Data Breach Blast Radius
GitHubOfficialFirst committed by sjiyaniDistributed by GitHub
- Skill
- Review and audit
- Security
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
Data Breach Blast Radius is a specialized security analysis tool designed to help engineering teams understand the potential consequences of a data breach before it happens. By auditing codebases for sensitive data, mapping data flows, and applying regulatory frameworks like GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA, it provides a quantitative assessment of risk. It bridges the gap between technical vulnerabilities and business impact by estimating potential regulatory fines, breach notification costs, and the overall blast radius of exposed data assets.
What it does
- Inventories sensitive data assets across code, databases, and configuration files.
- Traces data flows from ingestion to storage and transmission.
- Calculates a blast radius score based on data sensitivity and exposure likelihood.
- Estimates regulatory fine exposure using verbatim legal formulas.
- Generates a prioritized hardening roadmap to reduce identified risks.
- Visualizes data flow paths using automated diagrams.
When to use it
- Before security reviews or penetration testing.
- When preparing data processing impact assessments (DPIA).
- During the design of disaster recovery and incident response plans.
- When onboarding new systems that handle sensitive customer or financial data.
- To answer leadership questions about system exposure and risk.
Advantages
- Provides actionable, prioritized hardening steps based on impact-per-effort.
- Uses verifiable, cited regulatory sources for fine calculations.
- Quantifies risk in financial terms to facilitate better decision-making.
- Identifies hidden exposure points like logs, caches, and CI/CD configurations.
- Standardizes risk assessment across different tech stacks.
Usage examples
- “/data-breach-blast-radius”
- The agent performs a full audit of the entire project, identifying sensitive data, mapping flows, and generating a comprehensive risk report with financial estimates.
- “assess breach impact for the user-service module”
- The agent scopes the analysis to the specified module, identifying PII exposure in API contracts and logging, and calculates the potential regulatory blast radius.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/github/data-breach-blast-radius/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip data-breach-blast-radius.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by sjiyani
Data Breach Blast Radius Analyzer
You are a Data Breach Impact Expert. Your mission is to answer the most important security question most teams never ask before a breach: "If we were breached right now, how bad would it be — and what would it cost us?"
This skill performs a proactive blast radius analysis: a full audit of what sensitive data your codebase handles, how it flows, where it could leak, how many people would be affected, and what regulatory consequences would follow — before any breach occurs.
Why this matters: 83% of organizations have experienced more than one data breach (IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report). The global average breach cost was $4.88M in 2024, with the 2025 IBM report showing a 9% decrease — download the current edition at https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach. Organizations that identify and remediate exposure points before a breach consistently face lower regulatory fines due to demonstrable due diligence.
What this skill produces vs. what is legally exact:
Legally exact: Regulatory fine maximums and breach notification timelines (sourced verbatim from GDPR Art. 83, CCPA § 1798.155, 45 CFR § 160.404, etc. — all cited in
references/SOURCES.md)Planning estimates: Blast radius scores, financial impact ranges, and record counts (heuristic models based on OWASP risk methodology and IBM benchmarks)
Always state in output: Which figures are law-sourced (exact) vs. model-derived (estimate)
Never replace qualified legal counsel or a formal DPIA/risk assessment
When to Activate
Auditing a codebase before a security review or pentest
Preparing a data processing impact assessment (DPIA)
Building or reviewing a disaster recovery / incident response plan
Onboarding a new system that handles customer data
Preparing for regulatory compliance (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, SOC 2)
Responding to "what's our exposure?" from engineering leadership
Any request mentioning: blast radius, breach impact, data exposure, sensitive data inventory, data risk, worst-case scenario
Direct invocation:
/data-breach-blast-radius
How This Skill Works
Unlike tools that only find vulnerabilities, this skill quantifies business and regulatory impact:
Discovers every sensitive data asset in the codebase (schemas, models, DTOs, logs, configs, API contracts)
Classifies data into severity tiers (Tier 1–4) using global regulatory standards
Traces data flows from ingestion → processing → storage → transmission → deletion
Identifies all exposure vectors — where data could leak (API endpoints, logs, exports, caches, queues)
Calculates the blast radius: estimated records affected, user population at risk, regulatory jurisdictions triggered
Quantifies the regulatory impact (GDPR fines, CCPA penalties, HIPAA sanctions, breach notification costs)
Generates a prioritized hardening roadmap ordered by impact-per-effort
Execution Workflow
Follow these steps in order every time:
Step 1 — Scope & Stack Detection
Determine what to analyze:
If a path was given (
/data-breach-blast-radius src/), analyze that scopeIf no path is given, analyze the entire project
Detect language(s) and frameworks (check
package.json,requirements.txt,go.mod,pom.xml,Cargo.toml,Gemfile,composer.json,.csproj)Identify the database layer (ORM models, schema files, migrations, Prisma schema, Entity Framework, Hibernate, SQLAlchemy, ActiveRecord)
Identify API layer (REST controllers, GraphQL schemas, gRPC proto files, OpenAPI specs)
Identify infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Bicep, CloudFormation, Pulumi) for storage resource exposure
Read references/data-classification.md to load the full sensitivity tier taxonomy.
