Jetson Video Pipeline
NVIDIAOfficialCreated by Vinit BansalDistributed by NVIDIA
- Skill
- Workflow
- Software development
- Apache-2.0
- Medium risk
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The Jetson Video Pipeline skill provides a structured framework for managing video encode, decode, and transcode operations on NVIDIA Jetson hardware. It focuses on using official Jetson Video Codec SDK and PyNvVideoCodec samples to perform codec tasks while ensuring each stage of the pipeline is independently verified. The skill enforces strict evidence-based reporting, requiring that every consumer validates the output bytes produced by its preceding stage. It is designed for developers needing to perform codec triage, AV1 verification, or acceptance testing, while maintaining clear boundaries regarding what constitutes proven performance or interoperability.
What it does
- Plans and executes video codec workflows including encode, decode, and transcode.
- Validates pipeline stages by re-hashing and re-authenticating artifacts between producers and consumers.
- Provides structured acceptance reports for codec readiness and capability.
- Supports container triage and AV1 verification using official NVIDIA sample contracts.
- Enforces strict filesystem-based artifact sharing and synchronization protocols.
- Manages dry-run planning for codec architecture and route verification.
When to use it
- When you need to verify the correctness of a video codec pipeline on Jetson hardware.
- When performing acceptance testing for encode/decode performance or functionality.
- When you need to triage containerized video streams using official SDK tools.
- When you require a reproducible, evidence-based report of codec pipeline execution.
Advantages
- Ensures data integrity by requiring independent verification of every pipeline stage.
- Provides a standardized, reproducible approach to codec testing.
- Strictly adheres to official NVIDIA sample contracts and API usage patterns.
- Clear separation between planning, execution, and validation phases.
Usage examples
- “Plan an encode-decode pipeline for a 1080p H.264 file.”
- The agent will outline the required stages, identify the necessary sample tools, and state the assumptions for execution without launching any processes.
- “Execute an AV1 verification workflow for /data/input.ivf.”
- The agent will authenticate the media, run the appropriate AV1 sample, verify the output frame count, and provide a report with checksums.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/nvidia/jetson-video-pipeline/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip jetson-video-pipeline.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Vinit Bansal
Jetson Video Pipeline
Purpose
Build and run direct NVIDIA sample commands, then prove each consumer used the exact bytes produced by the preceding stage. This skill owns codec workflow and evidence policy; it does not own environment installation or product-support claims.
Terminal gates
Apply these before inspecting the target, another skill, or a command:
For a PSNR/SSIM-only request, state that objective quality measurement is outside this skill and requires a separately authorized workflow, return
not_evaluatedwith reasonout_of_scope, then stop. Do not name a tool or request media. Do the same for a request limited to capture, transport, AI, display, or glass-to-glass latency. For a mixed codec-plus-quality request, continue only the codec portion and report the quality portion asnot_evaluatedwith reasonout_of_scoperather than silently omitting it.Classify every other request before applying the media gate:
Return
plannedfor architecture and route questions; they need no media. State assumptions and what execution would verify, then stop before target inspection, retrieval, authentication, recipe dispatch, or workspace creation.A dry run with concrete commands needs a user-named path or placeholder and the metadata required by those commands. The media need not exist. Obtain recipe options through
jetson-video-recipe, reportplanned, and do not inspect, authenticate, or launch anything.Execution, verification, and performance require one exact target-local media path or one user-supplied HTTP(S) URL. Without it, return
input_required, identify the intended route briefly using only stages expressible by this skill's allowlisted samples, ask for that one item, and stop before target inspection, retrieval, authentication, recipe dispatch, or workspace creation. Label every other requested transform as unresolved rather than inventing an executable route.
Never choose catalog or synthetic media. The deterministic setup smoke fixture is allowed only for a bounded capability operation and is never representative pipeline or performance evidence.
Select and authenticate the execution surface
Steps 3–4 apply to execution; step 5 also applies to recipe-bearing dry runs.
For other planning, preserve an explicit surface without claiming live
eligibility; delegated surface-specific dry runs return selection_required
without ranking the choices.
