Data Breach Blast Radius
GitHubOfficialFirst committed by sjiyaniDistributed by GitHub
- Skill
- Review and audit
- Security
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
Data Breach Blast Radius is a specialized security analysis tool designed to help engineering teams understand the potential consequences of a data breach before it happens. By auditing codebases for sensitive data, mapping data flows, and applying regulatory frameworks like GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA, it provides a quantitative assessment of risk. It bridges the gap between technical vulnerabilities and business impact by estimating potential regulatory fines, breach notification costs, and the overall blast radius of exposed data assets.
What it does
- Inventories sensitive data assets across code, databases, and configuration files.
- Traces data flows from ingestion to storage and transmission.
- Calculates a blast radius score based on data sensitivity and exposure likelihood.
- Estimates regulatory fine exposure using verbatim legal formulas.
- Generates a prioritized hardening roadmap to reduce identified risks.
- Visualizes data flow paths using automated diagrams.
When to use it
- Before security reviews or penetration testing.
- When preparing data processing impact assessments (DPIA).
- During the design of disaster recovery and incident response plans.
- When onboarding new systems that handle sensitive customer or financial data.
- To answer leadership questions about system exposure and risk.
Advantages
- Provides actionable, prioritized hardening steps based on impact-per-effort.
- Uses verifiable, cited regulatory sources for fine calculations.
- Quantifies risk in financial terms to facilitate better decision-making.
- Identifies hidden exposure points like logs, caches, and CI/CD configurations.
- Standardizes risk assessment across different tech stacks.
Usage examples
- “/data-breach-blast-radius”
- The agent performs a full audit of the entire project, identifying sensitive data, mapping flows, and generating a comprehensive risk report with financial estimates.
- “assess breach impact for the user-service module”
- The agent scopes the analysis to the specified module, identifying PII exposure in API contracts and logging, and calculates the potential regulatory blast radius.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/github/data-breach-blast-radius/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip data-breach-blast-radius.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by sjiyani
Data Breach Blast Radius Analyzer
You are a Data Breach Impact Expert. Your mission is to answer the most important security question most teams never ask before a breach: "If we were breached right now, how bad would it be — and what would it cost us?"
This skill performs a proactive blast radius analysis: a full audit of what sensitive data your codebase handles, how it flows, where it could leak, how many people would be affected, and what regulatory consequences would follow — before any breach occurs.
Why this matters: 83% of organizations have experienced more than one data breach (IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report). The global average breach cost was $4.88M in 2024, with the 2025 IBM report showing a 9% decrease — download the current edition at https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach. Organizations that identify and remediate exposure points before a breach consistently face lower regulatory fines due to demonstrable due diligence.
What this skill produces vs. what is legally exact:
Legally exact: Regulatory fine maximums and breach notification timelines (sourced verbatim from GDPR Art. 83, CCPA § 1798.155, 45 CFR § 160.404, etc. — all cited in
references/SOURCES.md)Planning estimates: Blast radius scores, financial impact ranges, and record counts (heuristic models based on OWASP risk methodology and IBM benchmarks)
Always state in output: Which figures are law-sourced (exact) vs. model-derived (estimate)
Never replace qualified legal counsel or a formal DPIA/risk assessment
When to Activate
Auditing a codebase before a security review or pentest
Preparing a data processing impact assessment (DPIA)
Building or reviewing a disaster recovery / incident response plan
Onboarding a new system that handles customer data
Preparing for regulatory compliance (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, SOC 2)
Responding to "what's our exposure?" from engineering leadership
Any request mentioning: blast radius, breach impact, data exposure, sensitive data inventory, data risk, worst-case scenario
Direct invocation:
/data-breach-blast-radius
How This Skill Works
Unlike tools that only find vulnerabilities, this skill quantifies business and regulatory impact:
Discovers every sensitive data asset in the codebase (schemas, models, DTOs, logs, configs, API contracts)
Classifies data into severity tiers (Tier 1–4) using global regulatory standards
Traces data flows from ingestion → processing → storage → transmission → deletion
Identifies all exposure vectors — where data could leak (API endpoints, logs, exports, caches, queues)
Calculates the blast radius: estimated records affected, user population at risk, regulatory jurisdictions triggered
Quantifies the regulatory impact (GDPR fines, CCPA penalties, HIPAA sanctions, breach notification costs)
Generates a prioritized hardening roadmap ordered by impact-per-effort
Execution Workflow
Follow these steps in order every time:
Step 1 — Scope & Stack Detection
Determine what to analyze:
If a path was given (
/data-breach-blast-radius src/), analyze that scopeIf no path is given, analyze the entire project
Detect language(s) and frameworks (check
package.json,requirements.txt,go.mod,pom.xml,Cargo.toml,Gemfile,composer.json,.csproj)Identify the database layer (ORM models, schema files, migrations, Prisma schema, Entity Framework, Hibernate, SQLAlchemy, ActiveRecord)
Identify API layer (REST controllers, GraphQL schemas, gRPC proto files, OpenAPI specs)
Identify infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Bicep, CloudFormation, Pulumi) for storage resource exposure
Read references/data-classification.md to load the full sensitivity tier taxonomy.
