Generated banner for Doca Flow Tune
Generated logo for Doca Flow Tune

Doca Flow Tune

NVIDIAOfficialCreated by NVIDIA

  • Skill
  • Tool integration
  • Software development
  • Apache-2.0
  • Medium risk

From the author

Use this skill when the user is tuning a live or captured `doca-flow` pipeline with `doca_flow_tune` — snapshotting pipe / counter / KPI state, picking a tuning axis (rule placement, resource hints / table sizing, HW-offload mode) and a matching measurement (rule-install rate, lookup latency, hardware-counter delta), running offline or online (read-only or state-changing) modes, reading the dumper CSV / analyze JSON / visualize mermaid, or applying a recommendation back into the Flow program. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca_flow_tune" — typical implicit phrasings include "Flow rule-install rate is low on BlueField", "table sizing looks wrong for this pipe", "tune visualize step is empty", "before/after counters don't move", or "which doca-flow knob does this recommendation hit". Refuse and route elsewhere for writing the doca-flow application, DOCA install, or streaming Flow telemetry — those belong to other skills.
— the description by NVIDIA

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides instructions for using the doca_flow_tune tool to observe and tune live or captured DOCA Flow pipelines. It covers the tool's three-axis configuration model (rule placement, resource hints, and hardware-offload mode), the use of monitor, analyze, and visualize commands, and the workflow for applying tuning recommendations back into a Flow application. The skill is designed for operators and engineers needing to characterize pipeline behavior, dump counters, or identify performance bottlenecks in their own DOCA Flow implementations.

What it does

  • Guides the configuration of doca_flow_tune for online or offline analysis.
  • Supports snapshotting of pipe, counter, and KPI states from a live pipeline.
  • Assists in interpreting dumper CSV, analyze JSON, and visualize mermaid outputs.
  • Facilitates the mapping of tuning recommendations to specific Flow program parameters.
  • Provides a structured approach for validating tuning changes before full-scale application.
  • Defines the taxonomy for diagnosing tool-specific errors and session issues.

When to use it

  • When you need to profile the rule-install rate or lookup latency of a running Flow pipeline.
  • When you need to visualize the structure of a pipeline using captured JSON or CSV data.
  • When you need to identify appropriate table sizing or resource hints for a specific pipe.
  • When you need to diagnose why a pipeline is not behaving as expected based on hardware counters.
  • When you need to apply a tuning recommendation to your Flow application code.

Advantages

  • Enables data-driven tuning based on actual pipeline performance metrics.
  • Supports both live monitoring and offline analysis of captured pipeline states.
  • Provides a clear path for translating tool recommendations into code modifications.
  • Integrates with existing DOCA Flow workflows without requiring external instrumentation.

Usage examples

“My Flow rule-install rate is low on BlueField, how do I investigate?”
The agent will guide you to capture a monitor-mode baseline, select a tuning axis, and analyze the results to identify if the issue is related to rule placement or table sizing.
“The visualize step in doca_flow_tune is empty, what should I do?”
The agent will help you walk through the layered error taxonomy to check your JSON configuration and ensure the tool is correctly attached to the live Flow application.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/nvidia/doca-flow-tune/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip doca-flow-tune.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by NVIDIA

DOCA Flow Tune (doca_flow_tune)

Examples

  • "Flow rule-install rate is low on BlueField." — this is in scope. Capture a monitor-mode baseline, then pick one tuning axis.

  • "Tune visualize step is empty." — check the dumper JSON/CSV / analyze JSON before changing the Flow program.

Instructions

Follow Loading order below. Open the tasks companion for configure / tune / debug. Open the capabilities companion for online vs offline modes. Do not open every companion file.

Command surface (DOCA 3.5 public Flow Tune guide). doca_flow_tune is a single binary whose role on a given invocation is determined by which of three top-level commands the user picks — monitor, analyze, visualize (confirm with --help on the installed version); use only the commands the public guide and the installed --help list. Counter dumping is part of monitor (--enable-dump, or the background sub-command for dumping without screen output), not a separate command; analyze accepts the export and packet-trace sub-commands (hyphenated). monitor and analyze run the binary in server-attached online mode against a live doca-flow application reached over a Unix- domain socket whose path lives in network.server_uds of the JSON configuration file; visualize (and offline analysis of a previously exported pipeline file) runs in offline / captured-snapshot mode against JSON / CSV files the online commands previously dropped into the configured outputs_directory. The rest of this skill (and the capabilities companion / the tasks companion) uses the legacy "server role / online mode / offline mode" framing — that framing is internally consistent with the command surface here: server role = a server-attached online command (monitor, analyze export / analyze packet-trace); online mode = any of those; offline mode = visualize over captured files. Treat the command name as the primary handle; treat server/online/offline as the downstream behavioral consequence of the subcommand pick.

