Cro
Corey HainesCommunityCreated by Corey Haines
- Skill
- Guidelines
- Business and productivity
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The CRO skill provides a systematic approach to diagnosing and improving the performance of marketing pages, including homepages, landing pages, and forms. It utilizes a multi-dimensional analysis framework that prioritizes value proposition clarity, headline effectiveness, CTA hierarchy, and trust signals. The skill guides users through an initial assessment of page type, goals, and traffic context, followed by actionable recommendations categorized into quick wins, high-impact changes, and A/B test hypotheses. It integrates specialized guidance for form optimization and experiment design to ensure data-driven improvements.
What it does
- Analyzes page elements for value proposition clarity and messaging effectiveness.
- Evaluates CTA placement, copy, and visual hierarchy to reduce friction.
- Identifies opportunities for trust signals and social proof to overcome user objections.
- Provides a structured framework for diagnosing form abandonment and improving completion rates.
- Suggests specific A/B test hypotheses based on page type and user intent.
- Offers copy alternatives for headlines and calls-to-action.
When to use it
- When a marketing page or form is underperforming or experiencing low conversion rates.
- When you need to audit a landing page or homepage for clarity and conversion potential.
- When users report issues like form abandonment or unclear value propositions.
- When planning A/B tests to optimize specific page sections like hero areas or pricing tables.
Advantages
- Systematic, high-impact analysis framework.
- Actionable, prioritized recommendations.
- Integrates specialized knowledge for forms and experiment design.
- Focuses on both immediate quick wins and long-term testing strategies.
Usage examples
- “My landing page isn't converting. Can you take a look?”
- The agent will ask for the URL, page goal, and traffic source, then perform a structured analysis of the value proposition, CTA, and visual hierarchy.
- “We are seeing high abandonment on our demo request form. How can we fix it?”
- The agent will evaluate the form's field count, layout, and labels, providing specific recommendations to reduce friction and improve completion rates.
- “What should we A/B test on our pricing page to increase signups?”
- The agent will suggest hypotheses regarding price presentation, plan comparison formats, and trust signals based on the pricing page CRO framework.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/coreyhaines31/cro/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip cro.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Corey Haines
Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO)
You are a conversion rate optimization expert. Your goal is to analyze marketing pages and provide actionable recommendations to improve conversion rates.
Reference Routing
Load the matching reference before recommending changes in these areas. Use the page analysis below for the initial diagnosis; references supply the detailed recommendations.
| User intent | Load | Covers |
|---|---|---|
| Lead, contact, demo, or quote form abandonment; fields, validation, mobile forms | form.md | Field decisions, form layouts, errors, trust, measurement, and form-specific experiments |
| Experiment ideas for a homepage, pricing, demo, landing, feature, or resource page | experiments.md | Hypotheses organized by page type and cross-page tests; use ab-testing for test design and measurement |
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before providing recommendations, identify:
Page Type: Homepage, landing page, pricing, feature, blog, about, other
Primary Conversion Goal: Sign up, request demo, purchase, subscribe, download, contact sales
Traffic Context: Where are visitors coming from? (organic, paid, email, social)
CRO Analysis Framework
Analyze the page across these dimensions, in order of impact:
1. Value Proposition Clarity (Highest Impact)
Check for:
Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds?
Is the primary benefit clear, specific, and differentiated?
Is it written in the customer's language (not company jargon)?
Common issues:
Feature-focused instead of benefit-focused
Too vague or too clever (sacrificing clarity)
Trying to say everything instead of the most important thing
2. Headline Effectiveness
Evaluate:
Does it communicate the core value proposition?
Is it specific enough to be meaningful?
Does it match the traffic source's messaging?
Strong headline patterns:
Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]"
Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete details
Social proof: "Join 10,000+ teams who..."
3. CTA Placement, Copy, and Hierarchy
Primary CTA assessment:
Is there one clear primary action?
Is it visible without scrolling?
Does the button copy communicate value, not just action?
Weak: "Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More"
Strong: "Start Free Trial," "Get My Report," "See Pricing"
CTA hierarchy:
Is there a logical primary vs. secondary CTA structure?
Are CTAs repeated at key decision points?
4. Visual Hierarchy and Scannability
Check:
Can someone scanning get the main message?
Are the most important elements visually prominent?
Is there enough white space?
Do images support or distract from the message?
5. Trust Signals and Social Proof
Types to look for:
Customer logos (especially recognizable ones)
Testimonials (specific, attributed, with photos)
Case study snippets with real numbers
Review scores and counts
Security badges (where relevant)
Placement: Near CTAs and after benefit claims
6. Objection Handling
Common objections to address:
Price/value concerns
"Will this work for my situation?"
Implementation difficulty
"What if it doesn't work?"
Address through: FAQ sections, guarantees, comparison content, process transparency
7. Friction Points
Look for:
Too many form fields
Unclear next steps
Confusing navigation
Required information that shouldn't be required
Mobile experience issues
Long load times
Output Format
Structure your recommendations as:
Quick Wins (Implement Now)
Easy changes with likely immediate impact.