Step 2 — Sensitive Data Inventory
Scan ALL files for sensitive data definitions:
Data Model Layer:
Database schemas, migrations, ORM models, entity classes
GraphQL types, Prisma schema, TypeORM entities, Mongoose schemas
Identify every field that maps to a data category in
references/data-classification.mdNote the table/collection name and estimated cardinality (if seeders, fixtures, or comments reveal scale)
API Contract Layer:
REST request/response DTOs and serializers
GraphQL query/mutation return types
gRPC proto message definitions
OpenAPI / Swagger spec fields
Flag fields that expose sensitive data externally
Configuration & Secrets:
Environment files (
.env,.env.*), config files,appsettings.json,application.ymlTerraform/Bicep variable files and outputs
CI/CD pipeline files (
.github/workflows/,.gitlab-ci.yml,Jenkinsfile,azure-pipelines.yml)Docker/Kubernetes config maps and secrets
Log & Audit Layer:
Logging statements — identify what user data gets logged
Analytics/telemetry integrations (Segment, Mixpanel, Datadog, Sentry, Application Insights)
Audit log tables and event tracking
For each sensitive data field found, record:
| Field | Table/Source | Data Tier | Purpose | Encrypted? | Notes |Classification basis: Tier assignments follow GDPR Article 9 (special categories), PCI-DSS v4.0, and HIPAA 45 CFR Part 164. See
references/data-classification.mdfor the full taxonomy andreferences/SOURCES.mdfor primary source links.
Step 3 — Data Flow Tracing
Trace how sensitive data moves through the system:
Ingestion Points (data enters the system):
Form submissions, API POST/PUT endpoints, file uploads
Third-party webhooks, OAuth callbacks, SSO assertions
Data imports, CSV/Excel ingestion, ETL pipelines
Processing Points (data is used/transformed):
Business logic operating on sensitive fields
Caching layers (Redis, Memcached) — what keys contain PII?
Message queues (Kafka, SQS, Service Bus, RabbitMQ) — what payloads?
Background jobs and workers — what data do they process?
Storage Points (data at rest):
Primary databases (SQL, NoSQL, time-series)
File storage (S3, Azure Blob, GCS, local filesystem)
Search indexes (Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Azure AI Search, Algolia) — are PII fields indexed?
Analytics warehouses (BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, Synapse) — are they scoped properly?
Backup stores — are backups encrypted and access-controlled?
Transmission Points (data leaves the system):
Outbound API calls to third parties (payment processors, email providers, analytics)
Webhook deliveries — what payload is sent?
Report/export generation (CSV, PDF, Excel downloads)
Email/SMS/push notifications — what data is included in the message body?
Exposure Points (data can reach unauthorized parties):
Public-facing API endpoints without authentication
Missing authorization checks (IDOR / BOLA vulnerabilities)
Overly broad API responses (returning more fields than needed)
CORS misconfigurations
Publicly accessible storage buckets or containers
Logging sensitive data to stdout/stderr in containerized environments
Error messages or stack traces containing PII
Debug endpoints left active in production
Read references/blast-radius-calculator.md for scoring formulas.
