Generated banner for Google Cloud Solution Build Deploy Agents
Generated logo for Google Cloud Solution Build Deploy Agents

Google Cloud Solution Build Deploy Agents

GoogleOfficialPublished by Google

  • Skill
  • Workflow
  • Cloud and DevOps
  • Apache-2.0
  • No issues found

From the author

Designs, builds, and deploys AI agents or multi-agent systems on Google Cloud. Provides an interactive workflow to gather requirements, recommend a tailored architecture, and generate deployment instructions. Use when designing or implementing agentic systems on Google Cloud. Don't use for general Google Cloud solution architecture (use google-cloud-solution-architecture instead) or for narrow tasks targeting a single product without agent context.
— the description by Google

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides a structured, four-phase workflow to assist in the end-to-end lifecycle of AI agent development on Google Cloud. It guides the user through requirements discovery, architectural design, implementation planning, and validation. By leveraging specific Google Cloud best practices, it ensures that agentic systems are built with security, scalability, and operational excellence in mind, while providing clear paths for infrastructure provisioning and testing.

What it does

  • Analyzes functional and non-functional requirements for AI agent workloads.
  • Recommends appropriate agent design patterns, such as single-agent or multi-agent systems.
  • Generates technical decompositions and architecture diagrams in Mermaid format.
  • Maps workload components to specific Google Cloud products and services.
  • Produces Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and deployment scripts for cloud resources.
  • Defines validation plans, including local testing and deployment dry-runs.

When to use it

  • When you need to design a new AI agent or multi-agent system on Google Cloud.
  • When you require a structured plan to move an agentic workload from concept to production.
  • When you need to ensure your agent architecture follows Google Cloud best practices.
  • When you need to generate deployment instructions and infrastructure code for agentic services.

Advantages

  • Ensures architectural consistency by following established Google Cloud design principles.
  • Reduces deployment risk through structured validation and dry-run procedures.
  • Promotes operational excellence with built-in logging, tracing, and monitoring guidance.
  • Provides a clear, repeatable process for complex multi-agent system deployments.

Usage examples

“I need to build a multi-agent system for customer support on Google Cloud. Can you help me design the architecture?”
The agent will initiate the requirements discovery phase, asking about your specific customer support use cases, security constraints, and existing knowledge bases to propose a tailored architecture.
“Help me create an implementation plan for my agentic workload that uses Cloud Run.”
The agent will guide you through identifying prerequisites, generating Terraform scripts, and providing step-by-step deployment instructions optimized for Cloud Run scaling.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/google/google-cloud-solution-build-deploy-agents/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip google-cloud-solution-build-deploy-agents.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Google

Build and deploy AI agents on Google Cloud

This skill guides agents through the workflow of designing and implementing a tailored multi-product solution in the cloud for a given workload, use case, or requirement.

Attribution

MUST READ: Before executing any gcloud, REST API, or MCP command, you MUST read and follow the instructions in Usage Attribution.

Workflow

The solution design and implementation workflow is divided into the following phases:

  • Phase 1: Requirements discovery and analysis: Analyze the workload's requirements, constraints, dependencies, and current state.

  • Phase 2: Solution design: Build a technology stack, architecture, and deployment configuration for the workload based on Google Cloud design best practices and recommendations.

  • Phase 3: Implementation plan: Generate automation and instructions to deploy the solution.

  • Phase 4: Solution validation: Validate that the deployment meets the requirements of the workload.

Copy this checklist into your active task/plan artifact to track progress across the four phases:

  • [ ] Phase 1: Requirements discovery and analysis completed & confirmed.

  • [ ] Phase 2: Solution architecture generated & approved.

  • [ ] Phase 3: Implementation plan generated & approved.

  • [ ] Phase 4: Solution validation generated & approved.

Phase 1: Requirements discovery and analysis
  1. Discover requirements: Gather and understand the functional and non-functional requirements, business goals, and current state (if any) of the workload, including its architecture, dependencies, and constraints.

    Important: First, check whether the user's initial prompt has already answered the following questions or whether the prompt explicitly asks you to propose a solution architecture/diagram from a given set of parameters.