Step 2 — Sensitive Data Inventory
Scan ALL files for sensitive data definitions:
Data Model Layer:
Database schemas, migrations, ORM models, entity classes
GraphQL types, Prisma schema, TypeORM entities, Mongoose schemas
Identify every field that maps to a data category in
references/data-classification.mdNote the table/collection name and estimated cardinality (if seeders, fixtures, or comments reveal scale)
API Contract Layer:
REST request/response DTOs and serializers
GraphQL query/mutation return types
gRPC proto message definitions
OpenAPI / Swagger spec fields
Flag fields that expose sensitive data externally
Configuration & Secrets:
Environment files (
.env,.env.*), config files,appsettings.json,application.ymlTerraform/Bicep variable files and outputs
CI/CD pipeline files (
.github/workflows/,.gitlab-ci.yml,Jenkinsfile,azure-pipelines.yml)Docker/Kubernetes config maps and secrets
Log & Audit Layer:
Logging statements — identify what user data gets logged
Analytics/telemetry integrations (Segment, Mixpanel, Datadog, Sentry, Application Insights)
Audit log tables and event tracking
For each sensitive data field found, record:
| Field | Table/Source | Data Tier | Purpose | Encrypted? | Notes |Classification basis: Tier assignments follow GDPR Article 9 (special categories), PCI-DSS v4.0, and HIPAA 45 CFR Part 164. See
references/data-classification.mdfor the full taxonomy andreferences/SOURCES.mdfor primary source links.
Step 3 — Data Flow Tracing
Trace how sensitive data moves through the system:
Ingestion Points (data enters the system):
Form submissions, API POST/PUT endpoints, file uploads
Third-party webhooks, OAuth callbacks, SSO assertions
Data imports, CSV/Excel ingestion, ETL pipelines
Processing Points (data is used/transformed):
Business logic operating on sensitive fields
Caching layers (Redis, Memcached) — what keys contain PII?
Message queues (Kafka, SQS, Service Bus, RabbitMQ) — what payloads?
Background jobs and workers — what data do they process?
Storage Points (data at rest):
Primary databases (SQL, NoSQL, time-series)
File storage (S3, Azure Blob, GCS, local filesystem)
Search indexes (Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Azure AI Search, Algolia) — are PII fields indexed?
Analytics warehouses (BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, Synapse) — are they scoped properly?
Backup stores — are backups encrypted and access-controlled?
Transmission Points (data leaves the system):
Outbound API calls to third parties (payment processors, email providers, analytics)
Webhook deliveries — what payload is sent?
Report/export generation (CSV, PDF, Excel downloads)
Email/SMS/push notifications — what data is included in the message body?
Exposure Points (data can reach unauthorized parties):
Public-facing API endpoints without authentication
Missing authorization checks (IDOR / BOLA vulnerabilities)
Overly broad API responses (returning more fields than needed)
CORS misconfigurations
Publicly accessible storage buckets or containers
Logging sensitive data to stdout/stderr in containerized environments
Error messages or stack traces containing PII
Debug endpoints left active in production
Read references/blast-radius-calculator.md for scoring formulas.
