Apify Integration Development
ApifyOfficialPublished by Apify
- Skill
- Tool integration
- Automation and integrations
- Apache-2.0
- Low risk
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured approach for developers to build official Apify integrations across various platforms, including workflow automation tools, AI agent plugins, and framework packages. It outlines the Apify model, cross-cutting design rules such as asynchronous run flows, cost control mechanisms, and authentication standards. The skill emphasizes using the Apify MCP server for research and provides specific reference paths for different integration shapes to ensure consistency and correct API usage.
What it does
- Defines the Apify domain model including Actors, Runs, Datasets, and Key-Value stores.
- Provides design rules for asynchronous run flows and bounded polling.
- Establishes standards for cost control, attribution headers, and error handling.
- Offers guidance on choosing an integration shape based on the target platform.
- Details the implementation of high-level convenience operations like Web Fetch.
- Provides a definition-of-done checklist for integration validation.
When to use it
- When planning or building an official integration for a workflow automation app like Zapier or n8n.
- When developing an AI agent plugin or harness that requires access to Apify Actors.
- When creating a client-side package for AI frameworks like LangChain or LlamaIndex.
- When building a direct application client that interacts with the Apify REST API.
Advantages
- Ensures consistent integration behavior across different platforms.
- Provides clear architectural patterns for client-side and agent-based integrations.
- Includes specific guidance on cost management and error taxonomy.
- Facilitates easier review and validation by the Apify team.
Usage examples
- “How do I structure an integration for an AI agent harness?”
- The skill directs you to the ai-harness-plugin.md reference to choose between a coding agent plugin (MCP-based) or a custom tool registry plugin.
- “What are the requirements for polling an Actor run?”
- The skill mandates bounded polling using the run's timeout settings and forbids infinite while-true loops.
- “How should I handle cost controls in my integration?”
- The skill requires exposing maxTotalChargeUsd and maxItems as query parameters rather than embedding them in the Actor input.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/apify/apify-integration-development/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip apify-integration-development.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Apify
Apify Integration Development
Design and build an official Apify integration for a company's product, with minimal help from Apify. This skill covers every integration shape Apify supports - workflow-automation apps, AI agent plugins (coding agents and harnesses), AI framework packages, and direct application clients - so a partner team can ship a first-class Apify integration end to end. The cross-cutting rules below apply to all of them, and one category-specific reference file carries the rest.
Building an official integration? Once you publish it, contact [email protected] so the Apify team can review, test, and validate your integration before it reaches users. We'll check the capability surface, cost controls, error handling, and attribution headers, and help you close any gaps.
Step 0 - Learn the Apify model first (required)
Before designing anything, fetch and read https://apify.com/agents.md. It is the canonical quickstart for AI agents and the single source of truth for vocabulary, the run flow, and the cost rule. If the fetch fails, the mini-glossary below keeps the skill usable.
Apify vocabulary (always written with a capital A on the platform):
Actor - a serverless cloud program that takes JSON input, performs a task, and produces structured output. Not an AI agent.
Actor Run - one execution of an Actor. Each run has its own dataset, key-value store, and request queue, and ends in a terminal status (
SUCCEEDED,FAILED,TIMED-OUT,ABORTED).Dataset - append-only structured storage for a run's results. An Actor call returns the dataset ID, not its contents.
Key-Value Store - unstructured/file storage (screenshots, HTML, OUTPUT).
Actor Task - a saved, parameterized configuration for running an Actor.
Apify Store - the marketplace of Actors at
https://apify.com/store.md.Apify Console - the web UI at
https://console.apify.com.Compute Unit (CU) - billing unit: memory (MB) x duration (hours).
Server Actor - an Actor that runs as an always-ready HTTP server on its own stable URL (may be still called Standby in the API and docs). You send a request and get the result in the response - no run to start, no dataset to read.
Further terms (build, request queue, proxy, pricing models): https://docs.apify.com/llms.txt.
Use Apify MCP for live context while planning
The Apify MCP server is the fastest way to research Actors, schemas, pricing, and docs during integration design. See https://docs.apify.com/integrations/mcp (append .md for a markdown version).
