Revops
Corey HainesCommunityCreated by Corey Haines
- Skill
- Guidelines
- Business and productivity
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
RevOps provides a structured framework for building a unified revenue engine. It focuses on aligning marketing, sales, and customer success teams through standardized definitions, clear lead lifecycle stages, and automated CRM workflows. The skill emphasizes data hygiene, rigorous lead scoring, and defined service-level agreements (SLAs) to ensure that leads are qualified, routed, and followed up on efficiently, ultimately reducing friction in the revenue funnel.
What it does
- Defines lead lifecycle stages from subscriber to evangelist.
- Establishes MQL-to-SQL handoff SLAs and response time standards.
- Designs lead scoring models based on explicit fit and implicit engagement.
- Configures CRM automation for lead routing, task creation, and stale deal alerts.
- Provides frameworks for deal desk approvals and pipeline hygiene.
- Offers metrics and dashboard specifications for tracking revenue performance.
When to use it
- When designing or auditing your marketing-to-sales handoff process.
- When you need to define or recalibrate your MQL and SQL criteria.
- When implementing or optimizing lead routing and scoring in your CRM.
- When pipeline velocity is low or leads are falling through the cracks.
- When you need to establish SLAs between marketing and sales teams.
Advantages
- Creates a single source of truth for lead and account data.
- Reduces lead leakage by formalizing handoff procedures.
- Improves sales efficiency through automated routing and task management.
- Ensures alignment between marketing, sales, and customer success.
- Provides actionable metrics to identify bottlenecks in the revenue funnel.
Usage examples
- “We are struggling with our marketing-to-sales handoff. Can you help us define our MQL criteria and set up an SLA?”
- The agent will guide you through defining fit and engagement criteria for MQLs and help you draft an SLA for sales response times.
- “How should we route leads in our CRM to ensure our sales team responds within 4 hours?”
- The agent will provide a routing strategy, such as round-robin or territory-based assignment, and suggest automation recipes for SLA alerts.
- “Our pipeline is full of stale deals. What processes can we implement to improve pipeline hygiene?”
- The agent will recommend stage-gate requirements, stale deal alert automations, and metrics to track pipeline velocity.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/coreyhaines31/revops/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip revops.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Corey Haines
RevOps
You are an expert in revenue operations. Your goal is to help design and optimize the systems that connect marketing, sales, and customer success into a unified revenue engine.
Before Starting
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
GTM motion — Product-led (PLG), sales-led, or hybrid?
ACV range — What's the average contract value?
Sales cycle length — Days from first touch to closed-won?
Current stack — CRM, marketing automation, scheduling, enrichment tools?
Current state — How are leads managed today? What's working and what's not?
Goals — Increase conversion? Reduce speed-to-lead? Fix handoff leaks? Build from scratch?
Work with whatever the user gives you. If they have a clear problem area, start there. Don't block on missing inputs — use what you have and note what would strengthen the solution.
Core Principles
Single Source of Truth
One system of record for every lead and account. If data lives in multiple places, it will conflict. Pick a CRM as the canonical source and sync everything to it.
Define Before Automate
Get stage definitions, scoring criteria, and routing rules right on paper before building workflows. Automating a broken process just creates broken results faster.
Measure Every Handoff
Every handoff between teams is a potential leak. Marketing-to-sales, SDR-to-AE, AE-to-CS — each needs an SLA, a tracking mechanism, and someone accountable for follow-through.
Revenue Team Alignment
Marketing, sales, and customer success must agree on definitions. If marketing calls something an MQL but sales won't work it, the definition is wrong. Alignment meetings aren't optional.
Lead Lifecycle Framework
Stage Definitions
| Stage | Entry Criteria | Exit Criteria | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subscriber | Opts in to content (blog, newsletter) | Provides company info or shows engagement | Marketing |
| Lead | Identified contact with basic info | Meets minimum fit criteria | Marketing |
| MQL | Passes fit + engagement threshold | Sales accepts or rejects within SLA | Marketing |
| SQL | Sales accepts and qualifies via conversation | Opportunity created or recycled | Sales (SDR/AE) |
| Opportunity | Budget, authority, need, timeline confirmed | Closed-won or closed-lost | Sales (AE) |
| Customer | Closed-won deal | Expands, renews, or churns | CS / Account Mgmt |
| Evangelist | High NPS, referral activity, case study | Ongoing program participation | CS / Marketing |
Outbound contacts follow their own stages (targeted → in sequence → replied → positive → meeting booked → meeting held → opportunity), with fields for signal, tier, sequence, and channel so meetings can be attributed. See references/lifecycle-definitions.md.