Where to start: This is a tool skill for invoking doca_flow_tune, the unified DOCA Flow tuning tool. Open the tasks companion and start at ## configure to commit to the three-axis decision (target Flow pipeline × tuning axis × measurement) and pick offline vs online vs server-attach mode, then ## run for the snapshot → analyze → visualize loop, then ## test for the smoke-before-bulk overlay that gates any state-changing application of a tuning recommendation back into the Flow application's code. Open the capabilities companion when the question is what state doca_flow_tune can observe and recommend on, how its server / client roles fit inside the single artifact, which DOCA version the tool ships in, or how to interpret the dumper / monitor / analyze / visualize outputs without fooling yourself. If DOCA is not installed, route to doca-setup/SKILL.md first; if the user has no running doca-flow application yet, route to doca-flow/SKILL.md — flow-tune does not create pipes, it observes and recommends on top of pipes the library already created.

Example questions this skill answers well

The CLASSES of doca_flow_tune questions this skill is built to answer, each with one worked example. The class is the load-bearing piece; the worked example is one instance.

  • "Do I measure first or tune first?" — worked example: "my doca-flow service runs on a BlueField-3 and I think the rule-install rate is below what the device can sustain". Answered by the measure, then tune rule in the capabilities companion: a monitor-mode baseline, one tuning axis, then a monitor-mode re-capture on the same axis.

  • "Capture a snapshot of a live doca-flow pipeline's hardware and software counters without touching the dataplane." — worked example: "I want a side-effect-free dumper / monitor run against the running Flow ports for an operations-rate profile". Answered by the snapshot flow in the tasks companion plus the read-only-by-default posture in the capabilities companion.

  • "Pick the right tuning axis — rule placement, resource hints, or hardware-offload mode — for the question I actually have." — worked example: "my Flow pipe's rule-install rate is low; is this a placement question or a table-sizing question?". Answered by the three-axis configuration in the capabilities companion

    • the configure walk in the tasks companion.

  • "How do doca_flow_tune's server role and client / consumer role fit together inside the single artifact?" — worked example: "I keep reading about a Flow Tune server and a Flow Tune client; which binary am I running?". Answered by the one binary, two roles breakdown in the capabilities companion and the corresponding routing in the tasks companion.

  • "How do I take a recommended parameter change from flow-tune back into my doca-flow application without breaking the dataplane?" — worked example: "the analyze step suggests a different table sizing for my pipe; how do I apply it?". Answered by the recommendation → minimum-diff modification of the Flow program loop in the tasks companion and the smoke-before-bulk rule in the tasks companion.

  • "doca_flow_tune reports nothing / disagrees with the Flow app / cannot attach — what does that mean?" — worked example: "the tool runs but the visualize step produces an empty mermaid diagram". Answered by the layered error taxonomy in the capabilities companion

    • the tasks companion.

Audience

This skill serves external operators, performance engineers, DOCA Flow application developers, and AI agents who need to understand, characterize, or improve a running doca-flow pipeline's behavior on the user's actual install and device. Concretely:

  • An operator wanting a read-only snapshot of which pipes exist and how their hardware / software counters progress before recommending any change.

  • A performance engineer who has a measured baseline (for example a monitor-mode capture) and wants to turn measurement into optimization — pick a tuning axis and identify which knob in the doca-flow program is the lever.

  • A Flow developer using the offline analyze + visualize loop to understand a pipe layout without re-instrumenting the program.

  • An AI agent driving the "is this pipeline behaving as expected, and would a non-mutating tuning hint help" triage step.

It is not for users debugging the doca_flow_tune source code, not a substitute for the live public DOCA Flow Tune guide, not the place to learn the doca-flow API (see doca-flow/SKILL.md), and not a synthetic rule-rate benchmark: it measures the user's own pipeline.

doca_flow_tune is shipped as a single tool (one binary plus companion analyzer / visualizer scripts and JSON config templates) — the historical server and client roles live inside this one artifact, not in two executables. It uses the same kind: tool three-file shape as the rest of the bundle.

