SQL Code Review
GitHubOfficialFirst committed by stbenjamDistributed by GitHub
- Skill
- Review and audit
- Software development
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The SQL Code Review skill acts as a specialized auditor for database code, providing systematic analysis of SQL queries and schema designs. It evaluates code against security vulnerabilities like SQL injection, performance bottlenecks such as inefficient joins or missing indexes, and general maintainability standards. The skill supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, and Oracle, offering both database-agnostic best practices and platform-specific optimizations. It provides structured feedback including priority-based issue reporting, scoring, and actionable code improvements.
What it does
- Detects SQL injection vulnerabilities and suggests parameterized query fixes.
- Identifies performance anti-patterns like N+1 queries and inefficient WHERE clauses.
- Evaluates schema design for normalization, data types, and constraint integrity.
- Provides platform-specific optimization advice for PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, and Oracle.
- Generates a structured review report with priority levels and before-and-after code examples.
- Scores code quality across security, performance, and maintainability metrics.
When to use it
- During code reviews to ensure database queries meet security and performance standards.
- When troubleshooting slow-running queries or inefficient database interactions.
- Before deploying schema changes to verify normalization and constraint best practices.
- When refactoring legacy SQL code to improve readability and maintainability.
Advantages
- Reduces security risks by proactively identifying SQL injection vectors.
- Improves database performance through expert-level query and index optimization.
- Ensures consistent coding standards and naming conventions across the project.
- Provides clear, actionable recommendations with concrete code examples.
- Supports multiple major database engines with tailored best practices.
Usage examples
- “Review this SQL query for security and performance: SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '”
- The agent identifies the SQL injection risk, explains why string concatenation is dangerous, and provides a parameterized query example for the specific database engine.
- “Analyze my schema design for this PostgreSQL table: CREATE TABLE logs (data TEXT);”
- The agent suggests using JSONB for better performance and indexing, and recommends adding appropriate constraints and timestamps.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/github/sql-code-review/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip sql-code-review.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by stbenjam
SQL Code Review
Perform a thorough SQL code review of ${selection} (or entire project if no selection) focusing on security, performance, maintainability, and database best practices.
🔒 Security Analysis
SQL Injection Prevention
-- ❌ CRITICAL: SQL Injection vulnerability
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userInput;
query = f"DELETE FROM orders WHERE user_id = {user_id}";
-- ✅ SECURE: Parameterized queries
-- PostgreSQL/MySQL
PREPARE stmt FROM 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?';
EXECUTE stmt USING @user_id;
-- SQL Server
EXEC sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = @id', N'@id INT', @id = @user_id;Access Control & Permissions
Principle of Least Privilege: Grant minimum required permissions
Role-Based Access: Use database roles instead of direct user permissions
Schema Security: Proper schema ownership and access controls
Function/Procedure Security: Review DEFINER vs INVOKER rights
Data Protection
Sensitive Data Exposure: Avoid SELECT * on tables with sensitive columns
Audit Logging: Ensure sensitive operations are logged
Data Masking: Use views or functions to mask sensitive data
Encryption: Verify encrypted storage for sensitive data
⚡ Performance Optimization
Query Structure Analysis
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient query patterns
SELECT DISTINCT u.*
FROM users u, orders o, products p
WHERE u.id = o.user_id
AND o.product_id = p.id
AND YEAR(o.order_date) = 2024;
-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized structure
SELECT u.id, u.name, u.email
FROM users u
INNER JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id
WHERE o.order_date >= '2024-01-01'
AND o.order_date < '2025-01-01';Index Strategy Review
Missing Indexes: Identify columns that need indexing
Over-Indexing: Find unused or redundant indexes
Composite Indexes: Multi-column indexes for complex queries
Index Maintenance: Check for fragmented or outdated indexes
Join Optimization
Join Types: Verify appropriate join types (INNER vs LEFT vs EXISTS)
Join Order: Optimize for smaller result sets first
Cartesian Products: Identify and fix missing join conditions
Subquery vs JOIN: Choose the most efficient approach
Aggregate and Window Functions
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient aggregation
SELECT user_id,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders o2 WHERE o2.user_id = o1.user_id) as order_count
FROM orders o1
GROUP BY user_id;
-- ✅ GOOD: Efficient aggregation
SELECT user_id, COUNT(*) as order_count
FROM orders
GROUP BY user_id;🛠️ Code Quality & Maintainability
SQL Style & Formatting
-- ❌ BAD: Poor formatting and style
select u.id,u.name,o.total from users u left join orders o on u.id=o.user_id where u.status='active' and o.order_date>='2024-01-01';
-- ✅ GOOD: Clean, readable formatting
SELECT u.id,
u.name,
o.total
FROM users u
LEFT JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id
WHERE u.status = 'active'
AND o.order_date >= '2024-01-01';Naming Conventions
Consistent Naming: Tables, columns, constraints follow consistent patterns
Descriptive Names: Clear, meaningful names for database objects
Reserved Words: Avoid using database reserved words as identifiers
Case Sensitivity: Consistent case usage across schema
Schema Design Review
Normalization: Appropriate normalization level (avoid over/under-normalization)
