Terraform Skill
Anton BabenkoCommunityCreated by Anton Babenko
- Skill
- Tool integration
- Cloud and DevOps
- Apache-2.0
- Medium risk
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured workflow for managing Terraform and OpenTofu configurations. It emphasizes a diagnose-before-generate approach, requiring explicit context such as runtime versions, provider details, and environment criticality. It includes a response contract to ensure risk-aware planning, validation, and rollback procedures, while offering specific guidance on module hierarchy, state management, security, and testing strategies.
What it does
- Diagnoses infrastructure failure modes like identity churn, state corruption, and secret exposure.
- Enforces a response contract requiring version floors, risk assessment, and validation plans.
- Provides patterns for module development, directory layout, and naming conventions.
- Offers guidance on CI/CD pipeline stages, including plan artifact review and drift prevention.
- Facilitates safe state management, including backend selection and locking protocols.
- Supports semantic code navigation using terraform-ls or fallback search tools.
When to use it
- When writing or reviewing Terraform/OpenTofu modules and configurations.
- When debugging CI/CD pipeline failures or infrastructure drift.
- When planning complex refactors or state migrations.
- When configuring remote state backends or implementing security compliance checks.
Advantages
- Reduces risk of destructive changes through mandatory plan-destroy protocols.
- Improves code maintainability via standardized module and variable contracts.
- Ensures consistent security practices through integrated policy and secret handling.
- Provides clear version-aware guidance to prevent common configuration errors.
Usage examples
- “I am refactoring a module and worried about resource identity churn. How should I proceed?”
- The agent will guide you through using 'moved' blocks, comparing 'count' vs 'for_each' patterns, and validating the plan to ensure no unexpected resource destruction occurs.
- “How do I securely manage secrets in my Terraform configuration?”
- The agent will advise on using cloud-native secret managers, 'sensitive' variable flags, or 'write_only' arguments, and will check your implementation against security best practices.
- “Help me set up a CI/CD pipeline for my infrastructure.”
- The agent will provide a structured pipeline template including validation, testing, plan artifact generation, and environment-protected apply stages.
- “My state file is locked and I cannot run any operations. What should I do?”
- The agent will diagnose the state backend, verify locking mechanisms, and provide recovery steps based on your specific provider and backend configuration.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/antonbabenko/terraform-skill/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip terraform-skill.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Anton Babenko
Terraform Skill for Claude
Diagnose-first guidance for Terraform and OpenTofu. Core file is a workflow; depth lives in references loaded on demand.
Response Contract
Every Terraform/OpenTofu response must include:
Assumptions & version floor — runtime (
terraformortofu), exact version, providers, state backend, execution path (local/CI/Cloud/Atlantis), environment criticality. State assumptions explicitly if the user did not provide them.Risk category addressed — one or more of: identity churn, secret exposure, blast radius, CI drift, compliance gaps, state corruption, provider upgrade risk, testing blind spots.
Chosen remediation & tradeoffs — what was chosen, what was traded off, why.
Validation plan — exact commands (
fmt -check,validate,plan -out, policy check) tailored to runtime and risk tier.Rollback notes — for any destructive or state-mutating change: how to undo, what evidence to keep.
Never recommend direct production apply without a reviewed plan artifact and approval.
Never run terraform destroy (targeted or full) without first running terraform plan -destroy and showing the user every resource that will be deleted — including implicit dependents pulled in via locals or for_each. Get explicit confirmation before proceeding. Never use -auto-approve on destroy.
Workflow
Capture execution context — runtime+version, provider(s), backend, execution path, environment criticality.
Diagnose failure mode(s) using the routing table below. If intent spans categories, load both references.
Load only the matching reference file(s) — do not preload depth the task does not need.
Propose fix with risk controls — why this addresses the mode, what could still go wrong, guardrails (tests/approvals/rollback).
Generate artifacts — HCL, migration blocks (
moved,import), CI changes, policy rules.Validate before finalizing — run validation commands tailored to risk tier.
Emit the Response Contract at the end.
