AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The gcp-to-aws skill provides a deterministic, multi-phase process to migrate Google Cloud Platform (GCP) workloads to AWS. It supports infrastructure migration via Terraform analysis and AI workload migration by mapping models to Amazon Bedrock. The skill enforces a strict state machine, requiring discovery, clarification, design, estimation, and generation phases to ensure a reliable migration path. It includes specific logic for handling hybrid stacks, AI provider transitions, and complex infrastructure clustering.
What it does
- Discovers GCP resources from Terraform, application code, or billing data.
- Clarifies migration requirements through a structured questionnaire.
- Designs AWS architecture based on GCP workload types and AI model requirements.
- Estimates costs for the proposed AWS infrastructure and AI services.
- Generates migration artifacts including Terraform configurations and AI provider adapters.
- Provides specialized guidance for migrating AI workloads from Gemini or OpenAI to Amazon Bedrock.
When to use it
- When you need to migrate existing GCP infrastructure to AWS.
- When you are looking to move AI-driven applications from GCP or OpenAI to Amazon Bedrock.
- When you have Terraform files or billing exports and need a structured migration plan.
- When you require a step-by-step, validated approach to re-platforming cloud services.
Advantages
- Enforces a rigorous, fail-closed state machine to prevent skipped steps.
- Provides intelligent mapping of GCP services to AWS equivalents.
- Includes specific logic for AI workload migration and model compatibility.
- Supports multi-signal discovery using IaC, code, and billing data.
- Ensures consistent artifact generation through a structured 6-phase process.
Usage examples
- “Migrate my GKE and Cloud SQL setup to AWS.”
- The agent initiates the discovery phase, analyzing your Terraform files to identify GKE and Cloud SQL resources, then guides you through the clarification and design phases for EKS and RDS.
- “I need to move my LangChain app from OpenAI to Bedrock.”
- The agent identifies the AI workload, selects the best-fit Bedrock model family, and generates the necessary provider adapters and migration documentation.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/cline/gcp-to-aws/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip gcp-to-aws.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Cline
GCP-to-AWS Migration Skill
Philosophy
Re-platform by default: Select AWS services that match GCP workload types (e.g., Cloud Run → Fargate, Cloud SQL → RDS).
Dev sizing unless specified: Default to development-tier capacity (e.g., db.t4g.micro, single AZ). Upgrade only on user direction.
No human one-time migration costs: Do not present human labor, professional services, or people-time work as dollar estimates or "one-time migration cost" budget categories. Vendor charges grounded in data (for example GCP data transfer egress in the infra estimate when billing exists) are allowed.
Multi-signal approach: Design phase adapts based on available inputs — Terraform IaC for infrastructure, billing data for service mapping, and app code for AI workload detection.
BigQuery /
google_bigquery_*: The skill does not recommend a specific AWS analytics or warehouse service. During Clarify, if discovery shows BigQuery (IaCgoogle_bigquery_*and/or billing rows for BigQuery), you must surface the specialist advisory before Design (seereferences/phases/clarify/clarify.md). Design output usesDeferred — specialist engagement; keep directing the user to their AWS account team and/or a data analytics migration partner through Design, Estimate, and docs (seereferences/phases/design/design-infra.mdBigQuery specialist gate).
Definitions
"Load" = Read the file using the Read tool and follow its instructions. Do not summarize or skip sections.
$MIGRATION_DIR= The run-specific directory under.migration/(e.g.,.migration/0226-1430/). Set during Phase 1 (Discover).
Context Loading Rules
Each phase loads reference files on demand. To keep per-turn context manageable and prevent instruction-following degradation:
Budget: Each phase should load no more than ~800 lines of instructions (excluding user artifacts like JSON profiles and MCP tool results).
Conditional loading: Reference files with trigger conditions (e.g.,
agentic_profile.is_agentic == true) MUST NOT be loaded unless the condition is met. Do not speculatively load files.No duplication: Model mapping tables, pricing data, and shared warnings exist in one canonical file. Other files reference them; they do not copy them inline.
Progressive depth: Phase orchestrators (
design.md,generate.md) contain short routing logic that points to detailed sub-files. Load the sub-file only when its path is selected.