MQL Definition
An MQL requires both fit and engagement:
Fit score — Does this person match your ICP? (company size, industry, role, tech stack)
Engagement score — Have they shown buying intent? (pricing page, demo request, multiple visits)
Neither alone is sufficient. A perfect-fit company that never engages isn't an MQL. A student downloading every ebook isn't an MQL.
MQL-to-SQL Handoff SLA
Define response times and document them:
MQL alert sent to assigned rep
Rep contacts within 4 hours (business hours)
Rep qualifies or rejects within 48 hours
Rejected MQLs go to recycling nurture with reason code
For complete lifecycle stage templates and SLA examples: See references/lifecycle-definitions.md
Lead Scoring
Scoring Dimensions
Explicit scoring (fit) — Who they are:
Company size, industry, revenue
Job title, seniority, department
Tech stack, geography
Implicit scoring (engagement) — What they do:
Page visits (especially pricing, demo, case studies)
Content downloads, webinar attendance
Email engagement (opens, clicks)
Product usage (for PLG)
Negative scoring — Disqualifying signals:
Competitor email domains
Student/personal email
Unsubscribes, spam complaints
Job title mismatches (intern, student)
Building a Scoring Model
Define your ICP attributes and weight them
Identify high-intent signals from an eligible cohort with won and lost outcomes, using only features available at the qualification decision
Set point values for each attribute and behavior
Set MQL threshold (typically 50-80 points on a 100-point scale)
Freeze the rule and test a later, fully observed holdout against the current routing baseline; report precision, recall, missed wins, false positives, and workload
Pilot with monitoring and rollback; tune on development cohorts and preserve an untouched holdout for each promotion
Common Scoring Mistakes
Weighting content downloads too heavily (research ≠ buying intent)
Not including negative scoring (lets bad leads through)
Setting and forgetting (buyer behavior changes; recalibrate quarterly)
Scoring all page visits equally (pricing page ≠ blog post)
For detailed scoring templates and example models: See references/scoring-models.md
Lead Routing
Routing Methods
| Method | How It Works | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Round-robin | Distribute evenly across reps | Equal territories, similar deal sizes |
| Territory-based | Assign by geography, vertical, or segment | Regional teams, industry specialists |
| Account-based | Named accounts go to named reps | ABM motions, strategic accounts |
| Skill-based | Route by deal complexity, product line, or language | Diverse product lines, global teams |
Routing Rules Essentials
Route to the most specific match first, then fall back to general
Include a fallback owner — unassigned leads go cold fast and waste pipeline
Round-robin should account for rep capacity and availability (PTO, quota attainment)
Log every routing decision for audit and optimization
Speed-to-Lead
Response time is the single biggest factor in lead conversion:
Contact within 5 minutes = 21x more likely to qualify (Lead Connect)
After 30 minutes, conversion drops by 10x
After 24 hours, the lead is effectively cold
Build routing rules that prioritize speed. Alert reps immediately. Escalate if SLA is missed.
For form-submit enrichment, booking branches, missing-data fallbacks, and late results, load the inbound-routing playbook. Use it alongside the ownership and territory rules below.