Diagnose Before You Generate
| Failure category | Symptoms | Primary references |
|---|---|---|
| Identity churn | Resource addresses shift after refactor, count index churn, missing moved blocks | Code Patterns: count vs for_each, Code Patterns: moved blocks, Code Patterns: LLM mistakes |
| Secret exposure | Secrets in defaults, state, logs, CI artifacts | Security & Compliance, Code Patterns: write-only, State Management |
| Blast radius | Oversized stacks, shared prod/non-prod state, unsafe applies | State Management, Module Patterns |
| Destroy cascade | Targeted destroy deletes more than expected; locals referencing a targeted resource make all for_each consumers implicit dependents | Response Contract: plan-destroy first; State Management: Safe Destroy |
| CI drift | Local plan ≠ CI plan, apply without reviewed artifact, unpinned versions | CI/CD Workflows, Code Patterns: versions |
| Compliance gaps | Missing policy stage, no approval model, no evidence retention | Security & Compliance, CI/CD Workflows |
| Testing blind spots | Plan-only validation of computed values, set-type indexing, mock/real confusion | Testing Frameworks |
| State corruption / recovery | Stuck lock, backend migration, drift reconciliation | State Management |
| Provider upgrade risk | Breaking-change provider bump, unpinned modules | Code Patterns: versions, Module Patterns |
| Provider lifecycle | Removing a provider with resources still in state, orphaned resources, removed block usage | State Management: Provider Removal |
| Bootstrap / orchestration misuse | null_resource + local-exec for bootstrap, remote-exec for setup scripts, provisioner stdout leaking secrets in CI logs | Code Patterns: Provisioners as Last Resort |
| Navigation / safe-rename blind spots | Cannot locate symbol defs/refs semantically, value-symbol rename done as blind text replace, grep-only refactor missing refs, hallucinated rg shim | Code Intelligence |
| Cross-cloud / provider mapping | "What's the Azure/GCP equivalent of X", picking a backend/auth model per cloud | State Management: Cross-cloud equivalents |
When to Use This Skill
Activate when: creating or reviewing Terraform/OpenTofu configurations or modules, setting up or debugging tests, structuring multi-environment deployments, implementing IaC CI/CD, choosing module patterns or state organization, configuring or migrating remote state backends.
Don't use for: basic HCL syntax questions Claude already knows, provider API reference (link to docs), cloud-platform questions unrelated to Terraform/OpenTofu.
Core Principles
Module Hierarchy
| Type | When to Use | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Resource module | Single logical group of connected resources | VPC + subnets, SG + rules |
| Infrastructure module | Collection of resource modules for a purpose | Multiple resource modules in one region/account |
| Composition | Complete infrastructure | Spans multiple regions/accounts |
Flow: resource → resource module → infrastructure module → composition.
Directory Layout
environments/ # prod/ staging/ dev/ — per-env configurations
modules/ # networking/ compute/ data/ — reusable modules
examples/ # minimal/ complete/ — docs + integration fixturesSeparate environments from modules. Use examples/ as both documentation and test fixtures. Keep modules small and single-responsibility.
See Module Patterns for architecture principles, naming conventions, variable/output contracts.
Naming Conventions (summary)
Descriptive resource names (
aws_instance.web_server, notaws_instance.main)Reserve
thisfor genuine singleton resources onlyPrefix variables with context (
vpc_cidr_block, notcidr)Standard files:
main.tf,variables.tf,outputs.tf,versions.tf
See Module Patterns: Variable Naming and Code Patterns: Block Ordering for examples.
Block Ordering (summary)
Resource blocks: count/for_each first → arguments → tags → depends_on → lifecycle.
Variable blocks: description → type → default → validation → nullable → sensitive.
See Code Patterns: Block Ordering & Structure for the full rules and examples.
Testing Strategy
Decision Matrix: Which Testing Approach?
| Situation | Approach | Tools | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick syntax check | Static analysis | validate, fmt | Free |
| Pre-commit validation | Static + lint | validate, tflint, trivy, checkov | Free |
| Terraform 1.6+, simple logic | Native test framework | terraform test | Free-Low |
| Pre-1.6, or Go expertise | Integration testing | Terratest | Low-Med |
| Security/compliance focus | Policy as code | OPA, Sentinel | Free |
| Cost-sensitive workflow | Mock providers (1.7+) | Native tests + mocks | Free |
| Multi-cloud, complex | Full integration | Terratest + real infra | Med-High |
Native Test Rules (1.6+)
Before writing test code: validate resource schemas via Terraform MCP so assertions target real attributes.
command = plan— fast, for input-derived values onlycommand = apply— required for computed values (ARNs, generated names) and set-type nested blocksSet-type blocks cannot be indexed with
[0]— useforexpressions or materialize viacommand = applyCommon set types: S3 encryption rules, lifecycle transitions, IAM policy statements
See Testing Frameworks for static-analysis pipelines, native-test patterns, Terratest integration, mock providers, and the full LLM-mistake checklist.
