Complexa Evaluate Pdbs
NVIDIAOfficialPublished by NVIDIA
- Skill
- Workflow
- Science and research
- Apache-2.0
- Medium risk
- Has scripts
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The complexa-evaluate-pdbs skill provides a structured workflow to evaluate directories of pre-existing PDB files. It utilizes the Proteina-Complexa CLI to perform refolding and metric computation, including interface pAE, i_pLDDT, scRMSD, and designability scores. The skill supports various design types such as protein binders, ligand binders, and AME (motif-ligand) designs, allowing users to assess outputs from third-party tools like BindCraft, AlphaProteo, or RFdiffusion. It handles the full evaluation pipeline from pre-flight environment checks to final manifest generation.
What it does
- Refolds PDB files using backends like AF2, RF3, ESMFold, or Boltz2.
- Computes interface metrics including i_pAE, i_pTM, pLDDT, and scRMSD.
- Assesses monomer and codesignability through ProteinMPNN-based redesign.
- Calculates motif-specific metrics such as motif RMSD and sequence recovery.
- Aggregates results into CSV summaries with pass-rate analysis based on defined thresholds.
- Generates a run manifest to track configurations, git SHAs, and output paths for reproducibility.
When to use it
- When you need to evaluate a directory of pre-existing PDB designs.
- When assessing the quality of third-party protein binder or ligand binder outputs.
- When performing motif-aware evaluation for enzyme or AME designs.
- When you need to generate standardized pass-rate reports for a set of protein structures.
Advantages
- Automates the complex evaluation-to-analysis pipeline for protein designs.
- Supports multiple folding backends and design types within a unified configuration framework.
- Provides standardized metrics and success thresholds for consistent result interpretation.
- Includes pre-flight checks to ensure hardware and environment readiness before execution.
Usage examples
- “Evaluate my protein binder PDBs in /data/designs using AF2.”
- The agent runs the pre-flight check, then executes the complexa analysis command with the protein_binder configuration and colabdesign backend.
- “Score these ligand binder designs in /data/ligands.”
- The agent identifies the ligand_binder type, configures the RF3 folding backend, and runs the evaluation and analysis steps.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/nvidia/complexa-evaluate-pdbs/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip complexa-evaluate-pdbs.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by NVIDIA
Complexa Evaluate-PDBs Skill
Score a directory of pre-existing PDB files against the same metrics Proteina-Complexa uses internally. Wraps complexa analysis <evaluate_config> ++sample_storage_path=<dir>: the CLI runs the evaluate step (refold + interface metrics + monomer metrics) and then the analyze step (success thresholds, diversity, pass-rate CSVs). Do not run complexa generate here — the inputs already exist.
What this skill enables
Re-fold a directory of designed PDBs with AF2 (
colabdesign), RF3 (rf3_latest), ESMFold (esmfold), or Boltz2 (boltz2_default).Compute binder interface metrics:
i_pAE,min_ipAE,i_pTM,pLDDT, binder/complex scRMSD.Compute monomer designability (ProteinMPNN-redesigned scRMSD) and codesignability (original sequence refold scRMSD).
For motif inputs: motif RMSD (CA + all-atom), motif-region designability/codesignability, sequence recovery.
Aggregate into per-PDB CSVs plus pass-rate summaries using the default thresholds for the
result_type.
Step 1: Pre-flight
Always check GPU / disk / tool binaries before launching a refold job. RF3 and ColabDesign-AF2 are large.
bash scripts/preflight.shSurface from preflight.json:
gpu.availableandgpu.vram_gb— colabdesign/RF3 need ≥40 GB; ESMFold tolerates ≥24 GB.env.missing_required— must include the keys for the chosen folding backend:colabdesign→AF2_DIRrf3_latest→RF3_CKPT_PATH,RF3_EXEC_PATHesmfold→ ESMFold weights resolvable
tools.{foldseek,mmseqs}— required byaggregation.compute_diversity/compute_mmseqs_diversity(both defaulttrue).
If any required key is missing, route the user to the complexa-setup skill.
