Generated banner for Apigee Agent Gateway Governance
Generated logo for Apigee Agent Gateway Governance

Apigee Agent Gateway Governance

GoogleOfficialPublished by Google

  • Skill
  • Workflow
  • Automation and integrations
  • Apache-2.0
  • Low risk
  • Has scripts

From the author

Stands up an Apigee API proxy that a Google Cloud Agent Gateway calls as an ext-proc (Service Extension) callout on an agent's LLM traffic, to meter token usage per model, extract caller identity, and apply Model Armor prompt screening or a semantic cache. Use when wiring Apigee in as an AI gateway behind an Agent Gateway, when an agent's model egress needs governing, or when a callout proxy returns no verdict and you need to find out why. The distinguishing question is whether Apigee forwards the traffic or only inspects it: this skill is inspect-only, and builds the proxy itself. Don't use it when Apigee is meant to receive a request and route it onward to a backend — including hosting an MCP server behind Apigee — which needs a proxy with a target instead. Don't use for governing the agent's calls to tools or MCP servers. Don't use for choosing or switching which model a request goes to. Don't use for creating the Agent Gateway itself, nor for Apigee hybrid.
— the description by Google

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill automates the configuration of an Apigee API proxy to act as a service extension for a Google Cloud Agent Gateway. It enables inspection of LLM traffic to perform token metering, caller identity extraction, prompt screening via Model Armor, and semantic caching. The skill follows a structured deployment process using AFT templates and gcloud commands, ensuring the proxy is correctly wired to intercept and evaluate agent requests without acting as a backend router.

What it does

  • Stands up an inspect-only Apigee proxy for LLM traffic governance.
  • Configures token metering per model and enforces usage quotas.
  • Integrates Model Armor for prompt screening and semantic caching.
  • Manages gateway network connectivity and AuthzPolicy configuration.
  • Provides automated deployment scripts for consistent environment setup.
  • Supports both development and production modes with defined contract schemas.

When to use it

  • When you need to meter or govern LLM token usage for agents.
  • When you require prompt screening or semantic caching for agent egress.
  • When you need to extract caller identity from agent traffic.
  • When you are wiring Apigee as an AI gateway behind a Google Cloud Agent Gateway.

Advantages

  • Centralized governance for agent model egress.
  • Version-controlled proxy configuration via AFT templates.
  • Automated handling of complex network and service extension dependencies.
  • Non-intrusive inspection architecture that does not require backend routing.

Usage examples

“Set up Apigee governance for my existing Agent Gateway in dev mode.”
The agent will assess the current environment, apply default configurations for metering and identity, and generate a deployment plan for approval.
“Deploy the Apigee proxy using my production configuration file.”
The agent will validate the provided contract file, execute the deployment sequence, and verify the proxy is reporting as EXTENSIBLE.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/google/apigee-agent-gateway-governance/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip apigee-agent-gateway-governance.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Google

Apigee as an Agent Gateway Service Extension

Wires an Apigee proxy in as an ext-proc callout on a GCP Agent Gateway. The proxy is a processor, not an API proxy: it has no backend, inspects the LLM request and response the gateway hands it, and returns a verdict.

Usage Attribution

MUST READ: Before executing any gcloud, REST API, or MCP command, you MUST read and follow the instructions in Usage Attribution.

You build the proxy; the user does not.

Two modes, one schema. Decide which before anything else, and say which. Input file present → prod mode: it is the contract, every value comes from it, and a missing or malformed field is a refusal, not a default. No input file and the user is describing an outcome → dev mode: apply the documented defaults, show a plan with durations and get approval, start with identity and metering only, write apigee-agent-gateway-governance.yaml at the end as the handoff. assets/apigee-agent-gateway-governance.example.yaml documents the schema both modes use.

Modes, defaults, durations, cost disclosure and the interlocks that bind both: references/modes.md. Read it before you start.

Colour the plan's ACTION column — green REUSE, cyan CREATE/RESERVE, yellow APPEND/MODIFY; full palette in references/modes.md. Yellow is the one that earns its place: it is the only signal that a resource the user already owns is being changed. Rendered plain, the one row that modifies something is indistinguishable from the dozen that do not — which is exactly the row the approval exists for.

Prerequisite: where the agent runs

Check this before building anything. It decides whether traffic can reach the gateway at all, and it is silent when wrong — every step below still succeeds while nothing arrives.