Count vs For_Each — Quick Rule
| Scenario | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Boolean condition (create / don't) | count = condition ? 1 : 0 | Optional singleton toggle |
| Items may be reordered or removed | for_each = toset(list) | Stable resource addresses |
| Reference by key | for_each = map | Named access |
| Multiple named resources | for_each | Better identity stability |
Never use list index as long-lived identity — removing a middle element reshuffles every address after it. For the decision matrix, safe migration playbook, moved block patterns, and known-at-plan failure cases, see Code Patterns: count vs for_each.
Locals for Dependency Management
Using try() in a local to prefer a conditional resource's attribute over its parent is a specialized but high-value pattern — it forces correct deletion order without explicit depends_on. Common use: VPC + secondary CIDR associations + subnets.
See Code Patterns: Locals for Dependency Management for the full pattern and worked example.
Module Development
Standard layout:
my-module/
├── README.md # Usage documentation
├── main.tf # Primary resources
├── variables.tf # Typed inputs with descriptions
├── outputs.tf # Output values
├── versions.tf # required_version + required_providers
├── examples/
│ ├── minimal/
│ └── complete/
└── tests/
└── module_test.tftest.hcl # or Go for TerratestVariable contracts: always description, always explicit type, use validation for complex constraints, use sensitive = true for secrets, prefer optional() with typed defaults (1.3+) over untyped map(any).
Output contracts: always description, mark sensitive outputs, expose stable subsets (not whole provider objects).
See Module Patterns for the full contract patterns, module release checklist, and LLM-mistake checklist.
CI/CD
Pipeline stages: validate → test → plan → apply (with environment protection).
Cost control: mock providers on PR validation, real-cloud integration only on main or scheduled, tag test resources, auto-cleanup.
Drift prevention: pin runtime and providers, commit .terraform.lock.hcl, apply the reviewed plan artifact from the plan stage (do not re-run plan inside the apply job), run policy/security stage on every path to apply.
See CI/CD Workflows for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Atlantis templates plus the LLM-mistake checklist.
Security & Compliance
Essential checks:
trivy config .
checkov -d .Don't: store secrets in variables or .tfvars, use default VPC, skip encryption, open security groups to 0.0.0.0/0, use inline ingress/egress blocks in aws_security_group.
Do: source secrets from a cloud secret manager (AWS Secrets Manager / Azure Key Vault / GCP Secret Manager) or use write_only arguments on 1.11+, create dedicated VPCs, enforce encryption at rest and TLS, least-privilege SGs, use separate aws_vpc_security_group_{ingress,egress}_rule resources (e.g. AWS provider v5+).
Marking a variable sensitive = true masks display only — the value still lives in state. Use write_only / *_wo on 1.11+, or keep secret material out of Terraform entirely via runtime lookups.
See Security & Compliance for trivy/checkov pipelines, state-file hardening, compliance mappings, and the LLM-mistake checklist.
State Management
Never use local state in teams or production. Remote backends provide automatic locking, encryption, versioning, audit logging, and safe collaboration.
Choosing a Remote Backend
AWS example (Azure azurerm / GCP gcs / TF Cloud syntax: see State Management: Choosing a Remote Backend):
terraform {
backend "s3" {
bucket = "my-terraform-state"
key = "prod/vpc/terraform.tfstate"
region = "us-east-1"
encrypt = true
use_lockfile = true # Native S3 locking, 1.10+
}
}On Terraform < 1.10, use dynamodb_table = "terraform-state-lock" instead of use_lockfile. Azure Storage, GCS, and Terraform Cloud all offer built-in locking - see the State Management reference for syntax. For choosing among backends and their locking models, see Choosing a Remote Backend.
State Organization
| Pattern | Use When | Example Path |
|---|---|---|
| Per environment | Different teams per env | prod/terraform.tfstate, staging/... |
| Per component | Independent lifecycles | prod/vpc/, prod/eks/, prod/rds/ |
| Hybrid (recommended) | Both benefits | prod/networking/, prod/compute/, staging/networking/ |
Split state when: different teams, different update cadences, or >500 resources. Combine when: tightly coupled resources, <100 resources, same lifecycle.