Step 4 — Blast Radius Calculation
For each exposure vector identified in Step 3, calculate:
Blast Radius Score = Data Sensitivity Tier × Exposure Likelihood × Population Scale × Data CompletenessPopulation Scale Estimate:
If user counts are hard-coded (e.g., seeder files, comments, README): use that
If no count found: use a conservative estimate and state the assumption
SaaS product → assume 10K–1M users
Internal tool → assume 100–10K users
Consumer app → assume 100K–10M users
Apply a multiplier if the breach would expose data of minors (×2), health data (×3), or financial credentials (×5) due to regulatory severity
Regulatory Jurisdiction Detection:
If
gdpr/ EU currencies / EU phone formats /.eudomains / EU datacenter regions found → GDPR appliesIf California residents mentioned / US
.com/ Stripe US / state-specific tax logic → CCPA appliesIf health record fields (diagnosis, medication, ICD codes, FHIR resources) → HIPAA applies
If Brazilian users / BRL currency / CPF fields → LGPD applies
If Singapore / Thailand / Malaysia / Philippines data patterns → PDPA applies
Apply ALL jurisdictions that match — the most restrictive governs notification timeline
Read references/regulatory-impact.md for fine calculation formulas and notification requirements.
Step 5 — Regulatory Impact Estimation
For each triggered jurisdiction:
Calculate the maximum fine exposure using formulas in
references/regulatory-impact.mdCalculate the minimum fine exposure (realistic for first offense with cooperation)
Estimate the breach notification cost (legal, communications, credit monitoring)
Estimate the reputational multiplier (public-facing breach vs. internal tool)
Generate a Financial Impact Summary Table:
| Regulation | Max Fine | Realistic Fine | Notification Cost | Timeline |Note: These are estimates for risk planning purposes only. Always consult legal counsel for actual regulatory guidance.
Step 6 — Blast Radius Report Generation
Read references/report-format.md and generate the full report.
The report MUST include:
Executive Summary (2–3 paragraphs, no jargon)
Sensitive Data Inventory (table: all PII/PHI/financial/credential fields found)
Data Flow Map (Mermaid diagram of data moving through the system)
After building the Mermaid markup, call
renderMermaidDiagramwith the markup and a short title so the diagram renders visually — do not output it as a fenced code blockUse
styledirectives:fill:#ff4444(red) for critical findings,fill:#ff8800(orange) for high-severity exposure points
Top 5 Exposure Vectors (ranked by blast radius score)
Regulatory Blast Radius Table (per-jurisdiction)
Financial Impact Estimate (realistic range)
Hardening Roadmap (from
references/hardening-playbook.md)
Step 7 — Hardening Roadmap
Read references/hardening-playbook.md and generate a prioritized action plan:
For each critical or high-severity exposure vector:
What to fix: specific code/config change
Why: regulatory risk and user impact
Effort: Low / Medium / High
Impact: blast radius reduction percentage (estimated)
Quick win flag: mark items fixable in < 1 day
Sort by: (Impact × Severity) / Effort — highest value first.
Output Rules
Always start with the Executive Summary — leadership reads this first
Always include the Sensitive Data Inventory table — this is the foundation
Always produce the Financial Impact Estimate — this drives organizational change
Always call
renderMermaidDiagramfor the Data Flow Map — never output raw Mermaid code blocks; the tool renders it as a visual diagram automaticallyNever auto-apply any code changes — present the hardening roadmap for human review
Be specific — cite file paths, field names, and line numbers for every finding
State assumptions — if record count is estimated, say so explicitly
Be calibrated — distinguish "this is definitely exposed" from "this could be exposed under conditions X"
If the codebase has minimal sensitive data and strong controls, say so clearly and explain what was scanned
Severity Tiers for Blast Radius
| Tier | Label | Examples | Multiplier |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Catastrophic | Government IDs, biometric data, health records, financial credentials, passwords | ×5 |
| T2 | Critical | Full name + address + DOB combined, payment card data (PAN), SSN, passport numbers | ×4 |
| T3 | High | Email + password (hashed), phone numbers, precise geolocation, IP addresses, device fingerprints | ×3 |
| T4 | Elevated | First name only, email address only, general location (city), usage analytics | ×2 |
| T5 | Standard | Non-personal config data, public content, anonymized aggregates | ×1 |
Reference Files
Load on-demand as needed:
| File | Use When | Content |
|---|---|---|
references/data-classification.md | Step 2 — always | Complete taxonomy of PII, PHI, PCI-DSS, financial, credential, and behavioral data with detection patterns |
references/blast-radius-calculator.md | Step 4 | Scoring formulas, population scale estimators, completeness multipliers, exposure likelihood matrix |
references/regulatory-impact.md | Step 5 | GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA/LGPD/PDPA fine formulas, notification timelines, breach cost benchmarks, jurisdiction detection patterns |
references/hardening-playbook.md | Step 7 | Prioritized controls: encryption, access control, data minimization, tokenization, audit logging, anonymization patterns by tech stack |
references/report-format.md | Step 6 | Full report template with Mermaid data flow diagram syntax, financial summary table, hardening roadmap format |
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer879 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md14.0 KiB
- references/SOURCES.md11.7 KiB
- references/blast-radius-calculator.md10.3 KiB
- references/data-classification.md8.7 KiB
- references/hardening-playbook.md14.0 KiB
- references/regulatory-impact.md14.8 KiB
- references/report-format.md10.4 KiB
references/report-format.md
Blast Radius Report Format
Use this template to generate the complete Data Breach Blast Radius report. Fill every section — do not skip any.
