Developing Applications On Managed Service For Apache Flink
AWSOfficialPublished by AWS
- Skill
- Tool integration
- Cloud and DevOps
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides domain-specific knowledge for building, deploying, and maintaining Apache Flink applications on Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (MSF). It covers service-specific constraints, including the KPU resource model, configuration requirements, and operational lifecycle management. It emphasizes the use of service-level configurations over application-level settings for checkpoints and parallelism, and provides guidance on navigating the v1/v2 API identifier split for AWS CLI and SDK operations.
What it does
- Provides patterns for KPU-based resource configuration and scaling.
- Outlines service-specific constraints for checkpointing and parallelism.
- Details the lifecycle management for starting, stopping, and updating applications.
- Offers guidance on connector integration for Kinesis, Kafka, and Iceberg.
- Explains the v1/v2 identifier differences for IAM, CloudWatch, and SDK usage.
- Provides troubleshooting steps for application restart loops and state management.
When to use it
- When developing or migrating Apache Flink applications for Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink.
- When configuring KPU resources or troubleshooting application scaling behavior.
- When setting up IAM roles, trust policies, or CloudWatch logging for MSF.
- When performing version upgrades or migrating from Flink 1.x to 2.x.
- When implementing connectors for Kinesis, Kafka, or Iceberg within an MSF environment.
Advantages
- Ensures adherence to MSF-specific service constraints and operational patterns.
- Prevents common configuration errors related to the v1/v2 API identifier split.
- Provides structured workflows for application lifecycle and deployment tasks.
- Offers clear guidance on avoiding anti-patterns in job graph design and resource management.
Usage examples
- “How do I correctly configure checkpoints for an application running on Managed Service for Apache Flink?”
- The agent will advise against hardcoding checkpoint configurations in the application code and instead direct the user to manage these settings via the MSF service-level configuration.
- “I am getting a ConcurrentModificationException when updating my Flink application. How do I fix this?”
- The agent will explain the need to fetch the current application version ID or use a conditional token before issuing an update command, providing the necessary CLI syntax.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/aws/developing-applications-on-managed-service-for-apache-flink/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip developing-applications-on-managed-service-for-apache-flink.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by AWS
Managed Service for Apache Flink
Overview
Domain expertise for Apache Flink applications on Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (MSF). Covers development, KPU resource management, connectors, state management, monitoring, IaC deployment, and version migration.
Execute commands using available tools from the AWS MCP server when connected — it provides sandboxed execution, audit logging, and observability. When the MCP server is not available, fall back to the AWS CLI or shell as needed.
General Guidance
Before starting, ensure you have a clear understanding of the user persona, use case, and requirements:
STOP: Determine the users background and use case before proceeding:
Are they new to Flink? New to Managed Service for Apache Flink?
Are they familiar with Java development?
Is the use case complex with lots of business logic? Or simple and declarative?
These will inform how to organize the project, and whether to use Flink Table API or DataStream API. In general, assume the DataStream API.
Example Workflow for New Applications
1. User asks to build a Flink application
2. Confirm user's goals and use case
3. READ [best-practices.md](references/best-practices.md)
4. READ [dependency-management.md](references/dependency-management.md)
5. READ relevant connector guides (e.g. [kinesis-connector-guide.md](references/kinesis-connector-guide.md))
6. Generate code following the loaded guidance
7. Validate against best practices
8. READ environment-setup.md via [environment-setup.md](references/environment-setup.md)
9. Compile and test locallyExample Workflow for General Questions
1. User asks about real time delivery of data to Iceberg
2. Confirm user's goals and use case
3. READ [best-practices.md](references/best-practices.md)
4. READ [iceberg-connector-guide.md](references/iceberg-connector-guide.md)
5. READ other reference files as needed
6. Answer question with loaded guidanceReference Files
You MUST use this skill and its reference files to answer any question on these topics.
