AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides comprehensive domain expertise for managing Amazon Route 53 DNS configurations. It acts as a router to specific, self-contained procedures for tasks ranging from basic public DNS record creation to complex hybrid network resolution, traffic steering, and security-focused DNS Firewall management. It emphasizes best practices for IAM security, DNS transport encryption, and scalable configuration management across multi-account environments.
What it does
- Maps hostnames to IPs, AWS resources, or other hostnames via public DNS records.
- Implements traffic-steering policies like weighted routing and failover for disaster recovery.
- Configures health checks to monitor endpoint availability and trigger alerts.
- Secures VPC traffic by blocking malicious domains using DNS Firewall.
- Centralizes DNS configurations and security rules across multiple accounts using Route 53 Profiles or Firewall Manager.
- Enables hybrid network resolution and manages VPC Resolver configurations for Outposts.
When to use it
- When you need to point a domain or subdomain to an AWS resource or external IP.
- When implementing blue/green deployments or canary releases using weighted routing.
- When setting up high-availability architectures requiring cross-region failover.
- When you need to filter malicious DNS queries within a VPC.
- When managing DNS configurations at scale across an AWS Organization.
- When resolving private DNS queries between on-premises networks and AWS VPCs.
Advantages
- Provides structured, step-by-step procedures for complex DNS tasks.
- Includes critical security constraints for IAM and DNS transport.
- Offers clear decision frameworks for choosing between routing policies or centralization methods.
- Ensures consistent configuration by routing to specialized, self-contained reference files.
- Supports both sandboxed execution via AWS MCP and standard AWS CLI fallback.
Usage examples
- “How do I point my domain example.com to an S3 bucket?”
- The agent will guide you through the 'creating a public DNS record' procedure to map your domain to the S3 bucket endpoint.
- “I need to block known malicious domains for all my VPCs.”
- The agent will direct you to the 'centralizing DNS Firewall' procedure to deploy protection across your organization.
- “How can I fail over traffic between two regions?”
- The agent will provide the 'configuring failover routing' steps, including setting up the necessary health checks.
- “How do I resolve private DNS between my on-premises network and AWS?”
- The agent will walk you through the 'resolving private DNS for hybrid networks' procedure.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/aws/route53/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip route53.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by AWS
Amazon Route 53
Overview
Domain expertise for configuring Amazon Route 53 DNS across the public and private resolution paths: hosted zone records, traffic-steering routing policies, health checks, DNS Firewall, Route 53 Profiles, VPC Resolver (also known as Route 53 Resolver) for hybrid and Outposts networks, and Global Resolver.
This skill is a router. Each customer task maps to a procedure file under references/. Read the
matching reference in full before acting, then follow its constraints and steps. The reference
files are self-contained: each carries its own decision tables, constraints, procedure, and
troubleshooting.
Execute commands using the AWS MCP server when connected (sandboxed execution, audit logging,
observability). Fall back to the AWS CLI otherwise. All Route 53 Domains API calls are made in
us-east-1 regardless of where the customer works.
Which Route 53 task do you need?
| Goal | Reference |
|---|---|
| Point a hostname or zone apex at an IP, AWS resource, or hostname | creating a public DNS record |
| Split traffic across endpoints in a ratio (blue/green, canary, A/B) | splitting traffic with weighted routing |
| Fail over between two Regions for disaster recovery | configuring failover routing |
| Monitor whether an endpoint is up and get alerted | setting up a health check |
| Block malicious domains for a VPC at the resolver | blocking malicious domains |
| Work out which DNS Firewall rule wins for a domain across multiple rule groups | identifying the effective DNS Firewall rule |
| Apply one DNS config across many VPCs and accounts | configuring Route 53 Profiles |
| Fan DNS Firewall out across many accounts org-wide | centralizing DNS Firewall with Profiles |
| Resolve private DNS both ways across a hybrid network | resolving private DNS for hybrid networks |
| Run VPC Resolver locally on an AWS Outposts rack | running VPC Resolver on Outposts |
| Give on-premises and remote clients one anycast DNS endpoint | setting up Global Resolver |
Routing notes
Records vs routing policies. A plain hostname-to-target mapping is the public DNS record task. Splitting or steering traffic (weighted, failover) is a separate routing-policy task with its own reference. Start from the customer's intent, not the record type.