See State Management for locking, migration, multi-team isolation, disaster recovery, and the LLM-mistake checklist.
Version Management
| Component | Strategy | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Terraform runtime | Pin minor | required_version = "~> 1.9" |
| Providers | Pin major | version = "~> 5.0" |
| Modules (prod) | Pin exact | version = "5.1.2" |
| Modules (dev) | Allow patch | version = "~> 5.1" |
Commit .terraform.lock.hcl intentionally. Keep provider/runtime upgrades in a separate PR from functional changes. See Code Patterns: Version Management for constraint syntax and upgrade workflow.
Modern Terraform Features (1.0+)
| Feature | Min version | Common use |
|---|---|---|
try() | 0.13+ | Safe fallbacks, replaces element(concat()) |
nullable = false | 1.1+ | Prevent null silently overriding defaults |
moved blocks | 1.1+ | Refactor without destroy/recreate |
optional() with defaults | 1.3+ | Typed object attributes |
import blocks | 1.5+ | Declarative imports, reviewable in VCS |
check blocks | 1.5+ | Runtime assertions |
Native terraform test | 1.6+ | Built-in test framework |
| Mock providers | 1.7+ | Cost-free unit testing |
removed blocks | 1.7+ | Declarative resource removal |
| Provider-defined functions | 1.8+ | Provider-specific transformations (requires provider to declare functions) |
| Cross-variable validation | 1.9+ | Reference other var.* in validation blocks |
write_only arguments | 1.11+ | Secrets never stored in state |
| S3 native lock-file | 1.10+ | State locking without DynamoDB |
Before emitting a feature, verify the runtime floor. See Code Patterns: Feature Guard Table for the full table with common LLM error patterns per feature.
Runtime-Specific Guidance
Terraform 1.0-1.5 (OpenTofu starts at 1.6): Terratest for integration, static analysis + plan validation only (no native tests).
1.6+: native
terraform test/tofu testavailable — migrate simple unit tests, keep Terratest for complex integration.1.7+: mock providers cut test cost — mock for unit tests, real runs for final integration.
1.10+: S3 native lock-file (
use_lockfile) is the correct default for new configurations — DynamoDB locking is no longer required.1.11+:
write_onlyarguments for secret handling keep credentials out of state.Terraform vs OpenTofu: both supported. For licensing, governance, and feature delta, see Quick Reference: Terraform vs OpenTofu.
Code Intelligence (terraform-ls)
Semantic navigation for HCL. terraform-ls is optional; without it every row below degrades to a disclosed rg + Read fallback.
Self-contained terraform-ls layer of a generic code-intelligence discipline - apply the rows below directly. Recommended companion: the code-intelligence plugin (same antonbabenko/agent-plugins marketplace) carries the generic discipline (position anchoring, degradation gate, disclosure format, anti-phantom-shim) and ships /code-intelligence:doctor for readiness. If it is installed, defer to its generic protocol; this skill stays fully self-contained without it.
| Goal | Use | Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Find definition / all references | terraform-ls goToDefinition / findReferences | Needs init + a position anchor |
| Rename value symbol (var/local/output/provider alias) | Manual: findReferences -> per-file fresh Read -> edit -> validate | No rename provider |
| Rename resource/module address | moved block + plan shows 0 destroy | Text rename forces destroy/recreate |
Exact text / known name / .tfvars / non-HCL | rg + Read | No semantic scope |
✅ Supported: goToDefinition, findReferences, documentSymbol, hover, workspaceSymbol.
❌ Unsupported: goToImplementation, call hierarchy, rename provider. Do not call these then report their absence as a finding.
✅ Prereq: local
terraform/tofuon PATH,terraform initrun; cold start may need one retry.✅ LSP calls are position-anchored (
file:line:character) - anchor withrgfirst, never symbol-name-only.❌ Do not claim "LSP broken, using rg" until the Degradation Gate passes; disclose any tool substitution on the first line.
Depth: Code Intelligence.
Reference Files
Progressive disclosure — essentials here, depth on demand:
Testing Frameworks — static analysis, native tests, Terratest, mock providers
Module Patterns — structure, variable/output contracts,
terraform_remote_staterules, release checklistCI/CD Workflows — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Atlantis, cost control
Security & Compliance — trivy/checkov, secrets handling, compliance mappings
State Management — backends, locking, migration, multi-team, recovery
Code Patterns — block ordering,
count/for_eachdeep dive, modern features, version management, localsCode Intelligence - terraform-ls capabilities, position-anchored calls, manual rename, degradation gate
Quick Reference — command cheat sheets, flowcharts, troubleshooting
License
Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE for full terms.
