Generated banner for Pinecone RAG
Generated logo for Pinecone RAG

Pinecone RAG

GitHubOfficialFirst committed by immuhammadfurqanDistributed by GitHub

  • Skill
  • Tool integration
  • Data and AI
  • Apache-2.0
  • No issues found

From the author

Build production RAG pipelines and persistent agent memory using Pinecone as the vector database backend. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user mentions Pinecone, wants to index documents for semantic search, build a retrieval-augmented generation system, store agent memory across sessions, implement hybrid search, or connect an LLM to a searchable knowledge base — even if they don't say "Pinecone" explicitly. Also use when the user asks about vector databases for RAG, namespace isolation for multi-tenant agents, embedding pipelines, or scaling a knowledge base beyond what local storage can handle. DO NOT use for local-only vector stores (Chroma, FAISS, pgvector) or pure keyword search with no semantic component.
— the description by immuhammadfurqan

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides a structured approach to building retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems and persistent agent memory using Pinecone. It covers the end-to-end process, including index configuration, embedding generation, batch upserting, and retrieval strategies such as dense and hybrid search. The guide emphasizes best practices for namespace management, metadata handling, and testing to ensure reliable integration with LLM workflows.

What it does

  • Configures Pinecone indexes using serverless or pod-based specifications.
  • Implements batch upserting of documents with metadata for efficient retrieval.
  • Provides patterns for dense semantic search and hybrid search using BM25.
  • Demonstrates how to use namespaces for multi-tenant agent memory isolation.
  • Includes logic for building RAG pipelines that ground LLM responses in retrieved context.
  • Offers a smoke test procedure to verify end-to-end functionality.

When to use it

  • When building RAG systems that require a managed vector database.
  • When implementing persistent memory for AI agents across sessions.
  • When managing multi-tenant data isolation using namespaces.
  • When scaling knowledge bases beyond the capacity of local storage solutions.
  • When implementing hybrid search for domains requiring both semantic and keyword matching.

Advantages

  • Provides clear separation between document retrieval and agent memory workflows.
  • Includes specific guidance on matching embedding model dimensions to index configuration.
  • Promotes efficient data handling through batch processing and metadata storage.
  • Offers modular code patterns for common RAG and memory operations.

Usage examples

“How do I set up a Pinecone index for my RAG pipeline?”
The agent provides the configuration steps for creating a Pinecone index, including selecting between serverless and pod-based options and matching dimensions to your embedding model.
“How can I make my agent remember user facts across different sessions?”
The agent guides you through using Pinecone namespaces to store and recall agent-specific memories, ensuring data is isolated per agent or user.
“I need to implement hybrid search for my legal document database.”
The agent provides a hybrid search implementation using BM25 for keyword matching combined with dense vector embeddings for semantic search.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/github/pinecone-rag/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip pinecone-rag.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by immuhammadfurqan

Pinecone RAG Skill

This skill guides you through building a production RAG pipeline or persistent agent memory system using Pinecone. Follow the workflow from start to finish — don't skip steps or jump to code before understanding what the user actually needs.

Before you start — ask one question

Before writing any code, identify which of these two use cases applies:

A — RAG over documents: User wants to index a corpus (PDFs, docs, code, web pages) and retrieve relevant chunks to ground LLM responses.

B — Agent memory: User wants an agent to remember facts, decisions, or context across sessions or across multiple agents sharing a knowledge base.

The setup is similar but the namespace strategy and retrieval patterns differ. If the user hasn't said, ask: "Is this for document retrieval, agent memory, or both?" Then follow the relevant workflow below.


Step 1 — Choose your index configuration

Pick the index type before writing any code. Getting this wrong means re-creating the index later.

