Powerbi Report CLI
MicrosoftOfficialPublished by Microsoft
- Skill
- Tool integration
- Data and AI
- MIT
- Low risk
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The powerbi-report-cli skill provides a structured, mode-based framework for managing the entire Power BI report lifecycle. It acts as a dispatcher across four distinct phases: planning (requirements and scope), design (visual and layout strategy), authoring (local PBIR/PBIP file manipulation and validation), and management (Fabric item transport and rebinding). The skill enforces strict boundaries between these modes to ensure quality, requiring explicit approval for new reports and utilizing a dedicated CLI for metadata-driven validation and authoring tasks.
What it does
- Guides users through report requirements, scope, and page planning.
- Provides design contracts for visual archetypes, layouts, and branding.
- Enables local editing, validation, and previewing of PBIR and PBIP files.
- Handles report item transport to and from Microsoft Fabric.
- Supports re-theming, conditional formatting, and visual configuration.
- Enforces a mandatory approval gate for greenfield report development.
When to use it
- When planning a new Power BI report from a semantic model.
- When you need to define a professional design brief or layout strategy.
- When editing local PBIR/PBIP files, including visuals, filters, and themes.
- When validating report structure and formatting before deployment.
- When publishing or managing report items within a Fabric workspace.
Advantages
- Ensures consistent report quality through a structured, multi-mode workflow.
- Prevents premature publishing by enforcing a mandatory approval barrier.
- Uses a dedicated CLI to eliminate guesswork in PBIR schema and property editing.
- Maintains clear separation between design intent and technical implementation.
- Provides robust validation tools to catch errors before Fabric deployment.
Usage examples
- “Create a new executive report from this semantic model.”
- The agent enters planning mode, inspects the model, generates a report spec, and requests user approval before proceeding.
- “Design an operational page and choose the right charts.”
- The agent enters design mode, produces a design brief with page archetypes and chart recommendations.
- “Add a KPI page to this PBIP, validate it, and take screenshots.”
- The agent enters authoring mode, modifies the local PBIP files, runs validation, and captures screenshots for review.
- “Publish this local PBIP to my Fabric workspace and rebind it.”
- The agent enters management mode, performs the upload to Fabric, and completes the rebind operation.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://mp-staging.autogineer.com/agent-skills/microsoft/powerbi-report-cli/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip powerbi-report-cli.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Microsoft
Telemetry — MANDATORY. Every
api.fabric.microsoft.comcall must carryx-ms-fabric-skill: powerbi-report-cli(az rest:--headers "x-ms-fabric-skill=powerbi-report-cli"), including every LRO poll,fabric_lroand retry. Snippets omit it — add it anyway.
CRITICAL NOTES
To find workspace details, including its ID, from a workspace name: list all workspaces, then use JMESPath filtering.
To find item details, including its ID, from a workspace ID, item type, and item name: list all items of that type in that workspace, then use JMESPath filtering.
Use
powerbi-report-clifor the report artifact: requirements, design, PBIR/PBIP page and visual edits, preview, and publishing. Semantic model, measure, and DAX work belongs to a semantic-model skill. Natural-language questions about report data belong tofabriciq.
Power BI Reports - CLI Skill
This skill owns the Power BI report lifecycle end to end: requirements and scope, visual design, local PBIR/PBIP authoring and preview, and report-item transport to and from Microsoft Fabric.
It is a mode dispatcher and intentionally contains no detailed procedures. Select the mode that matches the request, then read the matching mode reference end to end before acting. The mode file holds the required workflow, commands, payloads, templates, and failure rules.
Mode Selection
| Mode | Use when the request... | Existing route examples | Read first |
|---|---|---|---|
planning | creates a new report/dashboard and needs requirements, model/dependency inspection, scope, a page plan, and approval before implementation | create a report, build a dashboard, create from a semantic model, plan then implement, walk me through creating a report | references/planning.md, then references/planning-part-02.md |
design | decides what a report should look like: tone, signature, page archetype, chart type, layout, color, typography, theme direction, accessibility, brand application, redesign, or critique | design a Power BI report, make the dashboard professional, choose a chart, apply a brand, redesign the report, create a design brief | references/design.md |
authoring | reads or edits local PBIR/PBIP files, validates them, previews the report, or captures screenshots | edit PBIR, create/add a report page or visual, format a visual, add filters/slicers/bookmarks/themes, validate PBIR, preview/reload/screenshot in Desktop or service | references/authoring.md |
management | moves a report definition to or from Fabric or manages the workspace report item | publish/upload/download PBIR or PBIP, list reports, get/update/delete a report, rebind a report | references/management.md |
Mode Boundary Rules
Classify by intent, not by which file or tool is already open.
