Powerbi Report CLI
MicrosoftOfficialPublished by Microsoft
- Skill
- Tool integration
- Data and AI
- MIT
- Low risk
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The powerbi-report-cli skill provides a structured, mode-based framework for managing the entire Power BI report lifecycle. It acts as a dispatcher across four distinct phases: planning (requirements and scope), design (visual and layout strategy), authoring (local PBIR/PBIP file manipulation and validation), and management (Fabric item transport and rebinding). The skill enforces strict boundaries between these modes to ensure quality, requiring explicit approval for new reports and utilizing a dedicated CLI for metadata-driven validation and authoring tasks.
What it does
- Guides users through report requirements, scope, and page planning.
- Provides design contracts for visual archetypes, layouts, and branding.
- Enables local editing, validation, and previewing of PBIR and PBIP files.
- Handles report item transport to and from Microsoft Fabric.
- Supports re-theming, conditional formatting, and visual configuration.
- Enforces a mandatory approval gate for greenfield report development.
When to use it
- When planning a new Power BI report from a semantic model.
- When you need to define a professional design brief or layout strategy.
- When editing local PBIR/PBIP files, including visuals, filters, and themes.
- When validating report structure and formatting before deployment.
- When publishing or managing report items within a Fabric workspace.
Advantages
- Ensures consistent report quality through a structured, multi-mode workflow.
- Prevents premature publishing by enforcing a mandatory approval barrier.
- Uses a dedicated CLI to eliminate guesswork in PBIR schema and property editing.
- Maintains clear separation between design intent and technical implementation.
- Provides robust validation tools to catch errors before Fabric deployment.
Usage examples
- “Create a new executive report from this semantic model.”
- The agent enters planning mode, inspects the model, generates a report spec, and requests user approval before proceeding.
- “Design an operational page and choose the right charts.”
- The agent enters design mode, produces a design brief with page archetypes and chart recommendations.
- “Add a KPI page to this PBIP, validate it, and take screenshots.”
- The agent enters authoring mode, modifies the local PBIP files, runs validation, and captures screenshots for review.
- “Publish this local PBIP to my Fabric workspace and rebind it.”
- The agent enters management mode, performs the upload to Fabric, and completes the rebind operation.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/microsoft/powerbi-report-cli/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip powerbi-report-cli.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Microsoft
Telemetry — MANDATORY. Every
api.fabric.microsoft.comcall must carryx-ms-fabric-skill: powerbi-report-cli(az rest:--headers "x-ms-fabric-skill=powerbi-report-cli"), including every LRO poll,fabric_lroand retry. Snippets omit it — add it anyway.
CRITICAL NOTES
To find workspace details, including its ID, from a workspace name: list all workspaces, then use JMESPath filtering.
To find item details, including its ID, from a workspace ID, item type, and item name: list all items of that type in that workspace, then use JMESPath filtering.
Use
powerbi-report-clifor the report artifact: requirements, design, PBIR/PBIP page and visual edits, preview, and publishing. Semantic model, measure, and DAX work belongs to a semantic-model skill. Natural-language questions about report data belong tofabriciq.
Power BI Reports - CLI Skill
This skill owns the Power BI report lifecycle end to end: requirements and scope, visual design, local PBIR/PBIP authoring and preview, and report-item transport to and from Microsoft Fabric.
It is a mode dispatcher and intentionally contains no detailed procedures. Select the mode that matches the request, then read the matching mode reference end to end before acting. The mode file holds the required workflow, commands, payloads, templates, and failure rules.