    • If the user's prompt provides sufficient requirements and it explicitly requests an architecture proposal or diagram, then skip asking the questions below, and instead proceed to the step Recommend agent design pattern.

    • If the user's prompt doesn't provide sufficient requirements, then complete these steps to gather missing information:

      1. Ask the user to describe the functional requirements of their workload: business processes, activities, and use cases.

      2. Ask the user to describe the non-functional requirements (security, privacy, compliance, reliability, disaster recovery, cost, operations, performance, and sustainability) of their workloads.

      3. Ask the user what existing systems, knowledge bases, product documentation, or other documentation the AI agents need to access for grounded guidance.

      4. Ask the user to describe dependencies, if any, on other workloads, products, or tools.

      5. Review the input that the user has provided so far, and check whether there are any ambiguities or contradictions in the input.

        If you identify any ambiguities or contradictions in the requirements that the user has provided, then do the following for each ambiguity or contradiction that you identify:

        • Describe the ambiguity or contradiction.

        • Ask the user how they wish to resolve the ambiguity or contradiction.

          • If the user delegates the choice to you (e.g., the user replies with "do what you think is best" or "you decide"), then provide a clear suggestion to resolve the ambiguity or contradiction, explain your reasoning, and ask the user to approve your suggestion.

        Critical: Until all the ambiguities and contradictions that you identify are resolved according to the preceding guidance, you must NOT recommend or generate any architecture design, technical decomposition, or Google Cloud product recommendations.

  2. Recommend agent design pattern: Evaluate the complexity, workflow, latency, and cost requirements of the workload to recommend an agent design pattern:

    • Single-agent system: Recommend for simpler tasks, acting as an effective starting point to refine core logic and tools.

    • Multi-agent system: Recommend for complex problems requiring multiple specialized agents to collaborate on a workflow.

  3. Identify components: Based on the requirements analysis, generate a technical decomposition of the workload. The technical decomposition must identify the logical components of the workloads and their relationships. Also identify any cross-cloud components, hybrid components, or on-premises components that the solution needs to integrate with.

  4. Ask for confirmation: Ask the user to confirm whether the recommended design pattern and technical decomposition match their workload requirements.

  5. Iterate: If the user requests changes, generate an updated technical decomposition, and ask the user to confirm the changes. Continue iterating until the user confirms the technical decomposition. Proceed to the next phase only after the user provides confirmation of the technical decomposition.

Phase 2: Solution design
  1. Retrieve relevant Google Cloud guidance from references/related-guidance.md.

    Important: Use the content that you retrieved from references/related-guidance.md to ground the guidance that you generate in the remaining steps of this phase.

  2. Map components to Google Cloud products: For each component in the confirmed technical decomposition, identify the appropriate Google Cloud products and features by consulting product-mappings.md for detailed recommendations, trade-offs, and alternatives across networking, frontends, agent/model runtimes, memory stores, and tools.

  3. Create architecture diagram: Create an architecture diagram in Mermaid format: https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid. The diagram should show the components, their relationships, and data/control flows.

  4. Generate design recommendations: Generate design guidance based on the following Google Cloud best practices and recommendations. Use the information in references/related-guidance.md, with an emphasis on the guidance in references/design-principles.md.

  5. Draft solution architecture: Compile the requirements, technical decomposition, product mapping, architecture diagram, and design recommendations into a single Markdown file adhering to the format in solution-template.md. Save this document in the workspace as solution-architecture.md.

  6. Request review: Present the generated solution architecture (including the complete fenced mermaid code block for the diagram) directly to the user in your response, and explicitly request their feedback or approval. When you present the architecture, ask the user to provide approval for you to proceed with an implementation plan.

  7. Iterate: If the user requests changes, generate an updated solution architecture and repeat the steps from "Map components to Google Cloud products" through "Request review" until the user approves the solution architecture.

Phase 3: Implementation plan
  1. Retrieve relevant implementation resources:

    Important: Use the resources in references/related-guidance.md as the technical foundation for the Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and the deployment instructions that you generate in the remaining steps of this phase.

