Cdf Auto Labeling
NVIDIAOfficialCreated by NVIDIA
- Skill
- Workflow
- Automation and integrations
- Apache-2.0
- Medium risk
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
CDF Auto-Labeling is a central routing skill designed to guide users through the lifecycle of automated data labeling tasks within the Cosmos Data Factory ecosystem. It provides a structured approach to onboarding, scenario planning, cookbook authoring, and pipeline execution. By acting as a router, it directs users to specialized documentation for specific tasks—such as migrating pipelines, debugging workflows, or managing containerized stages—while enforcing strict input validation and operational guardrails to ensure reproducible results.
What it does
- Routes users to specific documentation based on their current task or stage in the pipeline.
- Validates critical run inputs like data paths, output directories, and model endpoints.
- Provides a standardized workflow for running, debugging, and customizing annotation cookbooks.
- Facilitates the integration of new stages and the management of prebuilt container images.
- Enforces operational guardrails to prevent common errors like hardcoding secrets or skipping validation steps.
When to use it
- When you are a new user needing to get started with CDF Auto-Labeling.
- When you need to plan a new annotation scenario or adapt an existing cookbook.
- When you are troubleshooting a failed pipeline run or debugging a specific stage.
- When you need to migrate an external annotation repository into the CDF framework.
- When you need to pull or configure prebuilt stage containers from NGC.
Advantages
- Ensures consistent and reproducible pipeline execution through standardized cookbooks.
- Prevents configuration errors by mandating input validation before execution.
- Simplifies complex workflows by breaking them down into manageable, modular tasks.
- Promotes best practices by delegating specialized tasks to dedicated reference guides.
Usage examples
- “I cloned the repo and have my own warehouse-safety video. How do I produce auto-labels for my domain?”
- The agent will guide you to verify your environment, run a shipped example to confirm the stack, plan your scenario, adapt a cookbook, and execute a dry-run.
- “How do I pull the prebuilt stage containers from NGC?”
- The agent will direct you to the ngc-containers reference and provide instructions on using make pull to retrieve the necessary images.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/nvidia/cdf-auto-labeling/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip cdf-auto-labeling.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by NVIDIA
CDF Auto-Labeling
Use this skill when a user wants to kick off CDF Auto-Labeling on their own data, domain, or use case, or when the request matches a shipped cookbook, stage, authoring, or migration task. This is a router: sequence the specialized references instead of duplicating their detail.
Routing (Read First)
| Request looks like | Read |
|---|---|
| New user, clean checkout, first validated run, "how do I get started" | This file, then the matching reference below |
| Choose annotation targets / stage subset for a domain | references/scenario-planning.md |
| Create, review, or adapt a cookbook | references/cookbook-authoring.md |
| Write or adapt VLM/LLM prompts or question banks | references/prompt-authoring.md |
| Migrate an existing annotation repo into this one | references/pipeline-migration.md |
| Run the video data augmentation cookbook | references/video-data-augmentation.md |
| Run or choose an EPAS / PAS cookbook | references/event-and-person-attribute-search.md |
| Run event-verification reasoning | references/event-verification-reasoning.md |
| Debug an already-integrated workflow | references/workflow-runner-debugging.md |
Pull prebuilt stage images from NGC, log in to nvcr.io, or fix a missing cdf-* image | references/ngc-containers.md |
| Implement or review a new stage or Dockerized service | references/workflow-stage-integration.md |
| Configure or debug one production stage | The matching file under references/stages/ |
Stage references: super-resolution, detection-and-tracking, captioning, visual-qa, reasoning, person-attribute-search, grounding-2d, referring-expressions, training-export.
Instructions
Confirm the critical run inputs with the user before doing anything else, and ask a concise question whenever one is missing or ambiguous - never guess or silently invent a default. At minimum confirm: input data path, output path, VLM/LLM endpoint URLs and model names, model cache path, GPU ids, and (for reasoning-capable models) the
max_tokenscap. Restate the confirmed values back to the user before the first execution.Verify the environment: repository cloned,
maketargets available, the model cache path exists, the VLM/LLM endpoints are reachable, and a GPU is available. State any missing prerequisite as a blocker instead of assuming it. If the stage images are not present locally, offer to pull the prebuilt images from NGC withmake pullinstead of building them. Use ngc-containers.Run a shipped example first to confirm the stack works end to end before customizing. Pick the closest operator pipeline - video data augmentation, event-and-person-attribute-search, or event-verification-reasoning - and run its committed cookbook. Use the matching operator reference.
Plan the target scenario: define modality, domain, intended consumer, and required annotations, and get a minimal stage subset. Use scenario-planning.
Adapt the closest shipped cookbook to the new domain rather than authoring from scratch. Use cookbook-authoring.
Author the domain prompts and question banks. Use prompt-authoring.
Configure the per-stage settings for the domain (detector classes or SAM3 prompts, endpoints, windowing,
max_tokens). Use the relevant stage reference, starting with detection-and-tracking.Dry-run the adapted cookbook, then execute and validate the outputs. Use workflow-runner-debugging.