Use Agent Runtime, created with agent_gateway_config / agent_to_anywhere_config. It is the supported path and the orchestrator builds the client-side PSC, routing, DNS and cert trust for you. There is no gcloud surface for this and no console path — it is SDK-only, at agent creation time. See Route traffic through Agent Gateway for the binding, and references/networking-psc.md for a worked example.

Set GOOGLE_API_PREVENT_AGENT_TOKEN_SHARING_FOR_GCP_SERVICES: "False" in the agent's env_vars, or every invocation 401s on the agent's own sessions.create, before user code runs. Deploy-time invisible. Full symptom and isolation: references/gotchas.md, Agent Gateway.

Where the agent runs is otherwise settled — the premise is a working gateway and a working agent. Do not explain how to build one or list unsupported compute unprompted; references/networking-psc.md has the constraints if it turns out to matter.

Tool versions

Do not assume these are installed or current.

ToolMinimumWhy
gcloud588.0.0apigee apis import --from-template is on the GA track at this version; older SDKs need gcloud beta
google-cloud-aiplatform[agent_engines,adk]>=2.1,<3Agent Runtime client used to bind the agent to the gateway
google-adk>=2.9,<3only if you build the test agent with ADK

On gcloud >= 588.0.0: every feature must keep its uid, and the template must never declare endpoints or targets. All six features set uid today and the template declares neither, so the shipped bundle is correct — but both are load-bearing now, and breaking either one still compiles, still deploys, and reports nothing. Mechanism and symptoms: references/gotchas.md, under Authoring (AFT).

gcloud version | head -1          # confirm >= 588.0.0
gcloud components update          # if older
pip install "google-cloud-aiplatform[agent_engines,adk]>=2.1,<3" "google-adk>=2.9,<3"

scripts/compile_check.py needs PyYAML and names the interpreter if it is missing. pip install pyyaml, or run it with a Python 3 that has it; gcloud's bundled interpreter does not, and the SDK's vendored yaml is Python 2.

python3 scripts/compile_check.py assets/apigee-proxy-template.yaml

Execution model

Three layers, and the choice between them is not stylistic:

LayerUsed forWhy
AFT YAML templatethe proxy itselfversion-controlled, reviewable, diffable
gcloudPSC, DNS, AuthzExtension, AuthzPolicynative commands exist
REST (curl)env properties, envgroups, deployments, debug sessionsno gcloud equivalent today

The customer owns one input file (assets/apigee-agent-gateway-governance.example.yaml). It is the version-controlled artifact. Never hand-edit the generated proxy: regenerate it.

Run the Apigee-side sequence with the script, not by hand. Steps 1, 3 and 4 below are order-dependent and each fails in a way that reads as a different problem. scripts/deploy_proxy.sh does all three, preserves the properties map, polls the async operation, and exits non-zero if the deployment does not come up EXTENSIBLE:

scripts/deploy_proxy.sh --org "$ORG" --env "$ENV" --proxy "$PROXY" \
  --template assets/apigee-proxy-template.yaml [--service-account "$SA"] --yes \
  [--index-endpoint-id ID --index-id ID --sc-project P --sc-region R --embeddings-model M]

Run it without --yes first: it prints the plan and changes nothing. Show that plan, then re-run with --yes once the user agrees.

The vector-search flags are the one exception to "edit the default in every feature that declares it". Those three ids are substituted at deploy time and checked for leftovers; hand-editing them into feature-semantic-cache.yaml deploys fine, skips the check, and makes the file single-use.

scripts/ensure_gateway_connectivity.sh is the same idea for the gateway leg (step 0). It is the only part of this skill that modifies a resource the user already owns, so it applies nothing without --yes.

The steps are written out below so you can diagnose a failure, not so you can retype them.

Inputs you must resolve first

Environment prerequisites: references/setup.md — gcloud SDK (588+), project, billing, gcloud services enable, region, credentials, IAM. Nothing below creates any of it.

Prod: from the input file, then environment, then ask — never invent. Dev: apply the references/modes.md defaults, and ask only for what has none.