Conditional reference files (load ONLY when condition is true):
| File | Condition |
|---|---|
design-refs/ai-gemini-to-bedrock.md | ai-workload-profile.json exists AND summary.ai_source = "gemini" or "both" |
design-refs/ai-openai-to-bedrock.md | ai-workload-profile.json exists AND summary.ai_source = "openai" or "both" |
design-refs/ai-anthropic-to-bedrock.md | ai-workload-profile.json exists AND summary.ai_source = "anthropic" |
design-refs/ai.md | ai-workload-profile.json exists AND summary.ai_source = "other" |
design-refs/design-ref-harness.md | agentic_profile.is_agentic == true AND ai_constraints.agentic.migration_approach == "harness" |
design-refs/design-ref-agentic-to-agentcore.md | agentic_profile.is_agentic == true AND ai_constraints.agentic.migration_approach == "strands" |
shared/retarget-gotchas.md | agentic_profile.is_agentic == true AND ai_constraints.agentic.migration_approach == "retarget" |
When adding new reference files, verify the phase's total loaded instructions remain under budget. If a new file would exceed ~800 lines when combined with other loaded refs, split it or make it conditional.
Hybrid stack budget warning:
When both gcp-resource-inventory.json AND ai-workload-profile.json exist, the combined design refs will approach the ~800-line budget. Output this warning to the user before loading the AI design refs:
"⚠️ This is a large hybrid stack (infrastructure + AI workloads). To ensure complete and accurate recommendations, consider running the migration in two separate passes:
Pass 1 — Infrastructure: Run with only your Terraform files to get infra mapping, Terraform generation, and cost estimates.
Pass 2 — AI workloads: Run with only your application code to get Bedrock model recommendations, provider adapters, and AI migration artifacts.
Continue with the combined run? (Y/N)"
If the user chooses to continue, proceed with the combined run. Load AI refs after infra refs to preserve infra instruction fidelity. If the user declines, stop and instruct them to re-run with a single input source type.
This warning is advisory only — it does not block the run.
Prerequisites
User must provide at least one GCP source:
Terraform IaC:
.tffiles (with optional.tfvars,.tfstate)Application code: Source files with GCP SDK or AI framework imports
Billing data: GCP billing/cost/usage export files (CSV or JSON)
If none of the above are found, stop and ask user to provide at least one source type.
State Machine
This is the execution controller. After completing each phase, consult this table to determine the next action.
| Current State | Condition | Next Action |
|---|---|---|
discover | phases.discover != "completed" | Load references/phases/discover/discover.md |
clarify | phases.discover == "completed" AND phases.clarify != "completed" | Load references/phases/clarify/clarify.md |
design | phases.clarify == "completed" AND phases.design != "completed" | Load references/phases/design/design.md |
estimate | phases.design == "completed" AND phases.estimate != "completed" | Load references/phases/estimate/estimate.md |
generate | phases.estimate == "completed" AND phases.generate != "completed" | Load references/phases/generate/generate.md |
complete | phases.generate == "completed" AND phases.feedback == "pending" | Set phases.feedback to "completed" (user had two chances), then migration complete |
complete | phases.generate == "completed" AND phases.feedback == "completed" | Migration planning complete |
How to determine current state (deterministic):
Read
$MIGRATION_DIR/.phase-status.jsonIf
current_phaseexists, use it (must match one of: discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, complete)Otherwise use ordered phase evaluation:
discover→clarify→design→estimate→generatePick the first phase in that order where
phases.<phase> != "completed"; if none, state iscomplete
Phase gate checks: If prior phase incomplete, do not advance (e.g., cannot enter estimate without completed design).
Clarify is mandatory: Do not load references/phases/design/design.md, references/phases/estimate/estimate.md, or references/phases/generate/generate.md unless $MIGRATION_DIR/.phase-status.json exists and phases.clarify is exactly "completed". A preferences.json file alone is not sufficient proof that Clarify ran. If the user asks to skip Clarify or jump straight to Design, cost estimate, or artifact generation, refuse briefly, then load references/phases/clarify/clarify.md and run Phase 2. There is no exception for "quick" or "obvious" migrations.
Feedback checkpoints: Feedback is not a sequential phase — it is offered at two interleaved checkpoints (after Discover and after Estimate). See the Feedback Checkpoints section below for details.
Handoff Gate Orchestration (Fail Closed)
Load references/shared/handoff-gates.md when executing any phase completion step.