Data Types: Optimal data type choices for storage and performance
Constraints: Proper use of PRIMARY KEY, FOREIGN KEY, CHECK, NOT NULL
Default Values: Appropriate default values for columns
🗄️ Database-Specific Best Practices
PostgreSQL
-- Use JSONB for JSON data
CREATE TABLE events (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
data JSONB NOT NULL,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW()
);
-- GIN index for JSONB queries
CREATE INDEX idx_events_data ON events USING gin(data);
-- Array types for multi-value columns
CREATE TABLE tags (
post_id INT,
tag_names TEXT[]
);MySQL
-- Use appropriate storage engines
CREATE TABLE sessions (
id VARCHAR(128) PRIMARY KEY,
data TEXT,
expires TIMESTAMP
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
-- Optimize for InnoDB
ALTER TABLE large_table
ADD INDEX idx_covering (status, created_at, id);SQL Server
-- Use appropriate data types
CREATE TABLE products (
id BIGINT IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY,
name NVARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
price DECIMAL(10,2) NOT NULL,
created_at DATETIME2 DEFAULT GETUTCDATE()
);
-- Columnstore indexes for analytics
CREATE COLUMNSTORE INDEX idx_sales_cs ON sales;Oracle
-- Use sequences for auto-increment
CREATE SEQUENCE user_id_seq START WITH 1 INCREMENT BY 1;
CREATE TABLE users (
id NUMBER DEFAULT user_id_seq.NEXTVAL PRIMARY KEY,
name VARCHAR2(255) NOT NULL
);🧪 Testing & Validation
Data Integrity Checks
-- Verify referential integrity
SELECT o.user_id
FROM orders o
LEFT JOIN users u ON o.user_id = u.id
WHERE u.id IS NULL;
-- Check for data consistency
SELECT COUNT(*) as inconsistent_records
FROM products
WHERE price < 0 OR stock_quantity < 0;Performance Testing
Execution Plans: Review query execution plans
Load Testing: Test queries with realistic data volumes
Stress Testing: Verify performance under concurrent load
Regression Testing: Ensure optimizations don't break functionality
📊 Common Anti-Patterns
N+1 Query Problem
-- ❌ BAD: N+1 queries in application code
for user in users:
orders = query("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?", user.id)
-- ✅ GOOD: Single optimized query
SELECT u.*, o.*
FROM users u
LEFT JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id;Overuse of DISTINCT
-- ❌ BAD: DISTINCT masking join issues
SELECT DISTINCT u.name
FROM users u, orders o
WHERE u.id = o.user_id;
-- ✅ GOOD: Proper join without DISTINCT
SELECT u.name
FROM users u
INNER JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id
GROUP BY u.name;Function Misuse in WHERE Clauses
-- ❌ BAD: Functions prevent index usage
SELECT * FROM orders
WHERE YEAR(order_date) = 2024;
-- ✅ GOOD: Range conditions use indexes
SELECT * FROM orders
WHERE order_date >= '2024-01-01'
AND order_date < '2025-01-01';📋 SQL Review Checklist
Security
[ ] All user inputs are parameterized
[ ] No dynamic SQL construction with string concatenation
[ ] Appropriate access controls and permissions
[ ] Sensitive data is properly protected
[ ] SQL injection attack vectors are eliminated
Performance
[ ] Indexes exist for frequently queried columns
[ ] No unnecessary SELECT * statements
[ ] JOINs are optimized and use appropriate types
[ ] WHERE clauses are selective and use indexes
[ ] Subqueries are optimized or converted to JOINs
Code Quality
[ ] Consistent naming conventions
[ ] Proper formatting and indentation
[ ] Meaningful comments for complex logic
[ ] Appropriate data types are used
[ ] Error handling is implemented
Schema Design
[ ] Tables are properly normalized
[ ] Constraints enforce data integrity
[ ] Indexes support query patterns
[ ] Foreign key relationships are defined
[ ] Default values are appropriate
🎯 Review Output Format
Issue Template
## [PRIORITY] [CATEGORY]: [Brief Description]
**Location**: [Table/View/Procedure name and line number if applicable]
**Issue**: [Detailed explanation of the problem]
**Security Risk**: [If applicable - injection risk, data exposure, etc.]
**Performance Impact**: [Query cost, execution time impact]
**Recommendation**: [Specific fix with code example]
**Before**:
```sql
-- Problematic SQL
```
**After**:
```sql
-- Improved SQL
```
**Expected Improvement**: [Performance gain, security benefit]Summary Assessment
Security Score: [1-10] - SQL injection protection, access controls
Performance Score: [1-10] - Query efficiency, index usage
Maintainability Score: [1-10] - Code quality, documentation
Schema Quality Score: [1-10] - Design patterns, normalization
Top 3 Priority Actions
[Critical Security Fix]: Address SQL injection vulnerabilities
[Performance Optimization]: Add missing indexes or optimize queries
[Code Quality]: Improve naming conventions and documentation
Focus on providing actionable, database-agnostic recommendations while highlighting platform-specific optimizations and best practices.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer863 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md8.7 KiB
ATTRIBUTION.md
Attribution
This folder is an unmodified copy of the Agent Skill "sql-code-review", distributed by AutoGineer (https://autogineer.com/agent-skills).
Commit: 797337f33f73e35d08d82f840e21c4b8c4932d88
First committed by: stbenjam (https://github.com/stbenjam)
Publisher: GitHub (https://github.com/github)
Licence: MIT License (https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/797337f33f73e35d08d82f840e21c4b8c4932d88/LICENSE)
Licence evidence: repository licence LICENSE
Retrieved: 2026-11-07
The skill's own files are unmodified copies. AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by the author or the publisher.
Files added by AutoGineer
ATTRIBUTION.md: this file, written by AutoGineer
LICENSE: copied from LICENSE
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: GitHub Copilot
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- First committed by
stbenjam
- Publisher
- GitHub (Official)
- Distributed by
- GitHub
- Source
- github/awesome-copilot · skills/sql-code-review · commit 797337f
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Contributors
- stbenjam
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by stbenjam or GitHub.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download sql-code-review.zip