  • project, region

  • apigee.org, apigee.environment, apigee.envgroup, apigee.hostname, apigee.proxy

  • network.vpc, network.subnet, network.networkAttachment

  • gateway.name, gateway.matchPaths (a list, one entry per wire shape), gateway.manageNetworkConfig

matchPaths drives TWO artifacts; write both from the same list. The AuthzPolicy paths[].suffix gets one suffix per entry, verbatim with leading punctuation kept — it decides what the gateway routes to Apigee. The template's LLM_URI_MATCH gets one (request.uri Like "*<entry>*") clause per entry, OR-ed, leading : or / stripped — it decides what the proxy acts on once it arrives. The shipped two-entry default gives:

((request.uri Like "*generateContent*") or (request.uri Like "*chat/completions*"))

The AuthzPolicy is the outer gate and wins: a suffix list narrower than matchPaths means the missing shape never reaches Apigee at all. Derive both from the input file and never from the default when the file disagrees — the file is the reviewable contract and a mismatch is invisible once deployed.

A one-entry list is legitimate and governs one shape. Dropping an entry governs one fewer silently — deploys clean, zero transactions for the shape dropped — and narrows feature-normalize, Model Armor and the cache together. references/gotchas.md, Runtime.

semanticCache is a KNOWN ISSUE whenever it is on — warn, then build it. The key is the prompt embedding alone: no caller, no model, no shape. A hit therefore crosses callers — similar prompts share an answer — and one model behind one shape does not make it safe. With more shapes the first model to answer answers for the other too: empty HTTP 200 across shapes, wrong-model body within one. Warn whenever the cache is on, not only on multi-shape, then build. Wording: references/modes.md; mechanism: references/gotchas.md.

Each entry is a SUFFIX match. You write these, not the user — derive them from which endpoint their agent actually calls, and do not ask them to reason about suffixes. Vertex's OpenAI-compatible endpoint and api.openai.com need different entries, and getting it wrong governs nothing silently; the forms and the evidence are in references/gotchas.md, Runtime.

There is no apiShape field. Metering does not depend on the wire shape — the count is normalised in JS across both — so the field selected nothing and was removed. Adding a shape is an || branch in extract-model.js plus an entry in matchPaths.

Three places carry the callout hostname and all three must match — the Apigee envgroup, the AuthzExtension authority/service, and the private DNS A record. You set all three from one value: a build invariant to hold, not a question for the user. It becomes a topic only when a callout never lands, and then it is the first check. Build order matters alongside it — the AuthzExtension is inert until the host resolves and the proxy is deployed, so "the extension exists" is not evidence that leg works. references/gotchas.md, Runtime.

Workflow

0. Gateway: give it a route into the VPC

A gateway with no networkConfig has no route into the customer's VPC and cannot resolve the callout hostname. This skill builds it — network attachment, egress and DNS peering — so its absence is a build step, not a blocker, and should be reported that way. Do not open with an alarm about a resource you are about to create.

One thing here does need the user, and it is the reason this is step 0 rather than a silent prerequisite: attaching egress is one-way and affects traffic they already run. Settle it in the plan, before anything executes — see "Confirm everything up front" below. Capturing a known-good agent turn first is worth doing when they are nervous about a production gateway, because it separates "never worked" from "we broke it"; it is a precaution to offer, not a step to impose.

gcloud network-services agent-gateways describe "$GATEWAY" \
  --location="$REGION" --project="$PROJECT" --format='value(networkConfig)'
gcloud network-security authz-policies list \
  --location="$REGION" --project="$PROJECT"

A console-created gateway already has a CUSTOM AuthzPolicy — an IAP REQUEST_AUTHZ one, which coexists with ours and is not needed for the egress JWT. You never create the gateway, so assess it rather than assuming. references/gotchas.md, Agent Gateway.

Empty networkConfig output means missing, and it is easy to miss: the gateway still serves ordinary agent traffic perfectly, because that path goes to public Google endpoints and never enters the VPC. Only the Apigee callout fails.

If it is missing, behaviour depends on gateway.manageNetworkConfig:

  • true — run the script below. It creates the network attachment, then read-modify-writes the gateway to add the egress attachment and DNS peering. Agreement for this is taken in the plan, not here; --yes carries it.

  • false — the user has said they want to make this change themselves. Print the script invocation and let them run it. Do not modify the gateway.

scripts/ensure_gateway_connectivity.sh \
  --gateway "$GATEWAY" --project "$PROJECT" --region "$REGION" \
  --vpc "$VPC" --subnet "$SUBNET" --attachment "$ATTACHMENT" \
  --domain "$DNS_DOMAIN"            # add --yes only after the user agrees

Either way networkConfig has to exist before the Apigee work starts — not because its absence is an error, but because every later step then succeeds and governs nothing.