Health checks vs failover. A health check monitors an endpoint and raises alarms. The failover routing policy decides where traffic goes when a check fails. They are two references and are often used together: set up the health check, then wire it into failover.
DNS Firewall for one VPC vs many accounts. Authoring rules for a VPC is the blocking reference. Fanning the same protection across accounts with Profiles and Firewall Manager is the centralizing reference.
DNS Firewall authoring vs diagnosis. Creating or changing rules is the blocking reference. Working out which rule already wins for a domain when several rule groups are associated (a read and diagnostic task) is the identifying-the-effective-rule reference.
Profiles, two entry points. General Profile setup (attach resources, share via RAM, cost and visibility tradeoffs) is the configuring-Profiles reference. Using Profiles specifically to scale DNS Firewall org-wide is the centralizing reference.
VPC Resolver, three contexts. In-Region hybrid resolution, the Outposts-local resolver, and the Global Resolver anycast endpoint are three separate references. Match the reference to where the resolver runs.
Cross-service work
Pointing a custom domain at a CloudFront distribution, or failing over between CloudFront distributions, is cross-service work spanning Route 53 and CloudFront. Use this skill for the Route 53 side of pure-Route 53 tasks only.
Security Considerations
These apply across the Route 53 tasks below; each reference repeats the ones load-bearing for its workflow.
You SHOULD use least-privilege IAM credentials provisioned through IAM roles (instance profiles, SSO/IAM Identity Center session credentials, or
aws sts assume-role) rather than long-lived IAM user access keys, and prefer read-only credentials for inspection steps.You SHOULD recommend encrypted DNS transport (DoT or DoH) over plaintext Do53 for resolver client populations, since Do53 exposes queried domain names to on-path observers.
You MUST scope resolver-endpoint security group rules on port 53 to the on-premises CIDR ranges or known DNS server IPs, never
0.0.0.0/0.You MUST encrypt query log and notification destinations at rest: KMS on CloudWatch Logs log groups, SSE-S3/SSE-KMS on S3 buckets, server-side encryption (SSE) on a Data Firehose stream, and SSE on SNS topics, because DNS query logs and health-check notifications can reveal infrastructure topology.
For Global Resolver, you MUST treat access-token
valuereturned at create time as a secret; store it in AWS Secrets Manager rather than in plaintext, and validate which client populations each DNS view authorizes.
Additional Resources
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer925 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer9.9 KiB
- NOTICELicence file added by AutoGineer67 B
- SKILL.md6.4 KiB
- references/blocking-malicious-domains.md20.7 KiB
- references/centralizing-dns-firewall.md17.3 KiB
- references/configuring-failover-routing.md15.1 KiB
- references/configuring-route53-profiles.md15.4 KiB
- references/creating-a-public-dns-record.md12.9 KiB
- references/identifying-the-effective-dns-firewall-rule.md15.1 KiB
- references/resolving-private-dns-for-hybrid-networks.md15.3 KiB
- references/running-route53-resolver-on-outposts.md10.5 KiB
- references/setting-up-a-route53-health-check.md11.2 KiB
- references/setting-up-route53-global-resolver.md25.5 KiB
- references/splitting-traffic-with-weighted-routing.md10.7 KiB
references/blocking-malicious-domains.md
Blocking Malicious Domains with Route 53 DNS Firewall
Overview
Domain expertise for filtering DNS queries leaving a VPC against known-malicious domains and blocking matches at the Amazon-provided resolver using Route 53 Resolver DNS Firewall (also called Route 53 DNS Firewall). Covers the precondition that decides whether the firewall sees any traffic at all, building rule groups from AWS-managed and custom domain lists, choosing the block action mode, and reusing one rule group across a customer's VPCs.
Does not cover fanning the same protection across many accounts with Route 53 Profiles, or general Profile configuration. Those are separate skills.
Execute commands using the AWS MCP server when connected (sandboxed execution, audit logging, observability). Fall back to the AWS CLI otherwise.
Table of Contents
Overview
Workflow
Critical precondition: the firewall must see the VPC's queries
Decision: block action mode
Beyond static domain lists: DNS Firewall Advanced
Cost to expect
Reuse, do not duplicate
Troubleshooting
Procedure
Additional Resources
Workflow
To block malicious domains for a VPC, follow the procedure exactly. See the Procedure section below.