For routing decision trees and platform-specific setup: See references/routing-rules.md
Pipeline Stage Management
Pipeline Stages
| Stage | Required Fields | Exit Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified | Contact info, company, source, fit score | Discovery call scheduled |
| Discovery | Pain points, current solution, timeline | Needs confirmed, demo scheduled |
| Demo/Evaluation | Technical requirements, decision makers | Positive evaluation, proposal requested |
| Proposal | Pricing, terms, stakeholder map | Proposal delivered and reviewed |
| Negotiation | Redlines, approval chain, close date | Terms agreed, contract sent |
| Closed Won | Signed contract, payment terms | Handoff to CS complete |
| Closed Lost | Loss reason, competitor (if any) | Post-mortem logged |
Stage Hygiene
Required fields per stage — Don't let reps advance a deal without filling in required data
Stale deal alerts — Flag deals that sit in a stage beyond the average time (e.g., 2x average days)
Stage skip detection — Alert when deals jump stages (Qualified → Proposal skipping Discovery)
Close date discipline — Push dates must include a reason; no silent pushes
Pipeline Metrics
| Metric | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| Stage conversion rates | Where deals die |
| Average time in stage | Where deals stall |
| Pipeline velocity | Revenue per day through the funnel |
| Coverage ratio | Pipeline value vs. quota (target 3-4x) |
| Win rate by source | Which channels produce real revenue |
CRM Automation Workflows
Essential Automations
Lifecycle stage updates — Auto-advance stages when criteria are met
Task creation on handoff — Create follow-up task when MQL assigned to rep
SLA alerts — Notify manager if rep misses response time SLA
Deal stage triggers — Auto-send proposals, update forecasts, notify CS on close
Marketing-to-Sales Automations
MQL alert — Instant notification to assigned rep with lead context
Meeting booked — Notify AE when prospect books via scheduling tool
Lead activity digest — Daily summary of high-intent actions by active leads
Re-engagement trigger — Alert sales when a dormant lead returns to site
Calendar Scheduling Integration
Round-robin scheduling — Distribute meetings evenly across team
Routing by criteria — Send enterprise leads to senior AEs, SMB to junior reps
Pre-meeting enrichment — Auto-populate CRM record before the call
No-show workflows — Auto-follow-up if prospect misses meeting
For platform-specific workflow recipes: See references/automation-playbooks.md
Deal Desk Processes
When You Need a Deal Desk
ACV above $25K (or your threshold for non-standard deals)
Non-standard payment terms (net-90, quarterly billing)
Multi-year contracts with custom pricing
Volume discounts beyond published tiers
Custom legal terms or SLAs
Approval Workflow Tiers
| Deal Size | Approval Required |
|---|---|
| Standard pricing | Auto-approved |
| 10-20% discount | Sales manager |
| 20-40% discount | VP Sales |
| 40%+ discount or custom terms | Deal desk review |
| Multi-year / enterprise | Finance + Legal |
Non-Standard Terms Handling
Document every exception. Track which non-standard terms get requested most — if everyone asks for the same exception, it should become standard. Review quarterly.
Data Hygiene & Enrichment
Dedup Strategy
Matching rules — Email domain + company name + phone as primary match keys
Merge priority — CRM record wins over marketing automation; most recent activity wins for fields
Scheduled dedup — Run weekly automated dedup with manual review for edge cases
Required Fields Enforcement
Enforce required fields at each lifecycle stage
Block stage advancement if fields are empty
Use progressive profiling — don't require everything upfront
Enrichment Tools
| Tool | Strength |
|---|---|
| Clay | Waterfall enrichment across many providers |
| Apollo | Contact data + sequences, strong for prospecting |
| ZoomInfo | Enterprise-grade, largest B2B database |
Quarterly Audit Checklist
Review and merge duplicates
Validate email deliverability on stale contacts
Archive contacts with no activity in 12+ months
Audit lifecycle stage distribution (look for bottlenecks)
Verify enrichment data accuracy on a sample set
RevOps Metrics Dashboard
Key Metrics
| Metric | Formula / Definition | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Lead-to-MQL rate | MQLs / Total leads | 5-15% |
| MQL-to-SQL rate | SQLs / MQLs | 30-50% |
| SQL-to-Opportunity | Opportunities / SQLs | 50-70% |
| Pipeline velocity | (# deals x avg deal size x win rate) / avg sales cycle | Varies by ACV |
| CAC | Total sales + marketing spend / new customers | LTV:CAC > 3:1 |
| LTV:CAC ratio | Customer lifetime value / CAC | 3:1 to 5:1 healthy |
| Speed-to-lead | Time from form fill to first rep contact | < 5 minutes ideal |
| Win rate | Closed-won / total opportunities | 20-30% (varies) |
Dashboard Structure
Build three views:
Marketing view — Lead volume, MQL rate, source attribution, cost per MQL
Sales view — Pipeline value, stage conversion, velocity, forecast accuracy
Executive view — CAC, LTV:CAC, revenue vs. target, pipeline coverage
Output Format
When delivering RevOps recommendations, provide:
Lifecycle stage document — Stage definitions with entry/exit criteria, owners, and SLAs
Scoring specification — Fit and engagement attributes with point values and MQL threshold
Routing rules document — Decision tree with assignment logic and fallbacks
Pipeline configuration — Stage definitions, required fields, and automation triggers
Metrics dashboard spec — Key metrics, data sources, and target benchmarks
Format each as a standalone document the user can implement directly. Include platform-specific guidance when the CRM is known.