Use the script, not the raw commands: import is a whole-resource upsert and a hand-built YAML silently drops the gateway's registries and protocols. Why, and the etag and PROTOCOL_UNSPECIFIED handling: references/gotchas.md.

1. Apigee: enable the environment

The env must carry apigee-service-extension-enabled=true. No gcloud flag exists; PATCH the properties map.

curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  "https://apigee.googleapis.com/v1/organizations/$ORG/environments/$ENV"

The PATCH replaces the whole map. Read it first and re-send every property you intend to keep, or you will silently drop them.

curl -X PATCH -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  "https://apigee.googleapis.com/v1/organizations/$ORG/environments/$ENV?updateMask=properties" \
  -d '{"properties":{"property":[{"name":"apigee-service-extension-enabled","value":"true"}]}}'

This does not disable Apigee Analytics — the two coexist; if analytics looks missing it is the separate per-environment add-on. references/gotchas.md.

Use a dedicated environment, attached to exactly one envgroup. An environment in two makes the gateway 404 every request with the extension never invoked. It also leaves the / base path free, which is what the proxy ships with.

scripts/ensure_apigee_environment.sh creates the environment, attaches it to the regional runtime instance, and creates and attaches the envgroup — so step 2 is already done when it succeeds. It creates billable resources and applies nothing without --yes; that agreement is taken in the plan, not here.

scripts/ensure_apigee_environment.sh \
  --org "$ORG" --env "$ENV" --region "$REGION" \
  --envgroup "$ENVGROUP" --hostname "$HOSTNAME"      # add --yes to apply

It is idempotent and resumable, and refuses with exit 2 when the environment is already in another envgroup or the envgroup exists on a different hostname. It also handles three things a runbook tends to get wrong — the omitted type on create, the four-minute instance attachment that locks the environment, and polling the operation rather than a GET that succeeds too early.

2. Apigee: envgroup on the callout hostname

Done already if step 1's script ran. Verify, or do it by hand for an envgroup that already exists. The hostname must be exactly the callout host, and the group must be attached to the env.

curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  "https://apigee.googleapis.com/v1/organizations/$ORG/envgroups/$ENVGROUP/attachments"

How many envgroups is the environment in? More than one and the callout never lands. deploy_proxy.sh enforces this before touching anything and exits 2 naming them; assess_integration.sh reports it. Read the failure literally if it fires — the environment is wrong, not the script.

3. Build the proxy from the template
gcloud apigee apis import organizations/$ORG/apis/$PROXY \
  --from-template=assets/apigee-proxy-template.yaml

Each features: entry resolves relative to the template file's own directory, never the working directory, so a bare filename must sit beside the template (a subpath like features/feature-identity.yaml works too). assets/ is flat by convention, not compiler demand — but moving a file without updating features: fails the import with a bare FileNotFoundError.

If you get Permission denied on resource ... (or it may not exist) on an org you demonstrably have access to, it is the credential, not the access. With context-aware access enabled the default gcloud credential is rejected. Pass the ADC token instead:

CLOUDSDK_AUTH_ACCESS_TOKEN=$(gcloud auth application-default print-access-token) \
  gcloud apigee apis import ...

To change a parameter, edit the default in every FEATURE that declares it — not in the template. gcloud apigee apis import passes an empty caller-parameter map, so each feature resolves its own default and the template's declaration of the same name is never read. Editing the template changes nothing, silently, and the compile still passes. Measured: setting MA_CONTINUE_ON_ERROR to DRY_RUN in the template shipped ENFORCE on a fail-closed policy. LLM_URI_MATCH is declared in four features and all four must agree. scripts/compile_check.py fails on any disagreement. There is no --parameters flag.

Enable an optional recipe by adding its feature to the template's features list. See references/recipes.md.

tokenMetering.models in the input file is NOT generative. It documents which buckets exist; it does not create them. A bucket is real only when it has an LLMTokenQuota step in feature-token-metering.yaml and a matching *_TOKEN_LIMIT parameter. Three exist: gemini-pro, gemini-flash and other — the catch-all for any model whose name contains neither pro nor flash. Adding a fourth entry to the list meters nothing, and omitting other silently unmeters every non-Gemini model: the count is extracted and then discarded, with no ratelimit reference anywhere in the transaction. Adding a model is a feature-file edit, not a config change.

