where the biggest drop-off sits
Campaign return — spend versus attributed revenue per campaign, and cost per lead
Product performance — top three and bottom three by revenue and by growth rate
Customer sentiment — recent review scores, review themes, disputes, churn signals
A view with no data gets marked "n/a" and named in the appendix. It does not silently vanish.
Step 3 — Find the actual story
This is where the skill earns its keep. Five views on their own are still a dashboard. The job is to connect them.
The connections that matter most:
Spend rising while cost per lead rises means the channel is saturating, not scaling
Strong lead volume with falling win rate points at lead quality or response speed, not at marketing
One product carrying the whole trend means the growth is more fragile than the total suggests
Sentiment dropping while revenue holds is the early warning that shows up in revenue two months later
A stage where the funnel drops off sharply is usually worth more than any new campaign
Look for the single sentence that explains the period. Lead with it.
Step 4 — Write the three actions
Every pulse ends with exactly three actions. Not five, not a list of everything noticed.
Each action needs three things or it isn't an action:
What to do — specific enough to start today
Why — the number from this pulse that justifies it
What it's worth — the rough size of the opportunity or the risk
Rank them by size of impact, not by ease. Owners can decide what's easy; only this pulse can tell them what's big.
If the honest answer is that nothing needs to change, say that. A pulse that manufactures three actions every week trains the owner to ignore them.
Step 5 — Compose
Use the exact structure in reference/output_template.md. Include only sections with real data.
Writing rules:
Numbers lead, words follow. Not "paid social performed well" — "paid social drove 41 leads at USD 18 each, down from USD 31 last month."
Every number carries its comparison. A figure with no baseline is a missed insight.
Name the specific campaign, product, channel, or customer. "Some campaigns underperformed" is unusable.
No marketing vocabulary the owner doesn't use. Not "top of funnel velocity" — "how many new leads came in and how fast."
If a section has nothing worth saying, write "No material change" and move on.
Step 6 — Deliver the pulse page
Alongside the chat pulse — additive, never a replacement — deliver the full pulse per the owner's stored output preference — never default to a markdown file. Check the ## Business context block's Output preference (shared style guide rule, ../../shared/artifact-style.md):
Visual artifact (the default): render the pulse as an HTML page in the house style. Each of the five views gets a panel; revenue trend, cost per lead, and win rate are stat tiles with their comparison as the context line; campaign return and product performance are tables with tabular-nums spend and revenue columns; each view's status becomes a status pill (good, warn, critical, or n/a in plain text); the three actions close the page in their own panel, ranked.
docx / md / notion / canva preference: deliver the same content in that form — a DOCX or markdown file, a Notion page created via the connector (named destination, never overwriting), or a Canva Doc created via the Canva connector (a new design each run, named with the date; tables become lists); fall back to the visual artifact if Notion or Canva is not connected — and say that is why.
Best for skill: use the visual artifact — five views compare best side by side on one screen.
Step 7 — Offer to save, once
After presenting, offer once to save the pulse as a file or post it to Slack. Posting to Slack is an outward write, so it only happens on that explicit yes — the offer is the approval gate. If yes, do it. If no or no response, move on. Do not ask twice.
Then close with what the pulse found in one line, plus the single most relevant next step and at most two others nearby:
If the actions point at content or promotion: "what should I promote" runs
content-strategy.If the funnel is the problem: "fill my funnel" runs
/grow-pipeline.For the finance-side twin: "how's the business doing" runs
business-pulse.
Max three offers. Never repeat an offer the owner declined this session.
Scope variants
Owners often want a slice rather than the whole pulse:
"How did the campaign do" — campaign return only, plus the sentiment check
"How's the pipeline" — funnel conversion and stalled deals only
"What's selling" — product performance only
"Are we getting reviews" — sentiment only
"Where should I spend next month" — channel trend and campaign return, with the three actions weighted toward budget
Give them the slice they asked for. Don't force the full pulse on a narrow question.
What not to do
Do not ask permission before pulling data. The skill was invoked. Run it.
Do not invent attribution. If a campaign's revenue can't be traced, say the attribution is unavailable rather than assigning revenue on a guess. Fake attribution has moved real budgets.
Do not report CRM forecast value as revenue. Deal values are hopes; invoices are facts. Label which is which.
Do not double-count across sources. A Shopify order settled in Stripe is one sale. Pick one revenue source and name it.
Do not double-count inside one source. The sales-by-customer summary returns both a parent summary row and a separate total row for the same customer. Filter rows marked as totals before you rank customers or compute concentration, or the same customer lands in the list twice and the concentration figure comes out too high.
Do not manufacture urgency. If growth is steady, the pulse should read as steady.
Do not read expenses or margin from the QuickBooks P&L summary. Total the rows (
../../shared/quickbooks-report-traps.md, Trap 2).