Adopting an existing external annotation or dataset-generation repository into CDF instead of starting from a shipped cookbook is a migration task; use pipeline-migration for that path.
Examples
New user, new domain: "I cloned the repo and have my own warehouse-safety video. How do I produce auto-labels for my domain?"
Guided path:
Confirm env (model cache, VLM/LLM endpoints, GPU), then prove the stack on a shipped example before customizing:
make run SCRIPT=workflow-runner:main \
ARGS='--cookbook-file cookbooks/video_data_augmentation/configs/pipeline_video.yaml --container-dry-run'Plan the domain (scenario-planning) -> subset
detection_and_tracking -> captioning -> visual_qa -> reasoning -> training_export(addgrounding_2dfor caption→boxes orreferring_expressionsfor boxes→phrases; use grounding-2d / referring-expressions).Copy the closest cookbook to
cookbooks/warehouse_safety/configs/pipeline.yamland adapt inputs, detector classes/SAM3 prompts, prompts, and question banks.Dry-run the new cookbook, then run for real and validate outputs:
make run SCRIPT=workflow-runner:main \
ARGS='--cookbook-file cookbooks/warehouse_safety/configs/pipeline.yaml --container-dry-run'Guardrails
Do not guess or fabricate the critical inputs enumerated in step 1; if any is missing or ambiguous, ask the user and confirm before executing.
Do not customize a cookbook before a shipped example runs clean; a broken base makes domain debugging ambiguous.
Keep the first custom pipeline minimal - only the stages needed for the requested annotations - and expand later.
Verify that every selected stage's service package and image exist in the current branch before promising an end-to-end run.
Do not put secrets, tokens, or absolute home paths in committed cookbooks; use placeholders such as
<model-cache>and env vars for endpoint keys.For reasoning-capable models (for example Gemini 3 Flash), raise
max_tokenson thevisual_qaandreasoningLLM substages to avoid the thinking-token tax; keep the default cap for non-reasoning models.Do not rely on non-CDF pipelines, commands, or file locations. A first run must be reproducible through
workflow-runner:maininside this repo.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer909 B
- BENCHMARK.md7.3 KiB
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.2 KiB
- SKILL.md7.5 KiB
- evals/evals.json5.2 KiB
- references/README.md1.3 KiB
- references/cookbook-authoring.md6.3 KiB
- references/cookbook-authoring/cookbook-schema.md6.3 KiB
- references/cookbook-authoring/scenario-authoring.md2.8 KiB
- references/event-and-person-attribute-search.md5.1 KiB
- references/event-and-person-attribute-search/run-reference.md2.4 KiB
- references/event-verification-reasoning.md1.9 KiB
- references/event-verification-reasoning/run-reference.md1.3 KiB
- references/ngc-containers.md4.2 KiB
- references/pipeline-migration.md7.2 KiB
- references/pipeline-migration/migration-playbook.md3.8 KiB
- references/pipeline-migration/nonlinear-video-pipeline-example.md2.7 KiB
- references/pipeline-migration/service-reuse-matrix.md3.4 KiB
- references/pipeline-migration/sidecar-contracts.md3.0 KiB
- references/prompt-authoring.md3.3 KiB
- references/prompt-authoring/domain-evidence-checklists.md2.2 KiB
- references/prompt-authoring/prompt-patterns.md3.9 KiB
- references/prompt-authoring/question-bank-authoring.md2.0 KiB
- references/scenario-planning.md3.6 KiB
- references/scenario-planning/annotation-recommendations.md5.0 KiB
- references/scenario-planning/intake-and-decisions.md2.6 KiB
- references/scenario-planning/pipeline-composition.md6.0 KiB
- references/stages/captioning.md3.6 KiB
- references/stages/detection-and-tracking.md6.2 KiB
- references/stages/detection-tracking-patterns.md10.3 KiB
- references/stages/grounding-2d-patterns.md1.6 KiB
- references/stages/grounding-2d.md5.1 KiB
- references/stages/guardrails.md532 B
- references/stages/person-attribute-search.md4.5 KiB
- references/stages/reasoning.md5.0 KiB
- references/stages/referring-expressions-patterns.md1.2 KiB
- references/stages/referring-expressions.md5.5 KiB
- references/stages/super-resolution.md4.4 KiB
- references/stages/training-export.md3.7 KiB
- references/stages/visual-qa.md6.2 KiB
- references/video-data-augmentation.md12.2 KiB
- references/video-data-augmentation/run-reference.md3.7 KiB
- references/workflow-runner-debugging.md6.0 KiB
- references/workflow-runner-debugging/data-handoff.md3.5 KiB
- references/workflow-runner-debugging/runner-debugging-patterns.md3.7 KiB
- references/workflow-stage-integration.md7.1 KiB
- references/workflow-stage-integration/stage-service-contract.md3.0 KiB
- references/workflow-stage-integration/validation-checklist.md2.1 KiB
- skill-card.md4.9 KiB
- skill.oms.sig15.6 KiB
references/workflow-runner-debugging.md
CDF Workflow Runner Debugging
Use this skill when the user asks for an end-to-end agentic auto-labeling run, a container-by-container experiment, generated container command review, or a data-flow debugging pass, especially when mixed-resolution inputs may need conditional super-resolution.