Single
$MIGRATION_DIR: Use one run directory for the entire migration. Do not mix artifacts across.migration/*/sessions.Re-read from disk: Before each phase (and before each handoff gate), Read required artifacts from
$MIGRATION_DIR/. Do not rely on chat memory.Advance only on
HANDOFF_OK: A phase is complete only when its orchestrator emitsHANDOFF_OK | phase=<name> | artifacts=.... Do not load the next phase without it.On
GATE_FAIL: Output the failure line(s) to the user in plain language. Do NOT modify artifacts to pass the gate. Do NOT continue to the next phase. Tell the user which phase to re-run.Re-entry: Re-running an earlier phase after downstream phases completed requires explicit user confirmation; downstream phases must be reset to
"pending". Seehandoff-gates.mdre-entry table.
Generate phase additionally loads references/shared/validate-artifacts.md before writing migration-report.html.
State Validation
When reading $MIGRATION_DIR/.phase-status.json, validate before proceeding:
Multiple sessions: If multiple directories exist under
.migration/, list them with their phase status and ask: [A] Resume latest, [B] Start fresh, [C] Cancel.Invalid JSON: If
.phase-status.jsonfails to parse, STOP. Output: "State file corrupted (invalid JSON). Delete the file and restart the current phase."Unrecognized phase: If
phasesobject contains a phase not in {discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, feedback}, STOP. Output: "Unrecognized phase: [value]. Valid phases: discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, feedback."Unrecognized status: If any
phases.*value is not in {pending, in_progress, completed}, STOP. Output: "Unrecognized status: [value]. Valid values: pending, in_progress, completed."Invalid
current_phase(if present): Ifcurrent_phaseis not in {discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, complete}, STOP. Output: "Unrecognized current_phase: [value]. Valid values: discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, complete."Out-of-order completion: For ordered phases [discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate], if any later phase is
"completed"while an earlier phase is not"completed", STOP. Output: "Inconsistent phase ordering detected. Reconcile.phase-status.jsonbefore resuming."Multiple active phases: Across core phases {discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate}, at most one phase may be
"in_progress". If >1, STOP. Output: "Multiple phases are in_progress. Keep only one active phase before resuming."
State Management
Migration state lives in $MIGRATION_DIR (.migration/[MMDD-HHMM]/), created by Phase 1 and persisted across invocations.
.phase-status.json schema:
{
"migration_id": "0226-1430",
"last_updated": "2026-02-26T15:35:22Z",
"current_phase": "design",
"phases": {
"discover": "completed",
"clarify": "completed",
"design": "in_progress",
"estimate": "pending",
"generate": "pending",
"feedback": "pending"
}
}Status values: "pending" → "in_progress" → "completed". Never goes backward.
For core phases (discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate), at most one phase may be "in_progress" at any time.
current_phase is optional but recommended; when present it is authoritative.
The .migration/ directory is automatically protected by a .gitignore file created in Phase 1.
Phase Status Update Protocol
Use read-merge-write updates for .phase-status.json:
Read the current file before every update.
Change only the phase keys being advanced and
last_updated.Keep prior completed phases unchanged.
Set
current_phaseto the next deterministic phase (orcompleteafter generate).Write the full file in the same turn as your final phase work message.
Example — after completing the Clarify phase, write $MIGRATION_DIR/.phase-status.json with:
{
"migration_id": "MMDD-HHMM",
"last_updated": "2026-02-26T15:35:22Z",
"current_phase": "design",
"phases": {
"discover": "completed",
"clarify": "completed",
"design": "pending",
"estimate": "pending",
"generate": "pending",
"feedback": "pending"
}
}Replace MMDD-HHMM with the actual migration ID, generate the last_updated ISO 8601 UTC timestamp yourself, and set each phase to its correct status at that point.
Phase Summary Table
| Phase | Inputs | Outputs | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discover | .tf files, app source code, and/or billing exports (at least one required) | gcp-resource-inventory.json, gcp-resource-clusters.json, ai-workload-profile.json, billing-profile.json, .phase-status.json updated (outputs vary by input) | references/phases/discover/discover.md |
| Clarify | Discovery artifacts (gcp-resource-inventory.json, gcp-resource-clusters.json, ai-workload-profile.json, billing-profile.json — whichever exist) | preferences.json, .phase-status.json updated | references/phases/clarify/clarify.md |
| Design | preferences.json + discovery artifacts | aws-design.json (infra), aws-design-ai.json (AI), aws-design-billing.json (billing-only) | references/phases/design/design.md |
| Estimate | aws-design.json or aws-design-billing.json or aws-design-ai.json, preferences.json | estimation-infra.json or estimation-ai.json or estimation-billing.json, .phase-status.json updated | references/phases/estimate/estimate.md |
| Generate | estimation-infra.json or estimation-ai.json or estimation-billing.json, aws-design.json or aws-design-billing.json or aws-design-ai.json, preferences.json | generation-infra.json or generation-ai.json or generation-billing.json + terraform/, scripts/, ai-migration/, validation-report.json (when infra route active), MIGRATION_GUIDE.md, README.md, .phase-status.json updated | references/phases/generate/generate.md |
| Feedback | .phase-status.json (discover completed minimum), all existing migration artifacts | feedback.json, trace.json, .phase-status.json updated | references/phases/feedback/feedback.md |
MCP Servers
awspricing (for cost estimation):
Provides
get_pricing,get_pricing_service_codes,get_pricing_service_attributestoolsOnly needed during Estimate phase. Discover and Design do not require it.