designdecides what the report should look like;authoringwrites the PBIR that realizes it. Choosing a chart type isdesign; encoding it intovisual.jsonisauthoring.Restyling or reformatting an existing local report is
authoring, even when the request uses design language. Usedesignwhen the user wants advice or a design contract rather than a file change.authoringchanges local files and performs preview/validation. It does not publish to Fabric.managementtransports definitions and manages Fabric report items. It does not invent or directly author PBIR content.planningowns the guided requirements-to-approval flow for a new report. A focused edit to an existing report goes directly toauthoring.
A greenfield request can span modes in this order:
planning -> design -> authoring -> managementHandle one mode at a time. Announce each switch and read the new mode reference
before starting that part. The planning approval gate is a turn boundary:
never build or publish until the user explicitly approves the locked spec in a
later reply.
GREENFIELD APPROVAL BARRIER — MANDATORY. When a new-report request asks to plan, build, and/or publish but the user has not approved a locked spec in a prior reply, set the current phase to
approval_pendingand keepplanningas the only active mode. In this phase, do not loadauthoringormanagement, edit/scaffold PBIR or semantic-model files, generate synthetic data, call Fabric write APIs, or publish. Persist_brief/report-spec.md, ask for explicit approval, and end the turn. The build/publish wording in the original request is desired future scope, not approval to cross this barrier.
Required Deliverable by Mode
| Mode | Completion requirement |
|---|---|
planning | Persist _brief/report-spec.md or the user-named equivalent, ask for explicit approval, and stop before implementation. |
design | Produce the complete Design Brief: contract, including design_identity and a page archetype/layout contract for every page. Do not edit PBIR or call Fabric APIs. |
authoring | Persist the requested PBIR/PBIP changes, validate each logical batch, then complete the selected preview and screenshot-review workflow required by the authoring reference. Do not publish. |
management | Complete the requested Fabric report operation, including LRO polling and documented readback verification. |
Rules
MUST
Select the narrowest mode that fully covers the current request.
Read
references/<mode>.mdend to end before the first command or file edit in that mode. When an already-loaded mode explicitly routes one narrow cross-mode operation to a named topic reference, treat that topic reference as the complete handoff; do not load the target mode's umbrella file unless the work expands beyond that operation.In
planningmode, also readreferences/planning-part-02.mdbefore producing_brief/report-spec.md; it contains the required canonical design contract and approval checks.Across a multi-turn task, retain a compact working state containing resolved workspace/item/model IDs, local and downloaded paths, and references already read. Reuse it in later turns unless the user explicitly requests a fresh query or the preceding operation invalidated a value.
Preserve every argument and safety boundary documented by the selected mode.
Announce and perform an explicit mode switch when the request crosses a boundary.
Use the
powerbi-report-authorCLI metadata and validation surfaces instead of guessing PBIR schemas, roles, formatting properties, selectors, or enum values.Keep local edits local unless the user explicitly requests publishing.
Resolve Fabric workspace and item IDs by listing and filtering rather than guessing identifiers.
Produce the artifact the user requested; reading or summarizing a reference is not task completion.
PREFER
Infer facts already present in the prompt, semantic model, existing PBIP, or prior approved spec instead of asking again.
Load only the selected mode and its directly relevant topic references.
Reuse reference guidance already loaded in the current task. Open a new reference only when the requested operation or an observed mismatch requires it.
Preserve the user's existing project structure, schemas, host, operation, binding, and delivery target unless the selected mode explicitly requires a change.
AVOID
Acting from this dispatcher without reading the selected mode reference.
Reloading this dispatcher, a mode file, or a topic reference already read in the current task solely because the conversation advanced to a later turn.
Loading a retired sibling skill name; planning, design, authoring, and management are modes of this skill.
Editing PBIR or calling Fabric APIs in
planningordesign.Publishing from
authoring, or authoring PBIR content frommanagement.Bypassing the planning approval gate because the original request also asked to build or publish.
<!-- BEGIN GENERATED REFERENCE INDEX -->
Complete Reference Index
Open every relevant reference directly from this index. Files named part-XX continue the named topic.