If Apify MCP tools are already available in this environment, use them:
search-actors- find Actors by platform/product keyword (search by product name, not end goal).fetch-actor-details- read an Actor's input schema, output format, README, and pricing before you encode its shape into the integration.search-apify-docs/fetch-apify-docs- pull contextual documentation pages.
The anonymous discovery subset (search-actors, fetch-actor-details, search-apify-docs, fetch-apify-docs) works without an account, so you can research even before the developer has connected their token.
Pick your integration shape
Read exactly one reference file based on the product you are integrating into. Each reference carries the category-specific UX design, a canonical capability matrix, and a definition-of-done checklist.
| Product shape | Examples | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow automation platform | Zapier, n8n, Make, Pipedream, Activepieces | references/workflow-automation.md |
| AI agent plugin (coding agent or harness) | Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot (coding agents); OpenClaw-style runtimes, Hermes-style harnesses (harnesses) | references/ai-harness-plugin.md |
| AI framework package (PyPI/npm for LLM frameworks) | LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, Vercel AI SDK | references/ai-framework-package.md |
| Application integration (direct client) | A backend service, scheduled job, product feature calling Actors via apify-client or REST | references/sdk-integration.md |
Paths are relative to this skill folder. If your product spans two shapes (e.g. an AI harness built on top of a framework package), read both - the rules compose. The AI agent plugin reference covers two approaches with different trade-offs: a lightweight skills + MCP bundle for skills/MCP-aware coding agents, and a custom tool-registry plugin for OpenClaw/Hermes-style harnesses.
Cross-cutting design rules (true for every integration type)
These invariants were extracted from every existing Apify integration. Apply them regardless of shape.
Vocabulary mirroring
Model the integration's resources on Apify's domain (Actor / Run / Dataset / KV Store / Task). Users coming from Apify Console should find the same concepts under the same names.
Asynchronous run flow with bounded polling
Actors can run for seconds to hours. Use the asynchronous flow, never the 300-second synchronous endpoint for anything but short jobs:
POST /v2/actors/{actorId}/runs -> start, return runId
GET /v2/actor-runs/{runId} -> poll until terminal status
GET /v2/datasets/{datasetId}/items -> fetch results on SUCCEEDEDPolling must be bounded: use the run's own timeoutSecs plus a grace buffer, with an absolute ceiling fallback. Never while (true). On a non-terminal status, surface the run ID so the user/agent can poll again or inspect the failure.
Cost is first-class
Every path that starts a run must expose a cost control. The canonical control is maxTotalChargeUsd (caps the run's total charge on most pricing models) and maxItems (caps billed items on pay-per-result Actors). Send them as options / query parameters, never as Actor input - inside input they are either an Actor-declared field or simply invalid. 0 / empty / null means no limit. For LLM-facing integrations, the ceilings are developer-controlled; an LLM cannot widen them. A Server Actor request such as Web Fetch (below) starts no run and takes neither option.
Attribution headers
Stamp an integration header on every outbound request so Apify can attribute traffic: x-apify-integration-platform: <your-platform>. When a request is driven by an AI tool (not a human in a UI), also send x-apify-integration-ai-tool: true. If the integration was built using this skill, add x-apify-integration-origin: apify-integration-development-skill so Apify can distinguish skill-generated integrations from custom ones. One line, big telemetry payoff.
Authentication
Browser / consumer-facing (a human completes a sign-in): OAuth2 with PKCE. Do not ask for raw tokens.
Headless / server / CI (no human present): API token as
Authorization: Bearer <APIFY_TOKEN>, stored in an env var or secret manager, never hardcoded or logged.
Both paths are real - pick by who is present at auth time, not by which is easier.
Centralized HTTP layer
One base-URL constant, shared between credentials and the HTTP layer. A Server Actor lives on its own host (https://web-fetch.apify.actor) - route it through the same layer so auth and attribution headers still apply. Retries with exponential backoff on 429 and 5xx. Never retry non-idempotent POST /runs on network errors - a duplicate Actor run is a real, billed, side-effecting operation. This is the single most important correctness invariant in the HTTP layer.
Error taxonomy
Map Apify errors to the host platform's error categories (retryable vs auth vs permanent). Surface the API's actual error text, not a generic HTTP message. For permission-approval failures (a full-permission Actor needs explicit approval), include the approval URL after validating it is an absolute http(s) URL. For LLM consumers, return errors as data (JSON error objects), never as raised exceptions - the model needs something to read and reason about.
