Generated banner for Test Analysis Extensions
Generated logo for Test Analysis Extensions

Test Analysis Extensions

.NET (Microsoft)OfficialPublished by .NET (Microsoft)

  • Skill
  • Meta (authoring, orchestration, planning, memory)
  • Agent tooling
  • MIT
  • No issues found

From the author

Provides file paths to language-specific reference files for the test ANALYSIS skills (assertion-quality, test-anti-patterns, test-gap-analysis, test-smell-detection, test-tagging). Read this catalog to discover available extension files (e.g., dotnet.md for .NET/MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit, python.md for pytest/unittest, typescript.md for Jest/Vitest/Mocha, java.md for JUnit/TestNG, etc.). Do not invoke this reference-only skill — its bundled files are read by the quality agent and analysis skills needing framework-specific lookup tables (test markers, assertion APIs, skip annotations, sleep patterns, mystery guest indicators, integration markers, setup/teardown, tag-support capability).
— the description by .NET (Microsoft)

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

Test Analysis Extensions is a non-invocable data repository designed for internal use by other test-related agent skills. It provides structured reference files for various programming languages and their respective testing frameworks. These files contain essential metadata for identifying test markers, assertion APIs, lifecycle hooks, and anti-pattern indicators, enabling analysis agents to perform language-neutral evaluations across diverse codebases.

What it does

  • Provides standardized lookup tables for test framework syntax and conventions.
  • Maps language-specific features like setup/teardown hooks and skip annotations.
  • Defines capability support levels for automated tagging and reporting.
  • Enables consistent detection of mystery guest indicators and integration markers.
  • Supports cross-language analysis by normalizing test-related concepts.

When to use it

  • When building or maintaining test analysis agents that require framework-specific knowledge.
  • When an agent needs to identify test lifecycle methods or assertion patterns in a specific language.
  • When determining if a test suite supports automated tagging or requires report-only auditing.

Advantages

  • Decouples analysis logic from framework-specific implementation details.
  • Ensures consistent detection patterns across multiple programming languages.
  • Provides clear capability definitions for automated test manipulation.
  • Facilitates easier extension of analysis agents to new languages or frameworks.

Usage examples

“N/A - This is a reference-only skill for internal agent use.”
The agent automatically reads the relevant language file (e.g., python.md) to identify pytest fixtures and markers during analysis.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/dotnet/test-analysis-extensions/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip test-analysis-extensions.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by .NET (Microsoft)

Test Analysis Extensions

This reference-only catalog lists the bundled files used by test analysis. Consumers read the matching file directly; disable-model-invocation: true means this catalog must not be invoked through the model's skill tool. Resolve these resource paths relative to this catalog, not the project workspace.

Available Extension Files

FileLanguages / FrameworksContents
extensions/dotnet.md.NET (C#/F#/VB) — MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, TUnitTest markers, assertion APIs, sleep/delay patterns, skip annotations, mystery guest, integration markers, setup/teardown, tag support
extensions/python.mdPython — pytest, unittestSame categories, with pytest fixtures/markers and unittest TestCase
extensions/typescript.mdTypeScript / JavaScript — Jest, Vitest, Mocha, Jasmine, node:testSame categories, with async/await pitfalls
extensions/java.mdJava — JUnit 4, JUnit 5 (Jupiter), TestNGSame categories, with @Tag / @Category / groups
extensions/go.mdGo — testing package, testifySame categories, with table-driven idiom and build tags
extensions/ruby.mdRuby — RSpec, MinitestSame categories, with RSpec metadata and Minitest tags
extensions/rust.mdRust — built-in #[test], cargo testSame categories, with #[ignore], #[should_panic], feature flags
extensions/swift.mdSwift — XCTest, Swift TestingSame categories, with @Test, @Tag, @Suite
extensions/kotlin.mdKotlin — JUnit 5, Kotest, MockKSame categories, with @Tag and Kotest tags
extensions/powershell.mdPowerShell — Pester v5Same categories, with -Tag and Skip
extensions/cpp.mdC++ — GoogleTest, Catch2, doctestSame categories, with [tags] and * filters

Usage

  1. Detect the target codebase's primary language and test framework.

  2. Read the matching extension file before performing analysis.

  3. If multiple test frameworks are present (e.g., a project mixing Jest and Mocha), read all relevant extensions.

  4. Each extension file documents the same categories so analysis skills can be language-neutral.

Capability tags

Each extension file declares per-capability support so skills can gate behaviour safely:

  • Test discovery — how to locate test files and methods.