The procedure covers:
Confirming the VPC uses the Amazon-provided resolver so the firewall can see its queries
Creating a rule group and populating it with AWS-managed and custom domain lists
Choosing the block action mode
Associating one rule group across all the customer's VPCs
Surfacing the console link to verify the result
Critical precondition: the firewall must see the VPC's queries
DNS Firewall only inspects queries that reach the Amazon-provided resolver (the .2 resolver,
shown as AmazonProvidedDNS). If the VPC's Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) option set
points DNS at a custom resolver, the firewall sees nothing and has no effect, with no error.
Constraints:
You MUST check the VPC's DHCP option set before building any rule groups
If the VPC uses a custom resolver, you MUST tell the customer plainly that DNS Firewall will not filter this VPC's traffic, and MUST NOT proceed to create rule groups as if protection were in place. The console does not flag this precondition, so the customer will otherwise assume the VPC is protected when it is not
Decision: block action mode
A blocked query can be answered three ways. The right choice depends on how the customer wants the application to fail, because the wrong choice creates support cases that look like generic resolution failures.
| Mode | What the client sees | Use when |
|---|---|---|
NXDOMAIN | The domain does not exist | The application should fail fast, as if the name is unregistered |
NODATA | An empty answer | The failure should be quiet (can resemble a network issue) |
OVERRIDE | A CNAME to a domain you supply | Traffic should be redirected to a sinkhole or inspection host (DNS Firewall returns a CNAME, not an IP) |
Constraints:
You MUST confirm the desired mode with the customer rather than defaulting silently, because the mode changes application behavior on a block
Beyond static domain lists: DNS Firewall Advanced
Static managed and custom lists catch known-bad domains. DNS Firewall Advanced extends protection with four additional rule types that do not use customer domain lists:
| Rule type | Detection method | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| DGA (Domain Generation Algorithm) | ML-based behavioral detection | Malware that generates random-looking domains for command-and-control |
| DNS Tunneling | ML-based behavioral detection | Data exfiltration via DNS query/response payloads |
| Threat categories | Rule-based categorization | Blocking domains by threat type (e.g., malware, ransomware, spyware, C2) — broader than the Foundational managed lists |
| Content categories | Rule-based categorization | Blocking domains by content type (e.g., gambling, adult content, streaming) for acceptable-use enforcement |
DGA and DNS tunneling rules support confidence thresholds (HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW) that control the sensitivity of detection. Higher confidence means fewer false positives but may miss some threats.
Constraints:
You SHOULD recommend DNS Firewall Advanced rules when the customer's concern is malware that uses DGA command-and-control, DNS tunneling, or when they need category-based filtering that static lists cannot reliably cover
You MUST note that all Advanced rule types carry an additional hourly charge (see Cost to expect) and that the Allow action is not available for Advanced rules
You SHOULD recommend HIGH confidence for BLOCK actions and MEDIUM or LOW confidence for ALERT actions when using DGA or DNS tunneling rules, to minimize false positives on blocking
Cost to expect
DNS Firewall billing has three dimensions a customer should know before rollout:
Queries: $0.60 per million queries from VPCs with a rule group association (first 1 billion per month), then $0.40 per million. Queries that follow CNAMEs are also charged.
Custom domains: $0.0005 per domain per month for domains in custom lists. AWS-managed domain lists are free (you still pay for the queries inspected against them).
DNS Firewall Advanced: $0.16 per hour per rule group containing one or more Advanced rules, per VPC association.
Constraints:
You SHOULD surface these costs when the customer adds custom domains in bulk or enables Advanced rules, because both add charges beyond the per-query fee
Reuse, do not duplicate
Rule groups are reusable. You SHOULD associate one rule group with all of the customer's VPCs rather than creating a separate rule group per VPC. Per-VPC duplication drifts over time as new domains land in some rule groups but not others, leaving inconsistent protection.
Troubleshooting
Rules created but nothing is blocked
The VPC sends DNS to a custom resolver, not AmazonProvidedDNS. Confirm the DHCP option set
uses the .2 resolver before building rules. This is the most common cause and surfaces no error.
Application breaks in a confusing way after a block
The block action mode does not match the desired client behavior. Choose NXDOMAIN, NODATA,
or OVERRIDE based on how the application should fail. See the decision table above.
