Scientific Schematics
K-DenseCommunityCreated by K-Dense Inc.
- Skill
- Content generator
- Science and research
- MIT
- Low risk
- Has scripts
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
Scientific Schematics automates the creation of professional diagrams for research publications, posters, and presentations. By combining Nano Banana 2 AI for image generation with Gemini 3.6 Flash for quality assessment, the skill ensures that visual outputs meet specific academic standards. It employs a smart iterative loop that automatically refines diagrams until they reach the required quality threshold for the user's document type, saving time and effort in manual design.
What it does
- Generates scientific diagrams from natural language descriptions.
- Performs automated quality reviews using Gemini 3.6 Flash.
- Applies smart iterative refinement to improve diagrams until quality thresholds are met.
- Supports various document types with tailored quality benchmarks.
- Provides versioned image outputs and detailed JSON review logs.
- Enforces scientific design principles like colorblind-safe palettes and high-contrast layouts.
When to use it
- Creating neural network architectures or complex system diagrams.
- Drafting methodology flowcharts for study designs like CONSORT or PRISMA.
- Visualizing biological pathways or molecular interactions.
- Designing technical block diagrams for research papers or grant proposals.
- Generating figures for academic posters or conference presentations.
Advantages
- Reduces manual design time for complex scientific visuals.
- Ensures consistent quality through automated, objective review.
- Optimizes API usage by stopping iterations once quality thresholds are achieved.
- Provides clear feedback via critique logs for failed quality checks.
- Standardizes visual output with built-in scientific design best practices.
Usage examples
- “CONSORT participant flow diagram with 500 screened, 150 excluded, 350 randomized”
- Generates a publication-ready CONSORT flowchart for a journal paper, iterating until it meets the 8.5/10 quality threshold.
- “Transformer encoder-decoder architecture showing multi-head attention”
- Produces a clear neural network architecture diagram for a presentation, optimized for a 6.5/10 quality threshold.
- “MAPK signaling pathway from EGFR to gene transcription”
- Creates a biological pathway diagram for an academic poster, ensuring it meets the 7.0/10 quality threshold.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/k-dense-ai/scientific-schematics/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip scientific-schematics.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by K-Dense Inc.
Scientific Schematics and Diagrams
Overview
Scientific schematics and diagrams transform complex concepts into clear visual representations for publication. This skill uses Nano Banana 2 AI for diagram generation with Gemini 3.6 Flash quality review.
How it works:
Describe your diagram in natural language
Nano Banana 2 generates publication-quality images automatically
Gemini 3.6 Flash reviews quality against document-type thresholds
Smart iteration: Only regenerates if quality is below threshold
Publication-ready output in minutes
No coding, templates, or manual drawing required
Quality Thresholds by Document Type:
| Document Type | Threshold | Description |
|---|---|---|
| journal | 8.5/10 | Nature, Science, peer-reviewed journals |
| conference | 8.0/10 | Conference papers |
| thesis | 8.0/10 | Dissertations, theses |
| grant | 8.0/10 | Grant proposals |
| preprint | 7.5/10 | arXiv, bioRxiv, etc. |
| report | 7.5/10 | Technical reports |
| poster | 7.0/10 | Academic posters |
| presentation | 6.5/10 | Slides, talks |
| default | 7.5/10 | General purpose |
Simply describe what you want, and Nano Banana 2 creates it. All diagrams are stored in the figures/ subfolder and referenced in papers/posters.
What the output is: a raster PNG at whatever resolution the image model returns. This skill has no vector path and no DPI control — if a journal demands PDF, EPS, or 300 dpi TIFF, convert the PNG downstream and check the result at final print size.
Quick Start: Generate Any Diagram
Create any scientific diagram by simply describing it. Nano Banana 2 handles everything automatically with smart iteration:
# Generate for journal paper (highest quality threshold: 8.5/10)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "CONSORT participant flow diagram with 500 screened, 150 excluded, 350 randomized" -o figures/consort.png --doc-type journal
# Generate for presentation (lower threshold: 6.5/10 - faster)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "Transformer encoder-decoder architecture showing multi-head attention" -o figures/transformer.png --doc-type presentation
# Generate for poster (moderate threshold: 7.0/10)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "MAPK signaling pathway from EGFR to gene transcription" -o figures/mapk_pathway.png --doc-type poster
# Custom max iterations (max 2)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "Complex circuit diagram with op-amp, resistors, and capacitors" -o figures/circuit.png --iterations 2 --doc-type journalWhat happens behind the scenes:
Generation 1: Nano Banana 2 creates initial image following scientific diagram best practices
Review 1: Gemini 3.6 Flash evaluates quality against document-type threshold
Decision: If quality >= threshold → DONE (no more iterations needed!)