Authoring
Design
Mode Guides
<!-- END GENERATED REFERENCE INDEX -->
Examples
| User request | Mode |
|---|---|
| "Create a new executive report from this semantic model." | planning |
| "Design an operational page and choose the right charts." | design |
| "Add a KPI page to this PBIP, validate it, and take screenshots." | authoring |
| "Publish this local PBIP to my Fabric workspace and rebind it." | management |
Route Compatibility
The merged skill preserves the four previous route surfaces. Treat the following phrases as explicit aliases for the corresponding mode:
| Mode | Preserved route phrases |
|---|---|
planning | create a report; build a report; create a dashboard; create a new report from scratch; create a report from a semantic model or dataset link; build a report for this model; make me a dashboard; plan then implement; walk me through creating a report |
design | design Power BI report; make dashboard look professional; choose chart type; apply brand to report; redesign report; create design brief; Power BI report design archetype |
authoring | edit PBIR; create Power BI report page; add visual to PBIP; format report visual; validate Power BI report; preview Power BI report; Power BI Desktop preview status; preview report in service; preview report in browser; screenshot report page; screenshot all report pages; list preview hosts; implement dashboard in PBIP; add dashboard visuals to report; implement an approved PBIP report spec; edit PBIR pages/visuals; edit a Power BI report |
management | upload PBIR report definition; upload Power BI report; download PBIR definition; publish PBIR definition; publish Power BI report to Fabric; manage Power BI reports; list workspace reports |
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer881 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.1 KiB
- SKILL.md16.1 KiB
- apm.yml642 B
- references/authoring-part-02.md14.6 KiB
- references/authoring-part-03.md16.0 KiB
- references/authoring-part-04.md15.9 KiB
- references/authoring.md16.8 KiB
- references/authoring/authoring-workflows.md11.7 KiB
- references/authoring/bookmark.md14.3 KiB
- references/authoring/button-part-02.md16.1 KiB
- references/authoring/button-part-03.md7.7 KiB
- references/authoring/button.md15.7 KiB
- references/authoring/card-part-02.md16.1 KiB
- references/authoring/card-part-03.md8.6 KiB
- references/authoring/card.md6.4 KiB
- references/authoring/cartesian-part-02.md17.7 KiB
- references/authoring/cartesian-part-03.md12.3 KiB
- references/authoring/cartesian-part-04.md15.8 KiB
- references/authoring/cartesian.md18.0 KiB
- references/authoring/color-strategy.md8.4 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-02.md13.5 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-03.md16.0 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-04.md14.0 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-05.md16.9 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-06.md14.7 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting-part-07.md14.5 KiB
- references/authoring/conditional-formatting.md18.2 KiB
- references/authoring/custom-visuals.md13.9 KiB
- references/authoring/expressions.md11.9 KiB
- references/authoring/field-parameters.md5.1 KiB
- references/authoring/filter-pane.md5.0 KiB
- references/authoring/filters.md9.3 KiB
- references/authoring/formatting-overview.md4.8 KiB
- references/authoring/formatting-part-02.md3.3 KiB
- references/authoring/formatting.md17.0 KiB
- references/authoring/image.md12.6 KiB
- references/authoring/kpi.md2.5 KiB
- references/authoring/map.md13.4 KiB
- references/authoring/model-binding.md7.7 KiB
- references/authoring/page-formatting.md4.5 KiB
- references/authoring/powerbi-desktop.md2.4 KiB
- references/authoring/powerbi-report-author-cli-part-02.md3.2 KiB
- references/authoring/powerbi-report-author-cli.md17.7 KiB
- references/authoring/preview-part-02.md16.9 KiB
- references/authoring/preview-part-03.md4.0 KiB
- references/authoring/preview-part-04.md2.5 KiB
- references/authoring/preview.md16.1 KiB
- references/authoring/re-theming-part-02.md16.8 KiB
- references/authoring/re-theming-part-03.md4.9 KiB
- references/authoring/re-theming.md1.5 KiB
- references/authoring/screenshot-review.md5.0 KiB
- references/authoring/shape.md13.6 KiB
- references/authoring/slicers-part-02.md16.3 KiB
- references/authoring/slicers.md15.6 KiB
- references/authoring/table.md17.5 KiB
- references/authoring/textbox.md5.6 KiB
- references/authoring/theming-part-02.md6.7 KiB
- references/authoring/theming.md16.4 KiB
- references/authoring/version-control.md6.6 KiB
- references/design.md17.3 KiB
- references/design/accessibility.md11.4 KiB
