Generated banner for Team Composition Patterns
Generated logo for Team Composition Patterns

Team Composition Patterns

Seth HobsonCommunityCreated by Seth Hobson

  • Skill
  • Guidelines
  • Agent tooling
  • MIT
  • No issues found

From the author

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics, preset configurations, and agent type selection. Use this skill when deciding how many agents to spawn for a task, when choosing between a review team versus a feature team versus a debug team, when selecting the correct subagent_type for each role to ensure agents have the tools they need, when configuring display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) for a CI or local environment, or when building a custom team composition for a non-standard workflow such as a migration or security audit.
— the description by Seth Hobson

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

Team Composition Patterns provides a framework for organizing multi-agent teams within the Claude Code environment. It offers heuristics for team sizing based on task complexity, defines preset team structures for common workflows like debugging and feature implementation, and provides a decision matrix for selecting the appropriate agent type based on required tool access. The skill also covers display mode configurations and coordination strategies to minimize overhead.

What it does

  • Provides heuristics for determining optimal team size based on task complexity.
  • Defines preset team configurations for reviews, debugging, features, and research.
  • Maps agent types to specific tool capabilities and roles.
  • Offers guidance on configuring display modes like tmux or iTerm2.
  • Outlines best practices for custom team orchestration and role assignment.

When to use it

  • When planning the structure of a multi-agent team for a new project or task.
  • When deciding how many agents are needed to balance coverage and coordination overhead.
  • When selecting the correct agent type to ensure teammates have necessary file access.
  • When setting up the development environment for multi-agent workflows.
  • When troubleshooting coordination issues or duplicate work within a team.

Advantages

  • Reduces coordination overhead by providing proven team structures.
  • Ensures agents are assigned appropriate tools for their specific roles.
  • Helps prevent common pitfalls like assigning implementation tasks to read-only agents.
  • Standardizes team setup for consistent performance across different workflows.

Usage examples

“I need to perform a comprehensive security audit on our codebase. How should I structure the team?”
The agent will recommend the Security Team preset, consisting of 4 reviewers focusing on specific dimensions like OWASP vulnerabilities, auth, dependencies, and secrets.
“I have a complex bug with multiple potential causes. What is the best team configuration?”
The agent will suggest a Debug Team of 3 investigators, each assigned to explore a different hypothesis to identify the root cause efficiently.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/wshobson/team-composition-patterns/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip team-composition-patterns.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Seth Hobson

Team Composition Patterns

Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature.

When to Use This Skill

  • Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task

  • Choosing between preset team configurations

  • Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role

  • Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process)

  • Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows

Team Sizing Heuristics

ComplexityTeam SizeWhen to Use
Simple1-2Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature
Moderate2-3Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features
Complex3-4Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging
Very Complex4-5Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues

Rule of thumb: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead.

Preset Team Compositions

Review Team
  • Size: 3 reviewers

  • Agents: 3x team-reviewer

  • Default dimensions: security, performance, architecture

  • Use when: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment

Debug Team
  • Size: 3 investigators

  • Agents: 3x team-debugger

  • Default hypotheses: 3 competing hypotheses

  • Use when: Bug has multiple plausible root causes

Feature Team
  • Size: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers)

  • Agents: 1x team-lead + 2x team-implementer

  • Use when: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams

Fullstack Team
  • Size: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers)

  • Agents: 1x team-lead + 1x frontend team-implementer + 1x backend team-implementer + 1x test team-implementer

  • Use when: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers

Research Team
  • Size: 3 researchers

  • Agents: 3x general-purpose

  • Default areas: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic

  • Capabilities: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch)

  • Use when: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel

Security Team
  • Size: 4 reviewers

  • Agents: 4x team-reviewer

  • Default dimensions: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration

  • Use when: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces

Migration Team
  • Size: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer)

  • Agents: 1x team-lead + 2x team-implementer + 1x team-reviewer

  • Use when: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification

Agent Type Selection

When spawning teammates with the Agent tool, choose subagent_type based on what tools the teammate needs:

Agent TypeTools AvailableUse For
general-purposeAll tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.)Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes
ExploreRead-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob)Research, code exploration, analysis
PlanRead-only toolsArchitecture planning, task decomposition
agent-teams:team-reviewerRead/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessageCode review with structured findings
agent-teams:team-debuggerRead/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessageHypothesis-driven investigation
agent-teams:team-implementerRead/Write/Edit/search/Bash plus TaskList/TaskGet/TaskUpdate/SendMessageBuilding features within file ownership boundaries
agent-teams:team-leadRead/search/Bash plus Agent Teams coordination toolsTeam orchestration and coordination

Key distinction: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.