If below threshold: Improved prompt based on critique, regenerate
Repeat: Until quality meets threshold OR max iterations reached
Smart Iteration Benefits:
✅ Saves API calls if first generation is good enough
✅ Higher quality standards for journal papers
✅ Faster turnaround for presentations/posters
✅ Appropriate quality for each use case
Output: Versioned images (name_v1.png, name_v2.png), a copy of the winner at the path you
asked for, and name_review_log.json with the score, critique, and early-stop reason per iteration.
When the review cannot run — a rate limit, a content filter, a reviewer that answers in some
unexpected shape — the image is still generated and saved, but no score is invented for it. The log
records "score": null and "reviewed": false with the reason in "review_error", and the run
prints Review unavailable — image kept, quality not verified. Treat that image as unchecked and
look at it yourself; re-running is worth a try, since the failure is usually transient.
Configuration
Set your OpenRouter API key:
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY='your_api_key_here'Get an API key at: https://openrouter.ai/keys
Data leaves the machine. Your prompt is sent to OpenRouter to generate the image, and the generated image is sent back to OpenRouter for the quality review. Both are subject to OpenRouter's data policies and those of the underlying model providers. Do not describe unpublished data, patient information, or anything under embargo in the prompt.
AI Generation Best Practices
Effective Prompts for Scientific Diagrams:
✓ Good prompts (specific, detailed):
"CONSORT flowchart showing participant flow from screening (n=500) through randomization to final analysis"
"Transformer neural network architecture with encoder stack on left, decoder stack on right, showing multi-head attention and cross-attention connections"
"Biological signaling cascade: EGFR receptor → RAS → RAF → MEK → ERK → nucleus, with phosphorylation steps labeled"
"Block diagram of IoT system: sensors → microcontroller → WiFi module → cloud server → mobile app"
✗ Avoid vague prompts:
"Make a flowchart" (too generic)
"Neural network" (which type? what components?)
"Pathway diagram" (which pathway? what molecules?)
Key elements to include:
Type: Flowchart, architecture diagram, pathway, circuit, etc.
Components: Specific elements to include
Flow/Direction: How elements connect (left-to-right, top-to-bottom)
Labels: Key annotations or text to include
Style: Any specific visual requirements
Scientific Quality Guidelines (automatically applied):
Clean white/light background
High contrast for readability
Clear, readable labels (minimum 10pt)
Professional typography (sans-serif fonts)
Colorblind-friendly colors (Okabe-Ito palette)
Proper spacing to prevent crowding
Scale bars, legends, axes where appropriate
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
Creating neural network architecture diagrams (Transformers, CNNs, RNNs, etc.)
Illustrating system architectures and data flow diagrams
Drawing methodology flowcharts for study design (CONSORT, PRISMA)
Visualizing algorithm workflows and processing pipelines
Creating circuit diagrams and electrical schematics
Depicting biological pathways and molecular interactions
Generating network topologies and hierarchical structures
Illustrating conceptual frameworks and theoretical models
Designing block diagrams for technical papers
How to Use This Skill
Simply describe your diagram in natural language. Nano Banana 2 generates it automatically:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o output.pngThat's it! The AI handles:
✓ Layout and composition
✓ Labels and annotations
✓ Colors and styling
✓ Quality review and refinement
✓ Publication-ready output
Works for all diagram types:
Flowcharts (CONSORT, PRISMA, etc.)
Neural network architectures
Biological pathways
Circuit diagrams
System architectures
Block diagrams
Any scientific visualization
No coding, no templates, no manual drawing required.
AI Generation Mode (Nano Banana 2 + Gemini 3.6 Flash Review)
Smart Iterative Refinement, Advanced Usage, and Examples
The generate-review-refine loop, the Python API and command-line options, prompt engineering guidance, and four worked examples (CONSORT flowchart, neural network architecture, biological pathway, system architecture) are in references/iterative_refinement.md.