Step 2: Identify the design type
Like complexa design, evaluation has one default flow (protein binder) and two extensions (ligand binder, AME). The evaluate config you pass to complexa analysis decides everything else (which metrics, which refolder defaults, which thresholds the analyze step applies).
Default — protein binder
complexa analysis configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml \
++sample_storage_path=/abs/path/to/pdbs \
++dataset.task_name=02_PDL1 \
++result_type=protein_binder \
++metric.binder_folding_method=colabdesign \
++metric.inverse_folding_model=soluble_mpnn \
++run_name=eval_pdl1_af2Use this when the user's PDBs are protein-binder designs (multi-chain, binder is the last chain) or third-party outputs from BindCraft / AlphaProteo / RFdiffusion. Pulls thresholds for protein_binder (i_pAE * 31 ≤ 7.0, pLDDT ≥ 0.9, scRMSD_ca < 1.5 Å).
Extensions — pick the matching config
| Design type | Use the protein-binder default? | Evaluate config | Analyze config | result_type | Default backend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein binder | Yes (default) | configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml | configs/analyze.yaml | protein_binder | colabdesign (AF2) |
| Ligand binder (binder + small-molecule) | Same evaluate config, swap 3 overrides | configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml | configs/analyze.yaml | ligand_binder | rf3_latest |
| AME / motif + ligand (enzyme outputs) | No — needs motif-aware config | configs/evaluate_ame_from_pdb_dir.yaml | configs/analyze_motif_binder.yaml | motif_ligand_binder | rf3_latest |
| Motif protein binder (standalone) | No — no _from_pdb_dir variant | configs/evaluate_motif_binder.yaml + ++input_mode=pdb_dir | configs/analyze_motif_binder.yaml | motif_protein_binder | colabdesign / rf3_latest |
Extending to ligand binder (same evaluate config as default, three override swaps):
complexa analysis configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml \
++sample_storage_path=/abs/path/to/pdbs \
++dataset.task_name=39_7V11_LIGAND \
++result_type=ligand_binder \
++metric.binder_folding_method=rf3_latest \
++metric.inverse_folding_model=ligand_mpnn \
++run_name=eval_v11_rf3Extending to AME (different config; ligand auto-completion gotcha — see Step 4):
complexa analysis configs/evaluate_ame_from_pdb_dir.yaml \
++sample_storage_path=/abs/path/to/pdbs \
++dataset.task_name=M0096_1chm \
++run_name=eval_ame_chmSee references/eval_configs.md for the full matrix (every result_type, every threshold default, every supported folding backend, motif-protein-binder variant).
Step 3: Gather inputs (AskUserQuestion)
Ask in one batched AskUserQuestion:
pdb_dir— absolute path to the directory of PDBs to evaluate.Design type — protein binder / ligand binder / AME (motif + ligand).
Folding backend —
colabdesign(AF2, protein binders),rf3_latest(ligand / AME),boltz2_default(alternative).Target / task name — must match a key in
configs/targets/targets_dict.yaml,configs/targets/ligand_targets_dict.yaml, orconfigs/design_tasks/ame_dict_v2.yaml. Required for binder + AME evaluation (needed to identify the target reference and, for AME, the motif contigs).AME-only: confirm ligand residue name is already renamed to
L:0in every PDB (see Troubleshooting). If not, do that rename first.
Step 4: Run evaluate → analyze
Prefer complexa analysis (the evaluate→analyze chain) — it reuses the same config for both steps and writes a single log dir.
# Protein binder PDB dir, AF2 refold
complexa analysis configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml \
++sample_storage_path=/abs/path/to/pdbs \
++dataset.task_name=02_PDL1 \
++metric.binder_folding_method=colabdesign \
++metric.inverse_folding_model=soluble_mpnn \
++result_type=protein_binder \
++run_name=eval_pdl1_af2For ligand binders flip binder_folding_method=rf3_latest, inverse_folding_model=ligand_mpnn, result_type=ligand_binder. For AME use configs/evaluate_ame_from_pdb_dir.yaml — see references/eval_configs.md for full worked examples.