Primary pricing source:
references/shared/pricing-cache.md(cached 2026 rates, ±5-10% for infrastructure, ±15-25% for AI models). MCP is secondary — used only for services not found in the cache.
Files in This Skill
gcp-to-aws/
├── SKILL.md ← You are here (orchestrator + state machine)
│
├── references/
│ ├── phases/
│ │ ├── discover/
│ │ │ ├── discover.md # Phase 1: Discover orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── discover-iac.md # Terraform/IaC discovery
│ │ │ ├── discover-app-code.md # App code discovery
│ │ │ └── discover-billing.md # Billing data discovery
│ │ ├── clarify/
│ │ │ ├── clarify.md # Phase 2: Clarify orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── clarify-global.md # Category A: Global/Strategic (Q1-Q7)
│ │ │ ├── clarify-compute.md # Categories B+C: Config Gaps + Compute (Q8-Q11)
│ │ │ ├── clarify-database.md # Category D: Database (Q12–Q13b)
│ │ │ ├── clarify-ai.md # Category F: AI/Bedrock (Q14-Q22)
│ │ │ └── clarify-ai-only.md # Standalone AI-only migration flow
│ │ ├── design/
│ │ │ ├── design.md # Phase 3: Design orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── design-infra.md # Infrastructure design (IaC-based)
│ │ │ ├── design-ai.md # AI workload design (Bedrock)
│ │ │ └── design-billing.md # Billing-only design (fallback)
│ │ ├── estimate/
│ │ │ ├── estimate.md # Phase 4: Estimate orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── estimate-infra.md # Infrastructure cost analysis
│ │ │ ├── estimate-ai.md # AI workload cost analysis
│ │ │ └── estimate-billing.md # Billing-only cost analysis
│ │ ├── generate/
│ │ │ ├── generate.md # Phase 5: Generate orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── generate-infra.md # Infrastructure migration plan
│ │ │ ├── generate-ai.md # AI migration plan
│ │ │ ├── generate-billing.md # Billing-only migration plan
│ │ │ ├── generate-artifacts-infra.md # Terraform configurations
│ │ │ ├── generate-artifacts-scripts.md # Migration scripts
│ │ │ ├── generate-artifacts-ai.md # Provider adapter + test harness
│ │ │ ├── generate-artifacts-billing.md # Skeleton Terraform
│ │ │ └── generate-artifacts-docs.md # MIGRATION_GUIDE.md + README.md
│ │ └── feedback/
│ │ ├── feedback.md # Phase 6: Feedback orchestrator
│ │ └── feedback-trace.md # Anonymized trace builder
│ │
│ ├── design-refs/
│ │ ├── index.md # Lookup table: GCP type → design-ref file
│ │ ├── fast-path.md # Deterministic 1:1 mappings (Pass 1)
│ │ ├── compute.md # Compute mappings (Cloud Run, GCE, GKE, etc.)
│ │ ├── database.md # Database mappings (Cloud SQL, Spanner, etc.)
│ │ ├── storage.md # Storage mappings (GCS, Filestore, etc.)
│ │ ├── networking.md # Networking mappings (VPC, LB, DNS, etc.)
│ │ ├── messaging.md # Messaging mappings (Pub/Sub, etc.)
