Metrics Review
AnthropicOfficialPublished by Anthropic
- Skill
- Research and analysis
- Business and productivity
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The Metrics Review skill provides a systematic approach to evaluating product performance. It guides users through gathering data, organizing metrics into a hierarchy, analyzing trends, and producing a comprehensive scorecard. The skill emphasizes moving beyond raw numbers to identify actionable insights, helping teams understand product health, investigate anomalies, and make data-driven decisions during recurring review cadences.
What it does
- Structures product metrics into a hierarchy of North Star, L1 health, and L2 diagnostic indicators.
- Analyzes trends, rate of change, and anomalies to explain metric movements.
- Generates a standardized scorecard with status indicators for quick scanning.
- Provides a framework for identifying bright spots and areas of concern.
- Suggests actionable next steps like investigations, experiments, or investments.
- Offers guidance on setting up effective dashboards and alert systems.
When to use it
- During weekly, monthly, or quarterly product performance reviews.
- When investigating sudden spikes or drops in key product metrics.
- When comparing current performance against established targets or OKRs.
- When you need to transform raw data into a clear, actionable report for stakeholders.
Advantages
- Ensures consistency in how product health is measured and reported.
- Helps distinguish between meaningful trends and noise.
- Promotes a focus on actionable outcomes rather than just tracking vanity metrics.
- Facilitates better decision-making by linking data to specific product actions.
- Provides clear templates for different review cadences.
Usage examples
- “Run a monthly metrics review for our SaaS platform.”
- The agent will guide you through gathering the latest monthly data, compare it against targets, analyze key L1 metrics like retention and activation, and generate a scorecard with recommended actions.
- “Why did our signup conversion drop last week?”
- The agent will help you investigate the drop by looking at segment breakdowns, correlating the change with recent events, and identifying if it is a sustained trend or a one-time anomaly.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/anthropics/metrics-review/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip metrics-review.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Anthropic
Metrics Review
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.
Usage
/metrics-review $ARGUMENTSWorkflow
1. Gather Metrics Data
If ~~product analytics is connected:
Pull key product metrics for the relevant time period
Get comparison data (previous period, same period last year, targets)
Pull segment breakdowns if available
If no analytics tool is connected, ask the user to provide:
The metrics and their values (paste a table, screenshot, or describe)
Comparison data (previous period, targets)
Any context on recent changes (launches, incidents, seasonality)
Ask the user:
What time period to review? (last week, last month, last quarter)
What metrics to focus on? Or should we review the full product metrics suite?
Are there specific targets or goals to compare against?
Any known events that might explain changes (launches, outages, marketing campaigns, seasonality)?
2. Organize the Metrics
Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See Product Metrics Hierarchy below for full definitions.
If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.
3. Analyze Trends
For each key metric:
Current value: What is the metric today?
Trend: Up, down, or flat compared to previous period? Over what timeframe?
vs Target: How does it compare to the goal or target?
Rate of change: Is the trend accelerating or decelerating?
Anomalies: Any sudden changes, spikes, or drops?
Identify correlations:
Do changes in one metric correlate with changes in another?
Are there leading indicators that predict lagging metric changes?
Do segment breakdowns reveal that an aggregate trend is driven by a specific cohort?