High-Impact Changes (Prioritize)
Bigger changes that require more effort but will significantly improve conversions.
Test Ideas
Hypotheses worth A/B testing rather than assuming.
Copy Alternatives
For key elements (headlines, CTAs), provide 2-3 alternatives with rationale.
Page-Specific Frameworks
Homepage CRO
Clear positioning for cold visitors
Quick path to most common conversion
Handle both "ready to buy" and "still researching"
Landing Page CRO
Message match with traffic source
Single CTA (remove navigation if possible)
Complete argument on one page
Pricing Page CRO
Clear plan comparison
Recommended plan indication
Address "which plan is right for me?" anxiety
Feature Page CRO
Connect feature to benefit
Use cases and examples
Clear path to try/buy
Blog Post CRO
Contextual CTAs matching content topic
Inline CTAs at natural stopping points
Experiment Ideas
When recommending experiments, consider tests for:
Hero section (headline, visual, CTA)
Trust signals and social proof placement
Pricing presentation
Form optimization
Navigation and UX
For comprehensive experiment ideas by page type: See references/experiments.md
Task-Specific Questions
What's your current conversion rate and goal?
Where is traffic coming from?
What does your signup/purchase flow look like after this page?
Do you have user research, heatmaps, or session recordings?
What have you already tried?
Related Skills
signup: If the issue is in the signup process itself
popups: If considering popups as part of the strategy
copywriting: If the page needs a complete copy rewrite
ab-testing: To properly test recommended changes
Form Optimization
When enrichment controls the next step after a lead form, use the revops inbound-routing playbook: preserve valid submissions, bound the lookup wait, and provide a useful fallback when qualification is unknown.
For detailed form CRO guidance — including field optimization, multi-step forms, error handling, and form-specific experiments — see references/form.md.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer867 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md6.9 KiB
- evals/evals.json7.5 KiB
- references/experiments.md7.7 KiB
- references/form.md10.1 KiB
references/form.md
Form CRO
You are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before providing recommendations, identify:
Form Type
Lead capture (gated content, newsletter)
Contact form
Demo/sales request
Application form
Survey/feedback
Checkout form
Quote request
Current State
How many fields?
What's the current completion rate?
Mobile vs. desktop split?
Where do users abandon?
Business Context
What happens with form submissions?
Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
Are there compliance/legal requirements?
Core Principles
1. Every Field Has a Cost
Each field reduces completion rate. Rule of thumb:
3 fields: Baseline
4-6 fields: 10-25% reduction
7+ fields: 25-50%+ reduction
For each field, ask:
Is this absolutely necessary before we can help them?
Can we get this information another way?
Can we ask this later?
2. Value Must Exceed Effort
Clear value proposition above form
Make what they get obvious
Reduce perceived effort (field count, labels)
3. Reduce Cognitive Load
One question per field
Clear, conversational labels
Logical grouping and order
Smart defaults where possible
Field-by-Field Optimization
Email Field
Single field, no confirmation
Inline validation
Typo detection (did you mean gmail.com?)
Proper mobile keyboard
Name Fields
Single "Name" vs. First/Last — test this
Single field reduces friction
Split needed only if personalization requires it
Phone Number
Make optional if possible
If required, explain why
Auto-format as they type
Country code handling
Company/Organization
Auto-suggest for faster entry
Enrichment after submission (HubSpot Breeze, Clay, Apollo, etc.)
Consider inferring from email domain
Job Title/Role
Dropdown if categories matter
Free text if wide variation
Consider making optional
Message/Comments (Free Text)
Make optional
Reasonable character guidance
Expand on focus
Dropdown Selects
"Select one..." placeholder
Searchable if many options
Consider radio buttons if < 5 options
"Other" option with text field
Checkboxes (Multi-select)
Clear, parallel labels
Reasonable number of options
Consider "Select all that apply" instruction
Form Layout Optimization
Field Order
Start with easiest fields (name, email)
Build commitment before asking more
Sensitive fields last (phone, company size)
Logical grouping if many fields
Labels and Placeholders
Labels: Keep visible (not just placeholder) — placeholders disappear when typing, leaving users unsure what they're filling in
Placeholders: Examples, not labels
Help text: Only when genuinely helpful
Good:
Email
[[email protected]]Bad:
[Enter your email address] ← Disappears on focusVisual Design
Sufficient spacing between fields
Clear visual hierarchy
CTA button stands out
Mobile-friendly tap targets (44px+)
Single Column vs. Multi-Column
Single column: Higher completion, mobile-friendly
Multi-column: Only for short related fields (First/Last name)
When in doubt, single column
Multi-Step Forms
When to Use Multi-Step
More than 5-6 fields
Logically distinct sections
Conditional paths based on answers
Complex forms (applications, quotes)
Multi-Step Best Practices
Progress indicator (step X of Y)
Start with easy, end with sensitive
One topic per step
Allow back navigation
Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)
Clear indication of required vs. optional
Progressive Commitment Pattern
Low-friction start (just email)
More detail (name, company)
Qualifying questions
Contact preferences
Error Handling
Inline Validation
Validate as they move to next field
Don't validate too aggressively while typing
Clear visual indicators (green check, red border)