If you need to inspect output between stages, run them separately. The configs above are shared between evaluate and analyze:
complexa evaluate configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml ++sample_storage_path=/abs/path/to/pdbs ++run_name=eval_pdl1_af2
complexa analyze configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml ++run_name=eval_pdl1_af2Dry-run first if the user is unsure (no GPU work happens; the planned file walk + invocation prints):
complexa analysis configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml ++sample_storage_path=/abs/path/to/pdbs ++dryrun=trueDirect module invocation (debug fallback)
complexa evaluate / analyze are subprocess wrappers around the Hydra
modules with logging + parallel job splitting bolted on. To attach a debugger
or run under a profiler, invoke the module directly:
python -m proteinfoundation.evaluate \
--config-path "$(realpath configs)" \
--config-name evaluate_from_pdb_dir \
++sample_storage_path=/abs/path/to/pdbs \
++dataset.task_name=02_PDL1 \
++metric.binder_folding_method=colabdesign \
++run_name=eval_debugFor normal one-shot runs prefer complexa analysis — you get the shared log
dir and a single replayable invocation, instead of having to thread the same
overrides through two python -m calls.
Step 5: Parse results
Output lands under ./evaluation_results/${run_name}/:
Per-PDB metrics CSV —
*_results_*.csv(one row per input PDB ×sequence_types).Pass-rate summaries — written by the
analyzestep (e.g.res_designability.csv,res_filter_ligand_pass_*.csv,success_criteria_*.json).Diversity output — FoldSeek/MMseqs2 cluster files when
aggregation.compute_diversity=true(default).
Summarize to the user:
Per-PDB row count and number of successful designs vs total.
Default-threshold pass rate by
result_type(e.g. forprotein_binder:i_pAE*31 <= 7.0 AND pLDDT >= 0.9 AND scRMSD_ca < 1.5).Top 5 designs by primary metric (
i_pAEfor protein,min_ipAEfor ligand,motif_rmsd_pred_allfor motif binders).
Step 6: Emit manifest
Capture the resolved invocation + outputs for replay.
python3 scripts/write_manifest.py \
--output-dir ./evaluation_results/${run_name} \
--command "complexa analysis configs/evaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml ++sample_storage_path=<dir> ++dataset.task_name=<task> ++metric.binder_folding_method=<backend> ++run_name=<run>" \
--skill complexa-evaluate-pdbs \
--out ./eval_manifest.jsonThe manifest pins: resolved config, git SHA, ckpt SHA-256s, the result CSV paths, and the user-stated result_type for replay.
Most common overrides
| Override | Effect |
|---|---|
++sample_storage_path=<dir> | The directory of PDBs to evaluate (required). |
++dataset.task_name=<name> | Target / AME task name (binders, AME). Resolves target PDB + contigs. |
++metric.binder_folding_method=<backend> | colabdesign / rf3_latest / boltz2_default. |
++metric.inverse_folding_model=<model> | protein_mpnn / soluble_mpnn / ligand_mpnn. |
++metric.sequence_types=[self,mpnn,mpnn_fixed] | Which sequence flavors to refold. |
++metric.num_redesign_seqs=N | ProteinMPNN/LigandMPNN redesign count. |
++metric.compute_pre_refolding_metrics=true | Add bioinformatics/TMOL/HBPLUS metrics on the input structures. |
++metric.keep_folding_outputs=true | Save the refolded PDBs (large, but useful for inspection). |
++result_type=<type> | Override default thresholds: protein_binder / ligand_binder / motif_protein_binder / motif_ligand_binder. |
++aggregation.success_thresholds.<…> | Tighten or loosen specific thresholds (see references/eval_configs.md). |
++eval_njobs=N | Parallel GPUs for the evaluate step. |
++dryrun=true | Plan without running any folding. |
++file_limit=N | Cap input PDBs (handy for first-pass smoke tests). |
Hardware
GPU: ≥1 CUDA GPU. AF2 (
colabdesign) and RF3 (rf3_latest) need ≥40 GB VRAM (A100/H100/L40S). ESMFold runs on ≥24 GB. Multi-GPU via++eval_njobs=N.CPU/disk: 24 CPUs default (
ncpus_: 24). Each refolded PDB + intermediate output is ~1–5 MB;keep_folding_outputs=truecan balloon to tens of GB for thousands of inputs.See
references/hardware.mdfor per-backend wall-clock and VRAM tables.