Protection differs between VPCs
A separate rule group was created per VPC. Associate one reusable rule group across all VPCs.
Threat coverage has gaps
Domain lists were hand-curated without an AWS-managed list. Start from a managed list (malware, botnet command-and-control, or the aggregate threat list) and add custom lists on top.
Procedure
Overview
This procedure filters DNS queries leaving a VPC against known-malicious domains and blocks matches at the Amazon-provided resolver using Route 53 Resolver DNS Firewall. It verifies the precondition that decides whether the firewall sees any traffic, creates and populates a rule group, sets the block action mode, associates the rule group across the customer's VPCs, and surfaces the console link to verify the result.
Parameters
vpc_ids (required): One or more VPC IDs to protect (e.g.,
vpc-0abc123). All VPCs in a single run should share the Region.region (required): The AWS Region the VPCs are in (e.g.,
us-east-1).managed_domain_list (optional, default: the AWS-managed aggregate threat list): Which AWS-managed domain list to start from.
custom_domains (optional): Additional domains to block beyond the managed list.
block_action (required): One of
NXDOMAIN,NODATA, orOVERRIDE. Must be confirmed with the customer before creating rules (see Step 4); do not default it silently.override_target (required only when
block_actionisOVERRIDE): The domain name to return as a CNAME for blocked queries. OVERRIDE supports a CNAME target only, not an IP.
Constraints for parameter acquisition:
You MUST ask for all required parameters upfront in a single prompt rather than one at a time
You MUST confirm the Region and the full VPC list before any write operation
You MUST NOT default the block action silently; confirm it with the customer (see Step 4)
You MUST confirm successful acquisition of all parameters before proceeding
Steps
1. Verify dependencies
Check for required tooling and credentials before starting.
Constraints:
You MUST confirm credentials with
aws sts get-caller-identityYou MUST REQUIRE provisioning credentials through ephemeral mechanisms (IAM roles via instance profiles, SSO/IAM Identity Center session credentials, or
aws sts assume-role) rather than long-lived IAM user access keys.You SHOULD prefer read-only or least-privilege credentials for the inspection steps and only use write-capable credentials for the create and associate steps
You MUST enable Route 53 query logging to an encrypted destination where applicable, ensure CloudTrail is enabled to audit changes, and set CloudWatch alarms on health-check status where health checks are involved.
You MUST inform the customer if required tooling is missing and ask whether to proceed
2. Confirm the firewall will see the VPC's queries (precondition)
DNS Firewall only inspects queries that reach the Amazon-provided resolver. If the VPC's DHCP option set points DNS at a custom resolver, the firewall inspects nothing.
Constraints:
You MUST retrieve each VPC's associated DHCP option set:
aws ec2 describe-vpcs --vpc-ids {vpc_id} --region {region} --query 'Vpcs[0].DhcpOptionsId'You MUST inspect the option set's
domain-name-serversvalue:aws ec2 describe-dhcp-options --dhcp-options-ids {dhcp_options_id} --region {region}A
domain-name-serversvalue ofAmazonProvidedDNSmeans the firewall will see the queries. Any other value (a custom resolver IP) means it will notIf a VPC uses a custom resolver, you MUST tell the customer plainly that DNS Firewall will not filter that VPC's traffic, and MUST NOT continue building rules for it as though it were protected. The console surfaces no error for this case
3. Create the rule group and populate domain lists
Create one rule group and reference an AWS-managed domain list as the foundation, adding custom lists on top only as needed.
