Generated banner for Migrating Google Adk To Pydantic AI
Generated logo for Migrating Google Adk To Pydantic AI

Migrating Google Adk To Pydantic AI

PydanticOfficialPublished by Pydantic

  • Skill
  • Workflow
  • Software development
  • MIT
  • No issues found

From the author

Migrate Python Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) applications to Pydantic AI. Use for `LlmAgent`, `Runner`, sessions, state, memory, tools, callbacks, plugins, graph or dynamic workflows, resumability, events, artifacts, MCP, and ADK deployment boundaries.
— the description by Pydantic

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides a structured methodology for migrating existing Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) applications to Pydantic AI. It emphasizes preserving caller-visible behavior by tracing request paths, separating infrastructure from agent logic, and mapping ADK concepts like sessions, state, and workflows to Pydantic AI primitives. The guide focuses on high-risk areas such as durable execution, callback ordering, and multi-agent delegation to ensure a reliable transition without losing critical application state or side-effect management.

What it does

  • Provides a step-by-step migration path from Google ADK to Pydantic AI.
  • Maps ADK concepts like LlmAgent, sessions, and workflows to Pydantic AI equivalents.
  • Outlines strategies for handling state, memory, and artifact persistence.
  • Defines high-risk gates for tool confirmation, callback hooks, and durable execution.
  • Offers guidance on multi-agent delegation and sub-agent patterns.
  • Includes verification steps to ensure parity through deterministic testing.

When to use it

  • When you need to migrate an existing Google ADK application to Pydantic AI.
  • When you need to ensure that agent behavior, state management, and tool execution remain consistent during a framework transition.
  • When you are unsure how to map complex ADK features like graph workflows or session events to Pydantic AI.
  • When you need to verify that your migrated agent maintains the same caller contracts as the original ADK implementation.

Advantages

  • Reduces migration risk by focusing on small, verifiable vertical slices.
  • Prevents common pitfalls related to state persistence and event ordering.
  • Provides clear mapping references for complex ADK features.
  • Ensures that application-level infrastructure remains intact during the transition.

Usage examples

“How do I map an ADK LlmAgent with tools to Pydantic AI?”
The agent provides a mapping strategy using core Agent objects with typed dependencies and tools, ensuring tool names, schemas, and validation logic are preserved.
“What is the recommended approach for migrating ADK session state?”
The agent advises separating model context (message history) from application-owned state stores, ensuring tenant isolation and proper persistence for workflow data.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/pydantic/migrating-google-adk-to-pydantic-ai/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip migrating-google-adk-to-pydantic-ai.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Pydantic

Migrate Google ADK to Pydantic AI

Preserve caller-visible behavior, not ADK's class tree. Migrate the smallest complete request path and leave product infrastructure in the application.

Work from the running application

  1. Read repository instructions, dependencies, tests, and runtime entrypoints. Record the installed Google ADK, Pydantic AI, and optional pydantic-ai-harness versions.

  2. Trace one real request from Runner.run_async() or the deployed endpoint through the root agent, instructions, collaboration mode, model calls, tools, workflow nodes, callbacks/plugins, session service, emitted events, state/artifact deltas, and final response. Record only behavior that path uses.

  3. Separate the contracts before choosing targets:

    • Session.events used as model context;

    • session-, user-, app-, and invocation-scoped state;

    • searchable long-term memory;

    • workflow/node checkpoints and resume IDs;

    • versioned artifacts and external side effects.

  4. Classify the active slice:

    • Ordinary LlmAgent: normally one reusable Agent with typed dependencies, tools, and output.

    • ADK graph or dynamic workflow: keep simple deterministic control flow in plain async Python; use pydantic_graph when explicit typed nodes, branching, or graph inspection remain valuable.

    • Multi-agent delegation: inspect ADK's collaboration mode in Python 2.x; 1.x sub_agents use chat behavior. Use core multi-agent patterns for chat transfer semantics. Harness SubAgents can fit task or single_turn only when their isolated context, return, interaction, and concurrency behavior match.

    • Product runtime: retain auth, session/state stores, artifact stores, queues, transport, A2A endpoints, evaluation, observability, and deployment unless they are explicitly in scope.

  5. Add deterministic characterization tests, then migrate one vertical slice behind its existing caller boundary.

  6. Run the original tests and focused parity tests. Mark unexercised behavior unverified; similar names are not equivalence evidence.

Read Concept Mapping for the features the slice uses. Read Semantic Gaps for workflows, state, resume, confirmation, callbacks/plugins, event streams, skills, or execution environments. Read Verification and Cutover before removing ADK or changing production traffic.

High-risk gates

  • Do not pass ADK Session objects or mutable state dictionaries through model-chosen tool arguments. Put authenticated identity and service clients in typed dependencies; persist product and workflow state through application-owned stores.

  • message_history continues model context. It does not replace ADK session state, memory, artifacts, event records, node checkpoints, or invocation resume.

  • ADK resumability replays recorded node/tool results and can execute tools more than once. Choose a durable execution design explicitly and prove restart plus idempotency for side effects.

  • Keep conversational input, approval, and authorization distinct. Map tool confirmation to deferred tool approval; keep identity and access checks in trusted application code.

  • Preserve callback/plugin ordering and short-circuit rules deliberately. Pydantic AI hooks have their own capability ordering and exception-based skip/recovery semantics; a list of lookalike hooks is not parity.

  • ADK partial events are delivered without applying state deltas; each non-partial event applies its delta when appended. Artifact writes happen during the artifact operation, before the current event records the returned version. If callers consume ADK event fields or final-event detection, retain a boundary adapter and test the exact stream and persistence order.

  • Use Harness only for an observed reusable capability. Ordinary agents need core only, and a command allowlist is not an OS security boundary.

Pydantic AI defaults

  • Map instruction to instructions; use a RunContext instructions function when it depends on trusted runtime data.

  • Map function tools to typed Pydantic AI tools. Preserve tool names, descriptions, validation behavior, error shape, retries, confirmation, and concurrency only where callers rely on them.

  • Map output_schema to output_type when the terminal output contract is structured. Preserve an existing wire adapter if changing response shape would widen the migration.

  • Persist ModelMessage histories separately from workflow and product state. Reuse the application's current stores before adding a new persistence subsystem.

  • Use Hooks for local lifecycle interception or a custom capability for reusable policy that also owns tools, instructions, settings, or events.

  • Keep the active model/provider unless changing it is requested. Use provider-prefixed Pydantic AI model IDs and verify provider-specific tools, settings, streaming, and realtime behavior against installed APIs.

Completion

The slice is complete only when every observed caller contract is preserved by executable evidence, explicitly accepted as changed, or not applicable. Treat unverified and blocked contracts as unfinished. Do not remove google-adk while a retained runtime, session migration, deployment command, evaluation, or compatibility path still imports or invokes it.

Files

ATTRIBUTION.md

Attribution

This folder is an unmodified copy of the Agent Skill "migrating-google-adk-to-pydantic-ai", distributed by AutoGineer (https://autogineer.com/agent-skills).

The skill's own files are unmodified copies. AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by the author or the publisher.

Files added by AutoGineer

  • ATTRIBUTION.md: this file, written by AutoGineer

  • LICENSE: copied from LICENSE

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Needs Node.js

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
Pydantic
Publisher
Pydantic (Official)
Source
pydantic/skills · skills/migrating-google-adk-to-pydantic-ai · commit 98f591c
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced
Also distributed in
pydantic/skills

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Pydantic.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download migrating-google-adk-to-pydantic-ai.zip