Do NOT answer from training knowledge or by searching general AWS documentation when the question concerns Apache Flink, Managed Service for Apache Flink, KPU sizing, Flink monitoring, deployment, migration, real-time analytics, or Iceberg/LakeHouse streaming with Flink
You MUST load the relevant reference files below before taking other steps.
The reference files contain MSF-specific details (thresholds, statistics, namespaces, constraints) that differ from generic Flink guidance and are required for correct responses.
| Goal | Reference | When to Load |
|---|---|---|
| Best practices | best-practices.md | Always before writing code |
| Maven dependencies | dependency-management.md | New project or adding connectors |
| Local dev environment | environment-setup.md | Docker-based local development |
| MSF architecture | msf-overview.md | KPU model and service constraints |
| MSF constraints and patterns | msf-constraints-and-patterns.md | MSF vs self-managed Flink, service-level vs application-level configuration separation, MSF-specific resource/network/storage limits, common MSF patterns |
| Quotas, ENI planning, MSF vs EMR, source/sink choice | foundation-operations.md | Capacity planning, service selection, architecture design, CLI/IAM/CloudWatch identifier disambiguation |
| IAM execution role, trust policy, action prefix, service principal | foundation-operations.md | Writing IAM policies for MSF — covers the kinesisanalytics: (no v2) action prefix, kinesisanalytics.amazonaws.com (no v2) trust principal, and the v2/non-v2 disconnect that is the most common source of permission and AssumeRole failures |
| Flink 2.x migration | flink-2x-migration.md | Version upgrades, state compatibility |
| KPU sizing | resource-optimization.md | Right-sizing, performance diagnosis, scaling |
| Scaling decisions on running apps | scaling-decisions.md | In-flight scaling matrix, cost/memory impact of scale changes, autoscaling behavior, anti-patterns |
| Cost estimation | pricing-calculator.md | Budget planning, sizing-to-cost mapping, optimization levers |
| Application lifecycle ops | application-lifecycle.md | Start/stop, deploy code, rollback, snapshot lifecycle, runtime properties, delete |
| Restart loop diagnosis | first-fault-isolation.md | Crashing/restarting apps, finding original failure vs loop sustainers, Flink Dashboard live diagnosis |
| Checkpoint tuning | checkpoint-tuning.md | Checkpoint impact on KPU memory and CPU, frequency vs network bandwidth trade-offs, checkpoint duration exceeding interval, OOM/GC during checkpoints |
| Job graph design | job-graph-architecture.md | Performance issues, splitting jobs |
| Job graph anti-patterns | job-graph-anti-patterns.md | Data skew detection and mitigation, monolith job anti-pattern, high fan-out anti-pattern, removing multiple shuffles, when to split a large application |
| Monitoring and alarms | monitoring-and-metrics.md | CloudWatch dashboards, alarms, metrics |
| Logging | logging-configuration.md | Log4j2, CloudWatch Logs setup |
| Kinesis connectors | kinesis-connector-guide.md | Kinesis source and sink builders, polling configuration and throttling (READER_EMPTY_RECORDS_FETCH_INTERVAL, SHARD_GET_RECORDS_MAX, ReadProvisionedThroughputExceeded, LimitExceededException), legacy connector migration |
| Kinesis Enhanced Fan-Out (EFO) | kinesis-efo-guide.md | When to use EFO vs polling, EFO source configuration, consumer lifecycle (JOB_MANAGED vs SELF_MANAGED), parallelism vs shard count, IAM permissions, troubleshooting |
| Iceberg integration (write APIs, distribution modes, partitioning) | iceberg-connector-guide.md | Iceberg write APIs (append, upsert, dynamic), distribution modes (NONE/HASH/RANGE), CoW vs MoR, read patterns, partitioning, DDL. Does NOT contain catalog choice or maintenance approaches — for those, load iceberg-tuning-and-operations.md. |