Task-Specific Questions
What CRM platform are you using (or planning to use)?
How many leads per month do you generate?
What's your current MQL definition?
Where do leads get stuck in your funnel?
Do you have SLAs between marketing and sales today?
Tool Integrations
For implementation, see the tools registry. Key RevOps tools:
| Tool | What It Does | Guide |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot | CRM, marketing automation, lead scoring, workflows | hubspot.md |
| Salesforce | Enterprise CRM, pipeline management, reporting | salesforce.md |
| Calendly | Meeting scheduling, round-robin routing | calendly.md |
| SavvyCal | Scheduling with priority-based availability | savvycal.md |
| Attio | CRM with a hosted MCP for agents | attio.md |
| Apollo | Contact data, enrichment, and outbound sequences | apollo.md |
| ActiveCampaign | Marketing automation for SMBs, lead scoring | activecampaign.md |
| Zapier | Cross-tool automation and workflow glue | zapier.md |
| Introw | Partner-sourced pipeline, commissions, deal registration, QBRs | introw.md |
| Crossbeam | Partner account overlaps and co-sell identification | crossbeam.md |
Related Skills
cold-email: For outbound prospecting emails
emails: For lifecycle and nurture email flows
pricing: For pricing decisions and packaging
analytics: For tracking pipeline metrics and attribution
launch: For go-to-market launch planning
sales-enablement: For sales collateral, decks, and objection handling
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer873 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md16.3 KiB
- evals/evals.json7.0 KiB
- references/automation-playbooks.md10.9 KiB
- references/inbound-routing.md4.5 KiB
- references/lifecycle-definitions.md9.2 KiB
- references/routing-rules.md6.6 KiB
- references/scoring-models.md10.4 KiB
references/routing-rules.md
Lead Routing Rules
Decision trees, platform-specific configurations, territory routing, ABM routing, and speed-to-lead benchmarks.
Routing Decision Tree
Use this template to map your routing logic:
New Lead Arrives
│
├─ Is this a named/target account?
│ ├─ YES → Route to assigned account owner
│ └─ NO ↓
│
├─ Is ACV likely > $50K? (based on company size + industry)
│ ├─ YES → Route to enterprise AE team
│ └─ NO ↓
│
├─ Is this a PLG signup with team usage?
│ ├─ YES → Route to PLG sales specialist
│ └─ NO ↓
│
├─ Does lead match a territory?
│ ├─ YES → Route to territory owner
│ └─ NO ↓
│
└─ Default: Round-robin across available reps
└─ If no rep available: Assign to team queue with 1-hour SLACustomize this tree for your business. The key principle: route to the most specific match first, fall back to general.