Constraints:
You MUST create a single rule group for reuse, not one per VPC:
aws route53resolver create-firewall-rule-group --name {rule_group_name} --region {region}You SHOULD start from one or more AWS-managed domain lists. The four publicly available managed lists are:
AWSManagedDomainsMalwareDomainList— domains associated with malware distribution and hostingAWSManagedDomainsBotnetCommandandControl— domains used for botnet command-and-controlAWSManagedDomainsAggregateThreatList— combined multi-threat list (superset of malware, ransomware, botnet, spyware, DNS tunneling domains; includes domains from the other lists)AWSManagedDomainsAmazonGuardDutyThreatList— domains from Amazon GuardDuty DNS security findings (internally generated threat intelligence) List the managed lists in the Region to find their IDs:
aws route53resolver list-firewall-domain-lists --region {region}The managed list is referenced by its
Id, not its friendly name. You MUST resolve the friendly name to itsIdfromlist-firewall-domain-listsoutput before creating the ruleYou MUST treat custom domain lists as additive, not as the foundation. If the customer supplied
custom_domains, create a custom list and add the domains withupdate-firewall-domains(inline domains useupdate-firewall-domains, notimport-firewall-domains):aws route53resolver create-firewall-domain-list --name {custom_list_name} --region {region} aws route53resolver update-firewall-domains --firewall-domain-list-id {list_id} \ --operation ADD --domains {domain1} {domain2} --region {region}For a bulk list,
import-firewall-domainsloads domains from an Amazon S3 file and supports only--operation REPLACE(it overwrites the list); it does not accept inline--domains:aws route53resolver import-firewall-domains --firewall-domain-list-id {list_id} \ --operation REPLACE --domain-file-url s3://{bucket}/{key} --region {region}
4. Set the block action mode
Add a rule to the rule group that references each domain list with the confirmed block action.
Constraints:
You MUST confirm the block action with the customer before creating the rule, because the mode changes application behavior on a block:
NXDOMAIN— the client is told the domain does not exist (fail fast)NODATA— the client gets an empty answer (quiet failure)OVERRIDE— the client is returned a CNAME to a domain you supply (redirect to a sinkhole)
You SHOULD offer an ALERT-first rollout for an unfamiliar managed list: create the rule with
--action ALERTfirst, confirm from query logs that legitimate domains are not caught, then switch the rule to--action BLOCK. ALERT logs the match and permits the query, avoiding an outage from a false positive on a list the customer has not validatedFor
NXDOMAINorNODATA:aws route53resolver create-firewall-rule \ --firewall-rule-group-id {rule_group_id} \ --firewall-domain-list-id {list_id} \ --priority {priority} --action BLOCK --block-response {NXDOMAIN|NODATA} \ --name {rule_name} --region {region}For
OVERRIDE, you MUST supplyoverride_target, a DNS record type, and a TTL:aws route53resolver create-firewall-rule \ --firewall-rule-group-id {rule_group_id} \ --firewall-domain-list-id {list_id} \ --priority {priority} --action BLOCK --block-response OVERRIDE \ --block-override-domain {override_target} --block-override-dns-type CNAME \ --block-override-ttl {ttl} --name {rule_name} --region {region}
4a. Add ALLOW rules for false-positive mitigation (optional)
If legitimate domains are caught by a managed list or a broad custom list, create a higher-priority ALLOW rule for those specific domains. Because DNS Firewall evaluates rules by priority (lowest number first) and stops at the first match, an ALLOW rule with a lower priority number than the BLOCK rule overrides the block for that domain.
Constraints:
You SHOULD create a custom domain list of known-good domains and an ALLOW rule at a priority lower (higher precedence) than the BLOCK rule:
aws route53resolver create-firewall-domain-list --name {allowlist_name} --region {region} aws route53resolver update-firewall-domains --firewall-domain-list-id {allowlist_id} \ --operation ADD --domains {legitimate_domain1} {legitimate_domain2} --region {region} aws route53resolver create-firewall-rule \ --firewall-rule-group-id {rule_group_id} \ --firewall-domain-list-id {allowlist_id} \ --priority {priority_lower_than_block} --action ALLOW \ --name {allow_rule_name} --region {region}You MUST set the ALLOW rule's priority to a lower number than the BLOCK rule it overrides
4b. Enable query logging for monitoring (required)
Query logging is required to monitor ALERT rules, detect false positives, and confirm rules are matching expected traffic.
Constraints:
You MUST enable Resolver query logging on each protected VPC (this is the security-required control stated in Security Considerations; the log destination MUST have encryption at rest):
aws route53resolver create-resolver-query-log-config \ --name {log_config_name} \ --destination-arn {destination_arn} \ --region {region} aws route53resolver associate-resolver-query-log-config \ --resolver-query-log-config-id {config_id} \ --resource-id {vpc_id} --region {region}The destination can be a CloudWatch Logs log group, an S3 bucket, or a Data Firehose delivery stream.