│ │ └── ai.md # AI mappings (Vertex AI → Bedrock)
│ │
│ ├── clustering/terraform/
│ │ ├── classification-rules.md # Primary/secondary classification
│ │ ├── clustering-algorithm.md # Cluster formation rules
│ │ ├── depth-calculation.md # Topological depth calculation
│ │ └── typed-edges-strategy.md # Edge type assignment
│ │
│ └── shared/
│ ├── schema-phase-status.md # .phase-status.json schema (canonical reference)
│ ├── schema-discover-iac.md # gcp-resource-inventory + clusters schemas (loaded by discover-iac.md)
│ ├── schema-discover-ai.md # ai-workload-profile schema (loaded by discover-app-code.md and discover-iac.md Step 7d)
│ ├── schema-discover-billing.md # billing-profile schema (loaded by discover-billing.md)
│ ├── schema-estimate-infra.md # estimation-infra.json schema (loaded by estimate-infra.md at write time)
│ ├── handoff-gates.md # Fail-closed phase handoff protocol (GATE_FAIL / HANDOFF_OK)
│ ├── validate-artifacts.md # Pre-report validation (Generate Step 0; read-only)
│ ├── migration-complexity.md # Complexity tier definitions (small/medium/large) for timeline scaling
│ ├── pricing-cache.md # Cached AWS + source provider pricing (±5-25%, primary source)
│ └── bedrock-quotas.md # Bedrock TPM/RPM quota awareness, burndown rates, capacity planning| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
No GCP sources found (no .tf, no app code, no billing data) | Stop. Output: "No GCP sources detected. Provide at least one source type (Terraform files, application code, or billing exports) and try again." |
.phase-status.json missing phase gate | Stop. Output: "Cannot enter Phase X: Phase Y-1 not completed. Start from Phase Y or resume Phase Y-1." |
| awspricing unavailable after 3 attempts | Display user warning about ±5-25% accuracy. Use pricing-cache.md. Add pricing_source: "cached_fallback" to the applicable estimation-*.json file. |
| User skips questions or says "use defaults for the rest" | Apply documented defaults for remaining questions in the current batch and all subsequent batches. Phase 2 completes either way. |
aws-design.json missing required clusters | Stop Phase 4. Output: "Re-run Phase 3 to generate missing cluster designs." |
Defaults
IaC output: Terraform configurations, migration scripts, AI migration code, and documentation
Region:
us-east-1(unless user specifies, or GCP region → AWS region mapping suggests otherwise)Sizing: Development tier (e.g.,
db.t4g.microfor databases, 0.5 CPU for Fargate)Migration mode: Adapts based on available inputs (infrastructure, AI, or billing-only)
Cost currency: USD
Timeline assumption: 2-16 weeks depending on migration complexity — small (2-6 weeks), medium (6-12 weeks), large (12-18 weeks). See
references/shared/migration-complexity.mdfor tier definitions.
Workflow Execution
When invoked, the agent MUST follow this exact sequence:
Load phase status: Read
.phase-status.jsonfrom.migration/*/.If missing: Initialize for Phase 1 (Discover)
If exists: Determine current phase using deterministic rules in State Machine
Determine phase to execute:
If
current_phaseexists: execute that phase.Otherwise execute the first non-completed phase in ordered list: discover → clarify → design → estimate → generate.
If all ordered phases are completed: migration is complete (with feedback finalization rule).
Read phase reference: Load the full reference file for the target phase.
Execute ALL steps in order: Follow every numbered step in the reference file. Do not skip, optimize, or deviate.
Validate outputs: Confirm all required output files exist with correct schema before proceeding. Phase orchestrators run Completion Handoff Gate checks per
shared/handoff-gates.md.Handoff gate: Emit
HANDOFF_OKorGATE_FAILpershared/handoff-gates.md. OnGATE_FAIL, stop — do not update phase status or load the next phase.Update phase status: Only after
HANDOFF_OK. Use the Phase Status Update Protocol (read-merge-write) in the same turn as the phase's final output message.Feedback checkpoint: After a phase completes, check if feedback is due (see rules below). This runs before advancing to the next phase.
After Discover (if
phases.feedbackis"pending"): Output to user: "Would you like to share quick feedback (5 optional questions + anonymized usage data) to help improve this tool? Your data never includes resource names, file paths, or account IDs. [A] Send feedback now [B] Wait until after the Estimate phase"If user picks A → Load
references/phases/feedback/feedback.md, execute it, then continue to Clarify.If user picks B → Continue to Clarify (feedback stays
"pending").
After Estimate (if
phases.feedbackis"pending"): Output to user: "Would you like to share quick feedback now? (5 optional questions + anonymized usage data) [A] Yes, share feedback [B] No thanks, continue to Generate"If user picks A → Load
references/phases/feedback/feedback.md, execute it, then continue to Generate.If user picks B → Use the Phase Status Update Protocol to set
phases.feedbackto"completed". Continue to Generate.