Mode Selection
| Mode | Use when the request... | Existing route examples | Read first |
|---|---|---|---|
planning | creates a new report/dashboard and needs requirements, model/dependency inspection, scope, a page plan, and approval before implementation | create a report, build a dashboard, create from a semantic model, plan then implement, walk me through creating a report | references/planning.md, then references/planning-part-02.md |
design | decides what a report should look like: tone, signature, page archetype, chart type, layout, color, typography, theme direction, accessibility, brand application, redesign, or critique | design a Power BI report, make the dashboard professional, choose a chart, apply a brand, redesign the report, create a design brief | references/design.md |
authoring | reads or edits local PBIR/PBIP files, validates them, previews the report, or captures screenshots | edit PBIR, create/add a report page or visual, format a visual, add filters/slicers/bookmarks/themes, validate PBIR, preview/reload/screenshot in Desktop or service | references/authoring.md |
management | moves a report definition to or from Fabric or manages the workspace report item | publish/upload/download PBIR or PBIP, list reports, get/update/delete a report, rebind a report | references/management.md |
Mode Boundary Rules
Classify by intent, not by which file or tool is already open.
designdecides what the report should look like;authoringwrites the PBIR that realizes it. Choosing a chart type isdesign; encoding it intovisual.jsonisauthoring.Restyling or reformatting an existing local report is
authoring, even when the request uses design language. Usedesignwhen the user wants advice or a design contract rather than a file change.authoringchanges local files and performs preview/validation. It does not publish to Fabric.managementtransports definitions and manages Fabric report items. It does not invent or directly author PBIR content.planningowns the guided requirements-to-approval flow for a new report. A focused edit to an existing report goes directly toauthoring.
A greenfield request can span modes in this order:
planning -> design -> authoring -> managementHandle one mode at a time. Announce each switch and read the new mode reference
before starting that part. The planning approval gate is a turn boundary:
never build or publish until the user explicitly approves the locked spec in a
later reply.
GREENFIELD APPROVAL BARRIER — MANDATORY. When a new-report request asks to plan, build, and/or publish but the user has not approved a locked spec in a prior reply, set the current phase to
approval_pendingand keepplanningas the only active mode. In this phase, do not loadauthoringormanagement, edit/scaffold PBIR or semantic-model files, generate synthetic data, call Fabric write APIs, or publish. Persist_brief/report-spec.md, ask for explicit approval, and end the turn. The build/publish wording in the original request is desired future scope, not approval to cross this barrier.
Required Deliverable by Mode
| Mode | Completion requirement |
|---|---|
planning | Persist _brief/report-spec.md or the user-named equivalent, ask for explicit approval, and stop before implementation. |
design | Produce the complete Design Brief: contract, including design_identity and a page archetype/layout contract for every page. Do not edit PBIR or call Fabric APIs. |
authoring | Persist the requested PBIR/PBIP changes, validate each logical batch, then complete the selected preview and screenshot-review workflow required by the authoring reference. Do not publish. |
management | Complete the requested Fabric report operation, including LRO polling and documented readback verification. |
Rules
MUST
Select the narrowest mode that fully covers the current request.
Read
references/<mode>.mdend to end before the first command or file edit in that mode. When an already-loaded mode explicitly routes one narrow cross-mode operation to a named topic reference, treat that topic reference as the complete handoff; do not load the target mode's umbrella file unless the work expands beyond that operation.In
planningmode, also readreferences/planning-part-02.mdbefore producing_brief/report-spec.md; it contains the required canonical design contract and approval checks.Across a multi-turn task, retain a compact working state containing resolved workspace/item/model IDs, local and downloaded paths, and references already read. Reuse it in later turns unless the user explicitly requests a fresh query or the preceding operation invalidated a value.
Preserve every argument and safety boundary documented by the selected mode.
Announce and perform an explicit mode switch when the request crosses a boundary.
Use the
powerbi-report-authorCLI metadata and validation surfaces instead of guessing PBIR schemas, roles, formatting properties, selectors, or enum values.Keep local edits local unless the user explicitly requests publishing.
Resolve Fabric workspace and item IDs by listing and filtering rather than guessing identifiers.
Produce the artifact the user requested; reading or summarizing a reference is not task completion.
PREFER
Infer facts already present in the prompt, semantic model, existing PBIP, or prior approved spec instead of asking again.