  2. Identify deployment prerequisites: Document prerequisites for the deployment, including the following:

    • Projects and billing associations

    • Required Google Cloud APIs

    • Required IAM permissions

    • Any other prerequisites

  3. Generate Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Generate code (e.g., Terraform) and deployment scripts to automate the provisioning of the proposed Google Cloud resources.

    • Where appropriate, alongside or instead of raw infrastructure scripts, instruct the user to use Agents CLI commands (agents-cli scaffold create or agents-cli scaffold enhance) to set up or enhance the project structure, deployment configuration, and CI/CD pipelines.

  4. Write deployment instructions: Draft sequential, step-by-step deployment instructions to execute the IaC and initialize the workload components. Compile the deployment prerequisites, IaC, and deployment instructions into a single Markdown file adhering to the format in implementation-template.md. Save this document in the workspace as implementation-instructions.md.

    • The instructions MUST provide the exact ADK code to define a stateful agent node that takes a prompt, calls a model, and returns a tool execution request.

    • The instructions MUST demonstrate how to register tools like database readers by using Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

    • If deploying the agent to Cloud Run, the instructions MUST show how to configure Cloud Run to scale to zero when the agent is idle, reducing runtime costs.

    • The instructions MUST recommend using encrypted environment variables to store model parameters or private API credentials. Encryption helps to prevent the exposure of sensitive credentials in plain-text container log streams.

    • Where appropriate, the instructions MUST specify using the Agents CLI agents-cli deploy command (alongside or instead of raw infrastructure/deployment scripts) to run the deployment.

  5. Request review: Present the generated deployment instructions to the user and explicitly request their feedback and confirmation.

  6. Iterate: If the user requests changes, generate an updated implementation plan and repeat the steps from "Generate Infrastructure as Code (IaC)" through "Request review" until the user approves the implementation plan.

Phase 4: Solution validation
  1. Retrieve relevant verification resources:

    Important: Use the resources in references/related-guidance.md and their verification patterns as the starting point for the validation checks and verification scripts that you generate in the remaining steps of this phase.

  2. Define validation checks: Outline validation steps to verify that the deployed infrastructure meets the workload's requirements:

    • Deployment dry-run: Commands like terraform plan to preview changes. Include instructions to run agent deployment in dry-run mode (e.g., using agents-cli deploy --dry-run or -n) to preview steps and Terraform executions before pushing to production.

    • Local testing and quality verification: Recommend using the Agents CLI to run and test agent logic locally (agents-cli run) and conduct systematic evaluations (agents-cli eval run) to verify agent quality and performance before deploying.

    • Connectivity and routing: Verification of network paths, load balancer routing, and service endpoints.

    • Security policies: Verification of restricted access, firewall rules, and IAM enforcement.

  3. Generate verification scripts: Draft lightweight scripts or command-line instructions (e.g. using curl, gcloud, or agents-cli) that the user can run to perform these validation checks.

    • The validation plan MUST include instructions using the Agents CLI for local runs, evaluations, and post-deployment validation checks (e.g., agents-cli run --url <service-url> to test the deployed service endpoint).

  4. Compile validation plan: Document the validation steps, verification scripts, and expected outcomes in a single Markdown file adhering to the format in validation-template.md. Save this document in the workspace as validation-plan.md.

  5. Request review: Present the validation plan to the user and explicitly request their feedback or approval on the validation plan.

  6. Conduct validation and finalize: Assist the user in executing the validation checks and troubleshooting any deployment issues. After the solution is validated successfully, request final approval from the user.

  7. Iterate: If the user requests changes, generate an updated validation plan and repeat the steps from "Define validation checks" through "Request review" until the user approves the validation plan.


  • For the complete list of Google Cloud architectural documentation, product manuals, development kits, and checklists used by this skill, see related-guidance.md.