The loop stops as soon as the review passes, so a simple diagram usually costs one iteration; only complex figures use the full budget.
Command-Line Usage
The main entry point for generating scientific schematics:
# Basic usage
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram description" -o output.png
# Custom iterations (max 2)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "complex diagram" -o diagram.png --iterations 2
# Verbose mode
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png -vNote: The Nano Banana 2 AI generation system includes automatic quality review in its iterative refinement process. Each iteration is evaluated for scientific accuracy, clarity, and accessibility.
Best Practices Summary
Design principles — ask for these in the prompt
Clarity over complexity - Simplify, remove unnecessary elements
Consistent styling - Describe the same visual conventions across a paper's figures
Colorblind accessibility - Ask for the Okabe-Ito palette and redundant encoding
Appropriate typography - Sans-serif fonts, generously sized labels
Logical flow - State the direction (left-to-right, top-to-bottom) explicitly
The generator applies all of these by default, but naming them in your own words for the specific diagram works better than relying on the built-in guidelines alone.
What the pipeline cannot do
Vector output - PNG only; no PDF, SVG, or EPS is produced
Resolution control - the image model chooses; there is no DPI flag
Color space - RGB only; convert for CMYK print workflows downstream
Exact line weights or text sizes - describe them in the prompt, then verify by eye
For a journal that requires vector art or 300+ dpi TIFF, convert the PNG after generation and check the result at the size it will actually be printed.
Integration Guidelines
Include in LaTeX - Use
\includegraphics{}for generated imagesCaption thoroughly - Describe all elements and abbreviations
Reference in text - Explain diagram in narrative flow
Maintain consistency - Same style across all figures in paper
Version control - Keep prompts and generated images in repository
Troubleshooting Common Issues
Generation is stochastic and iteration is capped at 2, so the levers that actually change the
outcome are the prompt, the document type, and re-running. There is no post-processing step and no
quality-checking library in this skill: everything you can inspect lives in the generated PNG and
in <name>_review_log.json.
The diagram is wrong
Overlapping text, crowded elements, or arrows that miss their targets
Name the layout in the prompt: "vertical flow, one box per row, generous spacing between stages"
Name the connections: "arrow from RAF to MEK labelled phosphorylation", not "show the cascade"
Re-run. Two runs of the same prompt differ, and a bad layout is often just an unlucky draw
Content is scientifically wrong or a component is missing
List the components explicitly, with counts and labels — the model will not infer them
Read the
critiquefield in the review log: the reviewer usually names what it saw missing
Wrong text in labels, or figure numbering baked into the image
The prompt already forbids "Figure 1:" captions; if one appears anyway, re-run
Misspelled labels are the most common failure of image models. Read every label before using it
The score seems wrong
Score is lower than the diagram deserves
Read the critique before re-running; the reviewer's complaint is often legitimate and specific
The threshold, not the score, decides whether it iterates —
--doc-type journaldemands 8.5
A run stops at a score below the threshold
That is the iteration cap.