4. Deploy

Deploy to the service-extension env, then confirm the deployment reports proxyDeploymentType: EXTENSIBLE.

curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  ".../environments/$ENV/deployments"

STANDARD means it will not govern the agent's off-Apigee tool egress.

If any policy calls a Google API — Model Armor, embeddings, Vector Search — deploy with a service account or the deploy is rejected with MISSING_SERVICE_ACCOUNT:

curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  ".../apis/$PROXY/revisions/$REV/deployments?override=true&serviceAccount=$DEPLOY_SA"
5. Networking

This is the gateway → Apigee leg only. PSC endpoint to the Apigee instance service attachment, plus a private DNS A record. See references/networking-psc.md. The Apigee instance consumerAcceptList must include your project or the connection never reaches ACCEPTED.

The agent → gateway leg is the prerequisite above, and is not built here.

6. Bind the gateway

AuthzExtension then AuthzPolicy — in that order, and only once the host resolves and the proxy is deployed. The extension is inert until then.

Both document bodies ship as assets. Copy and substitute; do not invent them — assets/authz-extension.example.yaml and assets/authz-policy.example.yaml. They carry the fields that are load-bearing and have no obvious default: wireFormat: EXT_PROC_GRPC, failOpen, the authority/service pair, the metadata body flags, and the policy's customProvider / httpRules nesting.

gcloud service-extensions authz-extensions import $AUTHZ_EXT \
  --source=authz-extension.yaml --location=$REGION --project=$PROJECT
gcloud beta network-security authz-policies import $AUTHZ_POLICY \
  --source=authz-policy.yaml --location=$REGION --project=$PROJECT

The policy's resource paths take the project NUMBER, not the ID — both target.resources and customProvider.authzExtension.resources. Resolve it yourself; narrating two numbers at the user does not help. The trap, for when a callout never lands: the number in the gateway's serviceExtensionsServiceAccount is the Google-managed tenant project, not theirs, and it is the only one on screen, so it is the natural thing to copy. A wrong number imports cleanly and targets nothing. Copy the slots from assets/authz-policy.example.yaml.

7. Verify

You cannot test with curl — the host is internal and the proxy expects the gateway's IAP-egress JWT. Run scripts/read_debug_session.sh --arm, drive a turn, read it back with --session. Expect one transaction per turn per governed shape under a suffix list this narrow; zero alone does not mean the callout is dead — the script prints the probe that settles it.

Hard rules

Gate every step — how urgently depends on your AuthzPolicy. An ungated continueOnError="false" policy faults on any call that carries no prompt, and that breaks the agent's turn. Historically the most common failure here.

A narrow suffix list routes only the model call to Apigee, so the trap mostly does not fire. Broaden the policy and it fires at once: the ext-proc then sees every agent egress — session create/read, appendEvent, OpenTelemetry exports — measured at 12 calls for one single-question turn, of which one was the model call. Gate the steps regardless; a condition is cheap and it is what makes the policy safe to widen later. Full measurement: references/gotchas.md.

  • model call: (request.uri Like "*generateContent*")

Never fail-close on your own metering. Keep continueOnError="true" on the JavaScript and quota policies so a metering bug cannot break LLM traffic.

This skill meters by default and can enforce on request. Enforcement is assets/feature-token-enforce.yaml: request-flow EnforceOnly policies sharing each SharedName with the response-flow CountOnly half. Add it to the template's feature list. Verified live on ext-proc traffic — the over-budget caller gets a 429, model never called.

Never offer CountOnly=false as a substitute: in the response flow it cannot gate (the answer is already on the wire) and it freezes the counter, losing the metering too.

State two things whenever you offer it. It is one request late — the turn that crosses the limit completes, because a token cost is not known until the model answers. And it buckets on the requested model, which under an OpenAI alias can differ from the resolved model the counting side bills. The two traps that both present as "it never refuses": references/gotchas.md.

Normalize the model to a bucket. With an OpenAI-compatible endpoint the model is an alias in the request body and the resolved name is in the response body (google/gemini-2.5-pro). Exact-matching a raw name fails on the response path.

jsonPath needs its third argument true so it returns a scalar. Without it the quota policy receives a node it cannot parse.