You MUST enable encryption at rest on the query log destination, because query logs contain the domain names a VPC's workloads resolve: a KMS key on the CloudWatch Logs log group (
aws logs associate-kms-key), SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS on the S3 bucket, or server-side encryption on the Data Firehose streamQuery log records include
firewall_rule_group_id,firewall_rule_action, andfirewall_domain_list_idfor ALERT and BLOCK actions — use these to verify rules are matching expected traffic before switching from ALERT to BLOCK
5. Associate the rule group across all the customer's VPCs
Associate the single rule group with every VPC that passed the Step 2 precondition.
Constraints:
You MUST associate the same rule group with each protected VPC rather than creating new rule groups:
aws route53resolver associate-firewall-rule-group \ --firewall-rule-group-id {rule_group_id} \ --vpc-id {vpc_id} --priority {priority} \ --name {association_name} --region {region}You MUST skip any VPC flagged in Step 2 as using a custom resolver, and remind the customer why
6. Confirm and surface the console link
Confirm the associations and hand the customer the console link to verify.
Constraints:
You MUST verify each association reached
COMPLETE:aws route53resolver list-firewall-rule-group-associations \ --firewall-rule-group-id {rule_group_id} --region {region}You MUST present the rule group detail console view, filling
{region}with the VPCs' Region and{ruleGroupId}with the rule group ID returned bycreate-firewall-rule-groupin Step 3. Note the fragment isRulegroupId(lowercaseg):https://{region}.console.aws.amazon.com/vpcconsole/home?region={region}#DNSFirewallRuleGroupDetails:RulegroupId={ruleGroupId}
Example
Example input
{
"vpc_ids": ["vpc-0abc123", "vpc-0def456"],
"region": "us-east-1",
"managed_domain_list": "AWSManagedDomainsMalwareDomainList",
"block_action": "NXDOMAIN"
}Example output
Created rule group rslvr-frg-0123456789abcdef0 referencing AWSManagedDomainsMalwareDomainList
with a BLOCK/NXDOMAIN rule.
- Associated with vpc-0abc123 (COMPLETE)
- Associated with vpc-0def456 (COMPLETE)
Verify in the console:
https://us-east-1.console.aws.amazon.com/vpcconsole/home?region=us-east-1#DNSFirewallRuleGroupDetails:RulegroupId=rslvr-frg-0123456789abcdef0Troubleshooting
Rules created but nothing is blocked
The VPC sends DNS to a custom resolver, not AmazonProvidedDNS. Re-check the DHCP option set
(Step 2). DNS Firewall surfaces no error for this case.
Application breaks in a confusing way after a block
The block action mode does not match the desired client behavior. Re-create the rule with the mode that matches how the application should fail (Step 4).
Protection differs between VPCs
A separate rule group was created per VPC. Consolidate onto one reusable rule group and re-associate (Steps 3 and 5).
Association stuck or failed
Check the association status with list-firewall-rule-group-associations. A VPC can have a
limited number of associated rule groups; remove an unused association before adding another.
Verifying rules are matching (test domains)
AWS provides test domains for each managed list. Query these from within a protected VPC to confirm the firewall is active and rules are matching. The format is:
controldomain1.{listname}.firewall.route53resolver.{region}.amazonaws.comFor example:
dig controldomain1.botnetlist.firewall.route53resolver.us-east-1.amazonaws.comA successful block returns the configured block response (NXDOMAIN, NODATA, or OVERRIDE). If the query resolves normally, the firewall is not inspecting the VPC's traffic.
Security Considerations
You SHOULD use least-privilege IAM credentials provisioned through ephemeral mechanisms (IAM roles, SSO/IAM Identity Center session credentials, or
aws sts assume-role) rather than long-lived IAM user access keys, and prefer read-only credentials for inspection steps.You MUST enable Resolver query logging to an encrypted destination (KMS on CloudWatch Logs, SSE-S3/SSE-KMS on S3, or server-side encryption on a Data Firehose stream) and ensure CloudTrail is enabled to audit rule and association changes.
You SHOULD prefer an ALERT-first rollout on an unvalidated managed list and confirm matches from query logs before switching to BLOCK, so a false positive does not cause an outage.
You MUST confirm the block action mode with the customer, since the wrong mode changes how applications fail on a block.
Additional Resources
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs an MCP server
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- AWS
- Publisher
- AWS (Official)
- Source
- aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws · skills/specialized-skills/networking-and-content-delivery-skills/route53 · commit 0a218f8
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- NOTICE (added by AutoGineer from NOTICE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by AWS.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download route53.zip