--iterations 2is the maximum; the last image is kept and reported with its real score
"score": null and "reviewed": false in the log
The review call failed or answered in an unusable shape. The image is fine and was kept; only its quality was never measured. Check
"review_error", look at the image yourself, and re-run
Setup
Error: OPENROUTER_API_KEY not found
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY='sk-or-v1-...', or add it to a.envfile, or pass--api-key
Error: requests library not found
uv pip install requests
Any API error — run with -v to see the request, the model slug, and the full error body
Resources and References
Detailed References
Load these files for comprehensive information on specific topics:
references/iterative_refinement.md- The generate-review-refine loop, the Python API, every command-line option, prompt engineering guidance, and four worked examplesreferences/best_practices.md- Publication standards and accessibility guidelines to draw on when writing prompts and when judging the result
External Resources
Publication Standards
Nature Figure Guidelines: https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/final-submission
Science Figure Guidelines: https://www.science.org/content/page/instructions-preparing-initial-manuscript
CONSORT Diagram: http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/flow-diagram
Integration with Other Skills
This skill works synergistically with:
Scientific Writing - Diagrams follow figure best practices
Scientific Visualization - Shares color palettes and styling
LaTeX Posters - Generate diagrams for poster presentations
Research Grants - Methodology diagrams for proposals
Peer Review - Evaluate diagram clarity and accessibility
Quick Reference Checklist
Before submitting diagrams, verify:
Read the review log (this is the only automated check there is)
[ ]
<name>_review_log.jsonexists and"reviewed"istrueon the final iteration[ ]
"final_score"is a real number, notnull, and meets the threshold for your document type[ ] Read the
"critique"— the reviewer's remaining issues are listed even on a passing score[ ] If more than one version was generated, compare
_v1and_v2and keep the better one
Look at the image yourself
[ ] Every label is spelled correctly — image models misspell text, and no automated check here catches it
[ ] No overlapping or clipped text
[ ] All arrows connect the elements they are meant to connect
[ ] The science is right: correct components, correct direction, nothing invented
[ ] Units and counts match what you asked for
Accessibility (by eye, or in an external checker)
[ ] Colorblind-safe palette, and the encoding is not colour alone
[ ] Still readable converted to grayscale
[ ] Adequate contrast between adjacent elements
Publication fit
[ ] Consistent styling with the other figures in the manuscript
[ ] Legible at the column width it will actually be printed at
[ ] Converted to the journal's required format if PNG is not accepted
[ ] Caption written, with every abbreviation defined
[ ] Referenced in the manuscript text
Version control
[ ] The prompt is recorded (it is stored verbatim in the review log)
[ ] Review log committed alongside the image, so the score is auditable
[ ] The command that regenerates the figure is written down
Final Integration Check
[ ] Figure displays correctly in compiled manuscript
[ ] Cross-references work (
\ref{}points to correct figure)[ ] Figure number matches text citations
[ ] Caption appears on correct page relative to figure
[ ] No compilation warnings or errors related to figure
Environment Setup
# Required
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY='your_api_key_here'
# Get key at: https://openrouter.ai/keysGetting Started
Simplest possible usage:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o output.pngUse this skill to create clear, accessible, publication-quality diagrams that effectively communicate complex scientific concepts. The AI-powered workflow with iterative refinement ensures diagrams meet professional standards.
Citing Scientific Agent Skills
This skill is part of Scientific Agent Skills by K-Dense. If it materially contributed to a manuscript, report, presentation, or code release, add the paper to the references or software section and tell the user you did so:
Kassis, T., Agarwal, V., He, Y., Patel, D., & Brueckner, A. M. (2026). Scientific Agent Skills: A Library of Procedural Knowledge for Research Agents. arXiv:2609.00065. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00065
Always cite the current version. The DOI and https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00065 resolve to the
latest arXiv version, so never append a version suffix such as v1. When network access is
available, fetch https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00065 (or
http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?id_list=2609.00065) before writing the reference and take
the author list, year, and version from that record. If the record lists a journal reference
or publisher DOI, cite the published version instead.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer1014 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md17.0 KiB
- references/best_practices.md16.4 KiB
- references/iterative_refinement.md10.9 KiB
- scripts/example_usage.shScript3.2 KiB
- scripts/generate_schematic.pyScript7.4 KiB
- scripts/generate_schematic_ai.pyScript37.6 KiB
references/iterative_refinement.md
Smart Iterative Refinement Workflow
How the generate-review-refine loop works: the initial generation, the quality review, the decision to continue or stop, subsequent iterations, and the review log. Then the advanced generation options (Python API, command-line options, prompt engineering) and four worked examples.
Smart Iterative Refinement Workflow
The AI generation system uses smart iteration - it only regenerates if quality is below the threshold for your document type:
How Smart Iteration Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Generate image with Nano Banana 2 │
│ ↓ │
│ 2. Review quality with Gemini 3.6 Flash │
│ ↓ │
│ 3. Score >= threshold? │
│ YES → DONE! (early stop) │
│ NO → Improve prompt, go to step 1 │
│ ↓ │
│ 4. Repeat until quality met OR max iterations │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Iteration 1: Initial Generation
Prompt Construction:
Scientific diagram guidelines + User requestOutput: diagram_v1.png
Quality Review by Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash evaluates the diagram on:
Scientific Accuracy (0-2 points) - Correct concepts, notation, relationships
Clarity and Readability (0-2 points) - Easy to understand, clear hierarchy
Label Quality (0-2 points) - Complete, readable, consistent labels
Layout and Composition (0-2 points) - Logical flow, balanced, no overlaps
Professional Appearance (0-2 points) - Publication-ready quality
Example Review Output:
SCORE: 8.0
STRENGTHS:
- Clear flow from top to bottom
- All phases properly labeled
- Professional typography
ISSUES:
- Participant counts slightly small
- Minor overlap on exclusion box
VERDICT: ACCEPTABLE (for poster, threshold 7.0)Decision Point: Continue or Stop?