Language scope

This skill governs invocation, output interpretation, and recommendation-to-code-change routing for the DOCA Flow application doca_flow_tune observes. The tool is not a programming target — there is no public API to link against; the workflow is configure JSON, run, read outputs, propose minimum- diff changes to the surrounding doca-flow program. For the doca-flow API the recommendations route back into, see doca-flow/SKILL.md; for cross-language application patterns, see doca-programming-guide/SKILL.md.

When to load this skill

Load this skill when the user is — or the agent needs to — invoke doca_flow_tune against a running or planned doca-flow application to characterize, dump, visualize, analyze, or tune that pipeline. Concretely:

  • Picking which role to engage (offline analyze / visualize on a captured config + state, online dumper / monitor against the live app, or attach-to-app server-role usage).

  • Picking which tuning axis to ask about (rule placement, resource hints / table sizing, hardware-offload-mode).

  • Picking which measurement axis to compare against (rule-install rate, lookup latency, hardware-counter delta) — not interchangeable; use the axis the baseline capture named.

  • Capturing a documented before / after pair around a proposed Flow-program change (JSON config path, command line, DOCA version, device, environment, unredacted tool output).

  • Diagnosing an empty session, a degenerate visualize diagram, or an analyze recommendation that contradicts live counters.

Do not load this skill for general DOCA orientation, Flow program API work, install, or pure measurement methodology — route to doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md, doca-flow/SKILL.md, or doca-setup/SKILL.md.

What this skill provides

This is a thin loader. Substantive material lives in two companion files:

  • the capabilities companion — what doca_flow_tune observes and recommends on: the unified-artifact decomposition (server role

    • client / consumer role inside one binary), the three-axis configuration model (tuning axis × measurement × scope: which pipe / port / app), the documented offline / online / attach modes, the JSON configuration-file shape (the flow_tune_cfg.json example in the public Flow Tune guide), the dumper / monitor / analyze / visualize output surfaces, the version overlay (this tool rides the doca-flow library version it observes; the canonical rules live in doca-version/SKILL.md), the layered error taxonomy (config-syntax / attach-failed / pipe-not-found / measurement-unsound / recommendation-unactionable / version / cross-cutting), the observability posture (the tool is an observability primitive for the Flow pipeline), and the safety policy that makes any mutating application of a recommendation high-stakes because the recommendation lands in live Flow state.

  • the tasks companion — step-by-step workflows for the in-scope task verbs: install (route to setup; the binary is shipped), configure (the three-axis decision + JSON config + mode pick), build (route to install; the binary is shipped), modify (apply a recommendation back to the Flow program via minimum- diff), run (the snapshot → analyze → visualize flow), test (the eval loop — warm-up, steady-state, before / after pair, client / server / Flow version match), debug (walk the error taxonomy layer by layer), use (the agent-side workflow for consuming flow-tune output), plus a Deferred task verbs block and a Command appendix.

The skill assumes a host where DOCA is already installed (or the public NGC DOCA container is running) and a doca-flow application is already created and validated per the doca-flow/SKILL.md skill. Without those preconditions, the tune session has nothing to observe.

What this skill deliberately does not ship

This skill is agent guidance, not a samples or scripts bundle. To keep the boundary clean, it deliberately does not contain — and pull requests should not add:

  • Verbatim flag inventories, subcommand names, JSON config field names, or default endpoint paths quoted as the contract. The public DOCA Flow Tune guide (reached via doca-public-knowledge-map ## DOCA tools (doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md#doca-tools)) and the installed --help are the joint source of truth; the guide's configuration-file example is the second source for the JSON schema. Copying them here rots when the tool evolves.

  • Pre-baked example output (dumper CSV columns, analyzer JSON field names, visualizer mermaid output). Output is install-, device-, firmware-, and version-specific; a captured example pinned to one platform misleads operators elsewhere.

  • Wrappers, parsers, or scripts that consume flow-tune output. The right answer is to read the tool's own dump, analyze and visualize output files directly and quote them.

  • Pre-baked tuning recommendations. Recommendations are install-, device-, firmware-, and workload-specific; the agent always re-derives them from the user's actual session.

  • A samples/, templates/, or reference/ subtree. Mock tuning recipes read as production-grade and mislead.

Loading order

  1. Read this skill first to confirm the user's question is in scope (the user actually wants to invoke doca_flow_tune against a doca-flow pipeline, not measure baseline perf or learn the Flow API).

  2. For what doca_flow_tune observes, the one-binary / two-role decomposition, the three-axis model, the version overlay, the error taxonomy, observability surface, and safety posture, see the capabilities companion.