4. Generate the Review
Summary
2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
Metric Scorecard
Table format for quick scanning:
| Metric | Current | Previous | Change | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | [Target] | [On track / At risk / Miss] |
Trend Analysis
For each metric worth discussing:
What happened and how significant is the change
Why it likely happened (attribution based on known events, correlated metrics, segment analysis)
Whether this is a one-time event or a sustained trend
Bright Spots
What is going well:
Metrics beating targets
Positive trends to sustain
Segments or features showing strong performance
Areas of Concern
What needs attention:
Metrics missing targets or trending negatively
Early warning signals before they become problems
Metrics where we lack visibility or understanding
Recommended Actions
Specific next steps based on the analysis:
Investigations to run (dig deeper into a concerning trend)
Experiments to launch (test hypotheses about what could improve a metric)
Investments to make (double down on what is working)
Alerts to set (monitor a metric more closely)
Context and Caveats
Known data quality issues
Events that affect comparability (outages, holidays, launches)
Metrics we should be tracking but are not yet
5. Follow Up
After generating the review:
Ask if any metric needs deeper investigation
Offer to create a dashboard spec for ongoing monitoring
Offer to draft experiment proposals for areas of concern
Offer to set up a metrics review template for recurring use
Product Metrics Hierarchy
North Star Metric
The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:
Value-aligned: Moves when users get more value from the product
Leading: Predicts long-term business success (revenue, retention)
Actionable: The product team can influence it through their work
Understandable: Everyone in the company can understand what it means and why it matters
Examples by product type:
Collaboration tool: Weekly active teams with 3+ members contributing
Marketplace: Weekly transactions completed
SaaS platform: Weekly active users completing core workflow
Content platform: Weekly engaged reading/viewing time
Developer tool: Weekly deployments using the tool
L1 Metrics (Health Indicators)
The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:
Acquisition: Are new users finding the product?
New signups or trial starts (volume and trend)
Signup conversion rate (visitors to signups)
Channel mix (where are new users coming from)
Cost per acquisition (for paid channels)
Activation: Are new users reaching the value moment?
Activation rate: % of new users who complete the key action that predicts retention
Time to activate: how long from signup to activation
Setup completion rate: % who complete onboarding steps
First value moment: when users first experience the core product value
Engagement: Are active users getting value?
DAU / WAU / MAU: active users at different timeframes
DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): what fraction of monthly users come back daily
Core action frequency: how often users do the thing that matters most
Session depth: how much users do per session
Feature adoption: % of users using key features
Retention: Are users coming back?
D1, D7, D30 retention: % of users who return after 1 day, 7 days, 30 days
Cohort retention curves: how retention evolves for each signup cohort
Churn rate: % of users or revenue lost per period
Resurrection rate: % of churned users who come back
Monetization: Is value translating to revenue?
Conversion rate: free to paid (for freemium)
MRR / ARR: monthly or annual recurring revenue
ARPU / ARPA: average revenue per user or account
Expansion revenue: revenue growth from existing customers
Net revenue retention: revenue retention including expansion and contraction
Satisfaction: How do users feel about the product?
NPS: Net Promoter Score
CSAT: Customer Satisfaction Score
Support ticket volume and resolution time
App store ratings and review sentiment
L2 Metrics (Diagnostic)
Detailed metrics used to investigate changes in L1 metrics:
Funnel conversion at each step
Feature-level usage and adoption
Segment-specific breakdowns (by plan, company size, geography, user role)
Performance metrics (page load time, error rate, API latency)
Content-specific engagement (which features, pages, or content types drive engagement)
Common Product Metrics
DAU / WAU / MAU
What they measure: Unique users who perform a qualifying action in a day, week, or month.
Key decisions:
What counts as "active"? A login? A page view? A core action? Define this carefully — different definitions tell different stories.
Which timeframe matters most? DAU for daily-use products (messaging, email). WAU for weekly-use products (project management). MAU for less frequent products (tax software, travel booking).
How to use them:
DAU/MAU ratio (stickiness): values above 0.5 indicate a daily habit. Below 0.2 suggests infrequent usage.
Trend matters more than absolute number. Is active usage growing, flat, or declining?
Segment by user type. Power users and casual users behave very differently.
Retention
What it measures: Of users who started in period X, what % are still active in period Y?
Common retention timeframes:
D1 (next day): Was the first experience good enough to come back?
D7 (one week): Did the user establish a habit?
D30 (one month): Is the user retained long-term?
D90 (three months): Is this a durable user?
How to use retention:
Plot retention curves by cohort. Look for: initial drop-off (activation problem), steady decline (engagement problem), or flattening (good — you have a stable retained base).
Compare cohorts over time. Are newer cohorts retaining better than older ones? That means product improvements are working.