The primary executor is the workflow-runner service from
services/workflow_runner, not ad hoc agent-authored docker run commands.
Follow the numbered Workflow below for the exact procedure and its gates. OSMO or
Airflow should own scheduling, distributed execution, retry policy, queues, and
resource placement; this skill is only repo-specific runner usage and debugging
guidance.
Workflow
The flow is a linear spine Step 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 with two explicitly bounded loops and four terminal states: review-only report (Step 4), invalid-plan stop (Step 3), validated success (Step 5), and escalation after a failed rerun (Step 5). Steps 1-3 only inspect and plan (no side effects); Step 4 is the only step that executes, builds images, or mutates outputs, and runs only with explicit user approval.
Identify the cookbook or explicit stage sequence.
Run a dry plan:
make run SCRIPT=workflow-runner:main ARGS='--cookbook-file <config> --container-dry-run'.Is the plan valid? (single decision)
Trigger: the dry-run plan from Step 2 is available.
The plan is valid only if all hold: selected stages appear in the fixed canonical relative order (see Guardrails) with no retired
daft_exportstage; images, build targets, mounts, endpoints, and GPU settings are correct; when SR is selected, the SeedVR runtime is baked into the image and checkpoints exist under the model cache; and, for mixed-resolution inputs, SR--resolution-policy autois set and the callermedia_path/ active-media handoff is preserved.Invalid -> fix the cookbook, stage list, build flags, mounts, endpoints, or model availability and return to Step 2. Bounded loop: at most three correction passes; if still invalid, STOP and report the blocker (terminal).
Valid -> go to Step 4.
Is execution requested and approved? (execution gate)
Trigger: a valid plan from Step 3.
Dry-run / command-review only, or the user says not to execute -> report the plan and STOP (terminal); do not execute, build images, or mutate outputs.
Execution requested and explicitly approved -> run the whole selected pipeline once through
workflow-runner:main. The runner executes the selected stages internally in canonical order; the agent does not re-invoke per stage. Choose the build mode as a value, not a branch:--container-ensure-images build-if-missingbuilds only missing images;--container-build-imagesrebuilds all images. Continue to Step 5.
Validate outputs. After the single run completes, confirm each selected stage produced its expected outputs, in canonical order. This is a finite check over the selected stages, not a re-execution loop.
All expected outputs present -> report success (terminal).
A stage failed or is missing outputs -> follow Failure Handling in runner-debugging-patterns.md: stop unless the stage is optional; after fixing the root cause, rerun from the failed stage. Bounded loop: at most one rerun per fixed root cause - if the same stage fails again with no new cause, STOP and escalate with the saved log and exact command (terminal).
References
Read data-handoff.md before changing or debugging active-media behavior.
Read runner-debugging-patterns.md before writing experiment scripts, inspecting generated container commands, or debugging cookbook stages.
Examples
Inspect the plan, execute while building only missing images, then validate:
# Inspect the generated container plan (no execution)
make run SCRIPT=workflow-runner:main \
ARGS='--cookbook-file cookbooks/video_data_augmentation/configs/pipeline_video.yaml --container-dry-run'
# Execute, building only images that are missing
make run SCRIPT=workflow-runner:main \
ARGS='--cookbook-file cookbooks/video_data_augmentation/configs/pipeline_video.yaml --container-ensure-images build-if-missing'
# Validate stage outputs before reporting success
ls -lhR output/auto_labeling/<scenario>/Guardrails
Do not bypass the runner for production experiments unless the user is explicitly debugging a single container command.
Do not modify the original
media_pathin caller-authored input JSONL; runtime components such asprepare_inputmay rewritedata_entry.media_pathtosidecars/active.*, and downstream code such asSceneContext.from_input(data_entry.media_path)is expected to operate on those runtime rewrites.For mixed-resolution video, prefer SR
--resolution-policy autoover unconditional SR so high-resolution clips keep the existing active media.Do not mount broad host paths when runner-managed media/data/config/cache mounts are sufficient.
Prefer existing
make build IMAGE=...registrations and runner image flags over ad hoc image names.Plain
stagesdry-runs follow the canonical relative order. Cookbooks usingworkflow.nodesfollow their validated stable topological order and may repeat a stage. Confirm every plan/result/log entry preserves its node ID and repeated nodes use distinct sidecar namespaces. Sharedstage_argsapply to every occurrence; nodeargsare appended last.The single
daft_exportstage is retired: DAFTtask/writing belongs toreasoning, and dataset aggregation belongs to the newtraining_exportstage. Do not plan, run, or debug adaft_exportstage.The
person_attribute_searchstage (Visual Attribute Search product) builds theevent-and-person-attribute-search-serviceimage; the stage key staysperson_attribute_search.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Large base64-encoded blobs
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- NVIDIA
- Publisher
- NVIDIA (Official)
- Source
- NVIDIA/skills · skills/cdf-auto-labeling · commit fce3cca
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE-APACHE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by NVIDIA.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download cdf-auto-labeling.zip