| Iceberg tuning, operations, catalog choice, maintenance | iceberg-tuning-and-operations.md | Provides maintenance approaches for S3 Tables, Glue + Glue auto-compaction, and Glue + Flink embedded maintenance with JDBC lock for catalog-choice questions; small files problem and mitigations; Flink TableMaintenance API, post-commit maintenance, lock factories; IcebergSink monitoring, anti-patterns. |
| CDC connectors | cdc-connector-guide.md | MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, MongoDB CDC |
| IaC and deployment | iac-and-deployment.md | CloudFormation, CDK, Terraform, two-phase deployment |
| Serialization | serialization-guide.md | POJO, Avro, Kryo guidance |
| State management | state-management.md | TTL, state types, migration safety |
Additional Resources
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer998 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer9.9 KiB
- NOTICELicence file added by AutoGineer67 B
- SKILL.md8.8 KiB
- references/application-lifecycle.md20.7 KiB
- references/best-practices.md11.6 KiB
- references/cdc-connector-guide.md47.2 KiB
- references/checkpoint-tuning.md6.4 KiB
- references/dependency-management.md13.4 KiB
- references/environment-setup.md7.0 KiB
- references/first-fault-isolation.md14.4 KiB
- references/flink-2x-migration.md34.1 KiB
- references/foundation-operations.md12.1 KiB
- references/iac-and-deployment.md17.1 KiB
- references/iceberg-connector-guide.md17.1 KiB
- references/iceberg-tuning-and-operations.md31.1 KiB
- references/job-graph-anti-patterns.md11.8 KiB
- references/job-graph-architecture.md8.9 KiB
- references/kinesis-connector-guide.md9.3 KiB
- references/kinesis-efo-guide.md7.3 KiB
- references/logging-configuration.md9.9 KiB
- references/monitoring-and-metrics.md34.3 KiB
- references/msf-constraints-and-patterns.md8.8 KiB
- references/msf-overview.md6.3 KiB
- references/pricing-calculator.md6.2 KiB
- references/resource-optimization.md9.9 KiB
- references/scaling-decisions.md5.4 KiB
- references/serialization-guide.md9.2 KiB
- references/state-management.md4.5 KiB
references/scaling-decisions.md
Scaling Decision Framework
Overview
Decision matrix for choosing the right scaling action based on observed bottleneck. For initial KPU sizing methodology and CloudWatch trend signals, see resource-optimization.md. This guide is for in-flight scaling decisions on running applications.
Decision Matrix
What is the bottleneck?
│
├─► CPU > 70% sustained or backpressure > 500ms/s
│ → INCREASE Parallelism (adds KPUs, restart required)
│
├─► OOM errors or heapMemoryUtilization > 85%
│ → DECREASE ParallelismPerKPU (more memory per subtask)
│ → Same total parallelism, more KPUs, lower throughput-per-dollar
│
├─► Variable/spiky load + can tolerate restart-on-scale
│ → ENABLE AutoScalingEnabled=true
│ → MSF reacts on CPU only; 5-15 min reaction; restart per event
│
└─► CPU < 30% sustained, idle > 500ms/s, no backpressure
→ DECREASE Parallelism (over-provisioned)
→ Validate with 60+ minute trend before reducingScaling Impact Table
| Change | KPU Effect | Memory Per Subtask | Cost Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parallelism 4 → 8, PPK=1 | 4 → 8 KPU | 4 GB (unchanged) | 2× |
| Parallelism 4 → 8, PPK=2 | 2 → 4 KPU | 2 GB (unchanged) | 2× |
| PPK 2 → 1, Parallelism=8 | 4 → 8 KPU | 2 → 4 GB | 2× |
| PPK 1 → 2, Parallelism=8 | 8 → 4 KPU | 4 → 2 GB | 0.5× |
| Parallelism 8 → 4, PPK=1 | 8 → 4 KPU | 4 GB (unchanged) | 0.5× |
KPU formula: KPU = Parallelism / ParallelismPerKPU. Add 1 orchestration KPU for total billed.