Copyright © 2026 Anton Babenko
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer946 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer10.6 KiB
- SKILL.md19.9 KiB
- references/ci-cd-workflows.md13.8 KiB
- references/code-intelligence-lsp.md6.6 KiB
- references/code-patterns.md30.9 KiB
- references/module-patterns.md22.9 KiB
- references/quick-reference.md19.4 KiB
- references/security-compliance.md18.6 KiB
- references/state-management.md45.1 KiB
- references/testing-frameworks.md13.7 KiB
references/testing-frameworks.md
Testing Frameworks - Detailed Guide
Part of: terraform-skill Purpose: Detailed guides for Terraform/OpenTofu testing frameworks
This document provides in-depth guidance on testing frameworks for Infrastructure as Code. For the decision matrix and high-level overview, see the main skill file.
Table of Contents
Static Analysis
Plan Testing
Native Terraform Tests
Terratest (Go-based)
Static Analysis
Always do this first. Zero cost, catches 40%+ of issues before deployment.
Pre-commit Hooks
# In .pre-commit-config.yaml
- repo: https://github.com/antonbabenko/pre-commit-terraform
hooks:
- id: terraform_fmt
- id: terraform_validate
- id: terraform_tflintWhat Each Tool Checks
terraform fmt- Code formatting consistencyterraform validate- Syntax and internal consistencyTFLint- Best practices, provider-specific rulestrivy/checkov- Security vulnerabilities
When to Use
Every commit, always. Zero cost, catches 40%+ of issues.
Plan Testing
What terraform plan Validates
Verify expected resources will be created/modified/destroyed
Catch provider authentication issues
Validate variable combinations
Review before applying
In CI/CD
terraform init
terraform plan -out=tfplan
# Optionally: Convert plan to JSON and validate with tools
terraform show -json tfplan | jq '.'Limitations
Doesn't deploy real infrastructure
Can't catch runtime issues (IAM permissions, network connectivity)
Won't find resource-specific bugs
Native Terraform Tests
Available: Terraform 1.6+, OpenTofu 1.6+
When to Use
Team primarily works in HCL (no Go/Ruby experience needed)
Testing logical operations and module behavior
Want to avoid external testing dependencies
Basic Structure
Test discovery:
terraform testfinds*.tftest.hclfiles undertests/relative to the module root. Use-filter=<path>to scope to a specific file.
# tests/s3_bucket.tftest.hcl
run "create_bucket" {
command = apply
assert {
condition = aws_s3_bucket.main.bucket != ""
error_message = "S3 bucket name must be set"
}
}
run "verify_encryption" {
command = apply # `rule` is a set; use `one(...)` to extract the singleton
assert {
condition = one(aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.main.rule).apply_server_side_encryption_by_default[0].sse_algorithm == "AES256"
error_message = "Bucket must use AES256 encryption"
}
}Pattern applies identically on Azure/GCP; only provider/resource names change. See Module Patterns: Cross-cloud resource map.