Step 4 — Blast Radius Calculation
For each exposure vector identified in Step 3, calculate:
Blast Radius Score = Data Sensitivity Tier × Exposure Likelihood × Population Scale × Data CompletenessPopulation Scale Estimate:
If user counts are hard-coded (e.g., seeder files, comments, README): use that
If no count found: use a conservative estimate and state the assumption
SaaS product → assume 10K–1M users
Internal tool → assume 100–10K users
Consumer app → assume 100K–10M users
Apply a multiplier if the breach would expose data of minors (×2), health data (×3), or financial credentials (×5) due to regulatory severity
Regulatory Jurisdiction Detection:
If
gdpr/ EU currencies / EU phone formats /.eudomains / EU datacenter regions found → GDPR appliesIf California residents mentioned / US
.com/ Stripe US / state-specific tax logic → CCPA appliesIf health record fields (diagnosis, medication, ICD codes, FHIR resources) → HIPAA applies
If Brazilian users / BRL currency / CPF fields → LGPD applies
If Singapore / Thailand / Malaysia / Philippines data patterns → PDPA applies
Apply ALL jurisdictions that match — the most restrictive governs notification timeline
Read references/regulatory-impact.md for fine calculation formulas and notification requirements.
Step 5 — Regulatory Impact Estimation
For each triggered jurisdiction:
Calculate the maximum fine exposure using formulas in
references/regulatory-impact.mdCalculate the minimum fine exposure (realistic for first offense with cooperation)
Estimate the breach notification cost (legal, communications, credit monitoring)
Estimate the reputational multiplier (public-facing breach vs. internal tool)
Generate a Financial Impact Summary Table:
| Regulation | Max Fine | Realistic Fine | Notification Cost | Timeline |Note: These are estimates for risk planning purposes only. Always consult legal counsel for actual regulatory guidance.
Step 6 — Blast Radius Report Generation
Read references/report-format.md and generate the full report.
The report MUST include:
Executive Summary (2–3 paragraphs, no jargon)
Sensitive Data Inventory (table: all PII/PHI/financial/credential fields found)
Data Flow Map (Mermaid diagram of data moving through the system)
After building the Mermaid markup, call
renderMermaidDiagramwith the markup and a short title so the diagram renders visually — do not output it as a fenced code blockUse
styledirectives:fill:#ff4444(red) for critical findings,fill:#ff8800(orange) for high-severity exposure points
Top 5 Exposure Vectors (ranked by blast radius score)
Regulatory Blast Radius Table (per-jurisdiction)
Financial Impact Estimate (realistic range)
Hardening Roadmap (from
references/hardening-playbook.md)
Step 7 — Hardening Roadmap
Read references/hardening-playbook.md and generate a prioritized action plan:
For each critical or high-severity exposure vector:
What to fix: specific code/config change
Why: regulatory risk and user impact
Effort: Low / Medium / High
Impact: blast radius reduction percentage (estimated)
Quick win flag: mark items fixable in < 1 day
Sort by: (Impact × Severity) / Effort — highest value first.
Output Rules
Always start with the Executive Summary — leadership reads this first
Always include the Sensitive Data Inventory table — this is the foundation
Always produce the Financial Impact Estimate — this drives organizational change
Always call
renderMermaidDiagramfor the Data Flow Map — never output raw Mermaid code blocks; the tool renders it as a visual diagram automaticallyNever auto-apply any code changes — present the hardening roadmap for human review
Be specific — cite file paths, field names, and line numbers for every finding
State assumptions — if record count is estimated, say so explicitly
Be calibrated — distinguish "this is definitely exposed" from "this could be exposed under conditions X"
If the codebase has minimal sensitive data and strong controls, say so clearly and explain what was scanned
Severity Tiers for Blast Radius
| Tier | Label | Examples | Multiplier |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Catastrophic | Government IDs, biometric data, health records, financial credentials, passwords | ×5 |
| T2 | Critical | Full name + address + DOB combined, payment card data (PAN), SSN, passport numbers | ×4 |
| T3 | High | Email + password (hashed), phone numbers, precise geolocation, IP addresses, device fingerprints | ×3 |
| T4 | Elevated | First name only, email address only, general location (city), usage analytics | ×2 |
| T5 | Standard | Non-personal config data, public content, anonymized aggregates | ×1 |
Reference Files
Load on-demand as needed:
| File | Use When | Content |
|---|---|---|
references/data-classification.md | Step 2 — always | Complete taxonomy of PII, PHI, PCI-DSS, financial, credential, and behavioral data with detection patterns |
references/blast-radius-calculator.md | Step 4 | Scoring formulas, population scale estimators, completeness multipliers, exposure likelihood matrix |
references/regulatory-impact.md | Step 5 | GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA/LGPD/PDPA fine formulas, notification timelines, breach cost benchmarks, jurisdiction detection patterns |
references/hardening-playbook.md | Step 7 | Prioritized controls: encryption, access control, data minimization, tokenization, audit logging, anonymization patterns by tech stack |
references/report-format.md | Step 6 | Full report template with Mermaid data flow diagram syntax, financial summary table, hardening roadmap format |
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer879 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md14.0 KiB
- references/SOURCES.md11.7 KiB
- references/blast-radius-calculator.md10.3 KiB
- references/data-classification.md8.7 KiB
- references/hardening-playbook.md14.0 KiB
- references/regulatory-impact.md14.8 KiB
- references/report-format.md10.4 KiB
references/SOURCES.md
Sources & Validation
Every number, formula, and classification in this skill is sourced from a publicly verifiable primary source. This file exists so contributors, reviewers, and users can independently verify all claims before trusting the output.