Load only the selected mode and its directly relevant topic references.
Reuse reference guidance already loaded in the current task. Open a new reference only when the requested operation or an observed mismatch requires it.
Preserve the user's existing project structure, schemas, host, operation, binding, and delivery target unless the selected mode explicitly requires a change.
AVOID
Acting from this dispatcher without reading the selected mode reference.
Reloading this dispatcher, a mode file, or a topic reference already read in the current task solely because the conversation advanced to a later turn.
Loading a retired sibling skill name; planning, design, authoring, and management are modes of this skill.
Editing PBIR or calling Fabric APIs in
planningordesign.Publishing from
authoring, or authoring PBIR content frommanagement.Bypassing the planning approval gate because the original request also asked to build or publish.
<!-- BEGIN GENERATED REFERENCE INDEX -->
Complete Reference Index
Open every relevant reference directly from this index. Files named part-XX continue the named topic.
Authoring
Design
Mode Guides
<!-- END GENERATED REFERENCE INDEX -->
Examples
| User request | Mode |
|---|---|
| "Create a new executive report from this semantic model." | planning |
| "Design an operational page and choose the right charts." | design |
| "Add a KPI page to this PBIP, validate it, and take screenshots." | authoring |
| "Publish this local PBIP to my Fabric workspace and rebind it." | management |
Route Compatibility
The merged skill preserves the four previous route surfaces. Treat the following phrases as explicit aliases for the corresponding mode:
| Mode | Preserved route phrases |
|---|---|
planning | create a report; build a report; create a dashboard; create a new report from scratch; create a report from a semantic model or dataset link; build a report for this model; make me a dashboard; plan then implement; walk me through creating a report |
design | design Power BI report; make dashboard look professional; choose chart type; apply brand to report; redesign report; create design brief; Power BI report design archetype |
authoring | edit PBIR; create Power BI report page; add visual to PBIP; format report visual; validate Power BI report; preview Power BI report; Power BI Desktop preview status; preview report in service; preview report in browser; screenshot report page; screenshot all report pages; list preview hosts; implement dashboard in PBIP; add dashboard visuals to report; implement an approved PBIP report spec; edit PBIR pages/visuals; edit a Power BI report |
management | upload PBIR report definition; upload Power BI report; download PBIR definition; publish PBIR definition; publish Power BI report to Fabric; manage Power BI reports; list workspace reports |
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer881 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.1 KiB
- SKILL.md16.1 KiB
- apm.yml642 B
- references/authoring-part-02.md14.6 KiB
- references/authoring-part-03.md16.0 KiB
- references/authoring-part-04.md15.9 KiB
- references/authoring.md16.8 KiB
- references/authoring/authoring-workflows.md11.7 KiB
- references/authoring/bookmark.md14.3 KiB
- references/authoring/button-part-02.md16.1 KiB
- references/authoring/button-part-03.md7.7 KiB
- references/authoring/button.md15.7 KiB
- references/authoring/card-part-02.md16.1 KiB
- references/authoring/card-part-03.md8.6 KiB
- references/authoring/card.md6.4 KiB
- references/authoring/cartesian-part-02.md17.7 KiB
- references/authoring/cartesian-part-03.md12.3 KiB
- references/authoring/cartesian-part-04.md15.8 KiB
- references/authoring/cartesian.md18.0 KiB
- references/authoring/color-strategy.md8.4 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-02.md13.5 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-03.md16.0 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-04.md14.0 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-05.md16.9 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-06.md14.7 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-07.md14.5 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting.md18.2 KiB
- references/authoring/custom-visuals.md13.9 KiB
- references/authoring/expressions.md11.9 KiB
- references/authoring/field-parameters.md5.1 KiB