Critical: Validate Resource Schemas First
Always use Terraform MCP to validate resource schemas before writing tests:
# Example workflow in Claude Code:
# 1. Search for provider documentation
mcp__terraform__search_providers({
provider_name: "aws",
provider_namespace: "hashicorp",
service_slug: "s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration",
provider_document_type: "resources"
})
# 2. Get detailed schema
mcp__terraform__get_provider_details({
provider_doc_id: "12345" # from search results
})Block-type distinctions the LLM must verify against the real schema:
set — unordered, cannot index with
[0]list — ordered, indexable
computed attribute — only known after apply
Common Schema Patterns:
| AWS Resource | Block Type | Indexing |
|---|---|---|
rule in aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration | set | ❌ Cannot use [0] |
transition in aws_s3_bucket_lifecycle_configuration | set | ❌ Cannot use [0] |
noncurrent_version_expiration in lifecycle | nested block (MaxItems=1) — list-of-1 | ✅ Can use [0] |
Working with Set-Type Blocks
Problem: Cannot index sets with [0]
# ❌ WRONG: This will fail
condition = aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.this.rule[0].bucket_key_enabled == true
# Error: Cannot index a set valueSolution 1: Use command = apply to materialize the set
run "test_encryption" {
command = apply # Creates real/mocked resources
assert {
# Now the set is materialized and can be checked
condition = length([for rule in aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.this.rule :
rule.bucket_key_enabled if rule.bucket_key_enabled == true]) > 0
error_message = "Bucket key should be enabled"
}
}Solution 2: Check at resource level (avoid accessing nested blocks)
run "test_encryption_exists" {
command = plan
assert {
# Check that the resource exists without accessing set members
condition = aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.this != null
error_message = "Encryption configuration should be created"
}
}Solution 3: Use for expressions (works in apply mode)
run "test_encryption_algorithm" {
command = apply
assert {
condition = alltrue([
for rule in aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.this.rule :
alltrue([
for config in rule.apply_server_side_encryption_by_default :
config.sse_algorithm == "AES256"
])
])
error_message = "Encryption should use AES256"
}
}command = plan vs command = apply
| Goal | Mode | Why |
|---|---|---|
Input-derived attribute (bucket name from var.bucket) | plan | value known before refresh |
| Variable default / validation | plan | fast, no resource creation |
| Computed attribute (ARN, generated name, cloud ID) | apply | only known after provider round-trip |
| Set-type nested block | apply | materializes the set so for expressions resolve |
| Real behavior / mocked provider responses | apply | runs the actual create path |
# ✅ plan — input-derived
run "test_input" {
command = plan
variables { bucket = "test-bucket" }
assert {
condition = aws_s3_bucket.this.bucket == "test-bucket"
error_message = "Bucket name should match input"
}
}
# ✅ apply — computed
run "test_prefix" {
command = apply
variables { bucket_prefix = "test-" }
assert {
condition = startswith(aws_s3_bucket.this.bucket, "test-")
error_message = "Bucket name should start with prefix"
}
}❌ Asserting a computed value in plan mode → Condition expression could not be evaluated at this time. Fix: switch the run block to command = apply, or assert a different attribute that is known at plan.
With Mocking (1.7+)
mock_provider "aws" {
mock_resource "aws_instance" {
defaults = {
id = "i-mock123"
arn = "arn:aws:ec2:us-east-1:123456789:instance/i-mock123"
}
}
}Pros
Native HCL syntax (familiar to Terraform users)
No external dependencies
Fast execution with mocks
Good for unit testing module logic
Cons
Newer feature (less mature than Terratest)
Limited ecosystem/examples
Mocking doesn't catch real-world AWS behavior
Complete Test Examples (Following Best Practices)
Example 1: S3 Bucket Tests
# tests/unit/s3_bucket.tftest.hcl
mock_provider "aws" {} # Zero cost with mocks
# Test 1: Input validation (fast, plan mode)
run "validate_bucket_name" {
command = plan
variables {
bucket = "my-test-bucket"
}
assert {
condition = aws_s3_bucket.this.bucket == "my-test-bucket"
error_message = "Bucket name should match input"
}
}
# Test 2: Encryption defaults (apply mode for set access)
run "verify_default_encryption" {
command = apply
variables {
bucket = "encrypted-bucket"
}
assert {
# Using for expression to check set-type block
condition = alltrue([
for rule in aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.this.rule :
alltrue([
for config in rule.apply_server_side_encryption_by_default :
config.sse_algorithm == "AES256"
])
])
error_message = "Default encryption should be AES256"
}
assert {
# Check bucket key at rule level
condition = alltrue([
for rule in aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration.this.rule :
rule.bucket_key_enabled == true
])
error_message = "Bucket key should be enabled"
}
}
# Test 3: Computed values (apply mode required)
run "verify_generated_name" {
command = apply