After Generate: No feedback offer. If
phases.feedbackis still"pending", use the Phase Status Update Protocol to set it to"completed"(user had two chances and chose to defer/skip).
Display summary: Show user what was accomplished, highlight next phase, or confirm migration completion.
Critical constraint: Agent must strictly adhere to the reference file's workflow. If unable to complete a step, stop and report the exact step that failed.
User can invoke the skill again to resume from current_phase (or deterministic ordered evaluation when current_phase is absent).
Scope Notes
v1.0 includes:
Terraform infrastructure discovery
App code scanning (AI workload detection)
Billing data import from GCP
User requirement clarification (adaptive questions by category)
Multi-path Design (infrastructure, AI workloads, billing-only fallback)
AWS cost estimation (from pricing API or fallback)
Migration artifact generation (Terraform, scripts, AI adapters, documentation)
Optional feedback collection with anonymized telemetry
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer826 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer10.5 KiB
- SKILL.md29.6 KiB
- data/sdk-capability-map.json1.1 KiB
- references/clustering/terraform/classification-rules.md6.5 KiB
- references/clustering/terraform/clustering-algorithm.md7.9 KiB
- references/clustering/terraform/depth-calculation.md4.5 KiB
- references/clustering/terraform/typed-edges-strategy.md4.6 KiB
- references/design-refs/ai-anthropic-to-bedrock.md2.9 KiB
- references/design-refs/ai-gemini-to-bedrock.md15.4 KiB
- references/design-refs/ai-openai-to-bedrock.md17.5 KiB
- references/design-refs/ai.md3.4 KiB
- references/design-refs/compute.md6.8 KiB
- references/design-refs/database.md9.1 KiB
- references/design-refs/design-ref-agentic-to-agentcore.md18.8 KiB
- references/design-refs/design-ref-harness.md7.9 KiB
- references/design-refs/fast-path.md10.3 KiB
- references/design-refs/index.md6.2 KiB
- references/design-refs/messaging.md3.5 KiB
- references/design-refs/networking.md5.5 KiB
- references/design-refs/security.md3.8 KiB
- references/design-refs/storage.md4.7 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-ai-only.md16.4 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-ai.md57.7 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-compute.md10.0 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-database.md10.8 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-global.md23.7 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify.md50.5 KiB
- references/phases/design/design-ai.md29.6 KiB
- references/phases/design/design-billing.md12.7 KiB
- references/phases/design/design-infra.md12.8 KiB
- references/phases/design/design.md4.5 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover-app-code.md41.7 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover-billing.md7.2 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover-iac.md33.0 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover-preview.md19.9 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover.md11.5 KiB
- references/phases/estimate/estimate-ai.md17.2 KiB
- references/phases/estimate/estimate-billing.md12.4 KiB
- references/phases/estimate/estimate-infra.md46.6 KiB
- references/phases/estimate/estimate.md8.1 KiB
- references/phases/feedback/feedback-trace.md4.5 KiB
- references/phases/feedback/feedback.md3.2 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-ai.md13.5 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-ai.md33.6 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-billing.md6.1 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-docs.md21.0 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-infra.md43.2 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-report.md40.1 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-scripts.md14.5 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-billing.md16.5 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-infra.md22.0 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate.md7.9 KiB
- references/shared/ai-migration-guardrails.md6.6 KiB
- references/shared/ai-model-lifecycle.md8.8 KiB
- references/shared/bedrock-quotas.md7.1 KiB
- references/shared/handoff-gates.md4.7 KiB
- references/shared/migration-complexity.md11.0 KiB
- references/shared/pricing-cache.md41.2 KiB
- references/shared/pricing-fallback.md1.5 KiB
- references/shared/retarget-gotchas.md10.9 KiB
- references/shared/schema-discover-ai.md16.7 KiB
- references/shared/schema-discover-billing.md5.0 KiB
- references/shared/schema-discover-iac.md6.9 KiB
- references/shared/schema-estimate-infra.md15.6 KiB
- references/shared/schema-phase-status.md1.2 KiB
- references/shared/terraform-validation.md10.4 KiB
- references/shared/validate-artifacts.md6.2 KiB
references/phases/clarify/clarify-database.md
Category D — Database Model (If Database Resources Present)
Fire when: Database resources present (Cloud SQL, Spanner, Memorystore).
Q6 (availability) selects RDS vs Aurora for Cloud SQL PostgreSQL/MySQL — see clarify-global.md Q6. Q12–Q13 tune sizing and storage within the family Q6 chose. Q12–Q13 never override Q6.