  3. For the documented invocations and the snapshot → analyze → visualize → propose → smoke workflow — install, configure, build, modify, run, test, debug, use — see the tasks companion.

  • doca-flow/SKILL.md — the base library whose pipeline this tool observes and tunes. The pipe / entry / rule surface flow-tune reports on is created by doca-flow program code; recommendations route back into that program via the universal modify-a-sample workflow.

  • doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md — routing to the public DOCA Flow Tune page on docs.nvidia.com and the rest of the public DOCA documentation set.

  • doca-version/SKILL.md — the canonical version-detection chain, four-way match, NGC semantics, and headers-win-over-docs rule. The ## Version compatibility overlay in this skill is a thin extension on top.

  • doca-debug/SKILL.md — the cross-cutting debug ladder. Flow-tune surfaces its own error taxonomy; when the cause turns out to be below DOCA (driver, firmware, NUMA), the tune taxonomy hands off to doca-debug.

  • doca-structured-tools-contract/SKILL.md — the bundle's detect → prefer → fall back → report contract. The Command appendix in the tasks companion honors it.

  • doca-setup/SKILL.md — env preparation, install verification, hugepages, NUMA, and the I have no install yet path with the public NGC DOCA container.

  • doca-hardware-safety/SKILL.md — the cross-cutting hardware-safety meta-policy this skill's ## Safety policy overlays.

Files

BENCHMARK.md

Skill Benchmark: doca-flow-tune

✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication

Publication Recommendation

Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.

Evaluation Metadata

  • Skill: doca-flow-tune

  • Validation status: passed

  • Evaluation date: 2026-10-28

  • Evaluator version: 1.6.2

  • Agents: Claude Code (aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-5-5), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-6.1-sol)

  • Tasks: 4 evaluation tasks (3 positive, 1 negative)

  • Dataset digest: sha256:af08855d41640933eb1bea654d69779f4498fdc9c0770aef66b9e233658e2b58 (skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)

  • Attempts per task: 1

  • Environment: k8s-sandbox

  • Tier 2 evidence: required for publication

  • Tier 3 evidence: required for publication

Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.

Tier 1 LLM Provenance

SkillSpector provider, model, analyzer revision, and determinism evidence retained for this scan.

SkillProviderAdapterAnalyzerModelRevisionDeterminism
doca-flow-tunenv_inferenceopenaimcp_tool_poisoningaws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-5-52.13.1nondeterministic / provider_defaults
doca-flow-tunenv_inferenceopenaisemantic_developer_intentaws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-5-52.13.1nondeterministic / provider_defaults
doca-flow-tunenv_inferenceopenaisemantic_quality_policyaws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-5-52.13.1nondeterministic / provider_defaults
doca-flow-tunenv_inferenceopenaisemantic_security_discoveryaws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-5-52.13.1nondeterministic / provider_defaults
doca-flow-tunenv_inferenceopenaimeta_analyzeraws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-5-52.13.1nondeterministic / provider_defaults
  • Controls for doca-flow-tune: temperature=not set (source=provider_default, forwarded=no); seed=not set (source=unset, forwarded=no); reasoning_effort=not set (source=provider_default, forwarded=no)

What This Report Answers

The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:

  • is safe to use;

  • produces correct answers;

  • is discovered and activated when needed;

  • helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and

  • avoids wasted skill and tool usage.

Results at a Glance

MeasureClaude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift)Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift)
Overall87.9% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable93.2% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable
Security100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points)87.5% → 100.0% (+12.5 points)
Correctness45.0% → 80.0% (+35.0 points)65.0% → 100.0% (+35.0 points)
Discoverability100.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable95.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable
Effectiveness50.0% → 75.0% (+25.0 points)56.3% → 100.0% (+43.7 points)
Efficiency84.6% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable70.8% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable

How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.

Example: 47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.

A partial dimension was calculated from only the available configured signals; review the detailed report before relying on it.

Comparison details

Shared-source comparisons use the same signals and weights on both conditions. They do not replace the full dimension scores above or change the publication verdict.

AgentDimensionBasisBaseline → With skill (uplift)Explanation
claude-codeDiscoverabilityDimension comparisonN/ADiscoverability is not applicable to the no-skill baseline; there is no installed skill to discover.
claude-codeEfficiencyToken-only comparison98.3% → 90.9% (-7.4 points)Only Token Efficiency is comparable; the full dimension scores use different evaluator sources.
codexDiscoverabilityDimension comparisonN/ADiscoverability is not applicable to the no-skill baseline; there is no installed skill to discover.
codexEfficiencyToken-only comparison86.1% → 83.5% (-2.6 points)Only Token Efficiency is comparable; the full dimension scores use different evaluator sources.