Webhooks over polling for run-finished events
When the host supports inbound webhooks, register an Apify webhook scoped to actorId or actorTaskId with the terminal statuses the user picked. Make registration idempotent (a re-activated workflow should not create duplicate webhooks), persist the webhook ID so deactivation can clean it up, and always provide sample/fallback data so users can test the trigger without waiting for a real run.
Generate from OpenAPI where the host allows it
If the host platform can generate UI fields from an OpenAPI spec, use Apify's spec (https://apify.com/openapi.json) and a tag allowlist. Hand-write only what the spec cannot express: convenience wrappers, bill-cap fields, lean AI-tool output contracts.
High-level convenience operations alongside generic runs
Generic "run Actor" serves power users. Add a few opinionated, high-level actions for the common case so non-power users get a 2-field form instead of a full Actor configuration. The canonical one is Web Fetch: one URL in, page content out, built on the apify/web-fetch Server Actor - POST https://web-fetch.apify.actor/ with {"url": "...", "formats": ["markdown"]} returns the content in the response. No run is started, so the run rules above (asynchronous flow, polling, maxTotalChargeUsd) do not apply; the cost is one fetch event per successful request. Three things to get right: always send formats, check fetch.httpStatusCode (HTTP 200 only means Web Fetch itself succeeded), and handle both error shapes - flat {code, error} from the Actor, nested {error: {message}} from the platform - without auto-retrying its 502/504. Full contract: https://apify.com/apify/web-fetch.md. Do not build this on a crawler run with maxCrawlDepth: 0 - that is the legacy "Scrape single URL" pattern.
Testing and release
Keep two test modes: mocked (hermetic, no credentials) and live E2E (real API, CI-gated). Automate releases through the host platform's CI on Git tags / GitHub Releases. Never hand-edit versions or changelogs if a release workflow manages them.
Top anti-patterns to refuse on review
Retrying
POST /runson a network error - duplicates a billed run.Unbounded
while (true)polling - ties up the host with no ceiling.Putting
maxTotalChargeUsd/maxItemsinside Actor input instead of options - silently not a cap.Dumping a full dataset into an LLM context without size caps or untrusted-content fencing - prompt-injection and context blowout.
One monolithic tool list for an LLM agent - routing accuracy degrades past ~8 tools; curate subsets.
Surfacing a raw HTTP status/message instead of Apify's actual error text - users can't act on "400".
Minimal API surface every integration needs
| Purpose | Method + path |
|---|---|
| Start an Actor run | POST /v2/actors/{actorId}/runs |
| Start a Task run | POST /v2/actor-tasks/{taskId}/runs |
| Poll a run | GET /v2/actor-runs/{runId} |
| List runs | GET /v2/actor-runs |
| Dataset items | GET /v2/datasets/{datasetId}/items |
| KV record | GET /v2/key-value-stores/{storeId}/records/{key} |
| Set KV record | PUT /v2/key-value-stores/{storeId}/records/{key} |
| Store search | GET /v2/store |
| Webhook CRUD | POST/GET/DELETE /v2/webhooks |
| Validate token / current user | GET /v2/users/me |
| Fetch one URL (Web Fetch, Server Actor) | POST https://web-fetch.apify.actor/ |
REST reference: https://docs.apify.com/api/v2. OpenAPI spec: https://apify.com/openapi.json.
Working workflow
Fetch
https://apify.com/agents.mdand internalize the model.Pick the integration shape above and read the matching reference file.
Use Apify MCP (if available) to research the concrete Actors, schemas, and pricing the integration will expose.
Draft the capability matrix for the chosen category (each reference has one) and the UX spec (resource -> operation -> fields -> errors).
Scaffold the integration following the category-specific rules in the reference.
Verify against the definition-of-done checklist at the end of that reference.
Reference implementations to study
Real, public integrations per category - read their source when in doubt:
Workflow automation:
@apify/n8n-nodes-apify(npm), the Apify Zapier app.AI agent plugins (coding agents): the Apify plugin bundle (MCP server + skills + router + slash commands) shipped for Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, and similar tools.