Troubleshooting
Error: Config file not found— paths are relative to the repo root;cdto the repo before invokingcomplexa analysis.compute_motif_binder_metrics=Truebutresult_type=protein_binder—result_typeand the underlyingcompute_*_metricsmust agree. Useconfigs/evaluate_ame_from_pdb_dir.yamlfor AME inputs rather than mutatingevaluate_from_pdb_dir.yaml.RF3 shape errors on AME PDBs — RF3 tries to auto-complete the ligand atoms from CCD. Rename the ligand residue to
L:0in every input PDB before evaluation; see the snippet inREADME.md(atom_array.res_name[ligand_mask] = "L:0").Diversity step fails (
foldseek not found) —FOLDSEEK_EXECnot onPATH. Either fix.env(preferred) or disable:++aggregation.compute_diversity=false ++aggregation.compute_mmseqs_diversity=false.All pass-rates are 0% — check the
binder_folding_methodmatches the target type (RF3 for ligand, AF2 for protein) and that++dataset.task_nameresolves to the correct reference PDB (complexa target show <name>to verify).
Reference
Full evaluate/analyze config matrix, every supported result_type, per-threshold defaults, and three worked examples (protein binder / ligand binder / AME): see references/eval_configs.md.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer885 B
- BENCHMARK.md7.7 KiB
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.2 KiB
- SKILL.md12.7 KiB
- config/skillspector-baseline.yml1.2 KiB
- evals/evals.json5.0 KiB
- evals/trigger_evals.json1.4 KiB
- references/CONFIGURATION_GUIDE.md34.7 KiB
- references/EVALUATION_METRICS.md55.9 KiB
- references/INFERENCE.md14.9 KiB
- references/SEARCH_METADATA.md7.7 KiB
- references/SWEEP.md10.6 KiB
- references/eval_configs.md12.4 KiB
- references/hardware.md4.8 KiB
- scripts/preflight.shScript8.4 KiB
- scripts/write_manifest.pyScript9.6 KiB
- skill-card.md5.3 KiB
- skill.oms.sig7.0 KiB
BENCHMARK.md
Skill Benchmark: complexa-evaluate-pdbs
✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication
Publication Recommendation
Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.
Evaluation Metadata
Skill:
complexa-evaluate-pdbsEvaluation date: 2026-10-21
Evaluator version:
1.5.6Agents: Claude Code (
aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-5.5)Tasks: 4 evaluation tasks (3 positive, 1 negative)
Dataset digest:
sha256:0ffad3322b2d22337929bd98734c46260113b2d8ba6f217637a68462c578c8c9(skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)Attempts per task: 1
Environment:
k8s-sandboxTier 2 evidence: required for publication
Tier 3 evidence: required for publication
Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.
What This Report Answers
The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:
is safe to use;
produces correct answers;
is discovered and activated when needed;
helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
avoids wasted skill and tool usage.
Results at a Glance
| Measure | Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) | Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.7% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 82.4% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Security | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) | 75.0% → 100.0% (+25.0 points) |
| Correctness | 25.0% → 100.0% (+75.0 points) | 40.0% → 100.0% (+60.0 points) |
| Discoverability | 90.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 88.3% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Effectiveness | 27.1% → 61.3% (+34.2 points) | 36.3% → 46.3% (+10.0 points) |
| Efficiency | 87.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 77.5% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.
Example: 47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.
A partial dimension was calculated from only the available configured signals; review the detailed report before relying on it.