- references/design/anti-patterns.md18.5 KiB
- references/design/archetype-composition.md3.4 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/analytical-canvas.md17.7 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/comparative-benchmark-part-02.md5.7 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/comparative-benchmark.md15.8 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/executive-summary.md14.7 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/narrative-story.md18.1 KiB
- references/design/archetypes/operational-monitor.md17.0 KiB
- references/design/assets/base.json7.5 KiB
- references/design/brownfield.md5.7 KiB
- references/design/chart-selection.md9.8 KiB
- references/design/color.md10.5 KiB
- references/design/design-brief-part-02.md13.7 KiB
- references/design/design-brief.md8.8 KiB
- references/design/interactivity.md9.2 KiB
- references/design/layout.md11.3 KiB
- references/design/pre-flight-checklist.md10.8 KiB
- references/design/signatures.md12.3 KiB
- references/design/tone-catalog.md14.4 KiB
- references/design/typography.md9.2 KiB
- references/design/visual-cookbook-part-02.md11.0 KiB
- references/design/visual-cookbook.md16.7 KiB
- references/management-part-02.md17.2 KiB
- references/management-part-03.md7.5 KiB
- references/management-part-04.md16.7 KiB
- references/management.md10.1 KiB
- references/planning-part-02.md11.2 KiB
- references/planning.md19.5 KiB
references/authoring/custom-visuals.md
Custom Visuals (AppSource, Organizational, Private .pbiviz)
Custom visuals extend Power BI beyond the built-in catalog, so
powerbi-report-author catalog/formatting cannot describe them and each kind
is registered differently in report.json. This reference covers the three
kinds, finding a visual's GUID, registering and binding each, and verifying the
result in Power BI Desktop.
A
visualTypethat is not backed by a matching registration renders as "To see this custom visual, add it to this report first" — or a generic empty placeholder — in Desktop, andpowerbi-report-author validateflags it with aPBIR_VISUAL_TYPE_UNKNOWNwarning (never an error). See Desktop verification for exactly when that warning is suppressed.
Contents
Overview: The Three Kinds
Finding the GUID
1. AppSource (public) visual
2. Organizational (org store) visual
3. Private (
.pbiviz) visualBinding data to a custom visual
Desktop verification
Overview: The Three Kinds
Power BI supports three kinds of custom visual. Registration is what differs — pick the row that matches your visual:
| Kind | Also called | Package stored in report? | Registered in report.json via |
|---|---|---|---|
| AppSource | Public / marketplace | No — Desktop downloads it | publicCustomVisuals (array of GUID strings) |
| Organizational | Org store | No — loaded from tenant store | resourcePackages (an OrganizationalStoreCustomVisual package, _OrgStore name). Not the root organizationCustomVisuals array — that is schema-valid but does not register the plugin for rendering. |
| Private | Imported .pbiviz file | Yes — unpacked into CustomVisuals/ | resourcePackages (a CustomVisual package) |
For all three kinds, visual.visualType is set to the visual's GUID —
except organizational visuals, whose visualType is the GUID plus the
_OrgStore suffix and must exactly match the package name
(see §2). Data roles come from the visual's
own capabilities.dataRoles (see Binding data).
Only private visuals ship their package inside the report. AppSource and organizational visuals are resolved at open time from the marketplace / tenant store, so you need only the GUID — the AppSource GUID, or the
_OrgStorepackage name (which carries the org GUID). No bundled package bytes and no tenant blobpathare required; Desktop resolves the org package by GUID.
Finding the GUID
A .pbiviz file is a zip. Its package.json holds visual.guid,
visual.name, and visual.displayName:
# The GUID is the value you put in visual.visualType and in the registrations below
unzip -p MyVisual.pbiviz package.json # → { "visual": { "guid": "<GUID>", ... } }For AppSource visuals you can also read the GUID from the marketplace package.
GUIDs look like Aquarium1442671919391 (AppSource) or
CHARTICULATOR_VISUAL_CustomVisual1341858CCF82CD818D4B1826A3CBC4F3E (a private
Charticulator export). Organizational visuals are tenant-specific: you author
only the GUID and its _OrgStore-suffixed package name. Leave the tenant blob
path empty — Desktop resolves it from the tenant store by GUID on reload. The
GUID is not inferable from local files and there is no name→GUID lookup — the
user must provide the org GUID (or you copy it from a Desktop-authored instance
of the same visual). See
§2.