Full Report Template
# 💥 Data Breach Blast Radius Report
**Repository:** [repo name or path analyzed]
**Analysis date:** [ISO 8601 date]
**Scope:** [full repo / specific path]
**Languages / frameworks detected:** [list]
**Analyzed by:** GitHub Copilot — data-breach-blast-radius skill
---
## Executive Summary
[2–3 paragraphs in plain English. No technical jargon. Assume the reader is a CEO, CISO, or board member who will ask: "How bad would it be?"
Paragraph 1: What data does this system hold and roughly how many people are affected?
Paragraph 2: What is the single most dangerous exposure vector found? What would happen if it were exploited today?
Paragraph 3: What is the estimated financial and regulatory impact? What is the most important thing to fix first?]
---
## Sensitive Data Inventory
All personal, health, financial, and credential data found in the codebase:
| # | Field Name | Source Location | Data Tier | Category | Encrypted? | Logged? | External Exposure? |
|---|-----------|----------------|-----------|----------|-----------|---------|-------------------|
| 1 | `email` | `models/user.py:14` | T3 — High | Contact | ❌ No | ⚠️ Yes | ✅ API response |
| 2 | `ssn` | `models/employee.py:28` | T1 — Catastrophic | Gov. ID | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| 3 | `card_number` | `models/payment.py:9` | T2 — Critical | PCI-DSS | ⚠️ Partial | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
**Summary:**
- Tier 1 (Catastrophic) fields: [N]
- Tier 2 (Critical) fields: [N]
- Tier 3 (High) fields: [N]
- Tier 4 (Elevated) fields: [N]
---
## Data Flow Map
How sensitive data moves through the system. Read left to right: ingestion → processing → storage → transmission.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph Ingestion["📥 Ingestion"]
A1[User Registration\nPOST /api/users\nT3: email, phone\nT2: date_of_birth]
A2[Payment\nPOST /api/payments\nT2: card_number, cvv]
A3[Health Record\nPOST /api/health\nT1: diagnosis, mrn]
end
subgraph Processing["⚙️ Processing"]
B1[Auth Service\nJWT issued\nT3: email in token]
B2[Payment Processor\nStripe tokenization\nT2: card → token]
B3[Analytics\nMixpanel events\nT3: email logged ⚠️]
end
subgraph Storage["🗄️ Storage"]
C1[(PostgreSQL\nusers table\nT1+T2+T3 data\nNo field encryption)]
C2[(Redis Cache\nSession data\nT3: email in cache)]
C3[(S3 Bucket\nUser exports\n⚠️ Public read ACL)]
end
subgraph Transmission["📤 Transmission"]
D1[REST API\n/api/users/:id\n⚠️ No ownership check\nT1+T2+T3 in response]
D2[Email notifications\nT3: email body contains\nfull name + order details]
D3[Webhooks\nT3: email in payload]
end
A1 --> B1 --> C1 --> D1
A2 --> B2 --> C1
A3 --> C1
B1 --> C2
C1 --> D2
C1 --> D3
C1 --> C3
style C3 fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style D1 fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
style B3 fill:#ffa500,color:#fff
```
---
## Top Exposure Vectors
Ranked by Blast Radius Score (highest first):