| If Score... | Action |
|---|---|
| >= threshold | STOP - Quality is good enough for this document type |
| < threshold | Continue to next iteration with improved prompt |
Example:
For a poster (threshold 7.0): Score of 7.5 → DONE after 1 iteration!
For a journal (threshold 8.5): Score of 7.5 → Continue improving
Subsequent Iterations (Only If Needed)
If quality is below threshold, the system:
Extracts specific issues from Gemini 3.6 Flash's review
Enhances the prompt with improvement instructions
Regenerates with Nano Banana 2
Reviews again with Gemini 3.6 Flash
Repeats until threshold met or max iterations reached
Review Log
All iterations are saved with a JSON review log that includes early-stop information:
{
"user_prompt": "CONSORT participant flow diagram...",
"doc_type": "poster",
"quality_threshold": 7.0,
"iterations": [
{
"iteration": 1,
"image_path": "figures/consort_v1.png",
"score": 7.5,
"reviewed": true,
"review_error": null,
"needs_improvement": false,
"critique": "SCORE: 7.5\nSTRENGTHS:..."
}
],
"final_score": 7.5,
"final_reviewed": true,
"early_stop": true,
"early_stop_reason": "Quality score 7.5 meets threshold 7.0 for poster"
}Note: With smart iteration, you may see only 1 iteration instead of the full 2 if quality is achieved early!
When the review does not run
The reviewer is a second model call, and it can fail on its own — a rate limit, a content filter, an answer in a shape the parser cannot read. The image is generated first and is kept regardless; what is missing in that case is the measurement, so the log says so rather than substituting a number:
{
"iterations": [
{
"iteration": 1,
"image_path": "figures/consort_v1.png",
"score": null,
"reviewed": false,
"review_error": "the review model returned no choices",
"needs_improvement": false,
"critique": "Review unavailable: the review model returned no choices."
}
],
"final_score": null,
"final_reviewed": false
}The run exits 0 — the diagram is real — and prints
Review unavailable — image kept, quality not verified. It does not regenerate: a reviewer that
did not answer says nothing about the diagram, so another generation would be guesswork. Look at the
image yourself, and re-run if you want a score; these failures are usually transient.
final_reviewed is the field to check in automation. final_score alone cannot distinguish
"scored 7.5" from "never scored".
Advanced AI Generation Usage
Python API
from scripts.generate_schematic_ai import ScientificSchematicGenerator
# Initialize generator
generator = ScientificSchematicGenerator(
api_key="your_openrouter_key",
verbose=True
)
# Generate with iterative refinement (max 2 iterations)
results = generator.generate_iterative(
user_prompt="Transformer architecture diagram",
output_path="figures/transformer.png",
iterations=2
)
# Access results
print(f"Final score: {results['final_score']}/10")
print(f"Final image: {results['final_image']}")
# Review individual iterations
for iteration in results['iterations']:
print(f"Iteration {iteration['iteration']}: {iteration['score']}/10")
print(f"Critique: {iteration['critique']}")Command-Line Options
# Basic usage (default threshold 7.5/10)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram description" -o output.png
# Specify document type for appropriate quality threshold
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --doc-type journal # 8.5/10
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --doc-type conference # 8.0/10
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --doc-type poster # 7.0/10
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --doc-type presentation # 6.5/10
# Custom max iterations (1-2)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "complex diagram" -o diagram.png --iterations 2
# Verbose output (see all API calls and reviews)
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "flowchart" -o flow.png -v
# Provide API key via flag
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "diagram" -o out.png --api-key "sk-or-v1-..."