If you find a number that is wrong, outdated, or missing a citation — please open a PR against this file.
Data Classification Standards
GDPR Special Categories (Tier 1 classification basis)
Source: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 9 "Processing of special categories of personal data"
What it says: Biometric data, health data, genetic data, racial/ethnic origin, political opinions, religious beliefs, sex life/orientation are "special categories" requiring explicit consent.
Our use: These map directly to Tier 1 in
data-classification.md
PCI-DSS Data Classification
Source: PCI Security Standards Council — PCI DSS v4.0 (March 2022)
What it says: Primary Account Number (PAN), cardholder name, expiration date, service code = cardholder data. CVV = sensitive authentication data. Both must be protected.
Our use: Maps to Tier 2 PCI-DSS in
data-classification.md
HIPAA Protected Health Information (PHI) Definition
Source: 45 CFR Part 160 and Part 164 (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)
URL: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html
What it says: The 18 HIPAA identifiers that make health data "protected" — includes names, geographic data, dates, phone numbers, emails, SSNs, medical record numbers, health plan IDs, etc.
Our use: Tier 1 PHI fields in
data-classification.md
GDPR Fine Formulas
Source: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 83 "General conditions for imposing administrative fines" URL: https://gdpr-info.eu/art-83-gdpr/
Exact legal text (Article 83.4):
"Infringements of the following provisions shall...be subject to administrative fines up to 10 000 000 EUR, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 2 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher..."
Exact legal text (Article 83.5):
"Infringements of the following provisions shall...be subject to administrative fines up to 20 000 000 EUR, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 4 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher..."
Our formula: Directly transcribed from Article 83.4 (Tier 1 violations) and Article 83.5 (Tier 2 violations). No interpretation added.
Historic fines for calibration (all publicly verified):
CCPA / CPRA Fine Formula
Source: California Civil Code § 1798.155(a) — California Consumer Privacy Act URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1798.155
Note (as of June 30, 2025): Stats. 2025, Ch. 20, Sec. 1 (AB 137) amended § 1798.155. The administrative fine amounts are now in subsection (a). Old references to
§ 1798.155(b)for fine amounts are incorrect under the amended text. Verify at the URL above for any future changes.
Exact statutory text (§ 1798.155(a) as amended):
"Any business, service provider, contractor, or other person that violates this title shall be liable for an administrative fine of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for each violation or seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) for each intentional violation..."
Private Right of Action source: California Civil Code § 1798.150 URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV§ionNum=1798.150
Exact statutory text:
"Any consumer whose nonencrypted and nonredacted personal information...is subject to an unauthorized access and exfiltration...may institute a civil action for...damages in an amount not less than one hundred dollars ($100) and not greater than seven hundred and fifty ($750) per consumer per incident or actual damages, whichever is greater..."
Our formula: Directly transcribed. $2,500 / $7,500 per violation comes verbatim from § 1798.155(a) (as amended June 30, 2025). $100–$750 private right of action comes verbatim from § 1798.150.
HIPAA Fine Formula
Source: 45 CFR § 160.404 — Civil Money Penalties URL: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-C/part-160/subpart-D/section-160.404
Source (HHS penalty tiers explained): HHS Office for Civil Rights URL: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/agreements/index.html
HHS OCR penalty tiers (current inflation-adjusted 2024 amounts):
Tier A (no knowledge): $137–$68,928 per violation, $2,067,813 annual cap
Tier B (reasonable cause): $1,379–$68,928, $2,067,813 annual cap
Tier C (willful, corrected): $13,785–$68,928, $2,067,813 annual cap
Tier D (willful, not corrected): $68,928–$1,919,173, $1,919,173 annual cap
URL for current amounts: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/examples/all-cases/index.html
Note on our figures: The dollar amounts in regulatory-impact.md match HHS's inflation-adjusted 2024 penalty tiers. HHS adjusts these annually. Always verify against the HHS OCR website for the current year.