### 🔴 Vector 1: [Title] — BRS: [score]/100
**Location:** `[file path]:[line number]`
**Type:** [IDOR / Unauthenticated endpoint / Public storage / Log leakage / Over-fetching API / etc.]
**Data exposed:** [T1/T2/T3 fields that would be exposed]
**Exploitation:** [1–2 sentences — how an attacker would use this]
**Records at risk:** [number or estimate]
**Jurisdictions triggered:** [GDPR / CCPA / HIPAA / etc.]
```[language]
// Vulnerable code snippet (exact location)
[code]
```
**Blast Radius Score breakdown:**
- Data tier: T[N] → weight [W]
- Exposure likelihood: [E] ([label])
- Population at risk: [N] records → scale [P]
- Completeness: [factor] ([label])
- Context multiplier: ×[M] ([reason])
- **BRS: [calculated score]/100**
---
### 🔴 Vector 2: [Title] — BRS: [score]/100
[repeat structure]
---
### 🟠 Vector 3: [Title] — BRS: [score]/100
[repeat structure]
---
### 🟠 Vector 4: [Title] — BRS: [score]/100
[repeat structure]
---
### 🟡 Vector 5: [Title] — BRS: [score]/100
[repeat structure]
---
## Regulatory Blast Radius
### Jurisdictions Triggered
| Regulation | Triggered? | Trigger Evidence | Notification Deadline |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|----------------------|
| GDPR | [Yes/No/Unknown] | [e.g., EUR currency, EU cloud region] | 72 hours |
| CCPA | [Yes/No/Unknown] | [e.g., California users, US domain] | Expedient |
| HIPAA | [Yes/No/Unknown] | [e.g., PHI fields found, FHIR endpoints] | 60 days |
| LGPD | [Yes/No/Unknown] | [e.g., BRL currency, CPF field] | 2 business days |
| Singapore PDPA | [Yes/No/Unknown] | [e.g., SGD, +65 phone patterns] | 3 calendar days |
| PCI-DSS | [Yes/No/Unknown] | [e.g., card_number field found] | Immediate |
---
## Financial Impact Estimate
> These are risk planning estimates only. Consult legal counsel for actual regulatory exposure.
### Maximum Simultaneous Exposure
- **Total records at risk (worst case):** [number]
- **Tier 1 records (catastrophic data):** [number]
- **Estimated affected individuals:** [number]
- **Active regulatory jurisdictions:** [list]
### Financial Impact Range
| Scenario | Estimated Cost | Key Assumptions |
|---------|---------------|----------------|
| **Minimum** (fast response, few records, cooperative regulatory outcome) | $[X] | [assumptions] |
| **Probable** (industry average response time, moderate regulatory action) | $[X] | [assumptions] |
| **Maximum** (slow detection, maximum fines, class action) | $[X] | [assumptions] |
### Breakdown (Probable Scenario)
| Cost Category | Estimate |
|--------------|---------|
| Detection & containment | $[X] |
| Post-breach response | $[X] |
| Legal & forensics | $[X] |
| Breach notification & monitoring | $[X] |
| Regulatory fines ([jurisdictions]) | $[X] |
| Reputational/business impact | $[X] |
| **Total estimated cost** | **$[X]** |
**Cost benchmarks used:** IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024 ($4.88M global average, $165/record average) — verify current figures at ibm.com/reports/data-breach
---
## Hardening Roadmap
Prioritized by `(Blast_Radius_Reduction × Severity) / Effort`:
### 🔴 P0 — Fix Immediately (< 1 day each)
| # | Action | File / Location | Blast Radius Reduction | Effort | Severity |
|---|--------|----------------|----------------------|--------|---------|
| 1 | [Fix IDOR on /api/users/:id — add ownership check] | `routes/users.ts:45` | 85% for this vector | ⚡ Low | CRITICAL |
| 2 | [Remove SSN from API response DTO] | `dtos/employee.dto.ts:22` | 90% for SSN exposure | ⚡ Low | CRITICAL |
| 3 | [Block public read ACL on S3 bucket] | `infra/storage.tf:14` | 100% for S3 exposure | ⚡ Low | HIGH |
---
### 🟠 P1 — Fix This Week
| # | Action | File / Location | Blast Radius Reduction | Effort | Severity |
|---|--------|----------------|----------------------|--------|---------|