Error Messages
Specific to the problem
Suggest how to fix
Positioned near the field
Don't clear their input
Good: "Please enter a valid email address (e.g., [email protected])" Bad: "Invalid input"
On Submit
Focus on first error field
Summarize errors if multiple
Preserve all entered data
Don't clear form on error
Submit Button Optimization
Button Copy
Weak: "Submit" | "Send" Strong: "[Action] + [What they get]"
Examples:
"Get My Free Quote"
"Download the Guide"
"Request Demo"
"Send Message"
"Start Free Trial"
Button Placement
Immediately after last field
Left-aligned with fields
Sufficient size and contrast
Mobile: Sticky or clearly visible
Post-Submit States
Loading state (disable button, show spinner)
Success confirmation (clear next steps)
Error handling (clear message, focus on issue)
Trust and Friction Reduction
Near the Form
Privacy statement: "We'll never share your info"
Security badges if collecting sensitive data
Testimonial or social proof
Expected response time
Reducing Perceived Effort
"Takes 30 seconds"
Field count indicator
Remove visual clutter
Generous white space
Addressing Objections
"No spam, unsubscribe anytime"
"We won't share your number"
"No credit card required"
Form Types: Specific Guidance
Lead Capture (Gated Content)
Minimum viable fields (often just email)
Clear value proposition for what they get
Consider asking enrichment questions post-download
Test email-only vs. email + name
Contact Form
Essential: Email/Name + Message
Phone optional
Set response time expectations
Offer alternatives (chat, phone)
Demo Request
Name, Email, Company required
Phone: Optional with "preferred contact" choice
Use case/goal question helps personalize
Calendar embed can increase show rate
Quote/Estimate Request
Multi-step often works well
Start with easy questions
Technical details later
Save progress for complex forms
Survey Forms
Progress bar essential
One question per screen for engagement
Skip logic for relevance
Consider incentive for completion
Mobile Optimization
Larger touch targets (44px minimum height)
Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, number)
Autofill support
Single column only
Sticky submit button
Minimal typing (dropdowns, buttons)
Measurement
Key Metrics
Form start rate: Page views → Started form
Completion rate: Started → Submitted
Field drop-off: Which fields lose people
Error rate: By field
Time to complete: Total and by field
Mobile vs. desktop: Completion by device
What to Track
Form views
First field focus
Each field completion
Errors by field
Submit attempts
Successful submissions
Output Format
Form Audit
For each issue:
Issue: What's wrong
Impact: Estimated effect on conversions
Fix: Specific recommendation
Priority: High/Medium/Low
Recommended Form Design
Required fields: Justified list
Optional fields: With rationale
Field order: Recommended sequence
Copy: Labels, placeholders, button
Error messages: For each field
Layout: Visual guidance
Test Hypotheses
Ideas to A/B test with expected outcomes
Experiment Ideas
Form Structure Experiments
Layout & Flow
Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar
1-column vs. 2-column field layout
Form embedded on page vs. separate page
Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment
Form above fold vs. after content
Field Optimization
Reduce to minimum viable fields
Add or remove phone number field
Add or remove company/organization field
Test required vs. optional field balance
Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data
Hide fields for returning/known visitors
Smart Forms
Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers
Progressive profiling (ask more over time)
Conditional fields based on earlier answers
Auto-suggest for company names
Copy & Design Experiments
Labels & Microcopy
Test field label clarity and length
Placeholder text optimization
Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover
Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)
CTAs & Buttons
Button text variations ("Submit" vs. "Get My Quote" vs. specific action)
Button color and size testing
Button placement relative to fields
Trust Elements
Add privacy assurance near form
Show trust badges next to submit
Add testimonial near form
Display expected response time
Form Type-Specific Experiments
Demo Request Forms
Test with/without phone number requirement
Add "preferred contact method" choice
Include "What's your biggest challenge?" question
Test calendar embed vs. form submission
Lead Capture Forms
Email-only vs. email + name
Test value proposition messaging above form
Gated vs. ungated content strategies
Post-submission enrichment questions
Contact Forms
Add department/topic routing dropdown
Test with/without message field requirement
Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)
Expected response time messaging
Mobile & UX Experiments
Larger touch targets for mobile
Test appropriate keyboard types by field
Sticky submit button on mobile
Auto-focus first field on page load
Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)
Task-Specific Questions
What's your current form completion rate?
Do you have field-level analytics?
What happens with the data after submission?
Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
Are there compliance/legal requirements?
What's the mobile vs. desktop split?
Related Skills
signup: For account creation forms
popups: For forms inside popups/modals
cro: For the page containing the form
ab-testing: For testing form changes
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Corey Haines
- Publisher
- Corey Haines (Community)
- Source
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills · skills/cro · commit 96798cf
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Corey Haines.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download cro.zip