  • Assertion detection — framework-specific and language-level assertion forms.

  • Sleep/delay patterns — synchronous and asynchronous waits.

  • Skip / ignore — how to recognize skipped/ignored tests.

  • Setup / teardown — fixture and lifecycle hooks.

  • Mystery guest indicators — common file/db/network/env coupling patterns.

  • Integration markers — conventions that mark a test as integration/E2E.

  • Tag support (for test-tagging skill) — one of:

    • auto-edit — language has a canonical attribute/marker the skill can safely write.

    • report-only — no canonical syntax; produce audit reports without edits.

    • convention-based — tags exist via name/comment conventions only.

Notes for skill authors

  • Treat extension files as data, not as guidance to follow verbatim. They tell skills how to detect things in each language, not what to think about findings.

  • When language detection is uncertain, prefer reading multiple extension files over guessing.

  • If the user explicitly names a framework that does not have an extension file yet, fall back to the closest one (e.g., Pest → python.md/pytest semantics) and note the gap in the report.

Files

extensions/kotlin.md

Kotlin Test Frameworks Reference (JUnit 5, Kotest, MockK)

Reference data for analyzing Kotlin test code. Used by the polyglot test analysis skills.

Capability tags

CapabilitySupport
Test discoveryStrong — JUnit 5 conventions, Kotest spec classes
Assertion detectionStrong — JUnit + Kotest matchers + MockK verifications
Sleep/delay detectionStrong — Thread.sleep, delay()
Skip/ignore detectionStrong — @Disabled, .config(enabled = false)
Setup/teardown detectionStrong — JUnit + Kotest lifecycle
Tag supportauto-edit — JUnit 5 @Tag, Kotest tags, project-defined

Test File Identification

FrameworkFile conventionTest method markers
JUnit 5 (Jupiter)*Test.kt, *Tests.kt, *IT.kt@Test fun foo()
Kotest*Spec.kt (any style)inherits a spec class (StringSpec, FunSpec, BehaviorSpec, ShouldSpec, DescribeSpec, FeatureSpec, WordSpec, FreeSpec, AnnotationSpec)
Spek*Spec.ktobject FooSpec : Spek({ ... })
TestNG*Test.kt@Test fun foo() (TestNG annotation)

Assertion APIs

CategoryJUnit 5 (Assertions)Kotest matchersAssertK
EqualityassertEquals(expected, actual)actual shouldBe expectedassertThat(actual).isEqualTo(expected)
BooleanassertTrue(b) / assertFalse(b)b.shouldBeTrue() / b.shouldBeFalse()assertThat(b).isTrue()
NullassertNull(x) / assertNotNull(x)x.shouldBeNull() / x.shouldNotBeNull()assertThat(x).isNull()
ThrowsassertThrows<SomeException> { … }shouldThrow<SomeException> { … }assertFailure { … }.isInstanceOf(SomeException::class)
TypeassertTrue(x is T)x.shouldBeInstanceOf<T>()assertThat(x).isInstanceOf(T::class)
StringassertTrue(s.contains(sub))s shouldContain sub / s shouldMatch Regex("...")assertThat(s).contains(sub)
CollectionassertIterableEquals(...)col shouldContainExactly listOf(...)assertThat(col).containsExactly(...)
Coroutine resultrunTest { ... } block + assertEqualscoroutineScope { ... } shouldBe expectedwithin runTest
Failfail("reason")fail("reason") (Kotest)Assertions.fail("reason")

MockK verifications: verify(exactly = 1) { mock.method() } — counts as a state/side-effect assertion.

Sleep/Delay Patterns

PatternExample
Thread sleepThread.sleep(2000)
Coroutine delaydelay(1000) inside runBlocking { ... }
Acceptable (coroutine test)runTest { advanceTimeBy(1000) } (virtual time, no real wait)
Awaitility-styleAwaitility.await().atMost(5, SECONDS).until { ... }

Real delay inside runBlocking { } is a sleep smell; inside runTest { } it's virtual time and acceptable.