variables {
bucket_prefix = "test-"
}
assert {
condition = startswith(aws_s3_bucket.this.bucket, "test-")
error_message = "Generated bucket name should have prefix"
}
assert {
condition = length(aws_s3_bucket.this.bucket) > 5
error_message = "Bucket name should be generated"
}
}Example 2: Lifecycle Rules
# tests/unit/lifecycle.tftest.hcl
mock_provider "aws" {}
run "verify_lifecycle_transitions" {
command = apply # Required for set-type transition blocks
variables {
bucket = "lifecycle-bucket"
lifecycle_rules = [{
id = "archive"
enabled = true
transition = [
{ days = 90, storage_class = "GLACIER" },
{ days = 180, storage_class = "DEEP_ARCHIVE" }
]
}]
}
assert {
# Check that both transitions exist using for expression
condition = length([
for rule in aws_s3_bucket_lifecycle_configuration.this.rule :
rule.id if rule.id == "archive"
]) == 1
error_message = "Lifecycle rule should exist"
}
assert {
# Verify transition count using length
condition = alltrue([
for rule in aws_s3_bucket_lifecycle_configuration.this.rule :
length(rule.transition) == 2
])
error_message = "Should have 2 transitions"
}
}Terratest (Go-based)
Recommended for: Teams with Go experience, robust integration testing
When to Use
Team has Go experience
Need robust integration testing
Testing multiple providers/complex infrastructure
Want battle-tested framework with large community
Basic Structure
package test
import (
"testing"
"github.com/gruntwork-io/terratest/modules/random"
"github.com/gruntwork-io/terratest/modules/terraform"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func TestS3Module(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel() // ALWAYS include for parallel execution
terraformOptions := &terraform.Options{
TerraformDir: "../examples/complete",
Vars: map[string]interface{}{
"bucket_name": "test-bucket-" + random.UniqueId(),
},
}
// Clean up resources after test
defer terraform.Destroy(t, terraformOptions)
// Run terraform init and apply
terraform.InitAndApply(t, terraformOptions)
// Get outputs and verify
bucketName := terraform.Output(t, terraformOptions, "bucket_name")
assert.NotEmpty(t, bucketName)
}Cost Management
// Use tags for automated cleanup
Vars: map[string]interface{}{
"tags": map[string]string{
"Environment": "test",
"TTL": "2h", // Auto-delete after 2 hours
},
}Critical Patterns
Always use
t.Parallel()- Enables parallel test executionAlways use
defer terraform.Destroy()- Ensures cleanupUse unique identifiers - Avoid resource conflicts
Tag resources - Enable cost tracking and automated cleanup
Use separate AWS accounts - Isolate test infrastructure
Real-world Costs
Small module (S3, IAM): $0-5 per run
Medium module (VPC, EC2): $5-20 per run
Large module (RDS, ECS cluster): $20-100 per run
Optimization with Test Stages
// Test stages for faster iteration
stage := test_structure.RunTestStage
stage(t, "setup", func() {
terraform.InitAndApply(t, opts)
})
stage(t, "validate", func() {
// Assertions here
})
stage(t, "teardown", func() {
terraform.Destroy(t, opts)
})
// Skip stages during development:
// export SKIP_setup=true
// export SKIP_teardown=trueBest Practices Summary
For All Frameworks
Start with static analysis - Always free, always fast
Use unique identifiers - Prevent resource conflicts
Tag test resources - Enable tracking and cleanup
Separate test accounts - Isolate test infrastructure
Implement TTL - Automatic resource cleanup
Framework Selection
Quick syntax check? → terraform validate + fmt
Security scan? → trivy + checkov
Terraform 1.6+, simple logic? → Native tests
Complex integration or multi-cloud orchestration? → TerratestCost Optimization
Use mocking for unit tests
Implement resource TTL tags
Run integration tests only on main branch
Use smaller instance types in tests
Share test resources when safe
LLM Mistake Checklist — Testing
Common model mistakes when generating test code:
asserts computed values (ARNs, generated names, cloud-assigned IDs) in
command = planmode — must usecommand = applyindexes set-type nested blocks with
[0]— sets are unordered, useforexpressions orcommand = applyto materializetreats mocked-provider tests as integration coverage — mocks validate logic only, not provider behavior
forgets to exercise
validationblocks with invalid inputs — only tests the happy pathskips idempotency (
terraform plan -detailed-exitcodeafter apply) — the most common regression detectorasserts on Terraform syntax instead of module behavior (
terraform validatealready covers syntax)runs expensive real-cloud integration tests on every commit instead of gating them behind main/scheduled
omits cleanup, leaving orphaned resources billed against the test account
Back to: Main Skill File
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Instructions that use the network
- Downloads piped into a shell
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Anton Babenko
- Publisher
- Anton Babenko (Community)
- Source
- antonbabenko/terraform-skill · skills/terraform-skill · commit 9c1e92d
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anton Babenko.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download terraform-skill.zip