Files

references/product-mappings.md

Product mappings

Use the following list to identify the appropriate Google Cloud products and features for each component in the confirmed technical decomposition:

Table of Contents

Component / FeatureLine hints
Cloud Run networkingLines 24-45
FrontendLines 46-59
Agent development frameworkLines 60-63
Agent-to-agent communicationLines 64-71
Agent runtimeLines 72-91
Agent registryLines 92-97
Model runtimeLines 98-110
Model selectionLines 111-121
Model input and output inspectionLines 122-125
VPC connection to databasesLines 126-137
Agent memoryLines 138-175
Database (for search and retrieval)Lines 176-187
Agent toolsLines 188-213

<a id="cloud-run-networking"></a>Cloud Run networking

  • Recommended primary configuration: Regional External Application Load Balancer combined with Cloud Armor for HTTP/HTTPS/WebSocket ingress, and Direct VPC egress for Cloud Run private network access.

  • Alternative product 1: Global External Application Load Balancer

    • Pros: Single anycast IP, global IPv6 termination, and low-latency routes to globally distributed backend services.

    • Cons: Terminates TLS globally at edge locations, which might not comply with strict regional data residency regulations.

  • Alternative product 2: Internal Application Load Balancer

    • Pros: Securely exposes Cloud Run services internally within the VPC to meet internal ingress criteria, terminates TLS with trusted certificates, and supports Cloud Armor backend security policies.

    • Cons: Requires that you configure serverless network endpoint groups (NEGs) as backends and manage load balancer resources.

  • Alternative product 3: Private Service Connect interface

    • Pros: Secure private VPC connections for Gemini Enterprise Agent Runtime that uses network attachments.

    • Cons: Limited to RFC 1918 routable subnet ranges, requires proxy setup for non-routable/internet destinations.

<a id="frontend"></a>Frontend

  • Recommended primary product: Cloud Run

  • Alternative product 1: Firebase App Hosting

    • Pros: Automated builds and deployment pipeline from GitHub, optimized for modern framework integrations.

    • Cons: Less control over container configurations, limits customization of low-level networking.

  • Alternative product 2: Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)

    • Pros: Maximum control over routing, scaling, and custom container runtimes.

    • Cons: Significant infrastructure management complexity and cost overhead.

<a id="agent-development-framework"></a>Agent development framework

  • Recommended primary product: Agent Development Kit (ADK).

<a id="agent-to-agent-communication"></a>Agent-to-agent communication

  • Recommended primary product: Agent Gateway for governed Agent2Agent (A2A) connectivity.

    • Pros: Provides client-to-agent ingress, agent-to-anywhere egress, and natively integrates IAM, Model Armor, Agent Registry, and Agent Identity.

<a id="agent-runtime"></a>Agent runtime

  • Recommended primary product: Gemini Enterprise Agent Runtime

    • Pros: Fully managed runtime that supports built-in memory/sessions (Agent Platform Sessions), secure code execution sandbox, and native connection to remote MCP servers (like those hosted on Cloud Run).

    • Cons: Limited to the supported languages (see the supported Language list) and doesn't host custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers directly (they must be hosted externally on Cloud Run or GKE).

  • Alternative product 1: Cloud Run

    • Pros: Serves custom container instances scaling to zero; highly performant when hosting custom language engines, local API layers, or custom MCP servers.

    • Cons: Requires managing container builds and continuous delivery configurations, can't host or serve Gemini models.

  • Alternative product 2: Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)

    • Pros: Maximum infrastructure control, stateful pods, custom scaling.

    • Cons: High operational complexity and overhead.

<a id="agent-registry"></a>Agent registry

  • Recommended primary product: Agent Registry

    • Pros: Provides a unified catalog for agents, tools, and MCP servers. Optimizes routing in multi-agent (A2A) paths.

<a id="model-runtime"></a>Model runtime

  • Recommended primary product: Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform

  • Alternative product 1: Cloud Run

    • Pros: Serverless hosting for containerized open/custom models like Gemma. Can be configured to autoscale.

    • Cons: Cannot serve Google Gemini models.

  • Alternative product 2: Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)

    • Pros: Maximum control over inference server on GPU/TPU nodes, cheap for predictable high volume.

    • Cons: Cannot run Google Gemini models, high cluster management overhead.

<a id="model-selection"></a>Model selection

  • Recommended primary product (Text): Gemini Flash

  • Recommended primary product (Audio/Video): Gemini Flash with Gemini Live API

  • Alternative product 1: Gemini Pro

    • Pros: Highest capability for reasoning, complex instructions, context tracking, and multi-agent coordination.