⚠️ Never author from a name-guessed GUID. There is no name→GUID lookup in the tooling (
catalogonly covers built-in visuals). Mapping a friendly name like "Aquarium" toAquarium1442671919391is unverified recall — by a human or an agent — andvalidatecannot catch a wrong GUID: an unregistered GUID is only aPBIR_VISUAL_TYPE_UNKNOWNwarning, and a registered but wrong GUID validates clean yet renders empty or as the wrong visual in Desktop. Always confirm the GUID from an authoritative source before relying on it:
the visual's
package.jsoninside its.pbiviz— download the visual from AppSource, thenunzip -p MyVisual.pbiviz package.jsonand readvisual.guid(the AppSource listing page does not show this GUID; its URL carries an unrelated offer ID); ora Desktop-authored instance — add the visual in Desktop, save, and copy the
visualType/publicCustomVisualsGUID it persists toreport.json.
1. AppSource (public) visual
Add the GUID to publicCustomVisuals in report.json. Desktop downloads the
package on open.
{
"$schema": "https://developer.microsoft.com/json-schemas/fabric/item/report/definition/report/3.3.0/schema.json",
"themeCollection": { /* ... */ },
"publicCustomVisuals": [
"Aquarium1442671919391"
]
}AppSource licensing and freemium data caps
A "The publisher of … requires a license" wall in Desktop is not a PBIR authoring error and is not something you can fix in the files:
The license entitlement is an AppSource account/tenant property, not stored in the report.
publicCustomVisuals+ a matchingvisualTypeis the complete and correct authoring; nothing more can be added to the PBIR to grant a license.Freemium visuals show the license wall when the bound data exceeds their free tier. Several free/certified visuals (e.g. Enlighten Aquarium) render on the free tier only up to a data-point cap; binding high-cardinality fields (a large
Category, an extraLegendthat multiplies points, or many measures) pushes past the cap and triggers the wall — while the same visual with a small low-cardinality binding renders fine. If an AppSource visual shows the license wall, first reduce data volume (fewer categories, drop theLegend, fewer measures) before assuming it is a paid visual.Bind freemium custom visuals conservatively by default. Choose a low-cardinality
Category(≤ ~30 distinct values) — e.g. a division, region, or type column — never a high-cardinality name/ID column likeAccount_Name, a customer name, or a date at day grain. Prefer noLegend(it multiplies data points) and a single measure. Add richness only after confirming the visual still renders. This is the single most common cause of a custom visual "requiring a license" — it is a data-volume symptom, not a licensing or registration bug.The registration and
visualTypeare byte-for-byte identical whether or not the wall appears — so do not "fix" the license wall by editing the registration.
2. Organizational (org store) visual
Org-store visuals are the most error-prone kind. Two rules decide whether they render:
Register with a
resourcePackagespackage of typeOrganizationalStoreCustomVisual— not the rootorganizationCustomVisualsarray. TheorganizationCustomVisuals: [{ name, path }]form is part of the PBIR schema andvalidateaccepts it, but Desktop does not register the plugin from it, so the visual renders as an empty/grey placeholder. This is the single most common org-visual authoring mistake.Use the
_OrgStoresuffix everywhere. The packagenameand the containervisual.visualTypemust both be<GUID>_OrgStore. A bare<GUID>visualType(without the suffix) renders the generic empty placeholder even when the package is present.
// report.json
{
"resourcePackages": [
{ "name": "SharedResources", "type": "SharedResources", "items": [ /* base theme ... */ ] },
{
"name": "<GUID>_OrgStore",
"type": "OrganizationalStoreCustomVisual",
"items": [
{
"name": "resources/<GUID>_OrgStore.pbiviz.json",
"path": "",
"type": "CustomVisualMetadata"
}
]
}
]
}// the visual container (visual.json) on the page
{ "visual": { "visualType": "<GUID>_OrgStore" } }name—<GUID>_OrgStore, matching the containervisualTypeexactly.item
path— leave it empty (""). The user provides only the GUID; Desktop resolves the tenant blob path from the GUID on reload.No local files are required. You do not need a
CustomVisuals/<GUID>_OrgStore/folder or a.rpfile — Desktop resolves the package from the tenant store at load time. Registration + a matching container is enough to render.Do not also add the same visual to the root
organizationCustomVisualsarray; keep only theresourcePackagesentry.validatesuppressesPBIR_VISUAL_TYPE_UNKNOWNfor this visual only when the containervisualTypeexactly matches the_OrgStorepackagename. A bare<GUID>, a root-organizationCustomVisuals-only registration, or no registration keeps warning — treat that warning as "won't render."
3. Private (.pbiviz) visual
A private visual needs both of the following. The CustomVisuals/ folder
alone is not enough — without the resourcePackages entry the visual renders
as "add it to this report first".