Preserve explicit
native,pynvc, andboth. Map “whichever”, “best available”, “choose for me”, or otherwise delegated selection toauto, notboth. Forauto: zero eligible surfaces isblocked, one runs, and two isselection_required; do not rank them or consult old results.Obtain a fresh read-only readiness result from
jetson-video-setupthrough public skill dispatch. For Python, pass any exact user-supplied or current-conversation interpreter. Otherwise select the profile before dispatch: decode-performance may usepynvc-smoke; encode, segmentation,advanced/decode.py, pipeline, and encode-benchmark work requirefull-samples. Setup checks that profile's conventional path; never scan for a venv. If only the smoke profile is ready for full-samples work, returndependency_requiredbefore workspace creation and direct the user to provision a separate full-samples venv; never upgrade the smoke venv in place. Native eligibility requires one installed, package-verified SDK and one package-owned Samples root. Python eligibility requires that exact interpreter, an importable PyNvVideoCodec distribution loaded from its environment, and a cleanpip check. The result must match the requested Jetson and GPU. Preserve the setup reason when a candidate is ineligible. The requested pipeline supplies its own operation proof.Recipe-bearing encode and transcode work requires
jetson-video-recipe; an acceptance request containing a performance stage also requiresjetson-video-benchmark. Invoke either through public skill dispatch and pass its result as data. If a needed sibling is absent, preserve completed stages and say:I can run <stage>, but it requires <skill>, which is not installed. Install <skill> and retry this stage.“Preserve” means retain each completed stage's status and current path/size/SHA-256 identities in the user-facing partial result; it does not create hidden resumable state. On retry in the same request, reopen and rehash those artifacts and skip only unchanged
completestages. With a changed/missing identity, or a later request that does not supply the prior evidence, use a new workspace and rerun the stage.
Execute
Choose the smallest route:
encode_decode,native_transcode,pynvc_segments,container_triage,av1_verify, oracceptance.Read pipeline-workflow.md for stage order, content handling, retry policy, and reporting. Read official-sample-contract.md completely once; it covers sample allowlists, direct arguments, marker grammar, and frame-layout checks. Read buffer-sharing-and-synchronization.md completely once for filesystem boundaries. For a custom in-process CUVID/CUDA/NVENC graph, also read in-process-codec-boundaries.md completely once.
For execution, canonicalize the exact media, record its provenance and identity, and use a new mode-0700 workspace with fresh outputs. For a dry run, use only the supplied identity and metadata, state assumptions, and show planned commands and handoffs without opening the media or authenticating launchers.
For execution, authenticate each selected native sample or wheel member, launch its literal argument list directly, and retain unedited logs. Require the reference's exit, marker, count, error, freshness, and layout checks.
Reopen and rehash every producer output before and after its independent consumer. Preserve successful branches, report a failed peer as
partial, and apply the reference's single-retry rule.Emit the applicable
io_contractdirectly in every plan, result, and producer/consumer boundary. Do not depend on a contract module or infer external sharing from a device-memory mode.
Route requirements
| Route | Required proof |
|---|---|
encode_decode | One validated recipe; direct AppEncCuda→AppDec or wheel-owned basic encode→advanced decode; exact raw and decoded byte counts. |
native_transcode | H.264 input, exact HEVC native projection, AppTrans output, exactly one accepted transcode marker, then AppDec over the same hash; require the AppTrans and AppDec frame counts to be equal and positive, and to equal the known input count when available. |
pynvc_segments | Wheel-owned schedule/config; every declared segment is fresh and nonempty; decode and rehash every segment independently. |
container_triage | Eligible Jetson, exact local/retrieved container, intrinsic libavformat demux in AppDec or wheel-owned advanced decode, fresh decoded output. |
av1_verify | Exact AV1 native recipe; host and video-memory modes; AppDec consumes each exact IVF output and reports the expected frame count. |
acceptance | A concise reproducible report covering requested readiness, capability, recipe, codec, and benchmark stages with per-stage status and identities. |
Report
Use the statuses and concise report defined in pipeline-workflow.md. Include the selected runtime, exact media and recipe identities, literal commands, producer and consumer results, decoded layout/size validation, logs, limitations, and retry reason. Add compact JSON or a checksum manifest when useful or requested.
Limitations
Codec work does not prove capture, transport, inference, display, quality, or end-to-end latency.
API fields and inventory are not operation proof or product support.
Container demux is allowed only inside an authenticated released NVIDIA sample.
Apply every deterministic acceptance check in the references.
Codec/API capability and benchmark results do not prove buffer interoperability, zero copy, or synchronization compatibility.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer927 B
- BENCHMARK.md7.5 KiB
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.2 KiB
- SKILL.md8.8 KiB
- evals/evals.json4.5 KiB
- references/buffer-sharing-and-synchronization.md2.5 KiB
- references/in-process-codec-boundaries.md4.4 KiB
- references/official-sample-contract.md10.0 KiB
- references/pipeline-workflow.md8.3 KiB
- skill-card.md4.4 KiB
- skill.oms.sig5.5 KiB
BENCHMARK.md
Skill Benchmark: jetson-video-pipeline
✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication
Publication Recommendation
Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.