Segment retention by activation behavior. Users who completed onboarding vs those who did not. Users who used feature X vs those who did not.
Conversion
What it measures: % of users who move from one stage to the next.
Common conversion funnels:
Visitor to signup
Signup to activation (key value moment)
Free to paid (trial conversion)
Trial to paid subscription
Monthly to annual plan
How to use conversion:
Map the full funnel and measure conversion at each step
Identify the biggest drop-off points — these are your highest-leverage improvement opportunities
Segment conversion by source, plan, user type. Different segments convert very differently.
Track conversion over time. Is it improving as you iterate on the experience?
Activation
What it measures: % of new users who reach the moment where they first experience the product's core value.
Defining activation:
Look at retained users vs churned users. What actions did retained users take that churned users did not?
The activation event should be strongly predictive of long-term retention
It should be achievable within the first session or first few days
Examples: created first project, invited a teammate, completed first workflow, connected an integration
How to use activation:
Track activation rate for every signup cohort
Measure time to activate — faster is almost always better
Build onboarding flows that guide users to the activation moment
A/B test activation flows and measure impact on retention, not just activation rate
Goal Setting Frameworks
OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)
Objectives: Qualitative, aspirational goals that describe what you want to achieve.
Inspiring and memorable
Time-bound (quarterly or annually)
Directional, not metric-specific
Key Results: Quantitative measures that tell you if you achieved the objective.
Specific and measurable
Time-bound with a clear target
Outcome-based, not output-based
2-4 Key Results per Objective
Example:
Objective: Make our product indispensable for daily workflows
Key Results:
- Increase DAU/MAU ratio from 0.35 to 0.50
- Increase D30 retention for new users from 40% to 55%
- 3 core workflows with >80% task completion rateOKR Best Practices
Set OKRs that are ambitious but achievable. 70% completion is the target for stretch OKRs.
Key Results should measure outcomes (user behavior, business results), not outputs (features shipped, tasks completed).
Do not have too many OKRs. 2-3 objectives with 2-4 KRs each is plenty.
OKRs should be uncomfortable. If you are confident you will hit all of them, they are not ambitious enough.
Review OKRs at mid-period. Adjust effort allocation if some KRs are clearly off track.
Grade OKRs honestly at end of period. 0.0-0.3 = missed, 0.4-0.6 = progress, 0.7-1.0 = achieved.
Setting Metric Targets
Baseline: What is the current value? You need a reliable baseline before setting a target.
Benchmark: What do comparable products achieve? Industry benchmarks provide context.
Trajectory: What is the current trend? If the metric is already improving at 5% per month, a 6% target is not ambitious.
Effort: How much investment are you putting behind this? Bigger bets warrant more ambitious targets.
Confidence: How confident are you in hitting the target? Set a "commit" (high confidence) and a "stretch" (ambitious).
Metric Review Cadences
Weekly Metrics Check
Purpose: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health. Duration: 15-30 minutes. Attendees: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.
What to review:
North Star metric: current value, week-over-week change
Key L1 metrics: any notable movements
Active experiments: results and statistical significance
Anomalies: any unexpected spikes or drops
Alerts: anything that triggered a monitoring alert
Action: If something looks off, investigate. Otherwise, note it and move on.
Monthly Metrics Review
Purpose: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications. Duration: 30-60 minutes. Attendees: Product team, key stakeholders.
What to review:
Full L1 metric scorecard with month-over-month trends
Progress against quarterly OKR targets
Cohort analysis: are newer cohorts performing better?
Feature adoption: how are recent launches performing?
Segment analysis: any divergence between user segments?
Action: Identify 1-3 areas to investigate or invest in. Update priorities if metrics reveal new information.
Quarterly Business Review
Purpose: Strategic assessment of product performance, goal-setting for next quarter. Duration: 60-90 minutes. Attendees: Product, engineering, design, leadership.
What to review:
OKR scoring for the quarter
Trend analysis for all L1 metrics over the quarter
Year-over-year comparisons
Competitive context: market changes and competitor movements
What worked and what did not
Action: Set OKRs for next quarter. Adjust product strategy based on what the data shows.