- references/authoring/filter-pane.md5.0 KiB
- references/authoring/filters.md9.3 KiB
- references/authoring/formatting-overview.md4.8 KiB
- references/authoring/formatting-part-02.md3.3 KiB
- references/authoring/formatting.md17.0 KiB
- references/authoring/image.md12.6 KiB
- references/authoring/kpi.md2.5 KiB
- references/authoring/map.md13.4 KiB
- references/authoring/model-binding.md7.7 KiB
- references/authoring/page-formatting.md4.5 KiB
- references/authoring/powerbi-desktop.md2.4 KiB
- references/authoring/powerbi-report-author-cli-part-02.md3.2 KiB
- references/authoring/powerbi-report-author-cli.md17.7 KiB
- references/authoring/preview-part-02.md16.9 KiB
- references/authoring/preview-part-03.md4.0 KiB
- references/authoring/preview-part-04.md2.5 KiB
- references/authoring/preview.md16.1 KiB
- references/authoring/re-theming-part-02.md16.8 KiB
- references/authoring/re-theming-part-03.md4.9 KiB
- references/authoring/re-theming.md1.5 KiB
- references/authoring/screenshot-review.md5.0 KiB
- references/authoring/shape.md13.6 KiB
- references/authoring/slicers-part-02.md16.3 KiB
- references/authoring/slicers.md15.6 KiB
- references/authoring/table.md17.5 KiB
- references/authoring/textbox.md5.6 KiB
- references/authoring/theming-part-02.md6.7 KiB
- references/authoring/theming.md16.4 KiB
- references/authoring/version-control.md6.6 KiB
- references/design.md17.3 KiB
- references/design/accessibility.md11.4 KiB
- references/design/anti-patterns.md18.5 KiB
- references/design/archetype-composition.md3.4 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/analytical-canvas.md17.7 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/comparative-benchmark-part-02.md5.7 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/comparative-benchmark.md15.8 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/executive-summary.md14.7 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/narrative-story.md18.1 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/operational-monitor.md17.0 KiB
- references/design/assets/base.json7.5 KiB
- references/design/brownfield.md5.7 KiB
- references/design/chart-selection.md9.8 KiB
- references/design/color.md10.5 KiB
- references/design/design-brief-part-02.md13.7 KiB
- references/design/design-brief.md8.8 KiB
- references/design/interactivity.md9.2 KiB
- references/design/layout.md11.3 KiB
- references/design/pre-flight-checklist.md10.8 KiB
- references/design/signatures.md12.3 KiB
- references/design/tone-catalog.md14.4 KiB
- references/design/typography.md9.2 KiB
- references/design/visual-cookbook-part-02.md11.0 KiB
- references/design/visual-cookbook.md16.7 KiB
- references/management-part-02.md17.2 KiB
- references/management-part-03.md7.5 KiB
- references/management-part-04.md16.7 KiB
- references/management.md10.1 KiB
- references/planning-part-02.md11.2 KiB
- references/planning.md19.5 KiB
references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-05.md
Conditional Formatting Patterns - Part 5
Contents
Type 2: Rules-Based Formatting
Number vs percent thresholds (and percentile)
Rule bounds: one-sided vs two-sided ranges
Continuation of conditional-formatting.md. Open this file directly from the skill reference index.
Type 2: Rules-Based Formatting
Applies colors based on value conditions using Conditional.Cases[] inside a
color property. The structure is the same for charts (dataPoint.fill) and
tables/matrices (values.backColor or values.fontColor).
⚠️ There is no
backColorRuleorfontColorRuleproperty — these do not exist. Rules are expressed asConditional.Cases[]inside the standard color property path (backColor.solid.color.expr.Conditional).
fontColoris skipped on sparkline columns. AbackColor/fontColorrule works on ordinary columns; afontColorrule targeting a sparkline column is ignored (backColorstill applies).
⚠️ Every color band that users must edit in Power BI Desktop must be an explicit
Cases[]entry. Desktop rendersDefaultValue, but its conditional-formatting dialog does not expose that fallback as an editable rule row. Do not encode an intended low/red band only asDefaultValue. Add an explicit comparison for it (for example,< 1000000) and reserveDefaultValuefor blanks or otherwise unmatched values. It may repeat the lowest-band color when that is the safest fallback.