    • Cons: Higher request cost and latency, which makes it less suitable for real-time conversational requirements.

<a id="model-input-and-output-inspection"></a>Model input and output inspection

For security, always include model input and output inspection.

  • Recommended primary product: Model Armor

<a id="vpc-connection-to-databases"></a>VPC connection to databases

An agent sends queries through this connector to securely access resources in the Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) network used for storage resources in this architecture.

  • Recommended primary product: Serverless VPC Access connector

  • Alternative product 1: Direct VPC egress

    • Pros: Lower latency, lower resource cost, and avoids throughput scaling bottlenecks.

    • Cons: Requires specific routing and subnet configurations.

<a id="agent-memory"></a>Agent memory

Short-term memory
  • Recommended primary product: Agent Platform Sessions

    • Pros: Native, built-in managed memory for Gemini Enterprise Agent Runtime, low-ops, the default choice for most cases since it eliminates the need to provision and manage external databases.

    • Cons: Requires an Agent Runtime instance and is limited to the managed Agent Platform Sessions service (regional availability applies), although the agent itself can still run on Cloud Run or GKE.

  • Alternative product 1: Memorystore for Redis Cluster

    • Pros: High performance, sub-millisecond read/write latency. Ideal escalation path when you require microsecond response times and high throughput.

    • Cons: Requires managing Redis nodes, VPC routing/peering configuration, and has a higher base cost.

  • Alternative product 2: Firestore

    • Pros: Fully managed NoSQL database with serverless scaling, excellent for persistent state storage.

    • Cons: Higher latency compared to in-memory stores, which might affect real-time interactive applications.

  • Alternative product 3: Cloud SQL (with ADK DatabaseSessionService)

    • Pros: Strong relational guarantees and ACID compliance for complex querying over session state.

    • Cons: Higher connection overhead and latency, and requires managing database instances.

Long-term memory
  • Recommended primary product: Memory Bank

  • Alternative product 1: Firestore

    • Pros: Serverless, highly scalable document database that is ideal for storing large volumes of persistent knowledge.

    • Cons: Requires custom implementation for semantic search, embedding, and retrieval logic compared to purpose-built memory solutions.

<a id="database-for-search-and-retrieval"></a>Database (for search and retrieval)

  • Recommended primary product: Google Cloud Databases Use the recommendations listed on this page to help the user choose the appropriate database option (e.g., Cloud SQL, AlloyDB).

  • Alternative product 1: Compute Engine (for self-hosted databases)

    • Pros: Full control over database configurations, OS accessibility, and custom database engines or extensions.

    • Cons: High operational overhead to manually manage backups, patching, scaling, and high availability.

<a id="agent-tools"></a>Agent tools

  • API Management Platform (Enterprise Scale):

    • Recommended product: Apigee API hub.

    • Use case: Best for managing, securing, and monitoring a large number of API-based tools at an enterprise scale. It allows agents to connect to data instantly through prebuilt connectors or custom APIs.

  • Model Context Protocol (MCP):

    • Recommended primary products:

      • Google Cloud MCP servers (fully managed by Google for connecting to Google Cloud services).

      • Cloud Run or GKE (for deploying custom, self-hosted MCP servers as containerized applications).

      • Use case: Best for building modular or multi-agent systems that require interoperable and reusable tools, decoupling the agent's logic from specific tool implementations.

  • Built-in Tools:

    • Recommended primary framework: Agent Development Kit (ADK).

    • Use case: Best for common tasks (e.g., web search, code execution in a secure environment) to accelerate initial development without configuring external communication protocols.

  • Custom Function Tools:

    • Use case: Best for integrating with specific internal or third-party APIs that do not have an MCP server, or for exposing an "agent-as-a-tool" function in multi-agent orchestration.

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Needs Node.js

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
Google
Publisher
Google (Official)
Source
google/skills · skills/cloud/google-cloud-solution-build-deploy-agents · commit 2194d3b
Licence
Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Google.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download google-cloud-solution-build-deploy-agents.zip