AI agent plugins (harnesses):
apify-hermes-agent-plugin(PyPI),@apify/apify-openclaw-plugin.AI framework packages:
langchain-apify(PyPI).Application integration: see
references/sdk-integration.mdfor the canonicalapify-clientusage in JS/TS, Python, and over REST.
Support for integration questions: [email protected]. Contact us both for design guidance while you build and for review/testing once you publish - we validate the capability surface, cost controls, error handling, and attribution before the integration reaches users.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer981 B
- LICENSEAdded by AutoGineer10.0 KiB
- SKILL.md13.3 KiB
- references/ai-framework-package.md13.6 KiB
- references/ai-harness-plugin.md17.8 KiB
- references/sdk-integration.md8.6 KiB
- references/workflow-automation.md13.3 KiB
references/ai-framework-package.md
AI framework package integrations
Design guide for building a PyPI/npm package that exposes Apify to an AI/LLM framework - LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, Vercel AI SDK, or similar. These are client-side integrations: code that calls Apify Actors from outside the Apify runtime, for applications, agents, and RAG pipelines. Apply the cross-cutting rules from SKILL.md on top.
1. Scope: client-side only, wrap apify-client, never the Actor SDK
This package is for applications that call Apify Actors from outside the Apify runtime. It is not for code running inside an Actor. Apify Actors should run with limited permissions and use scoped tokens via the Actor SDK's Actor.open_dataset(); importing a framework client that reconstructs its own ApifyClient from an env-var token would bypass that scoping and pull an unnecessary dependency into Actor images.
Dependency philosophy: wrap the official apify-client library, never the apify SDK. apify is for building Actors; apify-client is for calling them. Keep the runtime dependency surface minimal (langchain-core, apify-client, and a backport if needed) to minimize version conflicts and keep install time short in agent environments.
Stamp a custom user-agent suffix (e.g. ; Origin/langchain) or the attribution header on the client so Apify can attribute traffic.
2. Layered architecture: client -> framework adapters -> public API
Public API curated exports
|
+--------------------+--------------------+
| | |
Tools Document loaders Retriever
(agents) (RAG ingestion) (RAG retrieval)
| | |
ApifyToolsClient (sync)
|
apify-client (sync + async)
|
Apify REST API| Layer | Role |
|---|---|
| Client | Thin, synchronous wrapper over apify-client. One method per Actor operation. No framework types here. |
| Tools | Framework BaseTool subclasses for agent tool-calling. |
| Document loaders | BaseLoader implementations for RAG ingestion. |
| Retriever | BaseRetriever for RAG query-time retrieval. |
Framework types live only above the client layer. The client layer speaks pure Python/JS dicts and apify-client objects. This lets the client be unit-tested with no framework dependency, and lets the framework-facing layers focus exclusively on schema, tool semantics, and envelope formatting.
3. ApifyToolsClient: one sync gateway, typed method per Actor
All Actor interaction goes through a single synchronous client class with one convenience method per supported Actor (e.g. google_search, instagram_scrape, crawl_website). Each method:
Builds the Actor-specific
run_inputdict, translating from the integration's normalized parameter names to the Actor's raw input schema. (Actor schemas are idiosyncratic -searchStringsArray,directUrls,detailsUrlsvslistingUrls; the client absorbs that so the tool exposes clean names likequery,url,url_type.)Calls
client.actor(id).call(...)which blocks until the run finishes.Checks run status and raises if the run did not reach
SUCCEEDED(a failed run must never silently return empty results).Returns a
(run_details, items)tuple (or just one where appropriate).
Why blocking? Callers don't manage polling loops; the API stays simple. The async surface is handled at the framework layer (asyncio.to_thread / Promise.resolve) rather than duplicating every method in async form.
Adding a new Actor tool means adding one client method (input translation + status check) and one tool class (schema + _run), not wiring up polling, retries, or async variants.
4. Uniform JSON output envelope
All tools return a JSON string of one shape:
{"run": {"run_id": "...", "status": "...", "dataset_id": "...",
"started_at": "...", "finished_at": "..."},
"items": [...]}run is null for dataset-only tools. An optional notice key surfaces out-of-band hints (e.g. an Actor returned demo placeholder data on the free plan). Serialize with default=str so non-JSON-native types (datetimes from a clean=True deserialiser) never throw mid-tool-call.