Part A — unpack the .pbiviz into CustomVisuals/<GUID>/
The on-disk layout mirrors the unzipped .pbiviz:
<Report>.Report/
└── CustomVisuals/
└── <GUID>/
├── package.json # from the .pbiviz (visual.guid, resources map)
└── resources/
└── <GUID>.pbiviz.json # the bundled visual payloadPart B — register it in report.json → resourcePackages
Append a package with type: "CustomVisual" whose single item is the
.pbiviz.json metadata file (do not add private visuals to
publicCustomVisuals):
{
"resourcePackages": [
{ "name": "SharedResources", "type": "SharedResources", "items": [ /* base theme ... */ ] },
{
"name": "<GUID>",
"type": "CustomVisual",
"items": [
{
"name": "<GUID>.pbiviz.json",
"path": "<GUID>.pbiviz.json",
"type": "CustomVisualMetadata"
}
]
}
]
}The item path is the bare <GUID>.pbiviz.json filename (resolved against the
package's CustomVisuals/<GUID>/resources/ folder), not a resources/… path.
Binding data to a custom visual
Custom visuals define their own roles in capabilities.dataRoles inside the
.pbiviz's <GUID>.pbiviz.json (nested under resources/). Read that file to
get the role name (used as the queryState key) and kind
(Grouping → bind a Column; Measure → bind a Measure). Honor the
dataViewMappings.conditions (min/max per role). Example role lookup:
# roles live at capabilities.dataRoles in the nested resource, not package.json
unzip -p MyVisual.pbiviz "resources/*.pbiviz.json" | jq '.capabilities.dataRoles'Then build visual.query.queryState keyed by each role name, exactly like a
built-in visual (see authoring-workflows.md (see authoring-workflows.md) and
expressions.md § Visual Query Projection (see expressions.md, section visual-query-projection)
for the authoritative projection shape). A custom visual with no bound fields is
valid but renders empty.
⚠️
queryRefandnativeQueryRefare siblings offield, not properties inside it. Nesting them insidefieldfails the container schema and the visual silently does not render.powerbi-report-author validatemay not catch this when the online schema is unreachable (PBIR_SCHEMA_UNREACHABLE); Desktop enforces it on load."projections": [ { "field": { "Measure": { "Expression": { "SourceRef": { "Entity": "Metrics" } }, "Property": "Revenue" } }, "queryRef": "Metrics.Revenue", "nativeQueryRef": "Revenue" } ]
Desktop verification
After adding the registration and (for private visuals) the
CustomVisuals/package,powerbi-desktop reloadpicks up the visual — a full close/reopen is not required, including for a brand-new custom visual added to an already-open report. If a private visual still shows "add it to this report first" after reload, the missing piece is almost always theresourcePackagesentry (Part B), not the reload mechanism.Org visuals load lazily from the tenant store. The first reload/screenshot can come back blank while the tenant blob is still resolving. Wait ~15–20s and, if still blank, reload a second time before concluding it is broken.
PBIR_VISUAL_TYPE_UNKNOWNfires for anyvisualTypethe CLI does not recognize — a mistyped built-in visual, or a custom visual that is unregistered or registered only in a non-rendering way. For a custom visual, clear it by adding the matching rendering registration:publicCustomVisuals(AppSource), aCustomVisualresourcePackagespackage (private), or anOrganizationalStoreCustomVisual_OrgStorepackage (organizational) — the rootorganizationCustomVisualsarray does not suppress the warning because it does not render. Also re-check the GUID/type for typos. Suppression is registration-only: it proves the entry exists, not that the visual resolves — always verify org visuals by rendering in Desktop, sincevalidatecannot reach the tenant store.
⚠️ Custom-visual clobber symptom. If a correct
OrganizationalStoreCustomVisualpackage reverts to the non-renderingorganizationCustomVisualsarray, orpublicCustomVisualsentries vanish after a reload, Desktop's unsaved in-memory model overwrote your disk edits on save/reload. Follow the general rule inSKILL.md(the Desktop reload workflow): only editreport.jsonwhenpowerbi-desktop statusreportshasUnsavedChanges: false, otherwise have the user save or close/reopen first.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Phrasing that asks for actions without confirmation
- Instructions that use the network
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Microsoft
- Publisher
- Microsoft (Official)
- Source
- microsoft/skills-for-fabric · skills/powerbi-report-cli · commit f8fac11
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Also distributed in
- microsoft/skills-for-fabric
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download powerbi-report-cli.zip