Token Usage

Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.

AgentDataset caseWith skillWithout skillDeltaChangeCoverage
claude-codeAll cases868,445323,930+544,515+168.10%skill 4/4; base 4/4
claude-codedoca-flow-tune.explicit-positive.v1228,36837,262+191,106+512.87%skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-codedoca-flow-tune.implicit-positive.v1259,541108,387+151,154+139.46%skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-codedoca-flow-tune.implicit-positive.v2172,563106,796+65,767+61.58%skill 1/1; base 1/1
claude-codedoca-flow-tune.negative.v1207,97371,485+136,488+190.93%skill 1/1; base 1/1
codexAll cases384,098254,449+129,649+50.95%skill 4/4; base 4/4
codexdoca-flow-tune.explicit-positive.v1111,097143,240-32,143-22.44%skill 1/1; base 1/1
codexdoca-flow-tune.implicit-positive.v179,56138,857+40,704+104.75%skill 1/1; base 1/1
codexdoca-flow-tune.implicit-positive.v2114,88426,957+87,927+326.18%skill 1/1; base 1/1
codexdoca-flow-tune.negative.v178,55645,395+33,161+73.05%skill 1/1; base 1/1
ALL AGENTSDataset aggregate1,252,543578,379+674,164+116.56%skill 8/8; base 8/8

Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are prompt + completion (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses (prompt - cached) + completion. Change is 100 * (with - without) / without; negative means fewer tokens. N/A comparisons include their reason in the coverage column; coverage is never estimated.

Tier Status

TierPurposeStatusEvidence
Tier 1Static validationPASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS11 validator(s); 15 finding(s)
Tier 2Semantic deduplicationPASSED2 validator(s); 0 finding(s)
Tier 3Live agent evaluationPASS2 agent(s); 4 task(s)

Findings and Observations

<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>

  • MEDIUM SCHEMA/metadata_key_style: Metadata key 'doca_version' is not kebab-case (skills/tools/doca-flow-tune/SKILL.md)

  • MEDIUM SCHEMA/folder_hierarchy: Unexpected nesting depth for general skill (skills/tools/doca-flow-tune)

  • MEDIUM SECURITY/Autonomous Decision Making (EA2): Excessive Agency: without confirmation (BENCHMARK.md:87)

  • MEDIUM SECURITY/Autonomous Decision Making (EA2): Excessive Agency: without confirmation (BENCHMARK.md:88)

  • MEDIUM SECURITY/Autonomous Decision Making (EA2): Excessive Agency: without confirmation (TASKS.md:182)

  • 10 additional finding(s) are available in the full evaluation artifacts.

</details>

Scoring Methodology

<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>

DimensionQuestionScored signals
SecurityIs it safe to use?security (100%)
CorrectnessIs the answer correct?accuracy (100%)
DiscoverabilityWas the right skill loaded when needed?skill_execution (100%)
EffectivenessDid the skill help complete the task?goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%)
EfficiencyDid it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage?skill_efficiency (50%) + token_efficiency (50%)
  • Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.

  • Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.

  • Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.

  • The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.

  • Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check).

  • Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible skill_efficiency wire id) and 50% token_efficiency. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.

Signals present in this run:

  • security (Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.

  • skill_execution (Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.

  • skill_efficiency (Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).

  • accuracy (Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.

  • goal_accuracy (Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.

  • behavior_check (Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.

  • token_efficiency (Token Efficiency): actual uncached prompt plus completion usage (50% of Efficiency).

</details>

Freshness

Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

The author says: Requires DOCA SDK installed at /opt/mellanox/doca on Linux (Ubuntu 22.04/24.04 or RHEL/SLES) with a BlueField DPU or ConnectX NIC attached, plus a running or captured `doca-flow` application to observe. Reads the user's local install via `pkg-config doca-flow` and the installed `/opt/mellanox/doca/tools/doca_flow_tune`. The validation steps require a live DOCA install.

Security

What our scanner noticed· Medium risk

  • Large base64-encoded blobs

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Created by
NVIDIA
Publisher
NVIDIA (Official)
Source
NVIDIA/skills · skills/doca-flow-tune · commit fce3cca
Licence
Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE-APACHE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by NVIDIA.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download doca-flow-tune.zip