A single predictable envelope lets agents parse results with one code path. The run metadata gives the agent enough to chain calls - run an Actor with one tool, then fetch the dataset with another using the returned dataset_id. End every tool description with "Use only the data returned; do not hallucinate missing fields."
5. Safety clamps - defense against LLM-requested extremes
An LLM invoking a tool can request absurd values: 10,000 results, 32 GB of memory, a 1-hour timeout. Clamp every request to developer-controlled ceilings:
| Clamp | Default ceiling | Developer max |
|---|---|---|
timeout_secs | 600 s | - |
memory_mbytes | 4,096 MB (snapped to nearest valid power-of-2) | 8,192 MB |
items / limit | 1,000 | - |
max_crawl_depth | 5 | - |
Memory is notable: Apify accepts memory only as a power-of-2 (128, 256, 512, ..., 32768). Snap an arbitrary LLM value to the nearest valid step at or below the developer's cap. The default ceiling of 4,096 MB (4 GB) is generous for most Actors but well below the platform max, so LLM-requested extremes are clamped. The developer can raise the ceiling up to 8,192 MB, but an LLM cannot widen it beyond the developer-set value.
Some Actors have runtime limits not declared in their input schema (e.g. a RAG web browser rejects maxResults > 100 at runtime). These can't be derived by schema introspection - track them by hand as overrides on the specific tool so the clamp enforces the Actor's real ceiling.
The ceilings are developer-controlled fields on the tool instance - an application can tighten them further, but the LLM cannot widen them. This makes the integration safe to hand to an autonomous agent without risking runaway compute costs.
6. Curated tool subsets, not one monolithic list
Tools are grouped into convenience lists:
| List | Tools | Use case |
|---|---|---|
| Core | Run Actor, get dataset, run+get, web fetch, run task, run task+get | Generic platform primitives |
| Search | Google search, web crawler, RAG web browser, Google Maps, YouTube, e-commerce | Web search & content crawling |
| Social | Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, TikTok, Facebook | Social media scraping |
Warn explicitly: don't bind all tools at once. Most LLMs lose routing accuracy past ~8 tools, so pick the family the agent actually needs. Curated subsets let an agent built for social-media analysis avoid distinguishing among 19 tool descriptions.
7. Hand-written tools + dynamic schema for the long tail
Alongside hand-written tools (which get clean schemas and descriptions), ship one dynamic tool that takes an actor_id at construction, fetches the Actor's latest default build, and generates an input model dynamically from the build's input schema. Prune descriptions to a fixed length; limit properties to type, default, prefill, enum.
This covers the long tail of Actors without a dedicated wrapper - you don't need a hand-written tool for every one of Apify's thousands of Actors. The trade-off is a looser schema (the LLM sees the raw Actor input shape) and a network call at construction time.
8. Map to the framework's idiomatic surfaces
Implement the framework's actual extension points, all backed by the same client:
| Surface | Base class | Use case |
|---|---|---|
| Tools | BaseTool | Agent tool-calling (ReAct, LangGraph) |
| Document loaders | BaseLoader | Batch RAG ingestion (load -> split -> embed -> vector store) |
| Retriever | BaseRetriever | Query-time web retrieval for RAG chains |
A dataset loader loads an existing dataset by ID and maps each item to a
Documentvia a user-supplied mapping function (every Actor's output schema is different, so give the user full control). Implement both eagerload()and streaminglazy_load().A crawl loader is an active loader: it runs a content crawler on construction, then yields
Documents withpage_content(markdown) andmetadata(source,title,crawl_depth).A search retriever wraps a search-and-crawl Actor for low-latency interactive RAG; the async path runs the synchronous client off the event loop via
to_thread.
9. Token hygiene
One canonical token parameter/env var (e.g. apify_token / APIFY_TOKEN). If a legacy name exists (APIFY_API_TOKEN), honor it with a DeprecationWarning but reject new code that declares it. Centralize the policy in two helpers: one for explicit __init__ signatures, one for Pydantic model_validator(mode='before') hooks. Store the token as a SecretStr (excluded from repr and serialization) and never log it.