Round-Robin Configuration
Basic Round-Robin Rules
Distribute leads evenly across eligible reps
Skip reps who are on PTO, at capacity, or have a full pipeline
Weight by quota attainment (reps below quota get slight priority)
Reset distribution count weekly or monthly
Log every assignment for auditing
HubSpot Round-Robin Setup
Using HubSpot's rotation tool:
Navigate to Automation → Workflows
Trigger: Contact property "Lifecycle Stage" equals "MQL"
Action: Rotate contact owner among selected users
Options: Even distribution, skip unavailable owners
Add delay + task creation after assignment
Custom rotation with workflows:
Create a custom property "Rotation Counter" (number)
Workflow trigger: New MQL created
Branch by rotation counter value (0, 1, 2... for each rep)
Set contact owner to corresponding rep
Increment counter (reset at max)
Create follow-up task with SLA deadline
Salesforce Round-Robin Setup
Using Lead Assignment Rules:
Setup → Feature Settings → Marketing → Lead Assignment Rules
Create rule entries in priority order (most specific first)
For round-robin: Use assignment rule + custom logic
Using Flow for advanced routing:
Create a Record-Triggered Flow on Lead creation
Get Records: Query a custom "Rep Queue" object for next available rep
Decision element: Check rep availability, capacity, territory
Update Records: Assign lead owner
Create Task: Follow-up task with SLA
Update "Rep Queue" to track last assignment
Territory Routing
By Geography
| Territory | Regions | Assigned Team |
|---|---|---|
| West | CA, WA, OR, NV, AZ, UT, CO, HI | Team West |
| Central | TX, IL, MN, MO, OH, MI, WI, IN | Team Central |
| East | NY, MA, PA, NJ, CT, VA, FL, GA | Team East |
| International | All non-US | International team |
By Company Size
| Segment | Company Size | Team |
|---|---|---|
| SMB | 1-50 employees | Inside sales |
| Mid-market | 51-500 employees | Mid-market AEs |
| Enterprise | 501-5000 employees | Enterprise AEs |
| Strategic | 5000+ employees | Strategic account team |
By Industry
| Vertical | Industries | Specialist |
|---|---|---|
| Tech | SaaS, IT services, hardware | Tech vertical rep |
| Financial | Banking, insurance, fintech | Financial vertical rep |
| Healthcare | Hospitals, pharma, healthtech | Healthcare vertical rep |
| General | All others | General pool (round-robin) |
Hybrid Territory Model
Combine multiple dimensions for precision:
Lead arrives
├─ Company size > 1000?
│ ├─ YES → Enterprise team
│ │ └─ Sub-route by geography
│ └─ NO ↓
├─ Industry = Healthcare or Financial?
│ ├─ YES → Vertical specialist
│ └─ NO ↓
└─ Round-robin across general pool
└─ Weighted by geography preferenceNamed Account / ABM Routing
Setup
Define target account list (typically 50-500 accounts)
Assign account owners in CRM (1 rep per account)
Match logic: Any lead from a target account domain routes to account owner
Matching rules:
Email domain match (primary)
Company name fuzzy match (secondary, requires manual review)
IP-to-company resolution (tertiary, for anonymous visitors)
ABM Routing Rules
| Tier | Account Type | Routing | Response SLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Top 20 strategic accounts | Named owner, instant alert | 1 hour |
| Tier 2 | Top 100 target accounts | Named owner, standard alert | 4 hours |
| Tier 3 | Target industry / size match | Territory or round-robin | Same business day |
Multi-Contact Handling
When multiple contacts from the same account engage:
Route all contacts to the same account owner
Notify the owner of new contacts entering
Track account-level engagement score (sum of all contacts)
Trigger "buying committee" alert when 3+ contacts from one account engage
Speed-to-Lead Data
Response Time Impact on Conversion
| Response Time | Relative Qualification Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Under 5 minutes | 21x more likely to qualify | Gold standard |
| 5-10 minutes | 10x more likely | Still strong |
| 10-30 minutes | 4x more likely | Acceptable for most |
| 30 min - 1 hour | 2x more likely | Below best practice |
| 1-24 hours | Baseline | Industry average |
| 24+ hours | 60% lower than baseline | Lead is effectively cold |
Source: Lead Connect, InsideSales.com
Implementing Speed-to-Lead
Instant notification — Push notification + email to rep on MQL creation
Auto-task with timer — Create task with 5-minute SLA countdown
Escalation chain:
5 min: Original rep alerted
15 min: Backup rep alerted
30 min: Manager alerted
1 hour: Lead reassigned to next available rep
Measure and report — Track actual response times weekly; recognize fast responders
Speed-to-Lead Automation
Trigger: New MQL created Actions:
Assign to rep via routing rules (instant)
Send push notification + email to rep
Create task: "Contact [Lead Name] — 5 min SLA"
Start SLA timer
If no activity logged in 15 min → alert backup rep
If no activity in 30 min → alert manager
If no activity in 60 min → reassign via round-robin
Measuring Speed-to-Lead
Track these metrics weekly:
Average time to first contact (from MQL creation to first call/email)
Median time to first contact (less skewed by outliers)
% of leads contacted within SLA (target: 90%+)
Contact rate by time of day (identify coverage gaps)
Conversion rate by response time (prove the ROI of speed)
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Corey Haines
- Publisher
- Corey Haines (Community)
- Source
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills · skills/revops · commit 96798cf
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Corey Haines.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download revops.zip