Table/matrix example (entry in values array):
{
"properties": {
"backColor": {
"solid": {
"color": {
"expr": {
"Conditional": {
"Cases": [
{
"Condition": {
"Comparison": {
"ComparisonKind": 2,
"Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } },
"Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "500D" } }
}
},
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#1AAB40'" } }
},
{
"Condition": {
"Comparison": {
"ComparisonKind": 2,
"Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } },
"Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "0D" } }
}
},
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#FFFFFF'" } }
},
{
"Condition": {
"Comparison": {
"ComparisonKind": 3,
"Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } },
"Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "0D" } }
}
},
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#D64554'" } }
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
},
"selector": {
"data": [{ "dataViewWildcard": { "matchingOption": 1 } }],
"metadata": "Sum(Sales.TotalProfit)"
}
}The three ordered cases cover every value (
>= 500green,>= 0white,< 0red) — noDefaultValueneeded; each is an editable rule in the dialog.
Chart example (entry in a supported chart object array):
{
"properties": {
"<colorProperty>": {
"solid": {
"color": {
"expr": {
"Conditional": {
"Cases": [
{
"Condition": {
"Comparison": {
"ComparisonKind": 2,
"Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } },
"Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "500D" } }
}
},
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#1AAB40'" } }
},
{
"Condition": {
"Comparison": {
"ComparisonKind": 3,
"Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } },
"Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "500D" } }
}
},
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#118DFF'" } }
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
},
"selector": {
"data": [{ "dataViewWildcard": { "matchingOption": 1 } }]
}
}Replace <colorProperty> and its containing object using the capability
matrix. For example:
| Result | Object | Replace <colorProperty> with |
|---|---|---|
| Bar/column/slice/rectangle/bubble color | dataPoint | fill |
| Full line/area series color | dataPoint | fill |
| Single-series line/area marker color by category | dataPoint | fill |
| Single-series line segment color | lineStyles | strokeColor |
| Data-label color | labels | color |
Key rules:
All keys are PascalCase:
Conditional,Cases,Condition,Comparison,ComparisonKind,Value, andDefaultValue.The operator is
Comparison(notCompare).Leftmust be a self-aggregating expression: useMeasure(already aggregated) or wrap aColumninAggregation { Expression: Column, Function: N }. A rawColumninLeftbreaks the visual. See Aggregation: columns vs. measures for the fullFunctionenum and valid/invalid examples.DefaultValueprovides the fallback color when no case matches.For "is not equal", use
Not { Expression: { Comparison: { ComparisonKind: 0, ... } } }; there is noNotEqualComparisonKind.
Selector requirements (critical — wrong selector silently drops all formatting):
| Visual type | Required selector | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tables/matrices | { "data": [{ "dataViewWildcard": { "matchingOption": 1 } }], "metadata": "<queryRef>" } | Both data AND metadata required — either alone fails |
| Single-series chart points | { "data": [{ "dataViewWildcard": { "matchingOption": 1 } }] } | Matches identity-bearing instances and excludes totals |
| Category-role chart rules | { "data": [{ "roles": ["Category"] }] } | Replace Category with the visual's actual category role name |
| Dynamic legend-series rules | { "data": [{ "roles": ["Series"] }], "hierarchyMatching": 1 } | hierarchyMatching: 1 is Partial; it enables per-series evaluation |
ComparisonKind values:
| Value | Operator | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | == | Equal |
| 1 | > | Greater Than |
| 2 | >= | Greater Than or Equal |
| 3 | < | Less Than |
| 4 | <= | Less Than or Equal |
Number vs percent thresholds (and percentile)
A rule threshold is the Right operand of each Comparison. In Power BI
Desktop the rules dialog exposes a per-boundary Number / Percent dropdown;
these are the only two threshold kinds. They encode differently:
| Threshold kind | Meaning | Right encoding |
|---|---|---|
| Number (default) | A fixed, absolute cutoff | Literal — { "Literal": { "Value": "500D" } } |
| Percent | A percent of the based-on field's min→max range; recomputed as the data changes | RangePercent (see below) |
| Percentile | Not a conditional-formatting threshold kind | — unsupported; see note |
📊 Where the Percent kind is available (tables/matrices and charts). The Percent (
RangePercent) kind is offered for any Type-2 rules visual that has a category grouping — table/matrix rows, or a chart Category/Axis. Two preconditions are enforced by Desktop (disableAutoRange = !hasGrouping || totalMatchingOption.disableAutoRange):
Grouping required. A visual with no grouping (e.g. a single-value card) offers Number only.