Dashboard Design Principles
Effective Product Dashboards
A good dashboard answers the question "How is the product doing?" at a glance.
Principles:
Start with the question, not the data. What decisions does this dashboard support? Design backwards from the decision.
Hierarchy of information. The most important metric should be the most visually prominent. North Star at the top, L1 metrics next, L2 metrics available on drill-down.
Context over numbers. A number without context is meaningless. Always show: current value, comparison (previous period, target, benchmark), trend direction.
Fewer metrics, more insight. A dashboard with 50 metrics helps no one. Focus on 5-10 that matter. Put everything else in a detailed report.
Consistent time periods. Use the same time period for all metrics on a dashboard. Mixing daily and monthly metrics creates confusion.
Visual status indicators. Use color to indicate health at a glance:
Green: on track or improving
Yellow: needs attention or flat
Red: off track or declining
Actionability. Every metric on the dashboard should be something the team can influence. If you cannot act on it, it does not belong on the product dashboard.
Dashboard Layout
Top row: North Star metric with trend line and target.
Second row: L1 metrics scorecard — current value, change, target, status for each key metric.
Third row: Key funnels or conversion metrics — visual funnel showing drop-off at each stage.
Fourth row: Recent experiments and launches — active A/B tests, recent feature launches with early metrics.
Bottom / drill-down: L2 metrics, segment breakdowns, and detailed time series for investigation.
Dashboard Anti-Patterns
Vanity metrics: Metrics that always go up but do not indicate health (total signups ever, total page views)
Too many metrics: Dashboards that require scrolling to see. If it does not fit on one screen, cut metrics.
No comparison: Raw numbers without context (current value with no previous period or target)
Stale dashboards: Metrics that have not been updated or reviewed in months
Output dashboards: Measuring team activity (tickets closed, PRs merged) instead of user and business outcomes
One dashboard for all audiences: Executives, PMs, and engineers need different views. One size does not fit all.
Alerting
Set alerts for metrics that require immediate attention:
Threshold alerts: Metric drops below or rises above a critical threshold (error rate > 1%, conversion < 5%)
Trend alerts: Metric shows sustained decline over multiple days/weeks
Anomaly alerts: Metric deviates significantly from expected range
Alert hygiene:
Every alert should be actionable. If you cannot do anything about it, do not alert on it.
Review and tune alerts regularly. Too many false positives and people ignore all alerts.
Define an owner for each alert. Who responds when it fires?
Set appropriate severity levels. Not everything is P0.
Output Format
Use tables for the scorecard. Use clear status indicators. Keep the summary tight — the reader should get the essential story in 30 seconds.
Tips
Start with the "so what" — what is the most important thing in this metrics review? Lead with that.
Absolute numbers without context are useless. Always show comparisons (vs previous period, vs target, vs benchmark).
Be careful about attribution. Correlation is not causation. If a metric moved, acknowledge uncertainty about why.
Segment analysis often reveals that an aggregate metric masks important differences. A flat overall number might hide one segment growing and another shrinking.
Not all metric movements matter. Small fluctuations are noise. Focus attention on meaningful changes.
If a metric is missing its target, do not just report the miss — recommend what to do about it.
Metrics reviews should drive decisions. If the review does not lead to at least one action, it was not useful.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer964 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md17.6 KiB
LICENSE
Apache License
Version 2.0, January 2004
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
1. Definitions.
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
exercising permissions granted by this License.
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
source, and configuration files.
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
and conversions to other media types.
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
as of the date such litigation is filed.
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
meet the following conditions:
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that You changed the files; and
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
the Derivative Works; and
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
as modifying the License.
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
the conditions stated in this License.
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
identification within third-party archives.
Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: Claude Code, Claude apps
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Claude Code frontmatter
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Anthropic
- Publisher
- Anthropic (Official)
- Source
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · product-management/skills/metrics-review · commit e050c2e
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from product-management/LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download metrics-review.zip