Database Engine Detection
Before asking questions, detect the database engine from IaC (database_version in google_sql_database_instance). State what was found:
"I see Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL (or MySQL) in your Terraform."
| Detected Engine | Migration Target family | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL | RDS PostgreSQL or Aurora PostgreSQL (per Q6) | Q6 selects family; engine from IaC |
| Cloud SQL for MySQL | RDS MySQL or Aurora MySQL (per Q6) | Q6 selects family; engine from IaC |
| Cloud SQL for SQL Server | RDS for SQL Server | Aurora doesn't support SQL Server |
| Spanner | Aurora DSQL (global distributed) or DynamoDB (key-value patterns) | Migration path differs significantly |
| Firestore | DynamoDB | NoSQL migration |
| AlloyDB | Aurora PostgreSQL | Closest equivalent |
If the engine is not PostgreSQL or MySQL, note the appropriate RDS or DynamoDB target. Ask the user to confirm if detection is ambiguous.
Skip Q12/Q13/Q13b when Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL or MySQL) is not present in inventory — auto-detect from IaC; no separate screening question required.
Q12 — What does your database traffic pattern look like?
Fire when: Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL or MySQL) present in inventory. Skip when: no Cloud SQL.
Auto-extract signal (dev-tier): When all Cloud SQL instances match dev pattern (db-f1-micro, db-g1-small, or tier contains micro/small with availability_type: ZONAL), extract database_traffic: "steady" with chosen_by: "extracted" and skip Q12. When instances mix dev and prod tiers, ask Q12.
Rationale: Traffic pattern informs capacity planning on the target already chosen by Q6.
Context for user: Give concrete examples so the user can pattern-match:
Steady, predictable load — consistent query volume day-to-day, no major spikes (e.g., internal CRUD app, content CMS)
Read-heavy with occasional write spikes — mostly reads with bursts of writes at certain times (e.g., reporting dashboards, catalog browsing with periodic bulk imports)
Write-heavy or globally distributed writes — high write throughput or writes coming from multiple regions (e.g., IoT ingestion, multi-region user-generated content, event logging)
Rapidly growing — traffic is noticeably increasing month over month, doubling every few months (e.g., post-launch growth, viral product)
Understanding your database traffic pattern helps me recommend the right sizing on AWS — within the RDS or Aurora family Q6 already selected.
A) Steady, predictable load — consistent volume, no major spikes B) Read-heavy with occasional write spikes — mostly reads, periodic write bursts C) Write-heavy or globally distributed writes — high write throughput or multi-region writes D) Rapidly growing — doubling every few months E) N/A — We don't use Cloud SQL F) I don't know
| Answer | When Q6 = Inconvenient or Significant Issue (RDS path) | When Q6 = Mission-Critical or Catastrophic (Aurora path) |
|---|---|---|
| Steady, predictable | Size RDS from Cloud SQL config; single-AZ or Multi-AZ per Q6 | Aurora standard Multi-AZ; size from Cloud SQL config |
| Read-heavy with write spikes | RDS with read replicas where justified; size writer for spikes | Aurora with read replicas; auto-scaling read capacity where supported |
| Write-heavy or globally distributed | Size RDS writer; flag architecture review if multi-region writes required | Aurora DSQL considered for global active-active; architecture review flagged |
| Rapidly growing | RDS with headroom on instance class; plan capacity reviews | Aurora with headroom; Aurora Serverless v2 for elastic scaling |
Interpret:
A -> database_traffic: "steady"
B -> database_traffic: "read-heavy"
C -> database_traffic: "write-heavy-global"
D -> database_traffic: "rapidly-growing"
E -> (no constraint written)
F -> same as default (A)Default: A — database_traffic: "steady".
Q13 — What's your typical database I/O workload?
Fire when: Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL or MySQL) present in inventory. Skip when: no Cloud SQL.
Auto-extract signal (dev-tier): Same dev-tier pattern as Q12 — extract db_io_workload: "low" with chosen_by: "extracted" and skip Q13 only when all instances are dev-tier. When instances mix dev and prod tiers, ask Q13.
Rationale: On AWS, storage and I/O billing differ between RDS and Aurora. This captures how disk-heavy the workload is. Q6 still governs RDS vs Aurora — this question only selects storage/I/O options within that family.