Display Mode Configuration

Configure in ~/.claude/settings.json:

{
  "teammateMode": "tmux"
}
ModeBehaviorBest For
"tmux"Each teammate in a tmux paneDevelopment workflows, monitoring multiple agents
"iterm2"Each teammate in an iTerm2 tabmacOS users who prefer iTerm2
"in-process"All teammates in same processSimple tasks, CI/CD environments

Custom Team Guidelines

When building custom teams:

  1. Every team needs a coordinator — Either designate a team-lead or have the user coordinate directly

  2. Match roles to agent types — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available

  3. Avoid duplicate roles — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources

  4. Define boundaries upfront — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities

  5. Keep it small — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead

Troubleshooting

A teammate was spawned as Explore but needs to write files. Explore and Plan are read-only agents. Change the subagent_type to general-purpose or an appropriate specialized agent type. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.

The team is growing too large and coordination is slowing everything down. Each additional teammate adds communication overhead. Consolidate roles: can one agent cover two dimensions? A 4-person team doing 6 independent tasks is usually better served by 3 agents covering 2 tasks each.

tmux mode is not showing panes. Ensure tmux is installed and a session is already running before spawning teammates. The in-process mode works without tmux and is suitable for CI or scripted environments.

Two reviewers are flagging the same issues. The review dimensions overlap. Redefine each reviewer's focus area: one on correctness/logic, one on security, one on performance/scalability. Overlapping coverage wastes tokens and produces duplicate findings.

A team-lead is spawning teammates but they are not receiving tasks. Verify that the lead is using the Agent tool to spawn teammates and passing complete context in the prompt. Teammates start fresh with no prior conversation history — they need all relevant information in their initial prompt.

  • parallel-feature-development — Decompose work streams and assign file ownership once the team is composed

  • team-communication-protocols — Establish messaging norms and shutdown procedures for the assembled team

Files

references/preset-teams.md

Preset Team Definitions

Detailed preset team configurations with task templates for common workflows.

Review Team Preset

Command: /team-spawn review

Configuration
  • Team Size: 3

  • Agent Type: agent-teams:team-reviewer

  • Display Mode: tmux recommended

Members
NameDimensionFocus Areas
security-reviewerSecurityInput validation, auth, injection, secrets, CVEs
performance-reviewerPerformanceQuery efficiency, memory, caching, async patterns
architecture-reviewerArchitectureSOLID, coupling, patterns, error handling
Task Template
Subject: Review {target} for {dimension} issues
Description:
  Dimension: {dimension}
  Target: {file list or diff}
  Checklist: {dimension-specific checklist}
  Output format: Structured findings with file:line, severity, evidence, fix
Variations
  • Security-focused: --reviewers security,testing (2 members)

  • Full review: --reviewers security,performance,architecture,testing,accessibility (5 members)

  • Frontend review: --reviewers architecture,testing,accessibility (3 members)

Debug Team Preset

Command: /team-spawn debug

Configuration
  • Team Size: 3 (default) or N with --hypotheses N

  • Agent Type: agent-teams:team-debugger

  • Display Mode: tmux recommended

Members
NameRole
investigator-1Investigates hypothesis 1
investigator-2Investigates hypothesis 2
investigator-3Investigates hypothesis 3
Task Template
Subject: Investigate hypothesis: {hypothesis summary}
Description:
  Hypothesis: {full hypothesis statement}
  Scope: {files/module/project}
  Evidence criteria:
    Confirming: {what would confirm}
    Falsifying: {what would falsify}
  Report format: confidence level, evidence with file:line, causal chain

Feature Team Preset

Command: /team-spawn feature

Configuration
  • Team Size: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers)

  • Agent Types: agent-teams:team-lead + agent-teams:team-implementer

  • Display Mode: tmux recommended

Members
NameRoleResponsibility
feature-leadteam-leadDecomposition, coordination, integration
implementer-1team-implementerWork stream 1 (assigned files)
implementer-2team-implementerWork stream 2 (assigned files)
Task Template
Subject: Implement {work stream name}
Description:
  Owned files: {explicit file list}
  Requirements: {specific deliverables}
  Interface contract: {shared types/APIs}
  Acceptance criteria: {verification steps}
  Blocked by: {dependency task IDs if any}

Fullstack Team Preset

Command: /team-spawn fullstack

Configuration
  • Team Size: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers)

  • Agent Types: agent-teams:team-lead + 3x agent-teams:team-implementer

  • Display Mode: tmux recommended

Members
NameRoleLayer
fullstack-leadteam-leadCoordination, integration
frontend-devteam-implementerUI components, client-side logic
backend-devteam-implementerAPI endpoints, business logic
test-devteam-implementerUnit, integration, e2e tests
Dependency Pattern
frontend-dev ──┐
               ├──→ test-dev (blocked by both)
backend-dev  ──┘