10. Content extraction: markdown-first with defensive fallbacks
When extracting page content from crawling Actors, prefer markdown over text, with a trailing or '' to guarantee a string even when a key is present but null. Follow a fixed fallback order for the source URL: nested metadata.url -> crawledUrl -> top-level url. Tolerate a metadata field that is missing or not a dict (some Actor responses surface null). Actor output shapes are inconsistent across versions and configurations; centralize one canonical fallback order so the retriever, loaders, and tools all agree on what "the content", "the source URL", and "the title" mean.
Single known URL -> Web Fetch. For the "fetch this URL" tool, do not run a crawler with a page limit of 1 - call the Web Fetch Server Actor endpoint described in SKILL.md. It is the one client method that is a plain HTTPS request instead of client.actor(id).call(...), so add the Bearer token and the attribution header by hand, and set run to null in the envelope. Take the content from markdown, the source URL from fetch.loadedUrl, and the title from metadata.title. For the LLM-facing tool: pin formats to ["markdown"], do not expose headers to the model (a fetched page could talk the agent into sending credentials to a host of its choosing), and fetch one URL per call with the content truncated to a developer-controlled cap.
11. Error mapping
Client layer raises
RuntimeErrorfor failed/empty runs andValueErrorfor invalid input. Wrap transport errors inRuntimeError.Tool layer catches both and re-raises as the framework's tool-error type (e.g.
ToolException) withhandle_tool_error = True, which surfaces to the agent as a recoverable error message.
An agent that gets a ToolException can read the message and retry with corrected input. An unhandled RuntimeError would crash the agent loop. The boundary is clean: the client raises domain errors; the tool adapts them to the framework's tool-error protocol.
12. Packaging, release, and quality bar
Minimal runtime deps; an explicit sdist allowlist so local-only paths (
dist/,.venv/,docs/, test fixtures) never reach the registry.Release via conventional-commits-driven automation that reads commit-message prefixes to auto-generate the changelog and compute the version bump; a
BREAKING CHANGE:footer triggers a major bump. Never hand-editversion =orCHANGELOG.mdif the workflow manages them.Strict linting (
select = ["ALL"]with a curated ignore list), strict typing (disallow_untyped_defs), and socket-disabled unit tests so the unit suite is truly unit - no hidden integration dependencies. Integration tests need a real token (CI only).
13. Position vs the Apify MCP server
The README's top banner should direct users to Apify's MCP server (https://mcp.apify.com) as a richer, more featureful alternative for interactive agent workflows that need dynamic Actor discovery. The package is not deprecated, but the MCP path is recommended for new interactive agent sessions.
The positioning: the package is the programmatic, typed, registry-installable option for code that outlives a single agent session (servers, scheduled jobs, pipelines); the MCP server is the interactive, dynamic option. Rather than compete, position them for their respective audiences.
Definition-of-done checklist
[ ] Package is client-side only; depends on
apify-client, neverapify.[ ] Layered: thin client (no framework types) -> framework adapters -> curated public API.
[ ] One synchronous client with a typed method per supported Actor; input normalization centralized.
[ ] All tools return the uniform JSON envelope; serialization never throws on non-native types.
[ ] Developer-controlled safety clamps (timeout, memory power-of-2, items, depth) are in place; hand-tracked runtime limits override specific tools.
[ ] Tools grouped into curated subsets; documentation warns against binding all at once.
[ ] A dynamic-schema tool covers the long tail of Actors.
[ ] Framework surfaces (tools / loaders / retriever) all backed by the same client.
[ ] One canonical token name; legacy alias emits a deprecation warning; token is
SecretStr, never logged.[ ] Content extraction is markdown-first with documented fallback order; the single-URL tool uses Web Fetch with
formatspinned and noheadersparameter.[ ] Client raises domain errors; tools adapt them to the framework's tool-error protocol.
[ ] sdist allowlist excludes local paths; release automation drives versioning.
[ ] Unit tests are socket-disabled; lint/typing are strict.
[ ] README cross-references the MCP server for interactive/dynamic use.
[ ] Attribution header / user-agent suffix is set on the client; skill-origin header included if built from this skill.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs an MCP server, Needs network access
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Instructions that use the network
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Apify
- Publisher
- Apify (Official)
- Source
- apify/agent-skills · skills/apify-integration-development · commit f22557f
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (written by AutoGineer)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Apify.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download apify-integration-development.zip