Criminal penalties source: 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6 URL: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1320d-6
LGPD Fine Formula
Source: Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD) — Lei nº 13.709/2018, Article 52 URL: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm
Exact text (Art. 52, I): Fine of up to 2% of revenue of a private legal entity or group in Brazil in its last fiscal year, limited to R$50,000,000 (fifty million reais) per infraction.
Our formula: Verbatim from Article 52.
Singapore PDPA Fine Formula
Source: Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (Singapore) — Section 48J URL: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PDPA2012
Maximum fine: S$1,000,000 per breach OR 10% of annual turnover in Singapore (if turnover > S$10M) — whichever is higher, per the 2021 amendment.
Breach Cost Benchmarks
Source: IBM Security — "Cost of a Data Breach Report" (published annually since 2005) URL: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach Publisher: IBM Security + Ponemon Institute Methodology (2024 edition): Survey of 604 organizations across 17 industries in 16 countries/regions. Each breach involved 2,170–113,954 compromised records.
Last-verified figures (IBM 2024 edition):
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Global average total cost | $4.88M | IBM 2024, p.4 |
| Healthcare cost per record | $408 | IBM 2024, p.12 |
| Average cost per record (all industries) | $165 | IBM 2024, p.11 |
| Average time to identify breach | 194 days | IBM 2024, p.15 |
| Average time to contain breach | 73 days | IBM 2024, p.15 |
| Cost premium for breaches > 200 days | +$1.02M | IBM 2024, p.16 |
| Cost reduction from AI/ML security | -$2.22M | IBM 2024, p.20 |
| Cost reduction from IR planning | -$232K | IBM 2024, p.21 |
| Cost reduction from employee training | -$258K | IBM 2024, p.21 |
2025 update: The IBM 2025 report (live at the URL above) reports a 9% decrease in the global average from $4.88M. The exact 2025 figure requires downloading the report PDF. Skill maintainers: update this table annually when a new edition is published.
Breach Notification Timelines
Blast Radius Formula Basis
The scoring formula structure is adapted from established risk quantification frameworks:
| Component | Based on |
|---|---|
| Tier Weight × Exposure Likelihood | OWASP Risk Rating Methodology — https://owasp.org/www-community/OWASP_Risk_Rating_Methodology |
| Completeness Factor | FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) model — https://www.fairinstitute.org/ |
| Population Scale normalization | CVSS v4.0 Attack Scale metric — https://www.first.org/cvss/v4-0/ |
| Context multipliers | GDPR recitals 75, 91 (special categories increase risk level) — https://gdpr-info.eu/recital-75-gdpr/ |
What the formula is NOT: It is not a legally recognized standard. It is a planning heuristic based on accepted risk frameworks, producing a relative score to compare exposure vectors — not an absolute prediction of breach cost.
What Is Estimated vs. What Is Exact
| Item | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR fine maximum (€20M / 4% turnover) | Exact — verbatim from Art. 83.5 | This is the law |
| CCPA fine ($2,500 / $7,500) | Exact — verbatim from § 1798.155(a) (as amended June 30, 2025) | This is the law |
| HIPAA tier amounts | Exact for 2024 — HHS inflation-adjusted | Update annually |
| Blast Radius Score | Estimate — heuristic planning tool | Not a legal or insurance figure |
| Financial impact range ($X–$Y) | Estimate — IBM benchmarks + fine formula applied to population | Not a prediction |
| "Probable" fine amount | Estimate — based on historic fine patterns | Real fines vary enormously by regulator |
| Notification timeline | Exact — verbatim from law | These are hard legal deadlines |
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: GitHub Copilot
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- First committed by
sjiyani
- Publisher
- GitHub (Official)
- Distributed by
- GitHub
- Source
- github/awesome-copilot · skills/data-breach-blast-radius · commit 797337f
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Contributors
- sjiyani
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by sjiyani or GitHub.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download data-breach-blast-radius.zip