Instances, not totals. The rule must target instances — use the instances-only selector
matchingOption: 1(InstancesOnly). WithInstancesAndTotals(0, the default) orTotalsOnly(2) Desktop disables Percent and the boundary falls back to Number.
Number thresholds on a percentage-valued measure. When the based-on field is
itself a percentage (e.g. Margin % stored as 0.25 for 25%), a Number
threshold must be the actual decimal value, not the display percentage:
0.25D, never 25D. This matches Desktop's guidance to pick Number (not
Percent) and type decimals for percentage fields. The Percent kind below is
a different concept — percent of the value range, not the field's own units.
🟢 Detect a percentage field before authoring a Number threshold. Read the based-on field (the rule's
Left) in the semantic model and inspect itsformatString— the TMDLmeasure/columnline, or the measure/columnformatStringinmodel.bim. Look for an active%token — a%that is not escaped as\%and not inside a quoted literal ("…"). An active%(e.g.0.0%,#,0.0%;-#,0.0%,0.0%;-0.0%;0.0%) means the field is stored as a decimal and Power BI multiplies by 100 for display — choose a NumberLiteraland type the decimal (0.25Dfor 25%). An escaped or quoted percent sign (0\%,0"%") prints a literal%without ×100 scaling, so the stored value already equals the displayed number — type it as-is (25displays25%→ author25D). When unsure, read the field's stored values against its display:0.0%storing0.25shows25%(author0.25);0\%storing25shows25%(author25). If there is no active%, type the value as-is.validateruns structurally on the PBIR only and does not read the model, so it cannot enforce this — the agent must perform the check (needs a local.pbipsemantic model or a live model via Modeling MCP). Do not use the Percent (RangePercent) kind just because the field is a percentage — that is a different concept (percent of the value range).
Percent-of-range thresholds (RangePercent). A Percent boundary is not a
static number: Desktop resolves it against the current minimum and maximum of
the based-on field, so the effective cutoff moves as the data range changes
(e.g. "top 25% of the range"). Encode the threshold's Right as a
RangePercent whose Min/Max are the global aggregate min/max of the
based-on field:
Percentis a fraction 0–1 (Desktop shows 0–100; divide by 100 —25→0.25).Min/Maxwrap the based-on field inScopedEval→Aggregation(Function3 = Min, 4 = Max) →ScopedEvalwith anAllRolesRefscope. The field insideMin/Maxmust be the same field as the rule'sLeft(the based-on field).
{
"Condition": {
"Comparison": {
"ComparisonKind": 2,
"Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } },
"Right": {
"RangePercent": {
"Percent": 0.25,
"Min": {
"ScopedEval": {
"Expression": {
"Aggregation": {
"Expression": {
"ScopedEval": {
"Expression": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } },
"Scope": [{ "AllRolesRef": {} }]
}
},
"Function": 3
}
},
"Scope": []
}
},
"Max": {
"ScopedEval": {
"Expression": {
"Aggregation": {
"Expression": {
"ScopedEval": {
"Expression": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } },
"Scope": [{ "AllRolesRef": {} }]
}
},
"Function": 4
}
},
"Scope": []
}
}
}
}
}
},
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#1AAB40'" } }
}The Min/Max shape is fixed boilerplate — only the inner based-on field and
the Percent value change per rule. Keep the two boundaries within a single
rule the same kind (both Number, or both Percent) — see
Rule bounds: one-sided vs two-sided ranges.