Serverless (recommended for most cases)

from pinecone import Pinecone, ServerlessSpec

pc = Pinecone(api_key="PINECONE_API_KEY")

if "my-index" not in pc.list_indexes().names():
    pc.create_index(
        name="my-index",
        dimension=1536,        # must match your embedding model exactly
        metric="cosine",
        spec=ServerlessSpec(cloud="aws", region="us-east-1")
    )
index = pc.Index("my-index")

Pod-based (for consistent high-throughput production)

from pinecone import PodSpec

pc.create_index(
    name="my-index-prod",
    dimension=1536,
    metric="cosine",
    spec=PodSpec(environment="us-east1-gcp", pod_type="p1.x1")
)

Dimension quick reference — match this exactly to your embedding model:

ModelDimension
text-embedding-3-small1536
text-embedding-3-large3072
voyage-3 / voyage-multimodal-31024
BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.51024
intfloat/multilingual-e5-large (Arabic, Malay, Chinese)1024

Checkpoint: Index exists, dimension matches embedding model, index.describe_index_stats() returns without error.


Step 2 — Embed and upsert documents

Always batch upserts — never upsert one vector at a time.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

def embed(texts: list[str]) -> list[list[float]]:
    res = client.embeddings.create(model="text-embedding-3-small", input=texts)
    return [r.embedding for r in res.data]

def upsert_docs(index, docs: list[dict], namespace: str = "default"):
    """docs = [{"id": "...", "text": "...", "metadata": {...}}]"""
    BATCH = 100
    for i in range(0, len(docs), BATCH):
        batch = docs[i:i + BATCH]
        vecs = [
            {
                "id": d["id"],
                "values": emb,
                "metadata": {**d.get("metadata", {}), "text": d["text"]}
            }
            for d, emb in zip(batch, embed([d["text"] for d in batch]))
        ]
        index.upsert(vectors=vecs, namespace=namespace)

Always store the original text in metadata — this avoids a second lookup at retrieval time.

Checkpoint: index.describe_index_stats() shows vector count > 0 in the target namespace.


Step 3 — Choose retrieval strategy

Dense (semantic) search — use for most cases
def search(index, query: str, top_k: int = 5, namespace: str = "default",
           filter: dict = None) -> list[dict]:
    [q_emb] = embed([query])
    results = index.query(
        vector=q_emb, top_k=top_k, namespace=namespace,
        include_metadata=True, filter=filter
    )
    return [{"text": m.metadata["text"], "score": m.score, "id": m.id}
            for m in results.matches]
Hybrid search (semantic + BM25 keyword) — use when corpus has exact terminology

Use hybrid when the domain has precise terms that semantic search misses: legal citations, medical codes, product SKUs, API method names.

from pinecone_text.sparse import BM25Encoder

bm25 = BM25Encoder().default()
bm25.fit([d["text"] for d in docs])  # fit once on your corpus

def hybrid_search(index, query: str, top_k: int = 5, alpha: float = 0.7):
    """alpha=1.0 is pure dense; alpha=0.0 is pure sparse."""
    dense = [v * alpha for v in embed([query])[0]]
    sparse_raw = bm25.encode_queries(query)
    sparse = {
        "indices": sparse_raw["indices"],
        "values": [v * (1 - alpha) for v in sparse_raw["values"]]
    }
    return index.query(vector=dense, sparse_vector=sparse,
                       top_k=top_k, include_metadata=True).matches
Metadata filtering — use to scope results before semantic ranking
# Exact match
results = index.query(vector=emb, filter={"source": {"$eq": "confluence"}})

# Combined filter
results = index.query(vector=emb, filter={
    "$and": [
        {"category": {"$eq": "engineering"}},
        {"language": {"$in": ["en", "ar"]}}
    ]
})

Checkpoint: A test query returns relevant results with scores > 0.7 for clearly matching content.