Reference files
reference/data_sources.md— connector to metric mapping, with fallbacksreference/thresholds.md— status cutoffs for each of the five viewsreference/output_template.md— exact output structurereference/gotchas.md— the failure modes that produce confidently wrong growth advice
Using a tool that isn't listed
The connectors named in this skill are the tested paths, not a wall. If the owner wants this flow to use a tool that isn't connected or listed, offer build-connector — it checks the connector directory first and connects through Zapier otherwise, never hand-building against a raw API. Once the connection exists, the tool joins this skill like any other optional connector, under the same approval gates.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer905 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.3 KiB
- SKILL.md9.6 KiB
- reference/data_sources.md5.6 KiB
- reference/gotchas.md4.9 KiB
- reference/output_template.md3.7 KiB
- reference/thresholds.md2.9 KiB
reference/gotchas.md
Gotchas
Failure modes that produce confidently wrong growth advice. Owners move real budget off this pulse, so a plausible-sounding mistake here costs money.
Gotcha: recommending more spend on a saturating channel
Why it matters: Rising spend with rising cost per lead means the channel is running out of audience, not scaling. "It's working, spend more" is the single most expensive wrong call this skill can make.
Bad
Paid social drove 47 leads, up from 29. Recommend increasing budget 50%.Spend went from USD 900 to USD 3,200 and cost per lead went from USD 31 to USD 68. Volume rose because spend rose. Efficiency collapsed.
Good
Paid-social volume is up but cost per lead rose from USD 31 to USD 68 as spend tripled.
That's saturation, not scale. Hold budget flat and fix creative before adding
more — another 50% of budget likely buys leads at USD 90.Always check cost per lead against spend before recommending budget in either direction.
Gotcha: reporting CRM deal value as revenue
Why it matters: Weighted pipeline is a forecast. Presenting it next to real revenue, in the same format, makes it read as money in the bank.
Bad
Revenue — USD 214,000Where USD 86,000 is invoices and USD 128,000 is open pipeline.
Good
Revenue — USD 86,400 (invoiced)
Pipeline — USD 128,000 open, weighted USD 41,000 (forecast, not booked)Label the forecast every time. Owners plan hiring off these numbers.
Gotcha: inventing attribution
Why it matters: When a campaign's revenue can't be traced, assigning it on a guess produces a return figure that looks authoritative and is fiction. Budgets move on these numbers.
Bad
Paid social return: 3.4xDerived by assuming every new customer that month came from paid social.
Good
Paid social: USD 3,200 spend, 47 leads at USD 18 each. Revenue attribution unavailable —
the CRM isn't capturing source on closed deals. Cost per lead is solid; whether
those leads convert is the open question. Turning on source tracking would
answer it next month.An honest gap with a fix is more useful than a confident fake number.
Gotcha: the platform's numbers and the CRM's numbers disagree
Why it matters: The ad platform will claim 60 conversions while the CRM shows 41 leads. This is normal — different attribution windows, different definitions. Picking whichever is flattering misleads.
Bad
Report 60, because it's the bigger number and it came from the ad platform.
Good
The ad platform reports 60 conversions; the CRM received 41 leads with it as the source.
The 19-lead gap is normal attribution difference. Using the CRM number, since
that's what your team actually worked.Report both, name the gap, and say which you used and why.
Gotcha: one product carrying the entire trend
Why it matters: "Revenue up 12%" reads as broad health. If one SKU accounts for all of it and the other nine are flat or down, the business is more fragile than the headline suggests.
Bad
Revenue up 12%. Growth engine is healthy.Good
Revenue up 12%, but entirely from one product — the summer bundle, up USD 9,800.
Every other product is flat or down. The headline is real; the breadth isn't.Always check whether the trend survives removing the top mover.
Gotcha: burying the funnel drop-off
Why it matters: The stage where the funnel loses the most is usually the highest-value finding available, and it is almost always cheaper to fix than any new campaign. It gets buried because it isn't a headline number.
Bad
Lead with revenue and channel mix. Mention stage conversion in a bullet halfway down.
Good
If one stage is losing more than 70% of what enters it, that is the headline sentence of the whole pulse, regardless of what revenue did.
Gotcha: manufacturing three actions on a quiet month
Why it matters: If every pulse produces three urgent actions, the owner learns the actions are filler and stops reading them. The credibility of the recommendation is the asset.
Bad
1. Consider testing a new ad channel.
2. Review your pricing.
3. Think about a referral program.Generic, unprompted by any number in the pulse.
Good
1. Nothing urgent this week. The engine is steady.
The one thing worth watching: referral share has grown three months running
with no effort behind it. Worth a deliberate test next month.Gotcha: marketing vocabulary the owner doesn't use
Why it matters: This audience is owner-operators, often the entire marketing department. Funnel-speak makes the pulse feel like it was written for someone else.
Bad
Top-of-funnel velocity improved while MQL-to-SQL conversion degraded.Good
More new leads came in than last month, but fewer of them turned into real
opportunities.Same finding. One of them gets acted on.
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: Claude Code, Claude apps
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Declares allowed tools
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Anthropic
- Publisher
- Anthropic (Official)
- Source
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · small-business/skills/growth-pulse · commit e050c2e
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download growth-pulse.zip