Charts use the identical RangePercent encoding. Percentage thresholds are
not table/matrix-only — place the same Right RangePercent block in the
chart's color object (e.g. dataPoint.fill; see the
Type 2 chart example and capability matrix for
the object/property per visual) and use a chart instances-only selector
{ "data": [{ "dataViewWildcard": { "matchingOption": 1 } }] } (no metadata).
The Min/Max inner field is still the rule's based-on Left, and the same
grouping/instances preconditions above apply (the chart's Category/Axis provides
the grouping).
⚠️ Percentile thresholds are not supported in conditional formatting on any visual — tables, matrices, or charts. The rules dialog offers only Number and Percent — there is no percentile threshold kind, and there is no expression that encodes one here. (The
Percentile { Expression, K, Exclusive }expression is a DAX aggregation for summarizing a field, not a CF threshold.) To approximate a percentile cutoff, add a measure that computes the percentile (e.g.PERCENTILEX.INC) and compare the based-on field against that measure or an absolute Number.
ℹ️ Gradient (color scale) stops are not percent/percentile either. A
FillRulemin/mid/maxstop takes only auto (omitvalue→ Desktop uses the data's lowest/highest) or an absolute custom number (valueLiteral). Do not place aRangePercentin a gradient stop — percent semantics are a rules-only feature. See Type 1.
Rule bounds: one-sided vs two-sided ranges
One-sided Cases[] entries — a single Comparison like the examples above — are
valid and render correctly. Author them freely; do not pad rules with
synthetic sentinel bounds to force a closed range. Encode every color band —
including the default/"else" color — as an explicit Cases[] entry rather than
relying on DefaultValue (see
Type 2: Rules-Based Formatting).
Use a two-sided Condition.And band only for interior bands that need both a
floor and a ceiling. Keep the outermost bands open-ended (a single
Comparison) so the full data domain stays covered — do not add sentinel
outer bounds unless they are verified business-domain limits, since a sentinel
leaves values beyond it uncovered. Both Comparisons in an interior band use the
same threshold kind on their Right operands (both Literal Number, or both
RangePercent):
"Cases": [
{
"Condition": { "Comparison": { "ComparisonKind": 2, "Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } }, "Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "500D" } } } },
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#1AAB40'" } }
},
{
"Condition": {
"And": {
"Left": { "Comparison": { "ComparisonKind": 2, "Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } }, "Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "0D" } } } },
"Right": { "Comparison": { "ComparisonKind": 3, "Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } }, "Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "500D" } } } }
}
},
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#FFFFFF'" } }
},
{
"Condition": { "Comparison": { "ComparisonKind": 3, "Left": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Sales" } }, "Property": "TotalProfit" } }, "Right": { "Literal": { "Value": "0D" } } } },
"Value": { "Literal": { "Value": "'#D64554'" } }
}
]Rules:
And { Left, Right }andComparison { ComparisonKind, Left, Right }are PascalCase (matches the Desktop serializer).Every
Comparisonin a rule must use the sameLeft(the based-on field), and both bounds of an interiorAndband must use the same threshold kind onRight.Desktop's canonical operators are lower
>=(2) and upper<(3) — keep that ordering so contiguous[min, max)bands leave no gaps or overlaps.Cases evaluate top-down (first match wins); order them so the intended band is reached first.
Keep the outermost bands open-ended so the full domain is covered; reach for an interior
Andband only where a color needs both a floor and a ceiling.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Phrasing that asks for actions without confirmation
- Instructions that use the network
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Microsoft
- Publisher
- Microsoft (Official)
- Source
- microsoft/skills-for-fabric · skills/powerbi-report-cli · commit f8fac11
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Also distributed in
- microsoft/skills-for-fabric
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download powerbi-report-cli.zip