Step 4A — Full RAG pipeline (document use case)

def rag_answer(index, question: str, namespace: str = "default",
               model: str = "gpt-4o-mini") -> str:
    hits = search(index, question, top_k=5, namespace=namespace)
    context = "\n\n".join(h["text"] for h in hits)

    return client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "system",
                "content": (
                    "Answer using only the provided context. "
                    "If the answer isn't in the context, say so.\n\n"
                    f"Context:\n{context}"
                )
            },
            {"role": "user", "content": question}
        ]
    ).choices[0].message.content

Step 4B — Agent memory (memory use case)

Use namespaces to isolate each agent's or user's memories completely. Namespace per agent prevents memory bleed across users or sessions.

import time, hashlib

def remember(index, agent_id: str, content: str,
             memory_type: str = "fact"):
    """Store a memory for an agent."""
    mem_id = hashlib.md5(
        f"{agent_id}{content}{time.time()}".encode()
    ).hexdigest()
    [emb] = embed([content])
    index.upsert(
        vectors=[{
            "id": mem_id,
            "values": emb,
            "metadata": {
                "text": content,
                "type": memory_type,
                "timestamp": time.time(),
                "agent_id": agent_id
            }
        }],
        namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}"
    )

def recall(index, agent_id: str, query: str,
           top_k: int = 5) -> list[str]:
    """Recall relevant memories for an agent."""
    return [h["text"] for h in
            search(index, query, top_k=top_k,
                   namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}")]

def forget(index, agent_id: str):
    """Wipe all memories for an agent (e.g., on user request)."""
    index.delete(delete_all=True, namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}")

Step 5 — Wire it together and test end to end

Run a quick smoke test before integrating into the larger system:

# Smoke test
upsert_docs(index, [
    {"id": "t1", "text": "Pinecone is a vector database for semantic search."},
    {"id": "t2", "text": "RAG combines retrieval with language model generation."},
])

hits = search(index, "What is Pinecone?")
assert hits[0]["score"] > 0.7, f"Expected high similarity, got {hits[0]['score']}"
print("Smoke test passed:", hits[0]["text"])

Checkpoint: Smoke test passes. End-to-end: index → upsert → query → LLM response works without errors.


Common pitfalls — fix these before they become bugs

  • Dimension mismatch: always verify len(embed(["test"])[0]) matches the index dimension before your first upsert.

  • Missing text in metadata: if you don't store "text" in metadata, you'll need a second lookup to get the actual content at query time.

  • Single-vector upserts in a loop: always batch in chunks of 100.

  • No namespace strategy: decide upfront — one namespace per user/agent prevents cross-tenant data leaks that are hard to fix later.

  • Fitting BM25 on a small corpus: BM25 needs a representative corpus to build good term frequencies. Fit on at least a few hundred documents.

When NOT to use this skill

Use a different approach when:

  • The dataset fits in memory and latency doesn't matter → use FAISS or Chroma

  • You're already on PostgreSQL and want to avoid a new service → use pgvector

  • You need sub-5ms p99 latency with no external API calls → local vector store

  • The user explicitly wants a different vector DB (Weaviate, Qdrant, etc.)

Files

ATTRIBUTION.md

Attribution

This folder is an unmodified copy of the Agent Skill "pinecone-rag", distributed by AutoGineer (https://autogineer.com/agent-skills).

The skill's own files are unmodified copies. AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by the author or the publisher.

Files added by AutoGineer

  • ATTRIBUTION.md: this file, written by AutoGineer

  • LICENSE: the SPDX text of Apache-2.0 (spdx/license-list-data v3.29.0 (31ba1a50e5397e00a304dbadc76531740e89ee48))

Requirements and compatibility

Written for: GitHub Copilot

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Needs an API key, Needs Python

The author says: pinecone>=6.0.0, Python 3.10+

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

First committed by
GitHub avatar of immuhammadfurqanimmuhammadfurqan
Publisher
GitHub (Official)
Distributed by
GitHub
Source
github/awesome-copilot · skills/pinecone-rag · commit 797337f
Licence
Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (written by AutoGineer)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced
Contributors
immuhammadfurqan

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by immuhammadfurqan or GitHub.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download pinecone-rag.zip