Pre-Scaling Validation
Always validate the bottleneck against trends, not point-in-time values, before scaling. Pull the last 6 hours of:
containerCPUUtilization— Maximum (hottest container)backPressuredTimeMsPerSecond— Average and MaximumidleTimeMsPerSecond— Average and MinimumheapMemoryUtilization— MaximumlastCheckpointDuration— trend (rising = pressure)
If signals conflict (high CPU but also high idle, or backpressure with low CPU), the bottleneck is downstream — investigate the operator graph via Flink Dashboard before scaling. Adding KPUs to a sink-bound or skew-bound job wastes money. See first-fault-isolation.md for live diagnosis via the Dashboard.
AutoScalingEnabled Behavior
MSF built-in autoscaling is CPU-only with fixed thresholds:
Scale up:
containerCPUUtilization > 75%for 15 consecutive 1-min datapoints → doublesCurrentParallelismScale down:
containerCPUUtilization < 10%for 360 consecutive 1-min datapoints (6h) → halvesCurrentParallelism, never below configuredParallelismEach event triggers a full restart (10–30s downtime). Backpressure, lag, and memory pressure do not trigger autoscaling.
During scaling: status is
AUTOSCALING. Onlystop-application --forceis valid.
For backpressure-driven, lag-driven, or memory-driven autoscaling: disable AutoScalingEnabled and implement custom scaling via CloudWatch alarms → Lambda → update-application.
Stateful vs Stateless ParallelismPerKPU
| Workload | ParallelismPerKPU | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stateful (keyed windows, joins, large RocksDB state) | 1 | Each subtask needs full 4 GB; sharing causes RocksDB contention and OOM |
| Stateless transforms (map, filter, simple routing) | 2 | Half memory per subtask is fine; doubles compute density per KPU |
| I/O-blocking (async lookups, slow sinks) | 2–4 | Subtasks spend most time blocked; pack more per KPU to fill CPU |
| Source operators matched to shards/partitions | Match to source count | Use setParallelism() on the source only |
Scaling Guardrails
❌ Cannot scale during a transitional state (STARTING, UPDATING, STOPPING, AUTOSCALING)
❌ Cannot scale during another in-flight update — sequence operations
⚠️ Every scaling change triggers a restart with 10–30s downtime (varies with state size and snapshot recency)
⚠️ Take a snapshot before scaling for rollback safety
⚠️ Scaling beyond 64 KPU requires a Service Quotas increase (default limit)
⚠️ Setting Parallelism > source partition/shard count creates idle subtasks — wasted KPUs
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails |
|---|---|
| Scaling up to fix checkpoint failures | Checkpoint failures are usually serialization, S3 perms, or alignment timeout — not capacity |
| Scaling up to fix data skew | Hot keys still go to the same subtask. Fix with rebalance() or pre-splitting keys |
| Scaling up to fix slow sink | Sink is the bottleneck regardless of KPU count. Optimize sink (batching, async I/O) or switch sink |
| Scaling during active restart loop | Restart loops persist until root cause is fixed; new KPUs join the loop |
| Reducing PPK and Parallelism in separate updates | Each triggers a restart; two sequential updates = double downtime. Combine in a single update-application call |
| Scaling on a single high CPU spike | Spikes from checkpointing or GC are normal; require sustained 30+ minute trend |
References
resource-optimization.md — KPU sizing methodology and trend-based signals
first-fault-isolation.md — diagnose before scaling
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs an MCP server
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- AWS
- Publisher
- AWS (Official)
- Source
- aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws · plugins/aws-data-analytics/skills/developing-applications-on-managed-service-for-apache-flink · commit 0a218f8
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- NOTICE (added by AutoGineer from NOTICE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Also distributed in
- aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by AWS.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download developing-applications-on-managed-service-for-apache-flink.zip