# Combine options
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "neural network" -o nn.png --doc-type journal --iterations 2 -vSetup and Cost
# Get a key at https://openrouter.ai/keys
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY='sk-or-v1-your_key_here'
# Or persist it in the shell profile
echo 'export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="sk-or-v1-your_key"' >> ~/.zshrc
# Or drop it in a .env file at the project root
echo "OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-v1-..." >> .env
# The only Python dependency
uv pip install requestsEach iteration costs two API calls: one image generation and one vision review. A diagram that
passes on the first try therefore costs two calls, and the maximum for any single run is four. The
image model dominates the bill. Check current per-token pricing for
google/gemini-3.1-flash-image and google/gemini-3.7-flash on OpenRouter — it changes, and any
figure written here would go stale.
Prompt Engineering Tips
1. Be Specific About Layout:
✓ "Flowchart with vertical flow, top to bottom"
✓ "Architecture diagram with encoder on left, decoder on right"
✓ "Circular pathway diagram with clockwise flow"2. Include Quantitative Details:
✓ "Neural network with input layer (784 nodes), hidden layer (128 nodes), output (10 nodes)"
✓ "Flowchart showing n=500 screened, n=150 excluded, n=350 randomized"
✓ "Circuit with 1kΩ resistor, 10µF capacitor, 5V source"3. Specify Visual Style:
✓ "Minimalist block diagram with clean lines"
✓ "Detailed biological pathway with protein structures"
✓ "Technical schematic with engineering notation"4. Request Specific Labels:
✓ "Label all arrows with activation/inhibition"
✓ "Include layer dimensions in each box"
✓ "Show time progression with timestamps"5. Mention Color Requirements:
✓ "Use colorblind-friendly colors"
✓ "Grayscale-compatible design"
✓ "Color-code by function: blue for input, green for processing, red for output"AI Generation Examples
Example 1: CONSORT Flowchart
python scripts/generate_schematic.py \
"CONSORT participant flow diagram for randomized controlled trial. \
Start with 'Assessed for eligibility (n=500)' at top. \
Show 'Excluded (n=150)' with reasons: age<18 (n=80), declined (n=50), other (n=20). \
Then 'Randomized (n=350)' splits into two arms: \
'Treatment group (n=175)' and 'Control group (n=175)'. \
Each arm shows 'Lost to follow-up' (n=15 and n=10). \
End with 'Analyzed' (n=160 and n=165). \
Use blue boxes for process steps, orange for exclusion, green for final analysis." \
-o figures/consort.pngExample 2: Neural Network Architecture
python scripts/generate_schematic.py \
"Transformer encoder-decoder architecture diagram. \
Left side: Encoder stack with input embedding, positional encoding, \
multi-head self-attention, add & norm, feed-forward, add & norm. \
Right side: Decoder stack with output embedding, positional encoding, \
masked self-attention, add & norm, cross-attention (receiving from encoder), \
add & norm, feed-forward, add & norm, linear & softmax. \
Show cross-attention connection from encoder to decoder with dashed line. \
Use light blue for encoder, light red for decoder. \
Label all components clearly." \
-o figures/transformer.png --iterations 2Example 3: Biological Pathway
python scripts/generate_schematic.py \
"MAPK signaling pathway diagram. \
Start with EGFR receptor at cell membrane (top). \
Arrow down to RAS (with GTP label). \
Arrow to RAF kinase. \
Arrow to MEK kinase. \
Arrow to ERK kinase. \
Final arrow to nucleus showing gene transcription. \
Label each arrow with 'phosphorylation' or 'activation'. \
Use rounded rectangles for proteins, different colors for each. \
Include membrane boundary line at top." \
-o figures/mapk_pathway.pngExample 4: System Architecture
python scripts/generate_schematic.py \
"IoT system architecture block diagram. \
Bottom layer: Sensors (temperature, humidity, motion) in green boxes. \
Middle layer: Microcontroller (ESP32) in blue box. \
Connections to WiFi module (orange box) and Display (purple box). \
Top layer: Cloud server (gray box) connected to mobile app (light blue box). \
Show data flow arrows between all components. \
Label connections with protocols: I2C, UART, WiFi, HTTPS." \
-o figures/iot_architecture.pngRequirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Declares allowed tools, Needs network access, Needs an API key, Needs Python
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Instructions that use the network
- Scripts that your agent may run
This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- K-Dense Inc.
- Publisher
- K-Dense (Community)
- Source
- K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer · skills/scientific-schematics · commit 529b9f7
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Also distributed in
- K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by K-Dense Inc. or K-Dense.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download scientific-schematics.zip