Evaluation Metadata
Skill:
jetson-video-pipelineEvaluation date: 2026-09-16
Evaluator version:
1.5.6Agents: Claude Code (
aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-5.5)Tasks: 4 evaluation tasks (4 positive)
Dataset digest:
sha256:0c0c71a3ea38de84c6381cf62d77d160d4475319a9fdd7b01475a29e17520891(skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)Attempts per task: 3
Environment:
k8s-sandboxTier 2 evidence: required for publication
Tier 3 evidence: required for publication
Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.
What This Report Answers
The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:
is safe to use;
produces correct answers;
is discovered and activated when needed;
helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
avoids wasted skill and tool usage.
Results at a Glance
| Measure | Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) | Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.7% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 93.2% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Security | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) | 66.7% → 100.0% (+33.3 points) |
| Correctness | 100.0% → 85.0% (-15.0 points) | 66.7% → 100.0% (+33.3 points) |
| Discoverability | 95.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 93.8% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Effectiveness | 55.4% → 67.5% (+12.1 points) | 34.2% → 88.8% (+54.6 points) |
| Efficiency | 96.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 83.4% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.
Example: 47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.
Token Usage
Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.
| Agent | Dataset case | With skill | Without skill | Delta | Change | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-code | All cases | 442,124 | 799,108 | -356,984 | -44.67% | skill 4/4; base 4/4 |
| claude-code | pipeline-execution-media-required | 62,407 | 297,523 | -235,116 | -79.02% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | pipeline-in-process-cuvid-nvenc-contract | 117,487 | 339,391 | -221,904 | -65.38% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | pipeline-native-encode-decode-dry-run | 156,273 | 66,784 | +89,489 | +134.00% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | pipeline-native-transcode-plan | 105,957 | 95,410 | +10,547 | +11.05% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | All cases | 246,594 | 1,417,522 | N/A | N/A | skill 4/4; base 6/6 |
| codex | pipeline-execution-media-required | 29,347 | 1,299,594 | N/A | N/A | skill 1/1; base 3/3 |
| codex | pipeline-in-process-cuvid-nvenc-contract | 48,420 | 75,575 | -27,155 | -35.93% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | pipeline-native-encode-decode-dry-run | 99,325 | 14,109 | +85,216 | +603.98% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | pipeline-native-transcode-plan | 69,502 | 28,244 | +41,258 | +146.08% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| ALL AGENTS | Dataset aggregate | 688,718 | 2,216,630 | N/A | N/A | skill 8/8; base 10/10 |
Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are prompt + completion (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses (prompt - cached) + completion. N/A means the relevant trajectory counters were not available; coverage is never estimated.
Tier Status
| Tier | Purpose | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Static validation | PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS | 11 validator(s); 7 finding(s) |
| Tier 2 | Semantic deduplication | PASSED | 2 validator(s); 0 finding(s) |
| Tier 3 | Live agent evaluation | PASS | 2 agent(s); 4 task(s) |
Findings and Observations
<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>
MEDIUM QUALITY/quality_efficiency: Deeply nested references in pipeline-workflow.md (
skills/jetson-video-pipeline/SKILL.md)MEDIUM SCHEMA/body_recommended_section: Missing recommended section: '## Instructions' (
skills/jetson-video-pipeline/SKILL.md)MEDIUM SCHEMA/body_recommended_section: Missing recommended section: '## Examples' (
skills/jetson-video-pipeline/SKILL.md)LOW QUALITY/quality_correctness: No examples provided (
skills/jetson-video-pipeline/SKILL.md)LOW QUALITY/quality_reliability: No prerequisites/requirements documented (
skills/jetson-video-pipeline/SKILL.md)2 additional finding(s) are available in the full evaluation artifacts.
</details>
Scoring Methodology
<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>
| Dimension | Question | Scored signals |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Is it safe to use? | security (100%) |
| Correctness | Is the answer correct? | accuracy (100%) |
| Discoverability | Was the right skill loaded when needed? | skill_execution (100%) |
| Effectiveness | Did the skill help complete the task? | goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%) |
| Efficiency | Did it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage? | skill_efficiency (50%) + token_efficiency (50%) |
Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (
goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check).Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible
skill_efficiencywire id) and 50%token_efficiency. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.
Signals present in this run:
security(Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.skill_execution(Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.skill_efficiency(Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).accuracy(Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.goal_accuracy(Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.behavior_check(Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.token_efficiency(Token Efficiency): actual uncached prompt plus completion usage (50% of Efficiency).
</details>
Freshness
Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Large base64-encoded blobs
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Vinit Bansal
- Publisher
- NVIDIA (Official)
- Distributed by
- NVIDIA
- Source
- NVIDIA/skills · skills/jetson-video-pipeline · commit fce3cca
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE-APACHE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Vinit Bansal or NVIDIA.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download jetson-video-pipeline.zip