A) Low (< 1,000 IOPS) — Mostly reads, infrequent writes B) Medium (1,000–10,000 IOPS) — Balanced workload C) High (> 10,000 IOPS) — Write-heavy, high transactions D) N/A — We don't use Cloud SQL E) I don't know
| Answer | When Q6 = Inconvenient or Significant Issue (RDS path) | When Q6 = Mission-Critical or Catastrophic (Aurora path) |
|---|---|---|
| Low (< 1,000 IOPS) | gp3 (default RDS storage) | Aurora Standard storage/I/O billing |
| Medium (1,000–10,000 IOPS) | gp3; note optional Provisioned IOPS if I/O grows | Aurora Standard; note optional switch to I/O-Optimized |
| High (> 10,000 IOPS) | io2 or Provisioned IOPS on RDS | Aurora I/O-Optimized |
Interpret:
A -> db_io_workload: "low"
B -> db_io_workload: "medium"
C -> db_io_workload: "high"
D -> (no constraint written)
E -> same as default (B)Default: B — db_io_workload: "medium".
Q13b — Approximately how large is your primary database?
Fire when: Cloud SQL (PostgreSQL or MySQL) present in inventory. Skip when: no Cloud SQL, or engine is SQL Server (DMS is always recommended for SQL Server regardless of size).
Rationale: Database size is the primary driver of migration tooling selection. pg_dump/pg_restore is sufficient for small databases but becomes impractically slow above ~10GB within a typical maintenance window. pgcopydb's parallel copy cuts migration time by 3–5x for medium databases. Very large databases (>500GB) require DMS for continuous replication regardless of whether a maintenance window exists.
Auto-detect signal: Read disk size from google_sql_database_instance: config.disk_size, config.disk_size_gb, or gcp_config.disk_size_gb. Map to Q13b band and skip Q13b when unambiguous:
| Disk size (GB) | db_size value | Skip Q13b? |
|---|---|---|
| < 10 | "<10GB" | Yes — chosen_by: "extracted" |
| 10 – 99 | "10-100GB" | Yes — chosen_by: "extracted" |
| 100 – 499 | "100-500GB" | Yes — chosen_by: "extracted" |
| ≥ 500 | ">500GB" | Yes — chosen_by: "extracted" |
If multiple instances disagree, ask Q13b. Record raw GB in metadata.inventory_clarifications.db_size_gb when extracted.
Database size determines which migration tool we recommend — this directly affects your migration window length and risk.
A) < 10 GB — small, pg_dump/pg_restore completes in minutes B) 10 GB – 100 GB — medium, pgcopydb recommended for parallel copy C) 100 GB – 500 GB — large, pgcopydb required; plan for multi-hour window D) > 500 GB — very large, AWS DMS strongly recommended regardless of window E) I don't know
| Answer | Tooling Recommendation |
|---|---|
| < 10 GB | pg_dump/pg_restore — fast, simple, no extra tooling required |
| 10 GB – 100 GB | pgcopydb — parallel table copy + index rebuild; 3–5x faster than pg_dump; requires wal_level=logical on Cloud SQL if CDC mode used |
| 100 GB – 500 GB | pgcopydb required — pg_dump at this size risks exceeding maintenance window; plan for 4–12 hour window depending on table count and index complexity |
| > 500 GB | AWS DMS strongly recommended — single-pass export/import at this scale is high-risk; DMS provides continuous replication with minimal cutover window (minutes, not hours) |
| I don't know | Default to pgcopydb (safer than pg_dump at unknown scale); flag for user to verify before migration |
Interpret:
A -> design_constraints.db_size: { value: "<10GB", chosen_by: "user" } — pg_dump/pg_restore recommended
B -> design_constraints.db_size: { value: "10-100GB", chosen_by: "user" } — pgcopydb recommended
C -> design_constraints.db_size: { value: "100-500GB", chosen_by: "user" } — pgcopydb required; flag extended window
D -> design_constraints.db_size: { value: ">500GB", chosen_by: "user" } — AWS DMS strongly recommended; flag in migration plan
E -> design_constraints.db_size: { value: "unknown", chosen_by: "default" } — default to pgcopydb; flag for verificationDefault: E — design_constraints.db_size: { value: "unknown", chosen_by: "default" } (default to pgcopydb; safer than pg_dump at unknown scale).
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: Claude Code
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Names Claude Code tools, Needs an MCP server
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Instructions that use the network
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Cline
- Publisher
- Cline (Official)
- Source
- cline/skills · skills/gcp-to-aws · commit 2637846
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Cline.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download gcp-to-aws.zip