Research Team Preset

Command: /team-spawn research

Configuration
  • Team Size: 3

  • Agent Type: general-purpose

  • Display Mode: tmux recommended

Members
NameRoleFocus
researcher-1general-purposeResearch area 1 (e.g., codebase architecture)
researcher-2general-purposeResearch area 2 (e.g., library documentation)
researcher-3general-purposeResearch area 3 (e.g., web resources & examples)
Available Research Tools

Each researcher has access to:

  • Codebase: Grep, Glob, Read — search and read local files

  • Web: WebSearch, WebFetch — search the web and fetch page content

  • Deep Exploration: Task with subagent_type: Explore — spawn sub-explorers for deep dives

Task Template
Subject: Research {topic or question}
Description:
  Question: {specific research question}
  Scope: {codebase files, web resources, library docs, or all}
  Tools to prioritize:
    - Codebase: Grep/Glob/Read for local code analysis
    - Web: WebSearch/WebFetch for articles, examples, best practices
  Deliverable: Summary with citations (file:line for code, URLs for web)
  Output format: Structured report with sections, evidence, and recommendations
Variations
  • Codebase-only: 3 researchers exploring different modules or patterns locally

  • Web research: 3 researchers using WebSearch to survey approaches, benchmarks, or best practices

  • Mixed: 1 codebase researcher + 1 docs researcher + 1 web researcher (recommended for evaluating new libraries)

Example Research Assignments
Researcher 1 (codebase): "How does our current auth system work? Trace the flow from login to token validation."
Researcher 2 (web): "Search for comparisons between NextAuth, Clerk, and Auth0 for Next.js apps. Focus on pricing, DX, and migration effort."
Researcher 3 (docs): "Look up the latest NextAuth.js v5 API docs. How does it handle JWT and session management?"

Security Team Preset

Command: /team-spawn security

Configuration
  • Team Size: 4

  • Agent Type: agent-teams:team-reviewer

  • Display Mode: tmux recommended

Members
NameDimensionFocus Areas
vuln-reviewerOWASP/VulnsInjection, XSS, CSRF, deserialization, SSRF
auth-reviewerAuth/AccessAuthentication, authorization, session management
deps-reviewerDependenciesCVEs, supply chain, outdated packages, license risks
config-reviewerSecrets/ConfigHardcoded secrets, env vars, debug endpoints, CORS
Task Template
Subject: Security audit {target} for {dimension}
Description:
  Dimension: {security sub-dimension}
  Target: {file list, directory, or entire project}
  Checklist: {dimension-specific security checklist}
  Output format: Structured findings with file:line, CVSS-like severity, evidence, remediation
  Standards: OWASP Top 10, CWE references where applicable
Variations
  • Quick scan: --reviewers owasp,secrets (2 members for fast audit)

  • Full audit: All 4 dimensions (default)

  • CI/CD focused: Add a 5th reviewer for pipeline security and deployment configuration

Migration Team Preset

Command: /team-spawn migration

Configuration
  • Team Size: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer)

  • Agent Types: agent-teams:team-lead + 2x agent-teams:team-implementer + agent-teams:team-reviewer

  • Display Mode: tmux recommended

Members
NameRoleResponsibility
migration-leadteam-leadMigration plan, coordination, conflict handling
migrator-1team-implementerMigration stream 1 (assigned files/modules)
migrator-2team-implementerMigration stream 2 (assigned files/modules)
migration-verifyteam-reviewerVerify migrated code correctness and patterns
Task Template
Subject: Migrate {module/files} from {old} to {new}
Description:
  Owned files: {explicit file list}
  Migration rules: {specific transformation patterns}
  Old pattern: {what to change from}
  New pattern: {what to change to}
  Acceptance criteria: {tests pass, no regressions, new patterns used}
  Blocked by: {dependency task IDs if any}
Dependency Pattern
migration-lead (plan) → migrator-1 ──┐
                      → migrator-2 ──┼→ migration-verify
                                     ┘
Use Cases
  • Framework upgrades (React class → hooks, Vue 2 → Vue 3, Angular version bumps)

  • Language migrations (JavaScript → TypeScript, Python 2 → 3)

  • API version bumps (REST v1 → v2, GraphQL schema changes)

  • Database migrations (ORM changes, schema restructuring)

  • Build system changes (Webpack → Vite, CRA → Next.js)

Requirements and compatibility

Written for: Claude Code

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Names Claude Code tools

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Created by
Seth Hobson
Publisher
Seth Hobson (Community)
Source
wshobson/agents · plugins/agent-teams/skills/team-composition-patterns · commit 4bde316
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Seth Hobson.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download team-composition-patterns.zip