References

  • references/modes.md — read first. How to answer "what can you do", dev vs prod, the defaults, durations, cost disclosure, the interlocks, and reading an assess report

  • scripts/assess_integration.sh — read-only. Setup Status Summary then a per-check table; --json carries both. Lead with the summary and read out the Enforcement row. Run it before planning: it decides CREATE vs REUSE. TODO is a build step, not a failure; only FAIL exits non-zero

  • references/networking-psc.md — both network legs, PSC, DNS, acceptance

  • references/recipes.md — Model Armor and semantic cache

  • references/verify.md — debug sessions and the checklist script

  • references/setup.md — SDK, project, billing, APIs, region, auth, IAM

  • references/gotchas.md — 63 failure modes and their symptoms

  • assets/apigee-agent-gateway-governance.example.yaml — the input contract

  • assets/apigee-proxy-template.yaml — the AFT template. Features merge by priority and all sit beside it: feature-identity.yaml (10), feature-normalize.yaml (15), feature-model-armor.yaml (20), feature-semantic-cache.yaml (30), feature-token-metering.yaml (50).

  • assets/authz-extension.example.yaml, assets/authz-policy.example.yaml — the step-6 bodies. Copy and substitute; paths take the project number

    Anything read out of the request body is normalised once, at priority 15, not inside whichever feature needs it first. LLM_URI_MATCH is shared, so widening it arms every feature gated on it simultaneously — including Model Armor, which fails closed. Model Armor and the cache both read agw.user_prompt; the quotas read agw.total_tokens, set on the response path by the metering feature's own JS for the same reason.

  • scripts/ensure_apigee_environment.sh — create the environment, attach it to the instance, create and attach the envgroup. Idempotent, --yes gated

  • scripts/ensure_gateway_connectivity.sh — route the gateway into the VPC. Read-modify-write; --yes gated

  • scripts/ensure_vector_search.sh — only when semanticCache is enabled: build index and endpoint, deploy one on the other, read back the domain. --yes gated, ~34 min, bills continuously

  • scripts/teardown_vector_search.sh — the only thing that STOPS that charge. Refuses until the revision drops SCL-lookup. --yes gated

  • scripts/deploy_proxy.sh — the Apigee-side sequence, idempotent, --dry-run

  • scripts/read_debug_session.sh — --arm a session (printing when it actually closes) and read it back as the verify.md checklist, instead of parsing the transaction JSON by hand

  • scripts/compile_check.py — compile the template offline, no org needed

Files

LICENSE


                                 Apache License
                           Version 2.0, January 2004
                        http://www.apache.org/licenses/

   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION

   1. Definitions.

      "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
      and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.

      "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
      the copyright owner that is granting the License.

      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
      direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
      otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
      outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.

      "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
      exercising permissions granted by this License.

      "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
      including but not limited to software source code, documentation
      source, and configuration files.

      "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
      transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
      not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
      and conversions to other media types.

      "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
      Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
      copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
      (an example is provided in the Appendix below).

      "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
      form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
      editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
      represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
      of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
      separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
      the Work and Derivative Works thereof.

      "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
      the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
      to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
      submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
      or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
      the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
      excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
      designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."

      "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
      on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
      subsequently incorporated within the Work.

   2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
      copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
      publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
      Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.

   3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
      (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
      use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
      where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
      by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
      or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
      granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
      as of the date such litigation is filed.

   4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
      Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
      modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
      meet the following conditions:

      (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
          Derivative Works a copy of this License; and

      (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
          stating that You changed the files; and

      (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
          that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
          attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
          excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
          the Derivative Works; and

      (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
          distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
          include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
          within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
          pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
          of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
          as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
          documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
          within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
          wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
          of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
          do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
          notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
          or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
          that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
          as modifying the License.

      You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
      may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
      for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
      for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
      the conditions stated in this License.

   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
      names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
      except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
      origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.

   7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
      agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
      Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
      WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
      implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
      of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
      PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
      appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
      risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.

   8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
      whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
      unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
      negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
      liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
      incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
      result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
      Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
      work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
      other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
      has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

   9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
      defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
      incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
      of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.

   END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS

   APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.

      To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
      boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
      identification within third-party archives.

   Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]

   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
   You may obtain a copy of the License at

       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
   limitations under the License.

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Needs a command-line tool, Needs Python, Needs Node.js

Security

What our scanner noticed· Low risk

  • Instructions that use the network
  • Scripts that your agent may run

This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
Google
Publisher
Google (Official)
Source
google/skills · skills/cloud/apigee-agent-gateway-governance · commit 2194d3b
Licence
Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Google.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download apigee-agent-gateway-governance.zip