Skip/Ignore Annotations

FrameworkAnnotation
JUnit 5@Disabled, @Disabled("reason"), @DisabledIf(...), @EnabledIf(...), @DisabledOnOs(OS.WINDOWS)
JUnit 5 (dynamic)Assumptions.assumeTrue(cond)
Kotest.config(enabled = false), xtest("…"), xshould("…"), xdescribe("…")
Kotest (project-wide)EnabledCondition / EnabledIf extensions
TestNG@Test(enabled = false), throw SkipException("reason")

Exception Handling — Idiomatic Alternatives

// JUnit 5:
val ex = assertThrows<InvalidOrderException> {
    service.placeOrder(emptyOrder)
}
assertEquals("at least one item", ex.message)

// Kotest:
val ex = shouldThrow<InvalidOrderException> {
    service.placeOrder(emptyOrder)
}
ex.message shouldContain "at least one item"

// AssertK:
assertFailure { service.placeOrder(emptyOrder) }
    .isInstanceOf(InvalidOrderException::class)
    .messageContains("at least one item")

Flag manual try { ... fail() } catch (e: SomeException) { ... } patterns.

Mystery Guest — Common Kotlin/Android Patterns

IndicatorWhat to look for
File systemFile(path).readText(), hard-coded paths
DatabaseRoom.databaseBuilder(...) without inMemoryDatabaseBuilder, real Exposed against file/server
NetworkRetrofit.create<…>() against a real base URL, OkHttp without MockWebServer
EnvironmentSystem.getenv("X")
AndroidContext.assets.open(...), file system writes to internal/external storage
AcceptableMockWebServer, MockK, inMemoryDatabaseBuilder, @MockK, Robolectric (acknowledged-integration), TemporaryFolder

Integration Test Markers

  • File suffix: *IT.kt, *IntegrationTest.kt, *E2ETest.kt

  • Annotations: @SpringBootTest, @DataJpaTest, @Tag("integration")

  • Kotest tags: tag = listOf(IntegrationTag)

  • Android: androidTest/ source set is on-device/instrumented (integration); test/ is JVM (unit)

  • Use of Testcontainers, embedded servers

Setup/Teardown

FrameworkPer-testPer-class
JUnit 5@BeforeEach@BeforeAll (must be @JvmStatic in companion object unless @TestInstance(PER_CLASS))
JUnit 5@AfterEach@AfterAll
KotestbeforeTest { } / beforeEach { }beforeSpec { }
KotestafterTest { } / afterEach { }afterSpec { }
TestNG@BeforeMethod@BeforeClass, @BeforeSuite
SpekbeforeEachTest { }beforeGroup { }

Tag/Trait Attributes (for test-tagging)

FrameworkTag mechanismExample
JUnit 5@Tag("positive") (stackable)@Tag("positive") @Tag("critical-path")
Kotestper-test: .config(tags = setOf(Positive)); per-spec: override fun tags() = setOf(Positive)tag objects: object Positive : Tag()
TestNG@Test(groups = ["positive"])@Test(groups = ["positive", "boundary"])

For JUnit 5 in Gradle, register tag filters in build.gradle.kts:

tasks.test {
    useJUnitPlatform {
        includeTags("positive")
        excludeTags("slow")
    }
}

Language-specific calibration notes

  • Coroutine tests must use runTest / runBlocking at the boundary; missing wrapper makes the test silently incomplete. Flag suspend fun test bodies without a coroutine scope.

  • runBlocking vs runTest: runBlocking waits in real time; runTest uses virtual time. Prefer runTest for testing time-dependent code.

  • MockK verify { } without exactly = N only checks at least once. Tests asserting exact behavior should set the count.

  • Kotest's forAll(...) (data-driven) is parametrized, NOT duplicate tests.

  • @OptIn(ExperimentalCoroutinesApi::class) is common in coroutine tests — not a smell.

  • Android @MediumTest / @LargeTest are size annotations from androidx.test.filters; treat as integration markers.

  • Compose UI tests (createComposeRule) are UI integration tests.

  • Bare assert(x) in tests is the Kotlin kotlin.assert — acceptable but recommend framework matchers for richer failure messages.

  • shouldBe chained Kotest matchers are single conceptual assertions; do not over-count chain length.

Requirements and compatibility

Written for: Claude Code

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Claude Code frontmatter, Needs Python, Needs Node.js

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
.NET (Microsoft)
Publisher
.NET (Microsoft) (Official)
Source
dotnet/skills · plugins/dotnet-test/skills/test-analysis-extensions · commit 96c3d68
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by .NET (Microsoft).

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download test-analysis-extensions.zip