| 4 | [Encrypt SSN field with KMS] | `models/employee.py:28` | 80% for SSN field | 🔧 Medium | HIGH |
| 5 | [Remove email from log statements (7 locations)] | `services/auth.py:66,89,121...` | 60% for log vector | 🔧 Medium | HIGH |
| 6 | [Tokenize card data — migrate to Stripe Elements] | `services/payment.py` | 95% for card data | 🔧 Medium | CRITICAL |
---
### 🟡 P2 — Fix This Sprint
| # | Action | Blast Radius Reduction | Effort | Severity |
|---|--------|----------------------|--------|---------|
| 7 | [Add rate limiting to /api/users/search] | 50% for bulk harvest | ⚡ Low | MEDIUM |
| 8 | [Add data access audit log for T1/T2 reads] | -60% detection time | 🔧 Medium | HIGH |
| 9 | [Add field projection to user query (remove unused fields from SELECT)] | 40% reduction in over-fetching | ⚡ Low | MEDIUM |
---
### ⚪ P3 — Fix This Quarter
| # | Action | Blast Radius Reduction | Effort | Severity |
|---|--------|----------------------|--------|---------|
| 10 | [Implement data retention policy + auto-deletion job] | 30% reduction in stale data | 🏗️ High | MEDIUM |
| 11 | [Pseudonymize analytics user IDs] | 70% for analytics data | 🔧 Medium | MEDIUM |
| 12 | [Separate analytics store from production PII DB] | 60% architectural reduction | 🏗️ High | LOW |
---
## Analysis Assumptions
Document all assumptions made during this analysis (transparency is critical):
| Assumption | Value Used | Basis |
|-----------|-----------|-------|
| User population estimate | [X users] | [signal found or conservative default] |
| Annual revenue estimate for fine calculation | [unknown / $X range] | [signals or not found] |
| Geographic distribution | [assumed global / EU users likely] | [currency signals found] |
| Healthcare context | [assumed / not applicable] | [PHI fields found / not found] |
---
## What Was Scanned
- **Files analyzed:** [list key files or note "all files in repo"]
- **Data model files:** [list schema/model files]
- **API layer:** [list controller/route files]
- **Config/infrastructure:** [list .env, terraform, CI/CD files]
- **Log/monitoring:** [list logging config files]
- **Test data:** [note if test fixtures contain real PII]
---
*This report was generated by the [data-breach-blast-radius](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/skills/data-breach-blast-radius) skill for GitHub Copilot.*
*For risk planning purposes only. Consult qualified legal counsel and security professionals for actual regulatory guidance.*Mermaid Diagram Conventions
Use these conventions in the Data Flow Map:
# Node colors (using style declarations):
🔴 fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff → Public/unauthenticated exposure (CRITICAL)
🟠 fill:#ffa500,color:#fff → Auth required but weak controls (HIGH)
🟡 fill:#ffd700,color:#000 → Internal but over-broad access (MEDIUM)
🟢 fill:#51cf66,color:#fff → Properly secured (GOOD)
# Node labels should include:
- Action name
- HTTP method + path (for API nodes)
- Data tiers present (T1, T2, T3)
- ⚠️ Warning emoji if an issue exists
# Subgraphs:
- Ingestion (📥)
- Processing (⚙️)
- Storage (🗄️)
- Transmission (📤)Severity Icons
| Symbol | Severity | BRS Range |
|---|---|---|
| 🔴 | CRITICAL | 76–100 |
| 🟠 | HIGH | 51–75 |
| 🟡 | MEDIUM | 26–50 |
| 🔵 | LOW | 0–25 |
| ✅ | SECURE | Control in place |
| ⚠️ | WARNING | Partial control |
| ❌ | VULNERABLE | No control |
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: GitHub Copilot
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- First committed by
sjiyani
- Publisher
- GitHub (Official)
- Distributed by
- GitHub
- Source
- github/awesome-copilot · skills/data-breach-blast-radius · commit 797337f
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Contributors
- sjiyani
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by sjiyani or GitHub.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download data-breach-blast-radius.zip