Token Usage
Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.
| Agent | Dataset case | With skill | Without skill | Delta | Change | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-code | All cases | 1,333,088 | 843,763 | +489,325 | +57.99% | skill 4/4; base 4/4 |
| claude-code | complexa-evaluate-pdbs-001 | 444,216 | 29,958 | +414,258 | +1382.80% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | complexa-evaluate-pdbs-002 | 337,154 | 253,809 | +83,345 | +32.84% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | complexa-evaluate-pdbs-003 | 375,575 | 281,465 | +94,110 | +33.44% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | complexa-evaluate-pdbs-004 | 176,143 | 278,531 | -102,388 | -36.76% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | All cases | 468,090 | 667,019 | -198,929 | -29.82% | skill 4/4; base 4/4 |
| codex | complexa-evaluate-pdbs-001 | 140,523 | 131,665 | +8,858 | +6.73% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | complexa-evaluate-pdbs-002 | 165,033 | 392,731 | -227,698 | -57.98% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | complexa-evaluate-pdbs-003 | 122,926 | 102,010 | +20,916 | +20.50% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | complexa-evaluate-pdbs-004 | 39,608 | 40,613 | -1,005 | -2.47% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| ALL AGENTS | Dataset aggregate | 1,801,178 | 1,510,782 | +290,396 | +19.22% | skill 8/8; base 8/8 |
Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are prompt + completion (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses (prompt - cached) + completion. N/A means the relevant trajectory counters were not available; coverage is never estimated.
Tier Status
| Tier | Purpose | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Static validation | PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS | 11 validator(s); 24 finding(s) |
| Tier 2 | Semantic deduplication | PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS | 2 validator(s); 1 finding(s) |
| Tier 3 | Live agent evaluation | PASS | 2 agent(s); 4 task(s) |
Findings and Observations
<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>
CRITICAL CONTENT_DEDUP/llm_cluster_member_limit: A Tier 2 cluster exceeds the LLM member limit. (
skills/complexa-evaluate-pdbs)MEDIUM QUALITY/quality_correctness: No documented scripts in table format (
skills/complexa-evaluate-pdbs/SKILL.md)MEDIUM QUALITY/quality_correctness: Instructions don't mention 'run_script' (
skills/complexa-evaluate-pdbs/SKILL.md)MEDIUM QUALITY/quality_correctness: SKILL_SPEC recommended field missing: 'metadata.author' (
skills/complexa-evaluate-pdbs/SKILL.md)MEDIUM QUALITY/quality_correctness: SKILL_SPEC recommended field missing: 'metadata.tags' (
skills/complexa-evaluate-pdbs/SKILL.md)20 additional finding(s) are available in the full evaluation artifacts.
</details>
Scoring Methodology
<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>
| Dimension | Question | Scored signals |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Is it safe to use? | security (100%) |
| Correctness | Is the answer correct? | accuracy (100%) |
| Discoverability | Was the right skill loaded when needed? | skill_execution (100%) |
| Effectiveness | Did the skill help complete the task? | goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%) |
| Efficiency | Did it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage? | skill_efficiency (50%) + token_efficiency (50%) |
Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (
goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check).Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible
skill_efficiencywire id) and 50%token_efficiency. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.
Signals present in this run:
security(Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.skill_execution(Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.skill_efficiency(Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).accuracy(Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.goal_accuracy(Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.behavior_check(Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.token_efficiency(Token Efficiency): actual uncached prompt plus completion usage (50% of Efficiency).
</details>
Freshness
Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: Claude Code
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Declares allowed tools, Names Claude Code tools, Needs Python
The author says: complexa CLI installed (pip install -e .); CUDA GPU; AF2_DIR (colabdesign) or RF3_CKPT_PATH+RF3_EXEC_PATH (rf3_latest); ESMFold weights for monomer paths
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Large base64-encoded blobs
- Instructions that use the network
- Scripts that your agent may run
This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- NVIDIA
- Publisher
- NVIDIA (Official)
- Source
- NVIDIA/skills · skills/bionemo-complexa-evaluate-pdbs · commit fce3cca
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE-APACHE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by NVIDIA.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download complexa-evaluate-pdbs.zip